Introduction
Several novel systemic cancer therapies have evolved in the last two decades. Oncology
drug development has moved from “cytotoxic” agents to “targeted” drugs. More recently,
immune modulation by drugs or cellular therapies has been added to anti-cancer armamentarium.[1] Advances in basic cancer biology have aided these developments. However, we are
far from achieving “cure” or “control” of most advanced cancers. There is a constant
need to innovate and develop therapies to “outwit” the ever-mutating cancer cell.
Canonical drug development models are painstakingly slow and very expensive and hence
there is need to look for alternative options. It is in this space that drug repurposing
fits whereby an existing drug (used for other nononcological indications) is used
for treating tumors by virtue of its action on some of the “targets” presented by
cancer. The increased understanding of the hallmarks of cancer and the development
of various data-driven approaches have facilitated the science of drug repurposing
in oncology.[2]
Traditional Drug Development Models
Traditional Drug Development Models
Potential compounds (with known or presumed anti-cancer properties) are identified
(from nature/ microbes) and first evaluated in preclinical cellular/tissue culture
models. These are then tested in animal models to understand the kinetics and dynamics
and anticancer properties. Once the preclinical studies are successful, the drug must
be formulated for human use and undergoes phase I testing for dose finding. This is
followed by larger phase II and phase III clinical trials. Similar sequence of development
is used for “targeted” drugs and immunotherapy drugs. However, this model requires
10 to 15 years from identification of a compound to final approval. It also requires
considerable investment of resources, ultimately reflected in the exorbitant cost
of newer molecules.[3] Many potential agents, which look promising in the laboratory or even in animal
models, fail in the clinic.
The Drug Repurposing Model: Advantages Over the Traditional Models
The Drug Repurposing Model: Advantages Over the Traditional Models
“Drug repositioning” or “drug repurposing” is a model in which new targets and/or
disease indications are identified for medicines that have already been approved (for
other indications than cancer; [Fig. 1]). These drugs have well-established pharmacological and safety profiles.[4] Thus, we can proceed directly to testing the efficacy. Money and time are saved
by skipping/shortening “dose-finding” and “toxicity-finding” studies. Since it is
a marketed product, the drug is often ‘out-of-patent’ and multiple generics are available.
Thus, the molecule would be inexpensive. For the reasons mentioned above, considerable
interest has been kindled in repurposing agents to treat cancer.[5] Collaborations such as “repurposing drugs in oncology” project have been initiated
by several researchers seeking to repurpose well-known noncancer drugs for use in
oncology.[6]
Fig. 1 Flow diagram showing the process of drug development comparing the traditional model
with the repurposing-based approach. Since the repurposed drugs have preliminary data
on human usage, basic pharmacology and toxicology studies in animal models can be
often omitted. Similarly, dose-finding studies (phase 1) in humans can be omitted
or fast-tracked with fewer dose levels. if found efficacious, physicians can use these
molecules directly in the clinic without cumbersome regulatory processes
It has been estimated that repurposing can reduce the time duration for drug development
from a 13 to 17 years to 3 to 7 years or lesser.[7] The repositioned drugs are already approved, and their safety, toxicology, and bioavailability
profiles are well known. These can enter clinical trial stages much faster, giving
it accelerated developmental advantage over a nonrepositioned drug. The relaunch of
a repositioned drug versus a new drug saves millions of dollars for a company.[4]
Effects of Repurposed Agents in Cancer: The “On-Target” and the “Off-Target” Models
Effects of Repurposed Agents in Cancer: The “On-Target” and the “Off-Target” Models
The target of a repurposed agent can be a gene, a protein, an enzyme, or a chemical
in the body/ tumor.[8] In the “on-target” approach, the repurposed agent's use is based on its stated mechanism
of action. A classic example would be aspirin, whose primary mechanism is cyclooxygenase-2
(COX-2) inhibition. When aspirin is used in oncology, we are still trying to exploit
its effect on COX-2 that results in anticancer effects. In the “off-target” approach,
the “other” effects of a molecule that occur in addition to its primary action are
exploited for anticancer efficacy. For example, valproic acid, a common antiepileptic,
has primary action on voltage-gated ion channels in the nervous system. However, it
has “other” actions such as inhibition of the histone deacetylases that has prompted
studies of repurposing this agent in multiple cancers.[9] In some cases, the “off-target” effect may be realized from the side effects caused
by the drug ([Table 1]). A few examples of drugs that were successfully repurposed are detailed below.
Table 1
Drug repurposing in oncology—”On-target” and “Off-target” agents
|
Drug
|
Mechanism
|
Primary use
|
“Target” in oncology
|
Cancer types studied
|
Status
|
|
Abbreviations: TGF-β, Transforming growth factor beta; AMPK, adenosine monophosphate–activated
protein kinase; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; CRC, colorectal cancer; EGFR, epidermal growth
factor receptor; ERK, extracellular-regulated kinase; HMG Co-A, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl
coenzyme A; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; TNBC,
triple negative breast cancer; VDR, vitamin D receptor.
|
|
“On-target” agents
|
|
Aspirin[21]
|
COX-2 inhibition
|
Analgesic, antiplatelet
|
COX-2
|
Colon, esophagus ovary
|
Strong evidence for primary and secondary prevention in colorectal cancers
|
|
Statins[22]
|
HMG Co-A reductase
|
Lipid-lowering
|
HMG Co-A reductase→ mevalonate pathway
|
Ovary, colon, breast
|
In trials
|
|
Metformin[23]
|
Multiple
|
Type 2 diabetes
|
AMPK pathway leading to downregulation of mTOR and depletion of p70. Cell cycle inhibition
through COX-2
|
Ovary, prostate, breast, colon
|
In trials
|
|
Mebendazole[24]
|
Inhibit the synthesis of microtubules via binding to colchicine binding site of β-tubulin
|
Antihelminthic
|
Colchicine-binding domain of tubulin →inhibition of tubulin polymerization.
|
Medulloblastoma, glioma, and astrocytoma
|
Phase II trial showed benefit in gliomas
|
|
Vitamin D[25]
|
Regulation of gene expression by direct binding to VDR genes
|
Rickets and osteomalacia
|
Binding to VDR genes→ activation of tumor suppressor genes
|
Breast, ovary, lymphomas
|
In trials
|
|
Propranolol[6]
|
Inhibition of β-adrenergic receptor
|
Hypertension
|
Inhibit oncogenic changes by blocking the β-receptors
|
Angiosarcomas
|
In trials
|
|
Losartan[6]
|
Blocks the binding of angiotensin II to the angiotensin I (AT1) receptor
|
Hypertension
|
Inhibition of the TGF-β pathway and reduce the extracellular matrix that hinders drug
delivery and efficacy
|
Pancreatic, malignant ascites, ovary
|
In trials
|
|
“Off-target” agents
|
|
Itraconazole[26]
|
Inhibition of fungal cytochrome P-450-dependent enzyme lanosterol 14-α-demethylase
|
Antifungal
|
Hedgehog signaling pathway, angiogenesis, and autophagy and reversal of multidrug
resistance
|
Ovary, prostate, lung
|
In trials
|
|
Niclosamide[27]
|
Inhibit synthesis of microtubules via binding to colchicine binding site of β-tubulin
|
Antihelminthic
|
Inactivation of MEK1/2-ERK1/2 mediated signal transduction →increased apoptosis
|
Colorectal cancer and prostate cancer
|
In trials
|
|
Chloroquine hydroxychloroquine[28]
|
Inhibition of antigen presentation of the cell, reducing the inflammatory response
|
Antimalarial connective tissue disorders
|
Autophagy inhibition
|
Ovary, pancreas, breast, lung, chondrosarcoma
|
In trials
|
|
Ivermectin[29]
|
The influx of Cl− ions
|
Anthelmintic
|
EGFR/ERK/Akt/NF-κB pathway→ downregulating the expression of P-gp
|
TNBC, CRC, lung, and ovarian cancers
|
In trials
|
|
Target unknown
|
|
Thalidomide[30]
|
Unknown
|
Antiemetic, sedative
|
Possible antiangiogenic effects, immunomodulation
|
Multiple myeloma
|
Approved
|
Selected Examples of Successful Repurposing in Oncology
Selected Examples of Successful Repurposing in Oncology
Thalidomide in Multiple Myeloma: (“Off-target”)
Thalidomide was initially developed as an agent against morning sickness in pregnant
women in the 1960s and 1970s.[10] After initial notoriety due to teratogenic effects, the molecule was shelved for
over two decades until it was successfully repurposed in the 1990s as an essential
agent against multiple myeloma based on its antiangiogenic and immune-modulatory properties.[11]
[12]
Olanzapine for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV):
(“On-target”)
Olanzapine was developed as an atypical antipsychotic. However, recognition of its
effects on multiple dopaminergic pathways in the nervous system, which are also involved
in emesis pathways, prompted clinical trials to treat and prevent chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting (CINV).[13] Currently, it is considered a standard agent when using highly emetogenic chemotherapy.[14]
Celecoxib in Oral Metronomic Therapy of Cancer (“on-target”)
Celecoxib is a selective inhibitor of COX-2 and was initially developed as a nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory agent.[15] Recent studies from India have successfully demonstrated its use in phase III studies
as a component of oral metronomic therapies for advanced cancer.[16]
[17]
Approaches in Drug Repurposing
Approaches in Drug Repurposing
Various computational approaches can be used to analyze large-scale data to generate
hypotheses for repurposing opportunities. These strategies have been summarized in
[Fig. 1] and have been reviewed extensively elsewhere.[3] Drugs being studied for repurposing often have extensive human usage experience.
These retrospective databases help us to understand the type of cancer and target
population where these agents might be helpful. For example, data regarding reduced
relapses of colorectal cancers among patients taking aspirin for cardiovascular conditions
prompted the repurposing of this agent in prevention of cancers.[4] Similarly, molecular docking studies using in silico approaches have been used to
model the structural association between a potential cancer target and a candidate
drug molecule.[3]
In the clinical testing phase, time-consuming phase I studies can be avoided as data
are available regarding these drugs' maximum tolerated doses, toxicity, and kinetics.
The required dosing as an anticancer agent can be assumed from this previous data.
However, small phase I studies may still be conducted with repurposed agents to identify
the correct dose, especially when the agent is planned to be used in combination with
other drugs.
Indian regulatory guidelines specify that “new indication for old drug” studies must
get approval from Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). However, as
per the new drug and clinical trial rules (2019) “non-regulatory” studies need not
obtain specific approval from CDSCO.[18] Investigator-initiated “academic” studies with repurposed drugs can be approved
by the local institutional ethics committee. This is the right step that significantly
eases the conduct of studies with repurposed agents.
Applying the Data from Repurposing Studies to Practice
Applying the Data from Repurposing Studies to Practice
Once a repurposed agent is found to be useful in phase III studies, it may be directly
used by clinicians as an “off-label” indication in oncology. One example is the widespread
use of olanzapine for CINV. There is extensive data, but no “regulatory” approval
of olanzapine to prevent CINV.
However, if a pharmaceutical company desires to obtain regulatory approval for the
new indication, it may need to conduct additional studies with the label of a “regulatory”
trial. The more stringent rules of pharmaceutical-sponsored trials would apply. There
may be a need to establish a dose–response relationship for the new indication.[19] The license for a further indication might depend not only on the regulatory evidence
such as quality, efficacy, and safety but also on assessment comparing the clinical
efficacy versus cost-effectiveness.[20]
Drug Repurposing: Caveats
Drug Repurposing: Caveats
Repurposed drugs are rarely effective as monotherapies. Combination studies must be
appropriately designed to identify the correct dose and scheduling of agents.[5] Thus, phase I studies cannot be always eliminated. The anticancer doses may be higher
than that which is used in usual practice for other indications resulting in unexpected
toxicities. Funding is still required to conduct these types of studies and must be
sought through various agencies by the investigator. The pharmaceutical industry may
not be keen to invest in these studies.[3]
Conclusion
The development of new anticancer drugs is expensive and has a low success rate. The
drug repurposing approach offers advantages of faster development, lesser cost, and
broader application. Though many studies with repurposed agents in cancer are going
on, the number of drugs that have found clinical application are few ([Table 1]). Newer approaches using genetic association and molecular docking may help to speed
up the process of repurposing.
