The Colorectal Anastomosis: A Timeless Challenge

Abstract

Colorectal anastomosis is a sophisticated problem that demands an elaborate discussion and an elegant solution.

“Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it.”

George Santayana, Life of Reason, 1905

Keywords

colon - anastomotic leak - colorectal anastomosis - technical considerations

Publication History

Article published online:
09 December 2022

• References

• 1 Platell C, Lim D, Tajudeen N, Tan JL, Wong K. Dose surgical sub-specialization influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer?. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9 (05) 961-964
• 2 McArdle CS, Hole DJ. Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (05) 610-617
• 3 Biondo S, Kreisler E, Millan M. et al. Impact of surgical specialization on emergency colorectal surgery outcomes. Arch Surg 2010; 145 (01) 79-86
• 4 Oliphant R, Nicholson GA, Horgan PG, McMillan DC, Morrison DS. West of Scotland Colorectal Cancer Managed Clinical Network. The impact of surgical specialisation on survival following elective colon cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29 (09) 1143-1150
• 5 Bergvall M, Skullman S, Kodeda K, Larsson PA. Better survival for patients with colon cancer operated on by specialized colorectal surgeons - a nationwide population-based study in Sweden 2007-2010. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21 (12) 1379-1386
• 6 Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246 (02) 207-214
• 7 Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998; 85 (03) 355-358
• 8 Lindgren R, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R, Matthiessen P. What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (01) 41-47
• 9 Wu SW, Ma CC, Yang Y. Role of protective stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (47) 18031-18037
• 10 Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Ho JWC, Seto CL. Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11 (01) 8-15
• 11 Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F, Schubert D, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Study Group Colon/Rectum Carcinoma (Primary Tumour). Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg 2007; 94 (12) 1548-1554
• 12 Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW. et al. Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (06) 902-908
• 13 Fong CF, Corman ML. History of right colectomy for cancer. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2019; 4: 49-49
• 14 Lirici MM, Hüscher CGS. Techniques and technology evolution of rectal cancer surgery: a history of more than a hundred years. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2016; 25 (05) 226-233
• 15 Dixon CF. Anterior resection for malignant lesions of the upper part of the rectum and lower part of the sigmoid. Ann Surg 1948; 128 (03) 425-442
• 16 Goligher JC, Dukes CE, Bussey HJR. Local recurrences after sphincter saving excisions for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg 1951; 39 (155) 199-211
• 17 Pollett WG, Nicholls RJ. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1983; 198 (02) 159-163
• 18 Jeffery PJ, Hawley PR, Parks AG. Colo-anal sleeve anastomosis in the treatment of diffuse cavernous haemangioma involving the rectum. Br J Surg 1976; 63 (09) 678-682
• 19 Fain SN, Patin CS, Morgenstern L. Use of a mechanical suturing apparatus in low colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1975; 110 (09) 1079-1082
• 20 Ravitch MM, Steichen FM. A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract. Ann Surg 1979; 189 (06) 791-797
• 21 Knight CD, Griffen FD. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery 1980; 88 (05) 710-714
• 22 Mann MR, Kawzowicz M, Komosa AJ. et al. The marginal artery of Drummond revisited: A systematic review. Translational Research in Anatomy 2021; 24: 100118
• 23 Huang J, Zhou J, Wan Y. et al. Influences of inferior mesenteric artery types and Riolan artery arcade absence on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2016; 19 (10) 1113-1118
• 24 Cirocchi R, Mari G, Amato B. et al. The dilemma of the level of the inferior mesenteric artery ligation in the treatment of diverticular disease: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (04) 917
• 25 Hall J, Hardiman K, Lee S. et al; Prepared on behalf of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (06) 728-747
• 26 Moynihan BGA. The surgical treatment of cancer of the sigmoid flexure and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1908; 6: 463-466
• 27 Ernest Miles W. A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 1908; 172 (4451): 1812-1813
• 28 Lange MM, Buunen M, van de Velde CJH, Lange JF. Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. A review. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (07) 1139-1145
• 29 Bonnet S, Berger A, Hentati N. et al. High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (05) 515-521
• 30 Buunen M, Lange MM, Ditzel M, Kleinrensink GJ, van de Velde CJH, Lange JF. Level of arterial ligation in total mesorectal excision (TME): an anatomical study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24 (11) 1317-1320
• 31 Matsuda K, Yokoyama S, Hotta T. et al. Oncological outcomes following rectal cancer surgery with high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. Gastrointest Tumors 2017; 4 (1,2): 45-52
• 32 Fan YC, Ning FL, Zhang CD, Dai DQ. Preservation versus non-preservation of left colic artery in sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 52: 269-277
• 33 Chen JN, Liu Z, Wang ZJ. et al. Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12 (06) 632-641
• 34 Seike K, Koda K, Saito N. et al. Laser Doppler assessment of the influence of division at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic blood flow in rectosigmoid cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22 (06) 689-697
• 35 Guo Y, Wang D, He L. et al. Marginal artery stump pressure in left colic artery-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a clinical trial. ANZ J Surg 2017; 87 (7-8): 576-581
• 36 Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E. et al. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed. Surg Oncol 2012; 21 (03) e111-e123
• 37 Yang Y, Wang G, He J, Zhang J, Xi J, Wang F. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 52: 20-24
• 38 Rutegård M, Hemmingsson O, Matthiessen P, Rutegård J. High tie in anterior resection for rectal cancer confers no increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Br J Surg 2012; 99 (01) 127-132
• 39 Zeng J, Su G. High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2018; 16 (01) 157
• 40 Matsuda K, Hotta T, Takifuji K. et al. Randomized clinical trial of defaecatory function after anterior resection for rectal cancer with high versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. Br J Surg 2015; 102 (05) 501-508
• 41 Yin TC, Chen YC, Su WC. et al. Low ligation plus high dissection versus high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 774782
• 42 Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, Wiggers T, Baas PC, van Dam GM. Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24 (05) 569-576
• 43 Cooperman M, Martin Jr EW, Evans WE, Carey LC. Use of Doppler ultrasound in intraoperative localization of intestinal arteriovenous malformation. Ann Surg 1979; 190 (01) 24-26
• 44 Ambrosetti P, Robert J, Mathey P, Rohner A. Left-sided colon and colorectal anastomoses: Doppler ultrasound as an aid to assess bowel vascularization. A prospective evaluation of 200 consecutive elective cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 1994; 9 (04) 211-214
• 45 Sheridan WG, Lowndes RH, Young HL. Tissue oxygen tension as a predictor of colonic anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30 (11) 867-871
• 46 Karliczek A, Benaron DA, Baas PC, Zeebregts CJ, Wiggers T, van Dam GM. Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy for prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomoses. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12 (10) 1018-1025
• 47 Chung RS. Blood flow in colonic anastomoses. Effect of stapling and suturing. Ann Surg 1987; 206 (03) 335-339
• 48 Dworkin MJ, Allen-Mersh TG. Effect of inferior mesenteric artery ligation on blood flow in the marginal artery-dependent sigmoid colon. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183 (04) 357-360
• 49 Boyle NH, Manifold D, Jordan MH, Mason RC. Intraoperative assessment of colonic perfusion using scanning laser Doppler flowmetry during colonic resection. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191 (05) 504-510
• 50 Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M, Radaelli G, Malvezzi L, Di Carlo V. Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (01) 76-82
• 51 Kudszus S, Roesel C, Schachtrupp A, Höer JJ. Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395 (08) 1025-1030
• 52 Jafari MD, Lee KH, Halabi WJ. et al. The use of indocyanine green fluorescence to assess anastomotic perfusion during robotic assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (08) 3003-3008
• 53 Kin C, Vo H, Welton L, Welton M. Equivocal effect of intraoperative fluorescence angiography on colorectal anastomotic leaks. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58 (06) 582-587
• 54 Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE. et al. Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220 (01) 82-92.e1
• 55 Boni L, David G, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A. Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (07) 2736-2742
• 56 Jafari MD, Pigazzi A, McLemore EC. et al. Perfusion Assessment in Left-Sided/Low Anterior Resection (PILLAR III): a randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter study assessing perfusion outcomes with PINPOINT near-infrared fluorescence imaging in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64 (08) 995-1002
• 57 Son GM, Kwon MS, Kim Y, Kim J, Kim SH, Lee JW. Quantitative analysis of colon perfusion pattern using indocyanine green (ICG) angiography in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (05) 1640-1649
• 58 Son GM, Ahn HM, Lee IY, Ha GW. Multifunctional indocyanine green applications for fluorescence-guided laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Coloproctol 2021; 37 (03) 133-140
• 59 Shikata J, Shida T. Effects of tension on local blood flow in experimental intestinal anastomoses. J Surg Res 1986; 40 (02) 105-111
• 60 Ludwig KA, Kosinski L. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection? Another view. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (11) 1198-1200
• 61 Brennan DJ, Moynagh M, Brannigan AE, Gleeson F, Rowland M, O'Connell PR. Routine mobilization of the splenic flexure is not necessary during anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50 (03) 302-307 , discussion 307
• 62 Chand M, Miskovic D, Parvaiz AC. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection?. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (11) 1195-1197
• 63 Nowakowski M, Małczak P, Mizera M. et al. The safety of selective use of splenic flexure mobilization in sigmoid and rectal resections-systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2018; 7 (11) E392
• 64 Goldstein DB. Common genetic variation and human traits. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (17) 1696-1698
• 65 Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (03) 131-136
• 66 Bosmans JWAM, Jongen ACHM, Birchenough GMH. et al. Functional mucous layer and healing of proximal colonic anastomoses in an experimental model. Br J Surg 2017; 104 (05) 619-630
• 67 Cohn Jr I, Rives JD. Antibiotic protection of colon anastomoses. Ann Surg 1955; 141 (05) 707-717
• 68 Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, Edberg S, Medzhitov R. Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 2004; 118 (02) 229-241
• 69 Brownlee IA, Havler ME, Dettmar PW, Allen A, Pearson JP. Colonic mucus: secretion and turnover in relation to dietary fibre intake. Proc Nutr Soc 2003; 62 (01) 245-249
• 70 Gershuni VM, Friedman ES. The microbiome-host interaction as a potential driver of anastomotic leak. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2019; 21 (01) 4
• 71 Bloemen JG, Schreinemacher MH, de Bruine AP, Buurman WA, Bouvy ND, Dejong CH. Butyrate enemas improve intestinal anastomotic strength in a rat model. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53 (07) 1069-1075
• 72 Desai MS, Seekatz AM, Koropatkin NM. et al. A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell 2016; 167 (05) 1339-1353.e21
• 73 Shakhsheer BA, Versten LA, Luo JN. et al. Morphine promotes colonization of anastomotic tissues with collagenase - producing enterococcus faecalis and causes leak. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20 (10) 1744-1751
• 74 Alverdy JC, Hyoju SK, Weigerinck M, Gilbert JA. The gut microbiome and the mechanism of surgical infection. Br J Surg 2017; 104 (02) e14-e23
• 75 Babrowski T, Holbrook C, Moss J. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence expression is directly activated by morphine and is capable of causing lethal gut-derived sepsis in mice during chronic morphine administration. Ann Surg 2012; 255 (02) 386-393
• 76 Shogan BD, Belogortseva N, Luong PM. et al. Collagen degradation and MMP9 activation by Enterococcus faecalis contribute to intestinal anastomotic leak. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7 (286) 286ra68
• 77 Gaines S, Shao C, Hyman N, Alverdy JC. Gut microbiome influences on anastomotic leak and recurrence rates following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2018; 105 (02) e131-e141
• 78 van der Stappen JW, Hendriks T, de Boer HH, de Man BM, de Pont JJ. Collagenolytic activity in experimental intestinal anastomoses. Differences between small and large bowel and evidence for the presence of collagenase. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992; 7 (02) 95-101
• 79 Alverdy JC, Hyman N, Gilbert J, Luo JN, Krezalek M. Preparing the bowel for surgery: learning from the past and planning for the future. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225 (02) 324-332
• 80 Nichols RL, Schumer W, Nyhus LM. Technique of preoperative bowel sterilisation. Lancet 1973; 2 (7831): 735
• 81 Migaly J, Bafford AC, Francone TD. et al; Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of bowel preparation in elective colon and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62 (01) 3-8
• 82 De Robles MS, Young CJ. Triple-staple technique effectively reduces operating time for rectal anastomosis. Ann Coloproctol 2021; 37 (01) 16-20
• 83 Emile SH, Barsom SH, Elfallal AH, Wexner SD. Comprehensive literature review of the outcome, modifications, and alternatives to double-stapled low pelvic colorectal anastomosis. Surgery 2022; 172 (02) 512-521
• 84 Lee S, Ahn B, Lee S. The relationship between the number of intersections of staple lines and anastomotic leakage after the use of a double stapling technique in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017; 27 (04) 273-281
• 85 Brisinda G, Vanella S, Cadeddu F. et al. End-to-end versus end-to-side stapled anastomoses after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2009; 99 (01) 75-79
• 86 McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 2015; 102 (05) 462-479
• 87 García-Granero E, Navarro F, Cerdán Santacruz C. et al. Individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for leak after double-stapled colorectal anastomosis: An institutional analysis of 800 patients. Surgery 2017; 162 (05) 1006-1016
• 88 Sato H, Maeda K, Hanai T, Matsumoto M, Aoyama H, Matsuoka H. Modified double-stapling technique in low anterior resection for lower rectal carcinoma. Surg Today 2006; 36 (01) 30-36
• 89 Tsubaki M, Ito Y, Fujita M, Kato H. Use of the modified double-stapling technique with vertical division of the rectum during a sphincter-preserving operation for the treatment of a rectal tumor. Asian J Surg 2012; 35 (03) 110-112
• 90 Tsubaki M, Suzuki Y, Adachi M. et al. Anastomotic leakage rate following modified double staple technique of anterior resection with vertical division of the rectum for rectal cancer surgery. Gastroenterol Hepatol Endosc 2017; 2 (01)
• 91 Federal Register. Accessed August 28, 2022 at: https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/86-FR-56195
• 92 Minjares-Granillo RO, Dimas BA, LeFave JJ, Haas EM. Robotic left-sided colorectal resection with natural orifice IntraCorporeal anastomosis with extraction of specimen: The NICE procedure. A pilot study of consecutive cases. Am J Surg 2019; 217 (04) 670-676
• 93 Haas EM, de Paula TR, Luna-Saracho R, Smith MS, LeFave JJ. Robotic natural-orifice IntraCorporeal anastomosis with Extraction (NICE procedure) for complicated diverticulitis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35 (06) 3205-3213
• 94 Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R. Rectovaginal fistula after low anterior resection: Prevention and management. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13 (08) 764-771
• 95 Mahid S, Galandiuk S, Christmas B, Tran D. Triple-staple technique for low rectal anastomoses eliminates the purse-string suture and facilitates stapled colorectal anastomosis. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202 (02) 382-383
• 96 Zilling T, Walther BS. Are intersecting staple lines a hazard in intestinal anastomosis?. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35 (09) 892-896
• 97 Roumen RM, Rahusen FT, Wijnen MH, Croiset van Uchelen FA. “Dog ear” formation after double-stapled low anterior resection as a risk factor for anastomotic disruption. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (04) 522-525
• 98 Kawasaki K, Fujino Y, Kanemitsu K. et al. Experimental evaluation of the mechanical strength of stapling techniques. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (10) 1796-1799
• 99 Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY. Comparison of intracorporeal single-stapled and double-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28 (01) 149-156
• 100 Asao T, Kuwano H, Nakamura J. et al. Use of a mattress suture to eliminate dog ears in double-stapled and triple-stapled anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45 (01) 137-139
• 101 Brunner M, Zu'bi A, Weber K. et al. The use of single-stapling techniques reduces anastomotic complications in minimal-invasive rectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37 (07) 1601-1609
• 102 Pla-Martí V, Martín-Arévalo J, Moro-Valdezate D. et al. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study. Tech Coloproctol 2021; 25 (03) 279-284
• 103 Berrisford RG, Page RD, Donnelly RJ. Stapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111 (01) 142-146
• 104 Kirat HT, Kiran RP, Lian L, Remzi FH, Fazio VW. Influence of stapler size used at ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on anastomotic leak, stricture, long-term functional outcomes, and quality of life. Am J Surg 2010; 200 (01) 68-72
• 105 Allen W, Wells CI, Greenslade M, Bissett IP, O'Grady G. Association between circular stapler diameter and stricture rates following gastrointestinal anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2018; 42 (10) 3097-3105
• 106 Reif de Paula T, Simon H, Shah M. et al. Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24 (04) 283-290
• 107 Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg 2013; 148 (02) 190-201
• 108 Goligher JC, Morris C, McAdam WA, De Dombal FT, Johnston D. A controlled trial of inverting versus everting intestinal suture in clinical large-bowel surgery. Br J Surg 1970; 57 (11) 817-822
• 109 Everett WG. A comparison of one layer and two layer techniques for colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1975; 62 (02) 135-140
• 110 Antoine Lembert 1802-1851. Study on intestinal suture with a description of a new procedure for performing this surgical operation. 1826. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31 (06) 489-494
• 111 Neutzling CB, Lustosa SAS, Proenca IM, da Silva EMK, Matos D. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (02) CD003144
• 112 Vargas HD, Margolin DA. Anastomotic construction. In: Steele RS, Hull TL, Hyman N, Maykel JA, Read TE, Whitlow CB. eds. ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. Arlington Heights, IL: Springer; 2022
• 113 Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Bianchini M. et al. Ileo-colic intra-corporeal anastomosis during robotic right colectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of different techniques. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36 (06) 1097-1110
• 114 Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S. et al. Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (06) 1512-1521
• 115 Solimon M. Robotic fully hand-sewn end to end colocolonic anastomosis. Accessed August 28, 2022 at: https://youtu.be/YUK6w6TgpWo
• 116 Baker JW. Low end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis; description of technic. Arch Surg 1950; 61 (01) 143-157
• 117 Tsunoda A, Kamiyama G, Narita K, Watanabe M, Nakao K, Kusano M. Prospective randomized trial for determination of optimum size of side limb in low anterior resection with side-to-end anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52 (09) 1572-1577
• 118 Hou S, Wang Q, Zhao S, Liu F, Guo P, Ye Y. Safety and efficacy of side-to-end anastomosis versus colonic J-pouch anastomosis in sphincter-preserving resections: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19 (01) 130
• 119 Forde KA, McLarty AJ, Tsai J, Ghalili K, Delany HM. Murphy's button revisited. Clinical experience with the biofragmentable anastomotic ring. Ann Surg 1993; 217 (01) 78-81
• 120 Masoomi H, Luo R, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Senagore AJ, Stamos MJ. Compression anastomosis ring device in colorectal anastomosis: a review of 1,180 patients. Am J Surg 2013; 205 (04) 447-451
• 121 Kanshin NN, Lytkin MI, Knysh VI, Klur VIu, Khamidov AI. First experience with application of compression anastomoses with the apparatus AKA-2 in operations on the large intestine [in Russian]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 1984; 132 (01) 52-57
• 122 Hardy Jr. TG, Pace WG, Maney JW, Katz AR, Kaganov AL. A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28 (07) 484-490
• 123 Bobkiewicz A, Studniarek A, Krokowicz L. et al. Gastrointestinal tract anastomoses with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring: is it still a valid technique for bowel anastomosis? Analysis of 203 cases and review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32 (01) 107-111
• 124 Fang AH, Chao W, Ecker M. Review of Colonic Anastomotic Leakage and Prevention Methods. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (12) E4061
• 125 Wullstein C, Gross E. Compression anastomosis (AKA-2) in colorectal surgery: results in 442 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 2000; 87 (08) 1071-1075
• 126 Ho YH, Ashour MAT. Techniques for colorectal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16 (13) 1610-1621
• 127 Slesser AAP, Pellino G, Shariq O. et al. Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20 (10) 667-676
• 128 Chun J, Lee D, Stewart D, Talcott M, Fleshman J. Comparison of the compression anastomosis ring (EndoCAR) with a circular stapled anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov 2011; 18 (03) 235-240
• 129 Berho M, Wexner SD, Botero-Anug AM, Pelled D, Fleshman JW. Histopathologic advantages of compression ring anastomosis healing as compared with stapled anastomosis in a porcine model: a blinded comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57 (04) 506-513
• 130 Lu Z, Peng J, Li C. et al. Efficacy and safety of a NiTi CAR 27 compression ring for end-to-end anastomosis compared with conventional staplers: A real-world analysis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. Clinics (São Paulo) 2016; 71 (05) 264-270
• 131 Dauser B, Braunschmid T, Ghaffari S, Riss S, Stift A, Herbst F. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: comparison of stapled versus compression anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013; 398 (07) 957-964
• 132 Wall J, Diana M, Leroy J. et al. MAGNAMOSIS IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy 2013; 45 (08) 643-648
• 133 Williams E, Prabhakaran S, Kong JC. et al. Utility of intra-operative flexible sigmoidoscopy to assess colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91 (04) 546-552
• 134 Yang SY, Han J, Han YD. et al. Intraoperative colonoscopy for the assessment and prevention of anastomotic leakage in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32 (05) 709-714
• 135 Kwon S, Morris A, Billingham R. et al; Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) Collaborative. Routine leak testing in colorectal surgery in the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Arch Surg 2012; 147 (04) 345-351
• 136 Wu Z, van de Haar RCJ, Sparreboom CL. et al. Is the intraoperative air leak test effective in the prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31 (08) 1409-1417
• 137 Clifford RE, Fowler H, Manu N, Sutton P, Vimalachandran D. Intra-operative assessment of left-sided colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review of available techniques. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23 (03) 582-591
• 138 Mitchem JB, Stafford C, Francone TD. et al. What is the optimal management of an intra-operative air leak in a colorectal anastomosis?. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 (02) O39-O45
• 139 Lightner AL, Pemberton JH. The role of temporary fecal diversion. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30 (03) 178-183
• 140 Plasencia A, Bahna H. Diverting ostomy: for whom, when, what, where, and why. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32 (03) 171-175
• 141 Wong NY, Eu KW. A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48 (11) 2076-2079
• 142 Taflampas P, Christodoulakis M, Tsiftsis DD. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction. Surg Today 2009; 39 (03) 183-188
• 143 Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24 (06) 711-723
• 144 Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6 (06) 462-469
• 145 Peeters KCMJ, Tollenaar RAEM, Marijnen CAM. et al; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92 (02) 211-216
• 146 Jestin P, Påhlman L, Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10 (07) 715-721
• 147 Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 2013; 148 (01) 65-71
• 148 Nurkin S, Kakarla VR, Ruiz DE, Cance WG, Tiszenkel HI. The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 (06) e309-e316
• 149 Kawada K, Sakai Y. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (25) 5718-5727
• 150 Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD. et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24 (21) 2247-2260
• 151 Gu WL, Wu SW. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evidence based on thirteen studies. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13: 9
• 152 Ahmad NZ, Abbas MH, Khan SU, Parvaiz A. A meta-analysis of the role of diverting ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36 (03) 445-455
• 153 Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V. et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 2008; 55 (86,87): 1562-1567
• 154 Ulrich AB, Seiler C, Rahbari N, Weitz J, Büchler MW. Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52 (03) 412-418
• 155 Thoker M, Wani I, Parray FQ, Khan N, Mir SA, Thoker P. Role of diversion ileostomy in low rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (09) 945-951
• 156 Mrak K, Uranitsch S, Pedross F. et al. Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Surgery 2016; 159 (04) 1129-1139
• 157 Wang FG, Yan WM, Yan M, Song MM. Comparison of anastomotic leakage rate and reoperation rate between transanal tube placement and defunctioning stoma after anterior resection: A network meta-analysis of clinical data. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45 (08) 1301-1309
• 158 Zhao S, Zhang L, Gao F. et al. Transanal drainage tube use for preventing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156 (12) 1151-1158
• 159 Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM. Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1999; 229 (02) 174-180
• 160 Zhang HY, Zhao CL, Xie J. et al. To drain or not to drain in colorectal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31 (05) 951-960
• 161 Rondelli F, Balzarotti R, Bugiantella W, Mariani L, Pugliese R, Mariani E. Temporary percutaneous ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in mechanical extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2012; 38 (11) 1065-1070
• 162 Zhou X, Lin C, Chen W, Lin J, Xu J. Completely diverted tube ileostomy compared with loop ileostomy for protection of low colorectal anastomosis: a pilot study. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16 (09) O327-O331
• 163 Bugiantella W, Rondelli F, Mariani L. et al. Traditional lateral ileostomy versus percutaneous ileostomy by exclusion probe for the protection of extraperitoneal colo-rectal anastomosis: the ALPPI (Anastomotic Leak Prevention by Probe Ileostomy) trial. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40 (04) 476-483