Applied Kinesiology: Die Vernetzung transparent machen

Zusammenfassung

Der Artikel beschreibt die Methode Applied Kinesiology (AK) mit ihren Hauptwerkzeugen als funktionelle Myodiagnostik. Er gibt eine Übersicht über die postulierten Mechanismen der Wirksamkeit und einen Überblick über vorhandene Studien. Zur Illustration der Anwendung in der Praxis dienen zwei Fallbeispiele.

Abstract

The article describes the method of applied kinesiology (AK) with its main tools as functional myodiagnostics. It presents an overview of the postulated mechanisms of effectiveness as well as of existing studies. Two case reports are used to illustrate the application in practice.

Schlüsselwörter

Applied Kinesiology - funktionelle Myodiagnostik - Osteopathie - Chirotherapie - Triad of Health

Keywords

Applied kinesiology - functional myodiagnostics - osteopathy - chirotherapy - Triad of Health

• Literatur

• 1 Andrews AW, Thomas MW, Bohannon RW (1996) Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Phys Ther 1996; 76 (3): 248-259
• 2 Armstrong RD, Horrocks A, Rickman S, Heinrich J, Kay A, Gibson T. Finger flexion function in rheumatoid arthritis: the reliability of eight simple tests. Br J Rheumatol 1987; 26(2): 118-122
• 3 Bohannon RW. Manual muscle test scores and dynamometer test scores of knee extension strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67(6): 390-392
• 4 Conable KM, Hanicke BT. Interexaminer agreement in applied kinesiology manual muscle testing. Selected Papers of the International College of Applied Kinesiology 1987
• 5 Florence JM, Pandya S, King WM, Robison JD, Baty J et al. Intrarater reliability of manual muscle test (Medical Research Council scale) grades in Duchenne‘s muscular dystrophy. Phys Ther 1992; 72(2): 115-122
• 6 Garten H. Applied Kinesiology, Muskelfunktion, Dysfunktion und Therapie. München: Elsevier, Urban & Fischer; 2012
• 7 Garten H. Applied Kinesiology - funktionelle Myodiagnostik in Osteopathie und Chirotherapie. München: Elsevier, Urban & Fischer; 2016
• 8 Giggey K, Tepe R. A pilot study to determine the effects of a supine sacroiliac orthopedic blocking procedure on cervical spine extensor isometric strength. J Chiropr Med 2009; 8(2): 56-61
• 9 Helliwell P, Howe AV, Wright V. Functional assessment of the hand: reproducibility, acceptability, and utility of a new system for measuring strength. Ann Rheum Dis 1987; 46(3): 203-208
• 10 Hsieh CY, Phillips RB (1990) Reliability of manual muscle testing with a computerized dynamometer. Journal of Manipulative and Physiologic Therapeutics 1990; 13 (2): 72-81
• 11 Jain M, Smith M, Cintas H, Koziol D, Wesley R. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the 10-point Manual Muscle Test (MMT) of strength in children with juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIM). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2006; 26(3): 5-17
• 12 Janda V. Manuelle Muskelfunktionsdiagnostik. Berlin: Ullsein-Mosby; 1994
• 13 Jepsen JR, Laursen LH, Larsen AI, Hagert CG. Manual strength testing in 14 upper limb muscles: a study of inter-rater reliability. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75(4): 442-448
• 14 Kandel ER, Schwartz JH. Principles of Neural Science (Principles of Neural Science). New York: Mcgraw-Hill; 2000
• 15 Kibler WB, Sciascia A, Dome D. Evaluation of apparent and absolute supraspinatus strength in patients with shoulder injury using the scapular retraction test. Am J Sports Med Dome 34(10): 1643-1647
• 16 Kilmer DD, McCrory MA, Wright NC, Kim HR, Aitkens SG. Hand-held dynamometry reliability in persons with neuropathic weakness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78(12): 1364-1368
• 17 Lawson A, Calderon L. Interexaminer agreement for applied kinesiology manual muscle testing. Percept Mot Skills 1997; 84(2): 539-546
• 18 Leisman G, Shambaugh P, Ferentz AH. Somatosensory evoked potential changes during muscle testing. Int J Neurosci 1989; 45(1-2): 143-151
• 19 Leisman G, Zenhausern R, Ferentz A, Tefera T, Zemcov A. Electromyographic effects of fatigue and task repetition on the validity of estimates of strong and weak muscles in applied kinesiological muscle-testing procedures. Percept Mot Skills 1995; 80(3 Pt 1): 963-977
• 20 Marino M, Nicholas JA, Gleim GW, Rosenthal P, Nicholas SJ. The efficacy of manual assessment of muscle strength using a new device. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10(6): 360-364
• 21 Mense S. Nervous outflow from skeletal muscle following chemical noxious stimulation. J Physiol 1977; 267 (1): 75-88
• 22 Mense S. The pathogenesis of muscle pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2003; 7(6): 419-425
• 23 Mense S. Muscle pain: >mechanisms and clinical significance. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008; 105: 214-219
• 24 Michener LA, Boardman ND, Pidcoe PE, Frith AM. Scapular muscle tests in subjects with shoulder pain and functional loss: reliability and construct validity. Phys Ther 2005; 85(11): 1128-1138
• 25 Perot C, Meldener R, Goubel F. Objective measurement of proprioceptive technique consequences on muscular maximal voluntary contraction during manual muscle testing. Agressologie 1991; 32(10 Spec No): 471-474
• 26 Pollard H, Lakay B, Tucker F, Watson B, Bablis P. Interexaminer reliability of the deltoid and psoas muscle test. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005; 28(1): 52-56
• 27 Roy MA, Doherty TJ. Reliability of hand-held dynamometry in assessment of knee extensor strength after hip fracture. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 83 (11): 813-818
• 28 Schaefer LV, Torick AH, Matuschek H, Holschneider M, Bittmann FN. Synchronization of Muscular Oscillations Between Two Subjects During Isometric Interaction. Eur J Transl Myol 2014; 24(3): 223-7
• 29 Unger J. The effects of a pelvic blocking procedure upon muscle strength: a pilot study. Chiropractic Technique 1998; 10(4)
• 30 Wadsworth CT, Krishnan R, Sear M, Harrold J, Nielsen DH. Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynametric muscle testing. Phys Ther 1987; 67(9): 1342-1347