J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 84(S 01): S1-S344
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1762119
Presentation Abstracts
Oral Abstracts

Risk Factors for Significant Postoperative Hemorrhage Following Pituitary Adenoma Resection: A Case–Control Study of 1,066 Surgeries

Robert C. Osorio
1   University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Alexander Aabedi
1   University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
William Carson
1   University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Aarav Badani
1   University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Eric Chalif
1   University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Philip V. Theodosopoulos
1   University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Sandeep Kunwar
1   University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Manish K. Aghi
1   University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Ezequiel Goldschmidt
1   University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
› Institutsangaben
 
 

    Objective: Postoperative hemorrhage is a rare but potentially severe complication after pituitary surgery. The risk factors for this complication are mostly unknown, and further knowledge would help define blood pressure targets and placement after surgery. Here we queried a large database of patients undergoing endonasal removal of pituitary adenomas and describe preoperative risks for significant postoperative hemorrhage (SPH).

    Methods: A population of 1,066 patients undergoing endonasal (microscopic and endoscopic) surgery for pituitary adenoma resection at a single center was reviewed. SPH was defined as postoperative hematoma evident on imaging requiring return to the operating room. Patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed including basic demographics, pituitary apoplexy at presentation, tumor size and cavernous sinus invasion. Variables were assessed with uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis. p-Values below 0.05 were considered significant.

    Results: Ten patients (0.9%) were found to have SPH. Univariate analysis showed that these cases were significantly more likely to present with apoplexy (30.0% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.004), have larger adenomas (3.07 ± 0.60 vs. 1.79 ± 0.99 (cm), p < 0.001), and lower gross total resection rates (20.0 vs 61.7%, p = 0.019). A multivariate regression analysis ([Table 1]) showed that tumor size (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.16–3.14, p = 0.008) and apoplexy at presentation (OR: 6.00, 95% CI: 1.15–24.82, p = 0.018) were significantly associated with higher odds of SPH.

    Conclusions: Our data found that larger tumor size and presentation with apoplexy were associated with significant postoperative hemorrhage. Patients presenting with pituitary apoplexy are six times more likely to experience a significant postoperative hemorrhage and should be carefully monitored for it.

    Table 1

    Multivariate regression of variables found to have p < 0.10 on univariate analysis

    Variable

    Odds ratio (95% CI)

    p-Value

    Apoplexy at presentation

    6.00 (1.15–24.82)

    0.018

    Tumor size

    1.94 (1.16–3.14)

    0.008

    Cavernous sinus invasion

    1.52 (0.36–7.11)

    0.574

    Number of prior pituitary surgeries

    1.83 (0.84–3.67)

    0.097

    Gross total resection

    0.42 (0.05–2.15)

    0.330

    Note: Bold rows indicate significance of p < 0.05. CI = confidence interval.



    #

    Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

    Publikationsverlauf

    Artikel online veröffentlicht:
    01. Februar 2023

    © 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

    Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany