Wirksamkeit von Thrust- und Non-Thrust-Manipulationen und Übungen mit und ohne zusätzliche myofasziale Therapie zur Behandlung akuter Inversions-/Supinations-Traumata: Randomisierte klinische Studie

Truyols-Dominguez S, Salom-Moreno J, Abian-Vicen J et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013; 43: 300–309

• Literatur

• 1 Collins N, Teys P, Vicenzino B. The initial effects of a Mulligan’s mobilization with movement technique on dorsiflexion and pain in subacute ankle sprains. Man Ther 2004; 9: 77-82
• 2 De Bie RA, de Vet HC, van den wildenberg FA. et al. The prognosis of ankle sprains. Int J Sports Med 1997; 18: 285-289
• 3 Fujii M, Suzuki D, Uchiyama E. et al. Does distal tibiofibular joint mobilization decrease limitation of ankle dorsiflexion?. Man Ther 2010; 15: 117-121
• 4 Green T, Refshauge K, Crosbie J. et al. A randomized controlled trial of a passive accessory joint mobilization on acute ankle inversion sprains. Phys Ther 2001; 81: 984-994
• 5 Yeo KH. Hypoalgesic effect of passive accesory mobilization technique in patients with lateral ankle pain. Man Ther 2011; 16: 373-377
• 6 Van der Wees PJ, Lenssen AF, Hendricks EJM. et al. Systematic review of treatments for ankle sprain. Austr J Physiother 2006; 52: 27-37
• 7 Whitman JM, Childs JD, Walker V. The use of manipulation in a patient with an ankle sprain injury not responding to conventional management: a case report. Man Ther 2005; 10: 224-231
• 8 Whitman JM, Cleland JA, Mintken PE. Predicting short-term response to thrust and nonthrust manipulation and exercise in patients post inversion ankle sprain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009; 39: 188-200