Endoscopy 2023; 55(S 02): S183-S184
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1765478
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2023
ePoster

Initial experience of spinal anesthesia for recto-sigmoid endoscopic submucosal dissection: a case series

G. F. Bonura
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
J. Rainer
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
P. Biancheri
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
P. Soriani
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
S. Deiana
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
T. Gabbani
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
N. Gualandi
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
L. Ottaviani
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
E. Guerra
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
A. Campioli
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
E. Gualdi
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
A. Pignatti
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
,
M. Manno
1   Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
› Author Affiliations
 
 

    Aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), considered to be the optimal resection technique for early colorectal cancer, requires the patient to be in still position for a long period of time. While conscious sedation may allow involuntary movements of the patient, deep sedation carries a higher risk of sedation-related adverse events (AEs), especially in frail patients. Spinal anesthesia (SA), a simple analgesic technique providing a deep and fast nerve block, has not been used in gastrointestinal endoscopy so far. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of SA in large recto-sigmoid lesion ESD [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12].

    Methods In this prospective case series study, we report an initial experience of ESD for large (>35mm) recto-sigmoid laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) using SA. We evaluated technical success, sedation/anesthesia-related periprocedural AEs and pain, measured via visual assessment scale (VAS).

    Results Eleven patients were included in the study (Table1). Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. No life-threatening sedation-related AEs were observed. Both one case (9.1%) of acute urinary retention and mild acute kidney injury were observed. All patients reported VAS=0 during procedure. Two out of 11 (18.2%) patients reported pain (VAS=3 and 7) on the day after the procedure only. No need for additional drug administration including opioids and/or benzodiazepines was needed. Median hospital stay was 1 day ([Fig. 1]).

    Zoom Image
    Fig. 1

    Conclusions This is the first report of the use of SA in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Our initial experience in large recto-sigmoid lesion ESD suggests that SA is feasible and safe, and may be a valuable option especially for long-lasting procedures in frail patients.


    #

    Conflicts of interest

    Authors do not have any conflict of interest to disclose.

    • 1 Smith LM, Cozowicz C, Uda Y. et al. Neuraxial and Combined Neuraxial/General Anesthesia Compared to General Anesthesia for Major Truncal and Lower Limb Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2017; 125: 1931
    • 2 Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A. et al. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1139-1157
    • 3 McGoldrick KE.. The role of spinal anesthesia in the ambulatory venue: current issues and concerns. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2001; 14: 605-609
    • 4 Berger Y, Gingold-Belfer R, Khatib M. et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery under spinal anaesthesia. J Minim Access Surg 2021; 17: 490-494
    • 5 Cortese G, Sales G, Maiolo G. et al. Effectiveness of spinal anesthesia in transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a 3-year experience. Minerva Anestesiol 2018; 84: 712-719
    • 6 Wadhwa V, Issa D, Garg S. et al. Similar Risk of Cardiopulmonary Adverse Events Between Propofol and Traditional Anesthesia for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 194-206
    • 7 Di Cianni S, Rossi M, Casati A. et al. Spinal anesthesia: an evergreen technique. Acta Biomed 2008; 79: 9-17
    • 8 Manno M, Deiana S, Gabbani T. et al. Implementation of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) sedation training course in a regular endoscopy unit. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 65-71
    • 9 Arimoto J, Higurashi T, Kato S. et al. Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E342-E349
    • 10 Yamashita K, Shiwaku H, Ohmiya T. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection under general anesthesia. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8: 466-471
    • 11 Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T. et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2017; 86: 74-86.e17
    • 12 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2022. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 591-622

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    14 April 2023

    © 2023. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

    Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

    • 1 Smith LM, Cozowicz C, Uda Y. et al. Neuraxial and Combined Neuraxial/General Anesthesia Compared to General Anesthesia for Major Truncal and Lower Limb Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2017; 125: 1931
    • 2 Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A. et al. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1139-1157
    • 3 McGoldrick KE.. The role of spinal anesthesia in the ambulatory venue: current issues and concerns. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2001; 14: 605-609
    • 4 Berger Y, Gingold-Belfer R, Khatib M. et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery under spinal anaesthesia. J Minim Access Surg 2021; 17: 490-494
    • 5 Cortese G, Sales G, Maiolo G. et al. Effectiveness of spinal anesthesia in transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a 3-year experience. Minerva Anestesiol 2018; 84: 712-719
    • 6 Wadhwa V, Issa D, Garg S. et al. Similar Risk of Cardiopulmonary Adverse Events Between Propofol and Traditional Anesthesia for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 194-206
    • 7 Di Cianni S, Rossi M, Casati A. et al. Spinal anesthesia: an evergreen technique. Acta Biomed 2008; 79: 9-17
    • 8 Manno M, Deiana S, Gabbani T. et al. Implementation of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) sedation training course in a regular endoscopy unit. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 65-71
    • 9 Arimoto J, Higurashi T, Kato S. et al. Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E342-E349
    • 10 Yamashita K, Shiwaku H, Ohmiya T. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection under general anesthesia. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8: 466-471
    • 11 Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T. et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2017; 86: 74-86.e17
    • 12 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2022. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 591-622

     
    Zoom Image
    Fig. 1