„Nationales Zweitmeinungsnetzwerk Hodentumoren“ – Bilanz und Perspektive einer „Weltverbesserungsmaschine“

• Literatur

• 1 Studienstatistik der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Urologische Onkologie. http://www.auo-online.de
• 2 Busch J, Rollig C, Weissbach L. et al. [What is most important is what comes across : Urological guidelines from the target group's point of view]. Urologe A 2010; 49: 75-80
• 3 Weissbach L, Bamberg M, Schmoll HJ. Interdisciplinary consensus conference on "diagnosis and therapy of testicular tumors". Urologe A 1997; 36 (04) 362-368
• 4 Schrader M, Weissbach L, Hartmann M. et al. Burden or relief: do second-opinion centers influence the quality of care delivered to patients with testicular germ cell cancer?. Eur Urol 2009; 57: 867-872
• 5 Zengerling F, Schrader A, Mohr A. et al. [National second-opinion network for testicular cancer patients. Results of a user survey]. Urologe A 2013; 52: 1290-1295
• 6 Zengerling F, Krege S, Schrader AJ. et al. National second opinion network for testicular cancer patients - transferring guidelines into practice!. Aktuelle Urol 2014; 45: 454-456