ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2016; 125(05): 192-197
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104310
CME-Fortbildung
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Das MARC-System – eine Innovation für die restaurative Zahnheilkunde?

K.-L. Konerding
1   Hamburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 May 2016 (online)

Lernziele

Der Leser soll nach dem Durcharbeiten des Artikels

  • die Bedeutung der klinisch korrekten Handhabung einer Polymerisationslampe bzw. Light curing unit kennen,

  • mögliche Fehlerquellen bei der Polymerisation stärker beachten und zukünftig in der klinischen Praxis berücksichtigen,

  • das zahnärztliche Praxispersonal in Bezug auf die Lichtpolymerisation vor der Behandlung korrekt einweisen und schulen können.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Cekic-Nagas I, Egilmez F, Ergun G. The effect of irradiation distance on microhardness of resin composites cured with different light curing units. Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 440-446
  • 2 Strydom C. Dental curing lights – maintenance of visible light curing units. SADJ 2002; 57: 227-133
  • 3 Price RB, Strassler HE, Price HL et al. The effectiveness of using a patient simulator to teach light-curing skills. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145: 32-43
  • 4 Price RB, Felix CM, Whalen JM. Factors affecting the energy delivered to simulated class I and class v preparations. J Can Dent Assoc 2010; 76: a94
  • 5 Price RB, McLeod ME, Felix CM. Quantifying light energy delivered to a Class I restoration. J Can Dent Assoc 2010; 76: a23
  • 6 Price RB, Derand T, Sedarous M et al. Effect of distance on the power density from two light guides. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 320-327
  • 7 Thome T, Steagall W, Tachibana A et al. Influence of the distance of the curing light source and composite shade on hardness of two composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2007; 15: 486-491
  • 8 Sigusch BW, Pflaum T, Volpel A et al. Resin-composite cytotoxicity varies with shade and irradiance. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 312-319
  • 9 Hwang IN, Hong SO, Lee BN et al. Effect of a multi-layer infection control barrier on the micro-hardness of a composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20: 576-580
  • 10 Strydom C. Curing lights – the effects of clinical factors on intensity and polymerisation. SADJ 2002; 57: 181-186
  • 11 Price RB, Watts DC, Barghi N et al. Effective use of Dental Curing Lights: A Guide for the Dental Practitioner. ZMK 2014; 4: 12
  • 12 Price RB, Labrie D, Whalen JM et al. Effect of distance on irradiance and beam homogeneity from 4 light-emitting diode curing units. J Can Dent Assoc 2011; 77: b9
  • 13 Sigusch BW, Volpel A, Braun I et al. Influence of different light curing units on the cytotoxicity of various dental composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1342-1348
  • 14 Sigusch BW, Pflaum T, Volpel A et al. The influence of various light curing units on the cytotoxicity of dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2009; 25 1446-1452
  • 15 Durner J, Obermaier J, Draenert M et al. Correlation of the degree of conversion with the amount of elutable substances in nano-hybrid dental composites. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 1146-1153
  • 16 Uhl A, Volpel A, Sigusch BW. Influence of heat from light curing units and dental composite polymerization on cells in vitro. J Dent 2006; 34: 298-306
  • 17 Kakaboura A, Tzoutzas J, Pitsinigos D et al. The effect of sterilization methods on the light transmission characteristics and structure of light-curing tips. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 918-923