Keywords
oral health - questionnaire - knowledge - attitudes - practices - pediatricians -
family physicians
Introduction
The oral cavity is among the main focal points for the interaction of the body with
the external environment.[1] This pivotal link can play a major role in shaping an individual's general health.
Historically, the impact of oral diseases on general health and mortality has been
attributed to inflammatory or nutritional pathways. For example, evidence suggests
that periodontal disease, one of the most common oral diseases, may lead to cardiovascular
and respiratory-related mortality, while tooth loss affects dietary intake which,
in turn, will negatively affects key nutrients intake.[2] Dental caries, which remains a pandemic disease across developing countries, if
left untreated in children will lead to negative long-term consequences related to
pain and chewing difficulties which may affect growth and cognitive development.[3] Further progression of tooth decay without intervention can lead to premature tooth
loss which, in addition to compromising chewing and esthetics, will affect the future
developing permanent dentition.[3] Furthermore, oral health can affect an individual's psychological and social well-being
with clear link between impaired oral health and negative impact on the quality of
life.[3]
Due to the fact that newly born infants are regularly examined during their first
year of life by non-dental health professionals, recommendations started to emerge
in the past two decades calling for actions to integrate oral health monitoring and
promotion to the overall general health assessment of infants. The main objectives
of these recommendations were to engage primary care physicians in oral health assessment,
prevention, and intervention. This, in turn, will aid in achieving healthy future
oral development and maintaining a disease-free oral cavity.
To ensure successful involvement of non-dental health care professionals and lay down
a sound foundation for this paradigm shift in expanding their role in oral health
prevention and monitoring, the work of Lewis et al[4] was among the first to offer several recommendations based on a national survey
which investigated pediatricians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding
oral health, and to determine willingness to incorporate fluoride varnish into their
practices. These included the need for adequate training for pediatricians in oral
health promotion, the need for guidelines on preventive dental care, and the availability
of sufficient resources to pursue successfully oral health-related activities.
As a result, several initiatives were introduced to empower the role of pediatricians
in providing oral health screening, preventive oral care, anticipatory guidance, fluoride
varnish application, and referring to dentist when dental intervention is needed.[5] Despite all efforts to integrate oral health promotion and care in medical settings
and to increase the awareness of medical physicians involved in infants' general health
care monitoring, several reports revealed that the level of physicians' engagement
and activities related to oral health monitoring and assessment is limited and requires
further support.[6] A recent review concluded that pediatricians have limited knowledge and understanding
in critical areas related to oral health such as identifying early signs of caries,
recommended age for a first dental visit, the transmission of bacteria from mother
to child, and knowledge about using fluorides.[7]
In Qatar, early childhood caries remains one of the most prevalent public health problems
with a prevalence of 89% in preschool children aged 4 to 5 years old.[8] This necessitates urgent action from decision-makers to promote preventive programs
and raise the awareness level of the public toward the importance of oral health.
Pediatric/family medicine physicians are no exception in their vital role. A recent
study assessed the KAP of health professionals in Qatar toward oral health and found
that despite demonstrating a positive attitude toward the anticipatory guidance elements
of oral health, the knowledge of health care professionals on childhood oral health
is rather limited. However, one of the main limitations of this study was the majority
of participants were nurses (77.3%) with a small number of pediatrician/family medicine
physicians which made the assessment of their KAP incomplete and unrepresentative.[9] No study evaluated KAP of only physicians who are involved in general health care
assessment of children under 4 years old in Qatar. Such an assessment is beneficial
and would provide an insight about whether educational programs and training are needed
to empower the role of medical physicians in oral health promotion and prevention
of oral diseases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of KAP
of pediatricians/family physicians practicing in all primary health care centers (PHCC)
in Qatar toward oral health.
Material and Methods
For transparent reporting, this study was presented in accordance with the Strengthening
the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement.[10]
Study Design
This was a prospective, cross-sectional study. Ethical approval was obtained from
the Medical Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, proposal ID MRC-01-19–163,
and Department of Clinical Research, Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha-Qatar (project
number: PHCC/DCR/2019/10/030).
Participants and Setting
The study population was physicians (family medicine and pediatricians) who were working
in well-baby clinics (WBC) in all PHCC in Doha, Qatar. The WBC provides medical services
based on international standards to all children under the 5 years of age. Physicians
were identified from the database which was provided from the operations directorate
office from which emails of physicians who provide health care in all WBC were retrieved.
Only physicians whose primary role involved health care provision for children aged
5 years or below were included in the study. Nonspeaking English language physicians
were excluded. Participation was voluntarily, and each physician was sent an information
sheet describing the objectives of the study.
Outcomes
The primary outcomes of this study were levels of physicians' KAP. Demographic variables
were considered predictors (independent variables) which included gender, age, specialty,
and experience years.
Questionnaire
A structured self-administered questionnaire was used in the present study. Items
of the questionnaire were adopted after a comprehensive literature review and based
on the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) recommendations for oral health
assessment in infants. Modifications related to the number of items and response options
were made. To ensure that items of the questionnaire were feasible and had good content
validity, it was given to a group of five pediatric dentists and five pediatricians.
Except for few wording amendments, no issues were reported in completing the questionnaire.
Construct validity could not be tested in relation to the outcomes of interest as
they were not psychosocial constructs in which psychometric properties need to be
tested. Furthermore, all studies that evaluated parents' KAP did not report on the
construct validity and used different wording or options for items.
The final version of the questionnaire comprised of four domains.
The first domain assessed demographic data which included gender, age groups (categorized
into ≤35, >35–45, and >45 years), years of experience (categorized into 0–10, 10–20,
and >20 years), and specialty (family medicine or pediatrician).
The second domain assessed the knowledge of parents using eight items which covered
knowledge about causative factors of dental caries, night feeding, frequency of sugar
intake, when children should start brushing, fluoride, the time for the first dental
visit, and whether caries is transmissible from the mother. Options for each item
ranged from “yes,” “no” and “I don't know,” where “yes” corresponds to a positive
knowledge to specific options relevant to a particular question.
The third domain assessed attitude (four items) which covered the importance of baby
well clinics (BWC) in oral health assessment, obstacles to provide better oral health
advice, the role of pediatricians in screening the oral cavity, and interest in obtaining
educational training. Options for each item were “yes,” “no” and “I don't know,” where
“yes” corresponds to a positive attitude.
The fourth domain assessed practice using five items which covered practices related
to examining the oral cavity, asking parents whether they supervise their children
when brushing their teeth, first dental visit, content of toothpaste, and sugar-free
medications. Options for each item were similar to attitudes domain.
The questionnaire was generated via the online program Google Forms. A link was sent
to all participants that included the questionnaire and an information sheet describing
the aims of the study.
Data collection was done by the principal investigator (H.M.A.Q.) who adopted a standardized
protocol with respect to sending emails. A reminder was sent to the physician if no
reply was received. Data collection was performed between February and April 2020.
Bias
A standardized protocol was adopted in sending emails to all physicians. In addition,
data entry and analysis were done by independent persons who were not involved in
the study.
Sample Size Calculation
No sample size calculation was done. However, to ensure a good study power, all physicians
working in BWC were approached in all the 27 PHCCs.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive and analytical statistics were employed. For descriptive statistics, the
frequency of distribution in relation to demographic data and responses to items of
the questionnaire were presented. For analytical statistics, associations between
independent variables (predictors) and KAP were assessed by employing univariate and
multivariate logistic regressions. Predictors which were significantly associated
in the unadjusted regression were entered into a final multivariate logistic regression
to evaluate their effects after adjustment. The scoring of KAP domains was based on
the percentage of the correct answers (favorable answers). The response “yes” was
considered a correct answer, whereas responses “no” or “I don't know” were considered
incorrect answers. The percentage of correct answers for each domain was calculated
by dividing the number of correct answers to the maximum possible number of correct
answers multiplied by 100. A percentage of 49 or below was considered poor, 50 to
69 fair, and ≥70 good. However, to facilitate the regression analyses, the outcomes
were dichotomized to either favorable (≥ 50%) or unfavorable answers (<50%). The p-value was set as 0.05, and SPSS software (version 22) was used for analysis.
Results
A total of 417 questionnaires were electronically sent. Ninety-nine physicians completed
and returned the surveys giving a response rate of 23.7%. Of the 99, 51 (51.5%) were
females. The majority of respondents were family medicine physicians 88 (89%), and
only 11 (11%) were pediatricians. The mean age of physicians was 38.5 years, and the
majority had 0 to 10 years of experience ([Table 1]).
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the sample
|
Frequency
|
|
Age (y)
|
Age ≤35 y
|
21
|
|
Age >35 to 45 y
|
51
|
|
Age >45 y
|
26
|
|
Number of years in practice
|
Year of experiences (0–10 y)
|
22
|
|
Year of experiences (>10 to 20 y)
|
48
|
|
Year of experiences (>20 y)
|
28
|
|
Specialty
|
Family medicine
|
87
|
|
Pediatrician
|
11
|
|
Gender
|
Female
|
51
|
|
Male
|
48
|
Knowledge
The overall mean score of knowledge was 61%. The knowledge of 19.2% was good, 61.6%
fair, and 19.2% poor ([Table 2]).
Table 2
Frequency of KAP levels (n = 99)
|
Valid
|
Poor n (%)
|
Fair
|
Good
|
Mean score
|
|
Knowledge
|
19(19.2)
|
61(61.6)
|
19(19.2)
|
61%
|
|
Attitude
|
14(14.1)
|
31(31.3)
|
54(54.5)
|
60%
|
|
Practice
|
61(61.6)
|
15(15.2)
|
23(23.3)
|
44.4%
|
Abbreviation: KAP, knowledge, attitudes, and practices.
Univariate logistic regression showed that gender, age groups, and years of experience
were significantly associated with knowledge (p = 0.02, p = 0.05, and p = 0.04, respectively) ([Table 3]).
Table 3
Association between demographic data with knowledge score (categorized as >50% questions
are correctly answered)
|
Predictor variables
|
Univariate logistic regression
|
|
Multivariate logistic regression
|
|
Percentage (%) of positive knowledge score
|
Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI
|
p-Value
|
Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI
|
p-Value
|
|
Gender
Male
Female
|
66.7
96
|
1.0 (reference)
12 (2.6–55.6)
|
0.002
|
1.0 (reference)
12.3 (2.4–62.2)
|
0.002
|
|
Age group
|
|
≤35 y
|
63.3
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
|
> 35–45 y
|
84.3
|
3 (1–9.8)
|
0.05
|
7.5 (1–58.6)
|
0.05
|
|
> 45 y
|
88.5
|
4.4 (1–19.3)
|
0.05
|
9.2(1–44.6)
|
0.05
|
|
Years of experiences
|
|
0–10 y
|
69.6
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
|
> 10–20 y
|
79.2
|
1.6 (0.5–5.1)
|
0.38
|
0.4 (0.05–3)
|
0.358
|
|
> 20 y
|
93
|
5.7 (1–31)
|
0.04
|
24 (0.8–68.3)
|
0.999
|
|
Specialty
|
|
Family medicine
|
79.5
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
|
Pediatrician
|
91
|
2.5 (0.3–21.4)
|
0.38
|
1.1 (0.1–13.1)
|
0.897
|
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
However, when the independent variables were entered into a multivariate logistic
regression model, the independent variables, gender and age groups, remained significantly
associated with knowledge (p = 0.02 and 0.05, respectively; [Table 3]). Females were more likely to give positive answers than males (odds ratio [OR] = 12.3,
95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4–62.2). Age groups 35 to 45 and >45 years were likely
to give more correct answers than the <35 years age group (OR= 7.5, 95% CI = 1.1–56.6
and 9.2, 95% CI 1.2–44.6, respectively).
Knowledge items with the highest percentages of favorable answers included the importance
of fluoride, time, bacteria, sugar intake, and saliva in the process of dental caries.
Items with the least percentages of favorable answers included whether amount or frequency
is important in the process of caries in which 76% gave incorrect answer, 60% did
not know when parents should start using fluoridated toothpaste, and 84% of participants
did not know that dental caries can be transmitted from the mother.
Attitudes
The overall mean score of attitudes was 60%. It was good in 55.4%, fair in 31.3%,
and poor in 14.1% ([Table 2]).
No significant associations were found between any of the independent variables and
attitudes ([Table 4]).
Table 4
Association between demographic data and attitudes scores (categorized as ≥50% questions
are correctly answered)
|
Predictor variables
|
Univariate logistic regression
|
|
Multivariate logistic regression
|
|
Percentage (%) of positive knowledge score
|
Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI
|
p-Value
|
Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI
|
p-Value
|
|
Gender
Male
Female
|
83.3
88
|
1.0 (reference)
1.4 (0.4–4.5)
|
0.511
|
1.0 (reference)
1.4 (0.4–5.1)
|
0.58
|
|
Age group
|
|
≤35 y
|
77.3
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
|
> 35–45 y
|
84.3
|
1.6 (0.4–5.5)
|
0.473
|
0.7 (0.1–4.3)
|
0.733
|
|
> 45 y
|
96.2
|
7.3 (0.7–68.6)
|
0.08
|
8.2 (0.2–78.7)
|
0.240
|
|
Years of experiences
|
|
0–10 y
|
74
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
|
> 10–20 y
|
87.5
|
2.4 (0.6–8.7)
|
0.161
|
3.3 (0.5–20.5)
|
0.187
|
|
> 20 y
|
93
|
4.5 (0.8–25.4)
|
0.081
|
1.3 (0.05–37.6)
|
0.850
|
|
Specialty
|
|
Family medicine
|
86.4
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
|
Pediatrician
|
82
|
0.7 (0.1–3.7)
|
0.685
|
0.3 (0.04–3.1)
|
0.348
|
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Items for attitudes with the highest percentages of favorable answers included that
the WBC is a suitable venue to provide parents with dental advice (66%), their role
in conducting clinical examinations (81.4%), and interest in obtaining educational
training on oral health advice (88.2%).
Practices
The overall mean score of practices was 44.4%. Physicians' practices were good in
23.3%, fair in 15.2%, and bad in 61.6% ([Table 2]).
Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions revealed that specialty was significantly
associated with practices ([Table 5]). Pediatricians were more likely to give correct answers than family medicine physicians
(OR= 5.3, 95% CI 1–25.6, p = 0.04).
Table 5
Association between demographic data and practice scores(categorized as ≥50% questions
are correctly answered)
|
Predictor variables
|
Univariate logistic regression
|
|
Multivariate logistic regression
|
|
Percentage (%) of positive knowledge score
|
Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI
|
p-Value
|
Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI
|
p-Value
|
|
Gender
Male
Female
|
31.3
46
|
1.0 (reference)
1.8 (0.8–4.2)
|
0.163
|
1.0 (reference)
2.1 (0.9–5.3)
|
0.080
|
|
Age group
|
|
≤35 y
|
41
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
|
> 35–45 y
|
35.3
|
0.8 (0.3–2.2)
|
0.649
|
0.9 (0.2–5)
|
0.980
|
|
> 45 y
|
42.3
|
1.1 (0.3–3.3)
|
0.992
|
7 (0.4–120)
|
0.170
|
|
Years of experiences
|
|
0–10 y
|
39
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
|
> 10–20 y
|
37.5
|
0.9 (0.3–2.6)
|
0.895
|
0.7 (0.1–3.5)
|
0.66
|
|
> 20 y
|
39.3
|
1 (0.3–3.1)
|
0.991
|
0.1 (0.04–1.5)
|
0.1
|
|
Specialty
|
|
Family medicine
|
35.2
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
1.0 (reference)
|
|
|
Pediatrician
|
63.2
|
3.2 (0.8–12)
|
0.05
|
5.3 (1–25.6)
|
0.04
|
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Items with the most favorable answers included examining children's oral cavities
and giving advice to parents to supervise their children's brushing. Items with the
least correct answers included advice given to parents on when to have the first dental
visit (55%) and the use of fluoridated toothpaste (60%).
Discussion
Equally to dentists, medical professionals can play a major in preventing oral diseases
and oral health promotion. In 2003, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published
a policy statement which suggested that “pediatricians and pediatric health care professionals
should develop the knowledge base to perform oral health risk assessments on all patients
beginning at 6 months of age.”[11] Medical professionals should have adequate KAP regarding oral health issues to ensure
their competency. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the KAP of pediatricians and
family medicine physicians who are providing medical care in WBC in Qatar.
In this study, the overall knowledge was considered fair (61%). This finding was similar
to other reports.[12]
[13]
[14] However, other studies reported suboptimal knowledge levels such as the study of
Sabbagh et al which found that only 1.4% of pediatricians had scores higher than 60%.[15] Similarly, another study in the United States found that only 9% of pediatricians
answered the knowledge questions correctly.[16] In both studies, it was concluded that pediatricians' knowledge regarding oral health
issues such as identifying oral diseases, timing of primary teeth eruption, preventive
measures, and referrals to dental professionals should be improved.
The participants in this study demonstrated areas of strengths with respect to their
knowledge. For example, the majority acknowledged the importance of fluoride, time,
bacteria, sugar intake, and saliva in the process of dental caries. This finding was
similar to other studies.[7] Nevertheless, the physicians showed some areas of weaknesses that necessitated a
high need for action. For example, most physicians (75%) answered that the amount
of sugar intake resulted in more occurrence of dental caries.[14] It is well known that the frequency of sugar intake is as important as the amount
in increasing the risk of caries; thus, medical physicians who are dealing with children
should focus their dietary advice on reducing the frequency of sugar intake.[17] Another disappointing finding was the fact that most physicians (60%) did not know
when parents should start using fluoridated toothpaste. This finding was in accordance
with another study conducted in Saudi Arabia (KSA) in a group of pediatricians and
family medicine physicians.[15] According to the AAP, it is recommended to use a “smear” of fluoride toothpaste
twice a day when the first tooth appears and until age 3 years.[18] As such, the knowledge of pediatricians regarding the benefits of fluoride and the
doses required needs reinforcement and improvement as the key areas.
Unfortunately, 84% of participants did not know that dental caries can be transmitted
between a mother and her child. This indicated that there is a need to reinforce the
knowledge of physicians with respect to caries etiology including modes of transmissions.[19]
Knowledge of participants was significantly associated with gender, age, and years
of experience. However, when the variables were entered into the regression model,
the significance of years of experience was not confirmed yielding only gender and
age as significant predictors. Females were significantly more knowledgeable than
males which was in agreement with several studies.[20]
[21]
[22]
[23] This finding could be attributed to the fact that a considerable number of female
physicians in this study might be mothers (no data on the number of physicians who
are mothers). It is well known that mothers are generally more involved in the daily
care of their children including oral hygiene care. In contrast, Rabie et al found
that males scored higher knowledge scores.[24] Based on our finding, infants seen in the BWC might not be receiving adequate dental
assessment by male physicians which is an area that needs to be addressed.
Age was also a significant predictor. Physicians who were above 45 years old demonstrated
significantly better knowledge compared with younger clinicians. This finding appears
to be logical as older physicians accumulate a great deal of experience, skills, and
knowledge.
With respect to attitudes, the study showed that, overall, it was also fair (60%).
Only 14% demonstrated poor attitudes, which was an encouraging finding. This agreed
with the findings of Bhoopathi et al[14] who found that most of the physicians had favorable attitudes toward oral health
issues. Among areas of positive attitudes that were demonstrated, most participants
believed that the WBC is a suitable venue to provide parents dental advice and pursue
regular check-ups for their children. Moreover, most participants showed positive
attitudes with respect to their roles in preventing oral diseases and conducting clinical
examinations. This was consistent with other studies.[7] It was an encouraging finding that most participants would be interested in obtaining
training on delivering oral health advice to parents, meaning positive attitudes and
openness toward updating their current knowledge in aspects related to their clinical
roles including oral health care. In a survey conducted in the United States on 854
pediatricians, it was found that pediatricians overwhelmingly believed that they play
an important role and are already involved in providing anticipatory guidance on oral
health issues.[20] However, lack of up-to-date information and proper training were the main barriers
in improving their levels of dental care. The survey recommended that formal training
about oral health should be incorporated in medical schools along with continuous
educational programs that should be organized regularly to reinforce their roles in
oral health maintenance for young children.
Although participants demonstrated moderate levels of knowledge and attitudes, this
did not reflect positively on their practices. The overall score of practices was
considered poor (44.4%). This finding was in accordance with other surveys conducted
in KSA. In contrast, another study in India showed that most of primary health care
workers demonstrated higher levels of favorable practices (81%).[14] Poor practices in our sample reflected an urgent need for actions and plans to improve
this aspect and confirmed other findings which stated that acceptable levels of knowledge
or attitudes do not necessarily translate into favorable practices.[12]
One of the most important findings of this study was the significant difference in
practice scores between pediatricians and family medicine physicians (p = 0.02).
Here, pediatricians showed higher levels of favorable practices. This finding indicated
that there is a gap between the knowledge of family medicine physicians and their
practices which as result requires urgent interventional educational programs to improve
this aspect. The same result was found in other surveys.[12] It would also appear that acceptable levels of knowledge and attitudes are not enough
to reflect on practices. Other factors might play a role such as lack of quality time
during clinical examinations and the fact that parents have little interest in issues
related to oral screening and monitoring.
Key practice deficits were identified in the present study. Areas that needed improvement
were related to advice given to parents on when to attend the first dental visit and
the use of fluoridated toothpaste. In both aspects, most of the participants gave
unfavorable answers (55 and 60%, respectively). According to the AAPD, the child should
visit the dentist within the 6 months of the eruption of the first primary tooth or
by age of 1 year. Furthermore, dietary counseling and advice related to fluoride importance
should be taught to parents during infants' well-clinics. Therefore, every effort
should be made to reinforce the role of pediatricians and family medicine physicians
in clinical settings and ensure that their practices conform to the recommended standards.[25] On a positive note, most participants reported that they examined children's oral
cavity and they advised parents to supervise their children's brushing with fluoridated
toothpaste.
The present study had several limitations. The sample might be unrepresentative as
only physicians from PHCCs were recruited. Recruiting physicians from other sectors
such as private practices could have improved the generalizability. In addition, the
response rate was suboptimal which may increase the chance of respondents' bias.
This low response rate might be attributed to the timing at which the survey was conducted
during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 which might have overwhelmed the respondents.
That is, physicians who did not respond might have different KAP, thus, affecting
the findings of this study. Moreover, bias related to social desirability might have
affected the outcomes as well. Finally, although face and content validity of the
questionnaire used in the present study was assessed, it is unlikely that it captured
all aspects of KAP. However, there is no standardized questionnaire to be used globally
and there are variations in questionnaires used to assess KAP across studies. Additionally,
the outcomes investigated were not psychosocial constructs that required psychometric
characteristics assessment. They were items related to clinical practices that are
based on standardized international recommendations.[11]
Conclusions
The participants demonstrated fair levels of knowledge and attitudes and poor levels
of practices. Areas of strengths and weaknesses in KAP were identified. Female physicians
were significantly more knowledgeable than males. Younger physicians need more support
and educational programs to improve their knowledge with respect to oral health issues.
When compared with pediatricians, family medicine physicians need to improve their
practices at the clinical level by organizing regular training programs to empower
their roles in oral health care promotion.
