CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2021; 42(02): 117
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735365
Abstract

Immunotherapy in Patients with Lung Cancer with Driver Mutations: A Single-Centre Experience

Amit Rauthan
Department of Medical Oncology, Manipal Hospitals, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Poonam Patil
Department of Medical Oncology, Manipal Hospitals, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Rajashree Aswath
Department of Medical Oncology, Manipal Hospitals, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Nitin Yashas
Department of Medical Oncology, Manipal Hospitals, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Gaurav Ningade
Department of Medical Oncology, Manipal Hospitals, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
 

Abstract

Introduction Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations. Trial data shows that programmed death-1/PDL1 blockade in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and other driver mutation positive lung cancers is not beneficial; and instead maybe detrimental. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of immune check point inhibitors in a series of patients with EGFR and other driver mutation–positive advanced NSCLC.

Objectives This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immune check point inhibitors in a series of patients with EGFR and other driver mutation–positive advanced NSCLC.

Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients which received PD1/PDL1 inhibitors for advanced NSCL between January 2017 and January 2020. Ten patients were detected to have driver mutations on either tumor tissue or blood by next-generation sequencing (NGS). PDL1 status was assessed on SP263 ventana platform.

Results Out of 10 patients, 7 were male and 3 were female. EGFR was detected in six patients (three on tumor and three in blood NGS), MET exon 14 skipping mutation in two patients, and RAS mutation in two patients on NGS in blood. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy was given in 5 (50%) patients, immunotherapy + bevacizumab + chemotherapy in two (20%) and immunotherapy alone in three patients (30%). Immunotherapy was started as first line in four patients as tumor tissue was negative for EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 by single gene testing. The remaining six patients received immunotherapy on progression in the second or subsequent lines. On NGS testing at progression, EGFR mutation was detected in one patient, MET exon 14 skip mutation was detected in two patients, and RAS mutation was detected in two patients. Immunotherapy alone was used in three patients in view of advanced age and multiple comorbidities. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months (range: 2–11 months). Two patients who received chemotherapy + bevacizumab + immunotherapy continue to do well without progression at 9 months.

Conclusion PD1/PDL1 checkpoint inhibitors seem to have a limited impact in treatment in patients with driver mutations. Molecular testing by NGS is recommended either on tumor tissue or on blood by NGS if single gene testing for EGFR/ALK/ROS1 alterations is negative. We recommend not using single agent checkpoint inhibitors in molecular driven advanced NSCLC even with high PDL1 expression. We do see benefit in patients who received PD1/PDL1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy with bevacizumab. In conclusion, in patients with molecular-driven NSCLC who progress after standard therapy can be treated with PD1/PDL1 inhibitors, but this should always be given in combination with chemotherapy and bevacizumab.


#
Table 1

Distribution of oncological problems

Age/sex

Driver mutation

Mutation detected

PDL 1

Immunotherapy given as single vs. combination

Line of immunotherapy

Initial treatment

PFS on immunotherapy

Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NGS, next-generation sequencing; NRAS, Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog; RAS, rat sarcoma virus; PDL 1, programmed death-ligand 1; PFS, progression free survival.

Chronic myeloid leukemia

1 (3.57%)

1

46/M

EGFR exon 19 del

Tumor tissue

0%

Atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel + bevacizumab

Second

Osimertinib

Not yet reached at 9 months follow-up

2

54/F

EGFR l861p (uncommon mutation)

NGS on blood

0%

Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + carboplatin

Second

Chemotherapy alone

10 months

3

70/F

EGFR l747p (uncommon mutation)

NGS on tissue

90%

Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + carboplatin

First

8 months

4

70/M

EGFR fusion

NGS on blood

50%

Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + carboplatin

First

11 months

5

63/M

MET exon 14 skip mutation

NGS on blood

0%

Pembrolizumab + nabpaclitaxel + carboplatin

First

5 months

6

58/M

EGFR exon 21 mutation

Tumor tissue

0%

Nivolumab alone

Third

Erlotinib, followed by chemotherapy

4 months

7

66/M

NRAS G12D mutation

NGS on blood

0%

Atezolizumab + bevacizumab + nabpaclitaxel + carboplatin

Second

Pemetrexed + carboplatin

Not progressed at 9 months

8

68/F

RAS G12C mutation

NGS on blood

60%

Pembrolizumab + carboplatin + pemetrexed

First

4 months

9

88/M

MET exon 14 skip mutation

NGS on tumor

0%

Pembrolizumab alone

First

2 months

10

80/M

EGFR exon 20 uncommon mutation

Tumor tissue

0%

Nivolumab alone

Fourth

Chemotherapy followed by afatinib

3 months


#

Address for correspondence

Prathyush Vundemodalu, MBBS, MD
Department of Medical Oncology
Manipal Hospitals, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560038
India   

Publication History

Article published online:
13 August 2021

© 2021. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India