PDF icon PDF herunterladen
J Wrist Surg 2023; 12(05): 384-389
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1760736
Special Review Article

A Stepwise Intraoperative Protocol to Minimize Complications after Volar Plating

Chul Ki Goorens
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Tienen, Kliniekstraat, Tienen, Belgium
,
Gilles Van Eetvelde
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Tienen, Kliniekstraat, Tienen, Belgium
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium
,
Niels Debaenst
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium
,
Kjell Van Royen
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium
3   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, OLV Aalst, Moorselbaan, Aalst, Belgium
› Institutsangaben

Funding No external funding received for this project.
› Weitere Informationen
 
 als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Although outcome of volar plating is generally good, care should be taken to avoid specific iatrogenic and preventable complications, with an incidence reporting averaging 15%. Flexor tendon rupture due to a prominent plate, extensor tendon rupture due to a dorsal protruding screw tips, cartilage lesions due to intra-articular screw placement, loss of reduction due to insufficient stability, and persisting ulnar pain with distal radioulnar joint instability due to unstable triangular fibrocartilaginous complex lesions or unstable ulnar styloid base fractures all have been described.

Purpose We believe that a majority of these complications can be prevented by meticulous assessment of several intraoperative parameters during volar plating. Therefore, we introduce the WRIST protocol, a stepwise easy-to-remember manual that combines multiple fluoroscopic measurements to guide intraoperative decision making.

Conclusion Large prospective studies of the “WRIST” protocol are needed for validation. But we believe that it may help surgeons to optimize surgical technique, functional and radiographic outcome, and prevent complications when treating distal radial fractures.


 

Keywords

distal radial fracture - volar plate - protocol - complications

Open reduction and anatomical fixation with an anatomical volar locking plate has become the golden standard to treat distal radius fractures.[1] [2] [3] Although results are generally good, care should be taken to avoid specific iatrogenic and preventable complications. Incidence of these complications ranges from 14 to 18%.[4] [5] Flexor tendon rupture due to a prominent plate, extensor tendon rupture due to a dorsal protruding screw tips, cartilage lesions due to intra-articular screw placement, loss of reduction due to insufficient stability, and persisting ulnar pain with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability due to unstable triangular fibrocartilaginous complex (TFCC) lesions or unstable ulnar styloid base fractures all have been described.[5] [6] [7]

We believe that a majority of these complications can be prevented by meticulous assessment of several intraoperative parameters during volar plating. Therefore, we propose to introduce the WRIST protocol that combines multiple fluoroscopic measurements to guide intraoperative decision making.

The WRIST Protocol

The protocol is also summarized in [Table 1].

Table 1

Summary of the “WRIST” protocol

WRIST

Point of interest

Measurements

Wrist

Check wrist anatomy

Volar tilt, ulnar variance, articular step off

Range of motion

Perform full range of motion

Articular congruency, intra-articular screw tips

Instability

Check the fracture stability during provocative maneuvers

Volar rim, dorsal rim, capsuloligamentous lesions

Soong

Check the plate protrusion according to the Soong classification

Volar plate protrusion

TFCC

Check DRUJ ballottement stability and ulna

TFCC, ulnar styloid, and other associated lesions

Abbreviations: DRUJ, distal radioulnar joint; TFCC, triangular fibrocartilaginous complex.


W = Wrist Anatomy

Treatment of distal radial fractures aims to restore normal anatomy to optimize clinical and functional outcomes. Insufficient fracture reduction may result in short-term secondary displacement or long-term malunion, leading to secondary complications like adaptive carpal instability or ulnocarpal abutment syndrome.[8] [9] To optimize radial anatomy, the following parameters should be assessed and properly restored: radial inclination, volar tilt, ulnar variance, and articular congruency ([Fig. 1]). Dorsal tilt > –10 degrees, ulnar positive variance > 2 mm, and articular step-off of > 2 mm must be considered as insufficient and should be corrected.[10] [11] [12] These parameters can be assessed intraoperatively on an anteroposterior (AP) and lateral wrist view using fluoroscopy.

Zoom
Fig. 1 (A) Measurement of volar tilt. (B) Measurement of radial inclination. (C) Measurement of ulnar variance.

 

R = Range of Motion

Smooth and complete passive range of motion (flexion/extension, radial/ulnar deviation, and pronation/supination) should be obtained after fixation and tested under dynamic fluoroscopy if needed. If passive mobility is limited, active mobility will also be impaired. When crepitation or clicking is encountered, intra-articular screw position should be excluded.[13]


 

I = Instability

Static fluoroscopic assessment might fail to unveil residual instability. Fracture fixation stability can be tested using provocative mobilization maneuvers under dynamic fluoroscopy.[14] [15] If a fracture fragment displaces under passive loading, there is insufficient plate or screw fixation stability. Volar rim instability can be tested by flexion in a lateral view, volar-ulnar corner instability by flexion in a volar oblique 45-degree view ([Fig. 2]). Dorsal rim instability is tested by extension in a lateral view, dorso-ulnar corner instability by extension in a dorsal oblique 45-degree view, and the stability of the radial styloid by radial deviation in an AP view ([Fig. 3]). Persistent fracture instability after plate fixation may result in loss of reduction during the healing process. Fragment-specific osteosynthesis using specially designed plate or screws can enhance fixation stability. For example, instability of the volar rim suggests that the plate must be placed more distally or fragment-specific rim plates must be used.[16] [17] Insufficient dorsal rim stability can be managed by intraoperative conversion to longer screws, changing the direction toward the dorsal fragment, or adding dorsal implants like screws, pins, or plates.[18] [19] Consequentially, if sufficient dorsal fracture stability is found after volar plating, this obliterates the need for extra dorsal fragment fixation (such as the “sandwich” technique).[20] Of course, preoperative computed tomography scan is often mandatory to provide indicative information to plan the surgery and which plate to use.

Zoom
Fig. 2 (A) Anteroposterior view of volar plate for a volar Barton fracture. (B) Sagittal view volar plate for a volar Barton fracture. (C) Stable volar-ulnar fragment (arrow) due to plate buttressing when testing in flexion in a volar oblique 45-degree view.
Zoom
Fig. 3 (A) Displacement of the dorso-ulnar fragment after testing in extension in a sagittal view. (B) Stable dorso-ulnar fragment (arrow) due to sufficient screw length when testing in extension in a dorsal oblique 45-degree view.

After fracture stability is attained, a displacement of the carpus relative to the radius must raise suspicion for radiocarpal capsuloligamentous lesions. If the carpus shifts ulnarly during a provocative ulnar shift maneuver, lesions to the radioscaphocapitate, short radiolunate, and/or long radiolunate ligament are present ([Fig. 4]). If the carpus shifts volarly during a provocative volar shift maneuver, the capsular attachments (short and long radiolunate ligament) of the lunate are most likely still detached. Capsuloligamentous lesions can be addressed by capsuloligamentous sutures or rigid immobilization enhanced by radiocarpal pinning, radiocarpal plating, or bridging external fixator.[21] [22]

Zoom
Fig. 4 (A) Anteroposterior view after volar plating and scapholunate pinning. (B) The carpus shifts ulnarly during a provocative ulnar shift maneuver.

 

S = Soong Classification

Soong et al published a classification that describes the relation of the most prominent part of the plate in relation to the watershed line, grading from less prominent to more prominent 0 to 2.[23] Later, they described how plate design, implant prominence, and inappropriate plate positioning might result in delayed flexor tendon rupture.[24] We advocate not only to assess the volar prominent plate edge projection, but also dorsal screw tip extrusion, with possible extensor tendon conflict, on the lateral view and the skyline view ([Fig. 5]).[25] If necessary, the volar plate should be reapplied with firm contact to the volar cortex of the distal radius.[26] A bicortical screw positioned in a distal row screw hole of the plate might aid in achieving optimal plate position and optimal plate-bone contact. The bicortical screw can be changed to an angle-stable screw at the end of the procedure. Fragment-specific plates may also reduce plate-tendon conflict.[27]

Zoom
Fig. 5 (A) Anteroposterior view after volar plating. (B) Sagittal view after volar plating. (C) Skyline view after volar plating.

 

T = TFCC

As a final assessment, we propose inspection of the distal ulna and the stability of the DRUJ. The ballottement test of the DRUJ (AP translation) does not require fluoroscopy. A highly unstable ballottement test suggests instability of the DRUJ. This may be provoked by several reasons: articular incongruency of the DRUJ, radioulnar ligament injury, peripheral TFCC injury with inclusion of the foveal insertion, or an unstable ulnar styloid base fracture. The instability of the DRUJ should be compared with the instability on the contralateral nonaffected wrist.[28] It is still under discussion whether TFCC injuries should be addressed immediately or during a secondary intervention if necessary.[29] [30] However, in our experience, with sufficient wrist arthroscopy experience radioulnar ligament and TFCC injuries may be treated in the same time after addressing the distal radial fracture. Ulnar styloid base fractures are considered unstable if the displacement is > 2 mm ([Fig. 6]). Especially, in combination with a positive ballottement test, ulnar styloid base fractures should be fixed to prevent persistent DRUJ instability and/or nonunion of the ulnar styloid base which may become symptomatic. Several treatment options exist to fix the styloid base: tension band wiring, hook plate, pins, or headless compression screws.[31] [32]

Zoom
Fig. 6 (A) Ulnar styloid base fracture (arrow). (B) Displaced ulnar styloid base fracture (arrow) on computed tomography (CT) reconstruction. (C) Headless compression screw for an ulnar styloid base fracture (arrow).

During wrist arthroscopy, other associated lesions like scapholunate lesions can also be assessed. The differentiation between acute and chronic scapholunate lesions, especially in the elderly, is sometimes challenging. Wrist arthroscopy enhances diagnostic accuracy. Treatment can be performed immediately with scapholunate pinning and/or capsuloligamentous suture.[33] [34]


 

 

Discussion

We firmly believe that our stepwise WRIST protocol could drastically improve the quality of volar distal radius plating and reduce known complications. The protocol serves to primarily influence the intraoperative radiological outcome, which is known to not always correlate with the clinical and functional outcome. Large prospective studies of the WRIST protocol are needed for validation, to evaluate its user friendliness, and its effectiveness to reduce complications after volar distal radius plating. To our knowledge, currently no other authors have published an intraoperative guide to assess the necessity for additional dorsal plating during surgery.

In conclusion we believe that using our WRIST protocol may help surgeons to optimize surgical technique, functional and radiographic outcome, and prevent complications when treating distal radial fractures.


 

 

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Authors' Contributions

- Conception of the protocol: C.K.G.

  - Testing and reviewing of the protocol during surgery: C.K.G., G.V.E., N.D., K.V.R.

  - Main writer of manuscript: C.K.G.

  - Assisting writers of manuscript: G.V.E., N.D., K.V.R.

  - Review of the submission: C.K.G., G.V.E., N.D.

  All authors have met the ICMJE criteria for authorship.



Address for correspondence

Chul Ki Goorens, MD
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Tienen
Kliniekstraat 45, 3300 Tienen
Belgium   

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 11. Oktober 2022

Angenommen: 28. November 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Februar 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA


  Lizenzen und Reprints
Zoom
Fig. 1 (A) Measurement of volar tilt. (B) Measurement of radial inclination. (C) Measurement of ulnar variance.
Zoom
Fig. 2 (A) Anteroposterior view of volar plate for a volar Barton fracture. (B) Sagittal view volar plate for a volar Barton fracture. (C) Stable volar-ulnar fragment (arrow) due to plate buttressing when testing in flexion in a volar oblique 45-degree view.
Zoom
Fig. 3 (A) Displacement of the dorso-ulnar fragment after testing in extension in a sagittal view. (B) Stable dorso-ulnar fragment (arrow) due to sufficient screw length when testing in extension in a dorsal oblique 45-degree view.
Zoom
Fig. 4 (A) Anteroposterior view after volar plating and scapholunate pinning. (B) The carpus shifts ulnarly during a provocative ulnar shift maneuver.
Zoom
Fig. 5 (A) Anteroposterior view after volar plating. (B) Sagittal view after volar plating. (C) Skyline view after volar plating.
Zoom
Fig. 6 (A) Ulnar styloid base fracture (arrow). (B) Displaced ulnar styloid base fracture (arrow) on computed tomography (CT) reconstruction. (C) Headless compression screw for an ulnar styloid base fracture (arrow).