Keywords
acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis - post-COVID-19 - COVID-19
Background
Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFR) is a rare, rapidly progressive, and life-threatening
infection involving the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.[1]
[2] The most predominant causative agents include Aspergillus and Mucor fungal species.[3] There was dramatic rise in AIFR cases in India, mostly seen in recently recovered
or recovering coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients.[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9] India witnessed a dramatic spurt in cases of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis and
by June 7, 2021, ∼28,252 cases of mucormycosis were reported, with 86% of them having
a history of COVID-19 infection.[10]
[11] Although the exact cause of this surge is not clear, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
coexisting with coronavirus infection, prolonged or high-dose steroid therapy, and
oxygen and ventilator support may have some role in triggering this fungal infection.[12]
Early identification of disease, initiation of antifungal drugs, and early surgical
debridement are the mainstay of management. Although tissue diagnosis is mandatory
for confirming diagnosis of AIFR, aggressive treatment has to be started based on
clinical and radiological findings. Imaging helps in early diagnosis as well as evaluation
of extent of disease and hence plays a vital role in starting timely intervention.
However, early imaging markers are not well known. Also, there is overlap between
imaging features of sinusitis due to fungal etiology versus other infective etiology.
Malignant lesions of paranasal sinuses also need to be differentiated from invasive
infective etiology.
Few studies have described imaging features of COVID-19-associated AIFR.[10]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19] We have described imaging findings in 90 studies including computed tomography (CT)
and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 60 patients of post-COVID-19 AIFR admitted
and managed at our institute.
Methods
This was a retrospective review approved by the institutional review board conducted
between May and July 2021. We reviewed imaging findings in post-COVID-19 patients
who were admitted at our hospital with rhinosinusitis. Inclusion criteria were: (1)
post-COVID-19 patients with rhinosinusitis who had proven fungal etiology on potassium
hydroxide smear or histopathology; (2) clinical course less than 4 weeks; and (3)
MRI and/or CT of craniofacial region done within 5 days before surgery. Patients without
history of COVID-19 infection were excluded. Epidemiological and clinical data including
age, sex, diabetes status, and history of oxygen therapy or steroid therapy were noted.
Noncontrast CT was done on 128-detector row multidetector CT scanner (GE Healthcare,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States) using 150 to 170 mm field of view and was acquired
as 1-mm thick sections in axial plane. Reconstruction was done in coronal and sagittal
planes. Soft tissue and bone algorithm were used.
MRI was done using 1.5-T MRI machine (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United
States). Routine sequences of brain (T1-weighted image, T2-weighted image, fluid attenuated
inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted imaging, gradient echo with/without postcontrast
ultrafast spoiled gradient echo 3D [brain volume imaging] sequence along with sinus
and orbit sequences [2-mm thin sections including axial T2 fat-saturated, T1-weighted,
postcontrast T1 Fast Spin Echo (FSE) fat-saturated images; 2-mm thin coronal sections
including T2 fat-saturated, postcontrast T1 FSE fat-saturated images]) were obtained.
Same protocol was followed in all patients. Additionally, Constructive Interference
in Steady State (CISS) 3D was done when perineural spread was suspected based on above
given sequences.
Site of involvement, unilateral/bilateral involvement, pattern of mucosal thickening,
periantral invasion, orbital invasion, enhancement pattern, intracranial involvement,
perineural spread, vascular involvement, and bony involvement were recorded.
Periantral fat invasion or orbital invasion was diagnosed by assessing pre- and postmaxillary
fat space or orbits for evidence of soft tissue on T1-weighted axial images. The same
structures were evaluated for presence of edema on T2-weighted fat-suppressed axial/coronal
MRI sequences or for abnormal enhancement on postcontrast T1 FSE fat-saturated axial/coronal
sequences.
Enhancement pattern of mucosal thickening and nasal cavity/paranasal sinus contents
was assessed as presence or absence of focal areas of lack of contrast enhancement
(LOCE).
Perineural spread was identified in forms of thickening (on MRI/CT) and enhancement
(on MRI) along involved cranial nerve.
Patients with vascular involvement in form of fungal aneurysms were further evaluated
using CT angiography and cerebral digital subtraction angiography.
We also studied involvement of structures on basis of seven imaging features of previously
described CT model (periantral fat, bone dehiscence, orbital invasion, septal ulceration,
pterygopalatine fossa, nasolacrimal duct, and lacrimal sac).
Comparison between MRI and CT features was done for patients who underwent CT and
MRI imaging on the same day. Ability to detect periantral invasion, orbital invasion,
infratemporal fossa invasion, cavernous sinus involvement, perineural spread, and
optic nerve involvement was compared between the two modalities.
Results
We analyzed findings in 90 studies (CT and MRI) in 60 patients. Age ranged from 26
to 74 years (mean age 51 years) with 55 male and 15 female patients. Overall, 95%
(57/60) patients had diabetes, 88.3% (53/60) patients received oxygen therapy, and
65% (39/60) patients received steroid therapy. There were 30 patients who underwent
both CT and MRI study at the same time. Twenty-two patients had only MRI study available
and eight patients had only CT study available. The findings are described below.
MRI Study
Fifty-two MRI studies (in 49 males and 13 females) were analyzed. Mucosal thickening
and secretions were found to have mixed signal intensity on T2-weighted image with
areas of T2 hyperintensity and foci of hypointensity. Site of involvement in nasal
cavity and paranasal sinuses is described in [Table 1]. MRI findings are shown in [Fig. 1].
Table 1
Involvement of structures on CT and MRI
|
Structures involved
|
Number of cases on CT (n = 38)
|
Number of cases on MRI (n = 52)
|
|
Nasal cavity
|
29: unilateral 16, bilateral 13
|
46: unilateral 20, bilateral 26
|
|
Ethmoid
|
37
|
52
|
|
Maxillary
|
36
|
51
|
|
Sphenoid
|
27
|
40
|
|
Frontal
|
28
|
37
|
|
Periantral invasion
|
26
|
44
|
|
Orbital invasion
|
24
|
29
|
|
Deep infratemporal fossa muscle plane invasion
|
4
|
37
|
|
Pterygopalatine fossa invasion
|
14
|
–
|
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Fig. 1 Imaging features of acute invasive rhinosinusitis on magnetic resonance imaging.
(A) T2-weighted axial image showing nodular mucosal thickening in left maxillary sinus
with foci of T2 hypointensity. (B) T2-weighted axial image showing mucosal thickening in bilateral ethmoid sinuses
with foci of T2 hypointense signal. (c) Coronal T2-weighted image shows complete T2 hypointense signal involving right middle
and inferior turbinate with signal as black as surrounding air. (D) Computed tomography image: coronal cut of same patient as in (C) showing hyperdense right middle and inferior turbinate. (E) Axial T2-weighted fat-saturated image shows nodular mucosal thickening in bilateral
maxillary sinus with periantral fat stranding, edema in left retroantral space, left
infratemporal fossa, and left pterygopalatine fossa. (F) T2-weighted coronal image shows mucosal thickening in right ethmoid and right maxillary
sinuses with fat stranding in right orbital fat. (G) Postcontrast fat-saturated T1-weighted axial image shows heterogeneous enhancement
of mucosal thickening in bilateral ethmoid sinuses with focal areas of lack of contrast
enhancement. (H) Postcontrast fat-saturated T1-weighted coronal image shows heterogeneous enhancement
of mucosal thickening in bilateral ethmoid sinuses with focal areas of lack of contrast
enhancement.
Among 51 cases of maxillary sinus mucosal thickening, there was pattern of mucosal
thickening with T2 hypointense septations identified in 46 cases and smooth mucosal
thickening identified in 5 cases. Mucosal thickening with T2 hypointense septations
was characterized by undulated surface of mucosal thickening with presence of septations
and foci of T2 hypointensity ([Fig. 1]). This pattern was partially/completely filling the sinus ([Fig. 1A] and [E]). Air fluid level was noted in 5/52 (9.6%) cases on MRI.
Number of cases showing orbital and periantral invasion is described in [Table 1]. Contrast-enhanced sequences were available in 40 cases. Enhancement without focal
areas of LOCE (LOCE –ve) was noted in 12 (30%) cases and enhancement with focal areas
of LOCE (LOCE +ve) was noted in 28 cases (70%), shown in [Fig. 1]. LOCE involving turbinates (Black turbinate sign) was noted in 17/40 cases (42.5%).
Orbital involvement in MRI is described in [Table 2] and shown in [Fig. 2]. Intracranial and vascular involvement is described in [Table 3] and shown in [Figs. 3] and [4]. One or a combination of more than one finding of focal areas of loss of contrast
enhancement, periantral invasion, orbital invasion, intracranial invasion, and vascular
involvement on MRI were noted in 50/52 cases (96.1%).
Table 2
Orbital involvement on MRI
|
Type of involvement
|
Number of cases on MRI (n = 52)
|
|
Fat invasion
|
29
|
|
Soft tissue
|
24
|
|
Peripherally enhancing collection
|
5
|
|
Optic nerve diffusion restriction
|
10
|
|
Endophthalmitis
|
1
|
Abbreviation: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Fig. 2 Magnetic resonance imaging features of orbital involvement. (A) T2 Fat Saturated (FS) coronal image shows mucosal thickening and T2 hypointensity
involving right maxillary and ethmoid sinuses with fat stranding involving right orbital
fat. (B) Axial T2 FS image shows T2 heterogeneous soft tissue involving right orbit in continuity
with T2 heterogeneous mucosal thickening involving right ethmoid sinus. (C) Postcontrast T1 FS coronal image shows peripherally enhancing collection involving
left frontal sinus with continuous involvement of left superior extraconal portion
of left orbit, suggestive of left frontal sinus and left orbital abscess. (D) T2 FS coronal image shows mucosal thickening involving bilateral ethmoid sinuses
with T2 hypointense signal involving left middle turbinate. Left orbit shows fat stranding
with bulky extraocular muscles and T2 hypointense thickened left optic nerve. (E) Diffusion-weighted imaging trace axial image shows diffusion restriction involving
right optic nerve. (F) Postcontrast T1 FS axial image shows enhancing mucosal thickening involving bilateral
ethmoids with focal area of lack of contrast enhancement in right ethmoid sinus. Ill-defined
enhancement noted in right orbit with nonenhancing soft tissue. Enhancement of uvea
noted involving right globe suggestive of endophthalmitis.
Table 3
Intracranial and vascular involvement on CT and MRI
|
Intracranial structure involvement
|
Number of cases on CT (n = 38)
|
Number of cases on MRI (n = 52)
|
|
Cavernous sinus thrombosis
|
–
|
2
|
|
Cavernous sinus soft tissue
|
3
|
15
|
|
Meningitis
|
–
|
8 (4 had leptomeningitis and 4 had pachymeningitis
|
|
Cerebritis
|
8
|
7
|
|
Abscess
|
–
|
2
|
|
Perineural invasion
|
3
|
8
|
|
Infarct
|
6 (2 in MCA territory, 3 in watershed zones, and 1 in MCA and AICA territories each)
|
9 (3 in MCA territory, 5 in watershed zones, and 1 in MCA and AICA territories each)
|
|
Vascular occlusion
|
–
|
3 (ICA occlusion)
|
|
Vascular narrowing
|
–
|
3 (ICA narrowing)
|
|
Aneurysm
|
2
|
–
|
|
Hemorrhage
|
2 (parenchymal bleed along with sylvian SAH in one case and basilar cistern SAH in
second case)
|
–
|
Abbreviations: AICA, Anterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery; CT, computed tomography;
ICA; internal carotid artery; MCA, Middle cerebral artery; MRI, magnetic resonance
imaging; SAH, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
Fig. 3 Intracranial involvement in acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis. (A) Postcontrast T1 axial image shows diffuse leptomeningeal and pachymeningeal enhancement
suggestive of meningitis. (B) Coronal and (C) axial T2-weighted images show T2 hyperintense signal in cortical-subcortical location
involving left temporal lobe and right frontal lobe, respectively, suggestive of cerebritis.
(D) Coronal T2-weighted image shows T2 hypointense soft tissue involving right cavernous
sinus with loss of flow void of right internal carotid artery. (E) Axial postcontrast T1 FS image shows enhancing mucosal thickening with areas of
loss of enhancement involving right ethmoid sinus with nonenhancement of right cavernous
sinus suggestive of cavernous sinus thrombosis. Ill-defined enhancement is noted in
right orbit with associated right globe uveal enhancement suggestive of endophthalmitis. (F) Axial diffusion-weighted imaging trace image shows diffusion restriction involving
cisternal segment of right trigeminal nerve. (G) Postcontrast T1 axial image of same
patient as in (F) shows peripheral enhancement and thickening involving right trigeminal nerve cisternal
segment suggestive of perineural spread. (H) Postcontrast T1 FS coronal image shows peripherally enhancing collection involving
sphenoid sinus with contiguous involvement of sella and suprasellar space suggestive
of pituitary abscess. Associated involvement of right cavernous sinus also noted.
(I) Postcontrast T1 image showing peripherally enhancing lesion involving left thalamus.
The lesion showed diffusion restriction (not shown). Features suggestive of left thalamic
abscess (hematogenous spread).
Fig. 4 Vascular involvement in acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis. (A) CISS 3D axial image showing mucosal thickening with foci of T2 hypointense signal
noted in bilateral ethmoid and left side of sphenoid sinus with T2 hypointense signal
involving left cavernous sinus with loss of signal of left internal carotid artery
(ICA). (B) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) trace axial image shows left MCA territory infarct.
(C) DWI trace axial image in lower section shows diffusion restriction along left trigeminal
nerve with left AICA territory infarct (likely due to arteritis involving left AICA,
which was noted in close relation to left trigeminal nerve with perineural spread).
(D) Coronal T2-weighted image showing bulky T2 hypointense left cavernous sinus with
normal appearance of left terminal ICA. (e) Same patient DWI axial image shows diffusion restriction involving left optic nerve.
(F) Computed tomography (CT) scan of same patient as in (D, E) done after 7 days due to new development of severe headache and sensorium shows
SAH involving left side of basal cistern and left crural cistern. (G) Cerebral angiography anteroposterior image of the same patient as in (D, E, F) shows fusiform dilatation of left supraclinoid and terminal ICA with saccular aneurysm
in left supraclinoid segment, which developed within an interval of 7 days and was
not noted in previous magnetic resonance imaging (in D). (H, I) Lateral angiogram and 3D image showing the aneurysm. (J) Different patient axial CT angiography image showing bilateral ethmoid sinus mucosal
thickening with right lamina papyracea erosion with right cavernous ICA aneurysm.
(K) VRT image of same patient as in (J) showing fungal aneurysm involving right cavernous ICA.
CT Study
Site of involvement in nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, and periantral and orbital
invasion are described in [Table 1]. Air fluid level was noted in 7/38 (18.4%) studies. Bony erosions were noted in
8/38 (21%) cases. Intracranial and vascular involvement is described in [Table 3]. Suspected cases of fungal aneurysms were evaluated using CT angiography (n = 2), which revealed aneurysm in two cases.
We also studied involvement of structures on basis of seven imaging features of previously
described CT model (periantral fat, bone dehiscence, orbital invasion, septal ulceration,
pterygopalatine fossa, nasolacrimal duct, and lacrimal sac). Two or more of these
variables were involved in 29/38 (76.3%) cases. CT findings are shown in [Fig. 5].
Fig. 5 Imaging features of acute invasive rhinosinusitis on computed tomography (CT). (A) Axial CT shows nodular mucosal thickening in left maxillary sinus with soft tissue
in left retroantral space and left pterygopalatine fossa. (B) Axial CT shows mucosal thickening in right ethmoid sinuses with right orbital proptosis
and isodense soft tissue in right orbit involving medial extraconal space and intraconal
space with associated right orbital fat stranding. (C) Bone window axial section shows erosions involving right maxillary sinus anterior
and posterolateral walls as well as erosion of right pterygoid plates. Periantral
soft tissue noted on right side. (D) Bone window coronal section shows mucosal thickening in sphenoid sinus and erosions
involving left middle cranial fossa floor.
Comparison of CT and MRI
There were 30 patients who underwent both CT and MRI imaging on the same day. There
was orbital fat infiltration noted in 20/30 (66.7%) cases in both MRI and CT studies.
Periantral fat invasion was noted in 25/30 (83.3%) cases in MRI and in 22/30 (73.3%)
cases in CT. CT could not identify periantral fat invasion in three cases, which were
picked up on MRI. Deep infratemporal fossa involvement in form of edema/soft tissue
was noted in 20/30 (66.7%) cases in MRI and in 4/30 (13.3%) cases in CT. CT could
not identify deep infratemporal involvement in 16 cases, which was positively identified
on MRI. MRI identified cavernous sinus involvement in form of bulkiness of cavernous
sinus with T2 hypointense soft tissue in 7/30 (23.3%) cases and in form of thrombosis
in 1/30 (3.3%) cases. CT identified soft tissue in 1/30 (3.3%) cases. Noncontrast
CT was available, so cavernous sinus thrombosis could not be evaluated on CT. Perineural
spread along trigeminal nerve was noted in 8/30 (26.7%) cases on MRI, while it could
be identified only in 2/30 (6.7%) cases on CT studies. Similarly, optic nerve involvement,
which was picked up on MRI on diffusion-weighted images (7/30, i.e., 23.3% studies),
could not be identified on CT, which only showed perioptic fat stranding.
Discussion
Invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is a rare disease that has high mortality and morbidity.
Early diagnosis and initiation of therapy is essential for proper management. Radiologic
imaging features have been previously described. Previous studies had focused on presence
of bony erosions (diagnosed on CT). However, these are late findings. Recent literature
has focused on MRI and CT studies to diagnose early infiltrative signs and development
of soft tissue abnormalities.
Most common site of involvement in our study was ethmoid sinus followed by maxillary
sinus. Previously described most commonly involved sinuses are maxillary sinus, ethmoid
air cells, and sphenoid sinus, with the frontal sinus being reported as the least
frequently affected, which is similar to our results.[20]
[21]
Unilateral nasal cavity disease was noted in 38.4% of MRI and 42% of CT studies. Unilateral
nasal cavity disease has been described as a common finding in invasive fungal disease;
however, it is not specific.[21]
[22] Although it is not commonly seen in viral or bacterial rhinosinusitis, yet, as a
standalone finding, it is not a strong individual predictor of invasive fungal etiology.[21] Middlebrooks et al found that 78.6% of their patients had unilateral predominant
findings, while bilateral involvement was more common in our series.[21] In a study by Slonimsky et al, they found that AIFR caused by Mucor species demonstrated a higher degree of bilateral sinonasal involvement as compared
with Aspergillus, which had predominant unilateral involvement.[2] The same may be the reason for findings in our study. We did not study the difference
between Aspergillus and Mucor species as we did not have histopathological information for all cases. In majority
of cases, microscopy prohibits conclusive differentiation of Mucorales from Aspergillus and other filamentous fungi.[23]
[24]
We noted that mucosal thickening with T2 hypointense septations was noted in a high
percentage of cases in MRI (88.4%) ([Fig. 1]). Previously described studies have shown presence of nodular mucosal thickening
as a feature of AIFR.[25]
[26]
[27] Another study described presence of smooth mucosal thickening in AIFR.[28] However, these studies have mostly described involvement in radiographs or CT and
MRI pattern of mucosal thickening has not been clearly described. We propose that
this pattern of mucosal thickening with T2 hypointense septations, if present, can
help in diagnosis toward fungal etiology. Similar pattern of mucosal thickening can
be seen in retention cysts or nasal polyps. Retention cysts are usually mostly located
in dependent portion of sinuses without extension to nasal cavity, while this pattern
of mucosal thickening with T2 hypointense septations usually uniformly involves the
sinus mucosa. Polyps can have similar imaging appearance and usually extend into nasal
cavity. Most importantly, we noted that evidence of perisinus invasion with associated
septations of mucosal thickening should alert toward fungal etiology. Additionally,
there is absence of additional areas of T2 hypointensity, and absence of focal areas
of LOCE in nasal polyposis/retention cysts. These features may help to differentiate
it from fungal-etiology-associated T2 hypointense septations.
Air fluid levels are uncommon in AIFR and is a more common finding noted in bacterial
rhinosinusitis.[22]
[25]
[26]
[28]
[29] Similar findings were noted in our study whereby air fluid level was noted in 9.6%
cases on MRI and 18.4% cases on CT and involving total 8/60 patients (13.3%).
Periantral fat involvement was noted in 68.4% cases of CT and in 84.6% cases of MRI.
Infiltration of periantral fat has been described as an early indicator of AIFR.[30] In a study of CT findings of AIFR, it was described as the best individual predictor;
however, by itself, it had a sensitivity of only 74%, which is comparable to our findings.[21] A recent study has described perisinus inflammation in 100% of their cases.[15]
We noted that areas of LOCE were noted in sinonasal tract and extrasinus location
in 28/40 (70%) cases (40 contrast-enhanced MRI scans were available) ([Fig. 1]). These areas of LOCE have been previously described[31]
[32]
[33]
[34] and were reported in 74% cases of invasive fungal sinusitis, which is comparable
to our study. Angioinvasive nature leads to tissue infarction, which has been proposed
to be the cause for this pattern of focal areas of LOCE.
We found diffusion restriction involving optic nerves in 10 cases ([Fig. 2]). Optic nerve diffusion restriction in fungal rhinosinusitis was previously described
in a few case reports.[35]
[36]
[37]
[38] Recent series by Kumar et al described ischemic optic neuropathy in 12 cases.[15] Another series by Elmokadem et al described optic neuritis (T2 hyperintensity of
optic nerves) in six cases.[16] We describe cases with diffusion restriction involving optic nerve due to fungal
rhinosinusitis. Interestingly, all these cases with optic nerve diffusion restriction
had fat infiltration and soft tissue involving orbital apex. Orbital apex involvement
with soft tissue may cause central retinal artery occlusion, ophthalmic artery necrosis,
optic nerve infarction and necrosis, or direct optic nerve infection by mucormycosis.[35]
[39]
[40]
Bone erosion was noted in 21% of CT studies. It is described as a late feature and
is not very sensitive.[2] Bony dehiscence was reported to have 100% specificity and 35% sensitivity for AIFR.[21] Elmokadem described bony involvement in 64% of their cases.[16] It is not necessarily present in all cases of AIFR that show invasion. This is because
of spread of fungal elements along vascular channels in bone.
We noted intracranial involvement in form of meningitis, fungal cerebritis, fungal
abscess, cavernous sinus thrombosis/soft tissue, perineural invasion, parenchymal
infarcts, and parenchymal/subarachnoid hemorrhage. We noted a case of pituitary fungal
abscess due to contiguous spread from sphenoid sinus ([Fig. 3]). Fungal abscess of pituitary has been described in fewer than 10 case reports.[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
Perineural spread along trigeminal nerve was seen in 8/52 (15.4%) cases ([Fig. 3]). Perineural spread in AIFR is also a rare finding, previously described only in
a few case reports.[38]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53] In a recently described series of cases of COVID-19-associated rhino-orbito-cerebral
mucormycosis by Kumar et al,[15] perineural spread was described in 29 cases (28.7%). Most commonly, involvement
of trigeminal or olfactory nerves has been described.
We also noted two cases of internal carotid artery (ICA) fungal aneurysms, one involving
supraclinoid ICA (ruptured) and another involving cavernous ICA (unruptured) ([Fig. 4]). Fungal aneurysms are very rare and less than 25 cases have been described.[14]
[15]
[54]
[55]
[56] They show hyphal growth along the vessel wall resulting from direct spread or through
hematogenous spreading, and characteristic fusiform shape has been described similar
to our cases. Intradural ICA is most commonly described location of these aneurysms,
which was noted in one of our cases.
Two of our patients had cavernous sinus involvement with MCA territory infarct with
perineural spread along trigeminal nerve and ipsilateral AICA territory infarct (one
case shown in [Fig. 4]). This interesting pattern of involvement can be explained by involvement of cavernous
sinus, leading to ICA wall inflammation that can cause infarct in MCA territory. Additionally,
perineural spread along trigeminal nerve can cause arteritis of adjacent AICA, leading
to ipsilateral AICA territory infarct. Basilar arteritis leading to pontine infarction
due to intracranial mucormycosis has been described.[57] Vasculitis due to fungal etiology most commonly occurs in the supraclinoid portion
of the ICA, and posterior circulation vessel involvement is rare and usually occurs
late.
In a previous study, Middlebrooks et al[21] described seven variable CT models (periantral fat, bone dehiscence, orbital invasion,
septal ulceration, pterygopalatine fossa, nasolacrimal duct, and lacrimal sac) that
were noted to be easily applicable and robust screening tools to detect AIFR. It was
noted that presence of any two variables predicted AIFR with 100% specificity, 100%
positive predictive value, and 88.1% sensitivity. We noted that 2 or more of these
7 variables were involved in 29/38 cases, with a sensitivity of 76.3%, which is slightly
lower than that described by Middlebrooks et al. This may be due to imaging early,
in the course of disease, the patients in our study. However, our study reinforces
the importance of utilization of these seven variable models on CT that can help in
early identification of AIFR.
We studied a combination of findings on MRI including focal areas of loss of contrast
enhancement, periantral invasion, orbital invasion, intracranial invasion, and vascular
involvement. One or more of these findings were noted in 50/52 cases (96.1%). The
two cases that had neither of these findings were noted to have mucosal thickening,
with T2 hypointense septations in both cases. Patients with early disease may not
show either of these five described features; in such patients, presence of mucosal
thickening with T2 hypointense septations in sinuses/nasal cavity should alert toward
possibility of fungal etiology and close follow-up of these patients should be done.
We found that on comparison of CT and MRI performed simultaneously, both CT and MRI
had equal sensitivity in diagnosis of orbital fat invasion while MRI was more sensitive
in diagnosis of periantral fat invasion. Similar to our findings, MRI was noted to
have a higher sensitivity (87–100%) as compared with CT (57–87%) in detection of extrasinus
invasion.[58] We also noted that deep infratemporal fossa involvement in forms of edema/soft tissue,
cavernous sinus involvement, and perineural invasion was also identified with higher
sensitivity on MRI as compared with CT. Optic nerve involvement could only be identified
on MRI. Even without angiography, MRI was able to identify vascular occlusion and
narrowing in cavernous ICA. Even though CT is superior in identification of bony erosions,
bony involvement is seen late in the disease process and noted in relatively low percentage
of cases. Thus, MRI should be the preferred imaging modality for early detection of
AIFR as well as for accurate estimation of the extent of the disease.
Our study has few limitations. We did not have a control group and did not compare
imaging findings of AIFR with other nonfungal etiologies of sinus pathologies like
bacterial sinusitis, benign polyps, allergic sinusitis, and neoplastic etiologies.
We also did not evaluate features to differentiate between various fungal species.
There was also lack of histopathological correlate of imaging features such as T2
hypointense septations, optic nerve diffusion restriction, areas of LOCE, and perineural
spread. These may form a part of future thrust areas and future studies.
Conclusion
Various CT and MRI features to help in early recognition of AIFR in post-COVID-19
patients have been described. Several rarely described findings are noted in our series
of AIFR like optic nerve involvement, pituitary fungal abscess, perineural spread,
fungal aneurysms, and arteritis-related posterior circulation infarcts. MRI is superior
for early detection of disease and in estimation of extent of disease, compared with
CT. Imaging can help in early detection of AIFR, which has a significant impact on
patient outcome.
