The Development and Validation of Data Elements and Process Steps for an Electronic Health Record for Hand Surgery Outreach Trips

Abstract

Background The surgical burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) as reported by the number of surgical cases per capita is great. To improve global health and help address this burden, there has been a rise in surgical outreach to LMICs. In high-income countries, an electronic health record (EHR) is used to document and communicate data critical to the quality of care and patient safety. Despite this, there is little guidance or precedence on the data elements or processes for utilizing an EHR on outreach trips. We validated data elements and process steps for utilizing an EHR for hand surgery outreach trips.

Methods We conducted a literature review to identify data elements collected during surgical outreach trips. A future-state process map for the collection and documentation of data elements within an EHR was developed through literature review and semistructured interviews with experts in global outreach. An expert consortium completed a modified RAND/University of California at Los Angeles Delphi process to evaluate the importance and feasibility of each data element and process step.

Results In total, 65 data elements (e.g., date of birth) and 24 process steps (e.g., surgical site marking) were validated for use in an EHR for hand surgery outreach trips to LMICs.

Conclusion This validated portfolio of data elements/process steps can serve as the foundation for pilot testing of an EHR to document and communicate critical patient data on hand surgery outreach trips. Utilization of an EHR during outreach trips to LMICs may serve to improve the safety and quality of care provided. The validated data elements/process steps can serve as a guide for EHR development and implementation of other surgical specialties.

Keywords

data collection - electronic health records - global outreach - hand surgery - quality improvement

Publication History

Article published online:
05 July 2022

• References

• 1 Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L. et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Surgery 2015; 158 (01) 3-6
• 2 Snyder J, Dharamsi S, Crooks VA. Fly-by medical care: conceptualizing the global and local social responsibilities of medical tourists and physician voluntourists. Global Health 2011; 7 (01) 6
• 3 Maki J, Qualls M, White B, Kleefield S, Crone R. Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: a methods study to evaluate quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 121
• 4 Gosselin RA, Gyamfi Y-A, Contini S. Challenges of meeting surgical needs in the developing world. World J Surg 2011; 35 (02) 258-261
• 5 Shawar YR, Shiffman J, Spiegel DA. Generation of political priority for global surgery: a qualitative policy analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3 (08) e487-e495
• 6 Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C. et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6 (11) e1196-e1252
• 7 The Lancet. Putting quality and people at the centre of health systems. Lancet 2018; 392 (10150): 795
• 8 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Financing Global Health: Viz Hub. Accessed October 10, 2020 at: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/fgh/
• 9 Sharma J, Aryal A, Thapa GK. Envisioning a high-quality health system in Nepal: if not now, when?. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6 (11) e1146-e1148
• 10 AbouZahr C, Boerma T. Health information systems: the foundations of public health. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83 (08) 578-583
• 11 Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2011; 4: 47-55
• 12 Center for the Advancement of Health. Computerized Doctors' Orders Reduce Medication Errors. ScienceDaily. Accessed March 30, 2020. at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/06/070627084702.htm
• 13 Tang PC, LaRosa MP, Newcomb C, Gorden SM. Measuring the effects of reminders for outpatient influenza immunizations at the point of clinical opportunity. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6 (02) 115-121
• 14 Smith MA. The role of shared decision making in patient-centered care and orthopaedics. Orthop Nurs 2016; 35 (03) 144-149
• 15 Schamber EM, Takemoto SK, Chenok KE, Bozic KJ. Barriers to completion of patient reported outcome measures. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (09) 1449-1453
• 16 Miller AR, Tucker CE. Can health care information technology save babies?. J Polit Econ 2011; 119 (02) 289-324
• 17 Wong R, Bradley EH. Developing patient registration and medical records management system in Ethiopia. Int J Qual Health Care 2009; 21 (04) 253-258
• 18 Tumusiime G, Was A, Preston MA, Riesel JN, Ttendo SS, Firth PG. The quality and utility of surgical and anesthetic data at a Ugandan regional referral hospital. World J Surg 2017; 41 (02) 370-379
• 19 Quinn J, Barnard Q, McKone-Sweet K, Schlesinger L. Surgical Quality Assurance Database (SQUAD) in Uganda: Surgical Quality Assurance Database (A and B). Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. 2015. Accessed on October 20, 2020, at: https://www.glo balsurgery.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/LCoGS-Teaching- Case-2.pdf.
• 20 Tomlinson M, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Swartz L, Tsai AC. Scaling up mHealth: where is the evidence?. PLoS Med 2013; 10 (02) e1001382
• 21 Lemaire J. Scaling Up Mobile Health: Elements Necessary for the Successful Scale Up of mHealth in Developing Countries. Geneva: Advanced Development for Africa; 2011
• 22 Pettigrew AM. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. J Manage Stud 1987; 24 (06) 649-670
• 23 Boonstra A, Versluis A, Vos JFJ. Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14: 370
• 24 Nasser JS, Chung KC. Development and validation of the data instrument for surgical global outreach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (04) 855e-864e
• 25 McGory ML, Shekelle PG, Ko CY. Development of quality indicators for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98 (22) 1623-1633
• 26 Shekelle P. The appropriateness method. Med Decis Making 2004; 24 (02) 228-231
• 27 Shekelle PG, Chassin MR, Park RE. Assessing the predictive validity of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998; 14 (04) 707-727
• 28 Trebble TM, Hansi N, Hydes T, Smith MA, Baker M. Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction. BMJ 2010; 341: c4078
• 29 Kamal RN, Behal R. Clinical care redesign to improve value in carpal tunnel syndrome: a before-and-after implementation study. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (01) 1-8
• 30 Burn MB, Shapiro LM, Eppler SL, Behal R, Kamal RN. Clinical care redesign to improve value for trigger finger release: a before-and-after quality improvement study. Hand (N Y) 2021; 16 (05) 624-631
• 31 Forrester JA, Koritsanszky LA, Amenu D. et al. Developing process maps as a tool for a surgical infection prevention quality improvement initiative in resource-constrained settings. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 226 (06) 1103-1116.e3
• 32 World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific. (‎ 2006 )‎. Electronic health records : manual for developing countries. Manila : WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific. Accessed on November 25, 2020, at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/207504
• 33 van Olmen J, Erwin E, García-Ulloa AC. et al. Implementation barriers for mHealth for non-communicable diseases management in low and middle income countries: a scoping review and field-based views from implementers. Wellcome Open Res 2020; 5: 7
• 34 Agarwal S, LeFevre AE, Lee J. et al; WHO mHealth Technical Evidence Review Group. Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist. BMJ 2016; 352: i1174