Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2022; 35(04): 213-219
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745756
Original Research

Who Is Healthy? A Review of How Equine Control Groups Are Defined in Clinical Orthopaedic Research 1999–2021

Tobias Wrangberg 
1   Mälaren Hästklinik AB, Sigtuna, Sweden
,
Anna Kendall
2   Division of Pathology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Proper identification of healthy subjects is essential in case–control studies. However, standardized definitions of healthy controls are lacking in equine orthopaedic research.

Objectives The aim of this study was to define the non-invasive methods used for selecting healthy control horses in osteoarthritis (OA), desmitis and tendinitis research.

Methods Systematic review. Case–control studies with a healthy control group and longitudinal studies where horses had to be healthy at the start were included. Studies where joints were visualized by arthroscopy or post-mortem examination were excluded.

Results From 2,472 OA papers and 2,746 desmitis/tendinitis papers, 127 and 84 papers met the inclusion criteria respectively. For OA, 11 methods were identified for defining healthy subjects with a median of three methods used per paper. Dynamic examination, radiographic evaluation and clinical examination were the most frequent. Eight different methods were identified in the desmitis/tendinitis papers with a median of three methods per paper; ultrasonography, clinical- and dynamic examination were the most frequent.

Conclusions Overall, the OA and desmitis/tendinitis studies used similar methods for defining subjects as healthy, but the way the examinations were performed and interpreted was inconsistent. In several studies, healthy controls were not examined for lameness. The most common methods have limitations for detecting horses with early OA, which may have implications for interpretation of results. Standardized use of more sensitive and objective methods could be beneficial.

Keywords

orthopaedic research - lameness - osteoarthritis - tendons - ligaments

Authors' Contributions

Both authors contributed to conception of the study and the reference searches. Both authors also drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 20 June 2021

Accepted: 16 February 2022

Article published online:
05 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Egenvall A, Penell JC, Bonnett BN, Olson P, Pringle J. Mortality of Swedish horses with complete life insurance between 1997 and 2000: variations with sex, age, breed and diagnosis. Vet Rec 2006; 158 (12) 397-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Frisbie DD. Future directions in treatment of joint disease in horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2005; 21 (03) 713-724 , viii viii.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schlesselman JJ. Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Greve L, Dyson SJ. The interrelationship of lameness, saddle slip and back shape in the general sports horse population. Equine Vet J 2014; 46 (06) 687-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ghorbani S, Nejad A, Law D, Chua KS, Amichai MM, Pimentel M. Healthy control subjects are poorly defined in case-control studies of irritable bowel syndrome. Ann Gastroenterol 2015; 28 (01) 87-93
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hudmon KS, Honn SE, Jiang H. et al. Identifying and recruiting healthy control subjects from a managed care organization: a methodology for molecular epidemiological case-control studies of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6 (08) 565-571
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 O'Meara B, Bladon B, Parkin TD, Fraser B, Lischer CJ. An investigation of the relationship between race performance and superficial digital flexor tendonitis in the Thoroughbred racehorse. Equine Vet J 2010; 42 (04) 322-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dominguez M, Münstermann S, de Guindos I, Timoney P. Equine disease events resulting from international horse movements: systematic review and lessons learned. Equine Vet J 2016; 48 (05) 641-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wylie CE, Newton JR. A systematic literature search to identify performance measure outcomes used in clinical studies of racehorses. Equine Vet J 2018; 50 (03) 304-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 van den Boom R, van de Lest CH, Bull S, Brama RA, van Weeren PR, Barneveld A. Influence of repeated arthrocentesis and exercise on synovial fluid concentrations of nitric oxide, prostaglandin E2 and glycosaminoglycans in healthy equine joints. Equine Vet J 2005; 37 (03) 250-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yamada ALM, Pinheiro M, Marsiglia MF, Hagen SCF, Baccarin RYA, da Silva LCLC. Ultrasound and clinical findings in the metacarpophalangeal joint assessment of show jumping horses in training. J Vet Sci 2020; 21 (03) e21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ma TW, Li Y, Wang GY. et al. Changes in synovial fluid biomarkers after experimental equine osteoarthritis. J Vet Res (Pulawy) 2017; 61 (04) 503-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 American Association of Equine Practitioners Lameness Exams. . evaluating the lame horse. Accessed March 6, 2022 at: https://aaep.org/horsehealth/lameness-exams-evaluating-lame-horse
    PubMed
  • 15 Mariñas-Pardo L, García-Castro J, Rodríguez-Hurtado I, Rodríguez-García MI, Núñez-Naveira L, Hermida-Prieto M. Allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Horse Allo 20) for the treatment of osteoarthritis-associated lameness in horses: characterization, safety, and efficacy of intra-articular treatment. Stem Cells Dev 2018; 27 (17) 1147-1160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Coppelman EB, David FH, Tóth F, Ernst NS, Trumble TN. The association between collagen and bone biomarkers and radiographic osteoarthritis in the distal tarsal joints of horses. Equine Vet J 2020; 52 (03) 391-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bertoni L, Jacquet-Guibon S, Branly T. et al. An experimentally induced osteoarthritis model in horses performed on both metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints: technical, clinical, imaging, biochemical, macroscopic and microscopic characterization. PLoS One 2020; 15 (06) e0235251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Smith AD, Morton AJ, Winter MD. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging scoring of an experimental model of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in the equine carpus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2016; 57 (05) 502-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kersh KD, McClure SR, Van Sickle D, Evans RB. The evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on collagenase induced superficial digital flexor tendonitis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19 (02) 99-105
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hagen J, Kojah K, Geiger M, Vogel M. Immediate effects of an artificial change in hoof angulation on the dorsal metacarpophalangeal joint angle and cross-sectional areas of both flexor tendons. Vet Rec 2018; 182 (24) 692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Crevier-Denoix N, Audigié F, Emond AL. et al. Effect of track surface firmness on the development of musculoskeletal injuries in French Trotters during four months of harness race training. Am J Vet Res 2017; 78 (11) 1293-1304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ringer SK, Lischer CJ, Ueltschi G. Assessment of scintigraphic and thermographic changes after focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy on the origin of the suspensory ligament and the fourth metatarsal bone in horses without lameness. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66 (10) 1836-1842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Geburek F, Mundle K, Conrad S. et al. Tracking of autologous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells with in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and histology after intralesional treatment of artificial equine tendon lesions–a pilot study. Stem Cell Res Ther 2016; 7: 21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Geburek F, Roggel F, van Schie HTM. et al. Effect of single intralesional treatment of surgically induced equine superficial digital flexor tendon core lesions with adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: a controlled experimental trial. Stem Cell Res Ther 2017; 8 (01) 129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Waguespack RW, Burba DJ, Hubert JD. et al. Effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on desmitis of the accessory ligament of the deep digital flexor tendon in the horse. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (04) 450-456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Plaas A, Sandy JD, Liu H. et al. Biochemical identification and immunolocalizaton of aggrecan, ADAMTS5 and inter-alpha-trypsin-inhibitor in equine degenerative suspensory ligament desmitis. J Orthop Res 2011; 29 (06) 900-906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gottlieb R, Whitcomb MB, Vaughan B, Galuppo LD, Spriet M. Ultrasonographic appearance of normal and injured lateral patellar ligaments in the equine stifle. Equine Vet J 2016; 48 (03) 299-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Van Hoogmoed LM, Agnew DW, Whitcomb M, Hyde DW, MacDonald MH, Snyder JR. Ultrasonographic and histologic evaluation of medial and middle patellar ligaments in exercised horses following injection with ethanolamine oleate and 2% iodine in almond oil. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63 (05) 738-743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Tully LJ, Murphy AM, Smith RK, Hulin-Curtis SL, Verheyen KL, Price JS. Polymorphisms in TNC and COL5A1 genes are associated with risk of superficial digital flexor tendinopathy in National Hunt Thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J 2014; 46 (03) 289-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of a ridden horse pain ethogram and its relationship with gait in a convenience sample of 60 riding horses. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10 (06) E1044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Keegan KG, Dent EV, Wilson DA. et al. Repeatability of subjective evaluation of lameness in horses. Equine Vet J 2010; 42 (02) 92-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Cokelaere SM, Plomp SGM, de Boef E. et al. Sustained intra-articular release of celecoxib in an equine repeated LPS synovitis model. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2018; 128: 327-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Schleining JA, McClure SR, Evans RB, Hyde WG, Wulf LW, Kind AJ. Liposome-based diclofenac for the treatment of inflammation in an acute synovitis model in horses. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2008; 31 (06) 554-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Nelson BB, King MR, Frisbie DD. Assessment of a novel equine tarsocrural experimental joint disease model using recombinant interleukin-1β and arthroscopic articular sampling of the medial malleolus of the tibia on the standing sedated horse. Vet J 2017; 229: 54-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Van de Water E, Oosterlinck M, Korthagen NM. et al. The lipopolysaccharide model for the experimental induction of transient lameness and synovitis in Standardbred horses. Vet J 2021; 270: 105626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Keegan KG, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y. et al. Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor-based lameness evaluation system for horses. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72 (09) 1156-1163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Back W, Dewulf J, Gasthuys F. Use of a stand-alone pressure plate for the objective evaluation of forelimb symmetry in sound ponies at walk and trot. Vet J 2010; 183 (03) 305-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA. et al. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res 2012; 73 (03) 368-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Donnell JR, Frisbie DD, King MR, Goodrich LR, Haussler KK. Comparison of subjective lameness evaluation, force platforms and an inertial-sensor system to identify mild lameness in an equine osteoarthritis model. Vet J 2015; 206 (02) 136-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Keg PR, van Weeren PR, Back W, Barneveld A. Influence of the force applied and its period of application on the outcome of the flexion test of the distal forelimb of the horse. Vet Rec 1997; 141 (18) 463-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Busschers E, van Weeren PR. Use of the flexion test of the distal forelimb in the sound horse: repeatability and effect of age, gender, weight, height and fetlock joint range of motion. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2001; 48 (07) 413-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Conaghan PG. Osteoarthritis in 2012: Parallel evolution of OA phenotypes and therapies. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2013; 9 (02) 68-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Niemelä TM, Tulamo RM, Carmona JU, López C. Evaluation of the effect of experimentally induced cartilage defect and intra-articular hyaluronan on synovial fluid biomarkers in intercarpal joints of horses. Acta Vet Scand 2019; 61 (01) 24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Dahlberg L, Roos H, Saxne T. et al. Cartilage metabolism in the injured and uninjured knee of the same patient. Ann Rheum Dis 1994; 53 (12) 823-827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Serra Bragança FM, Hernlund E, Thomsen MH. et al. Adaptation strategies of horses with induced forelimb lameness walking on a treadmill. Equine Vet J 2021; 53 (03) 600-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Rantanen NW. The use of diagnostic ultrasound in limb disorders of the horse: a preliminary report. J Equine Vet Sci 1982; 2 (02) 62-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Smith RK, McIlwraith CW. Consensus on equine tendon disease: building on the 2007 Havemeyer symposium. Equine Vet J 2012; 44 (01) 2-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Celimli N, Seyrek-Intas D, Kaya M. Morphometric measurements of flexor tendons and ligaments in Arabian horses by ultrasonographic examination and comparison with other breeds. Equine Vet Educ 2004; 16 (02) 81-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Avella CS, Ely ER, Verheyen KL, Price JS, Wood JL, Smith RK. Ultrasonographic assessment of the superficial digital flexor tendons of National Hunt racehorses in training over two racing seasons. Equine Vet J 2009; 41 (05) 449-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Guermazi A, Niu J, Hayashi D. et al. Prevalence of abnormalities in knees detected by MRI in adults without knee osteoarthritis: population based observational study (Framingham Osteoarthritis Study). BMJ 2012; 345: e5339
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD, White II NA, Werpy NM. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of desmopathy of the collateral ligaments of the equine distal interphalangeal joint. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50 (01) 21-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Ryd L, Brittberg M, Eriksson K. et al. Pre-osteoarthritis: definition and diagnosis of an elusive clinical entity. Cartilage 2015; 6 (03) 156-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 McIlwraith CW. Use of synovial fluid and serum biomarkers in equine bone and joint disease: a review. Equine Vet J 2005; 37 (05) 473-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Estrada RJ, van Weeren PR, van de Lest CH. et al. Comparison of healing in forelimb and hindlimb surgically induced core lesions of the equine superficial digital flexor tendon. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27 (05) 358-365
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Back W, Schamhardt HC, Hartman W, Barneveld A. Kinematic differences between the distal portions of the forelimbs and hind limbs of horses at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56 (11) 1522-1528
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Brommer H, Brama PA, Barneveld A, van Weeren PR. Differences in the topographical distribution of articular cartilage degeneration between equine metacarpo- and metatarsophalangeal joints. Equine Vet J 2004; 36 (06) 506-510
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar