RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732438
The Impact of Neurocognitive Skills on Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Sentences
Authors
Funding Development of measures used in this work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) Career Development Award 5K23DC015539-02 to A.C.M.

Abstract
Background Recent models theorize that neurocognitive resources are deployed differently during speech recognition depending on task demands, such as the severity of degradation of the signal or modality (auditory vs. audiovisual [AV]). This concept is particularly relevant to the adult cochlear implant (CI) population, considering the large amount of variability among CI users in their spectro-temporal processing abilities. However, disentangling the effects of individual differences in spectro-temporal processing and neurocognitive skills on speech recognition in clinical populations of adult CI users is challenging. Thus, this study investigated the relationship between neurocognitive functions and recognition of spectrally degraded speech in a group of young adult normal-hearing (NH) listeners.
Purpose The aim of this study was to manipulate the degree of spectral degradation and modality of speech presented to young adult NH listeners to determine whether deployment of neurocognitive skills would be affected.
Research Design Correlational study design.
Study Sample Twenty-one NH college students.
Data Collection and Analysis Participants listened to sentences in three spectral-degradation conditions: no degradation (clear sentences); moderate degradation (8-channel noise-vocoded); and high degradation (4-channel noise-vocoded). Thirty sentences were presented in an auditory-only (A-only) modality and an AV fashion. Visual assessments from The National Institute of Health Toolbox Cognitive Battery were completed to evaluate working memory, inhibition-concentration, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed. Analyses of variance compared speech recognition performance among spectral degradation condition and modality. Bivariate correlation analyses were performed among speech recognition performance and the neurocognitive skills in the various test conditions.
Results Main effects on sentence recognition were found for degree of degradation (p = < 0.001) and modality (p = < 0.001). Inhibition-concentration skills moderately correlated (r = 0.45, p = 0.02) with recognition scores for sentences that were moderately degraded in the A-only condition. No correlations were found among neurocognitive scores and AV speech recognition scores.
Conclusions Inhibition-concentration skills are deployed differentially during sentence recognition, depending on the level of signal degradation. Additional studies will be required to study these relations in actual clinical populations such as adult CI users.
Keywords
audiovisual speech - cochlear implant - neurocognitive function - vocoded speech recognitionNote
Data from this manuscript were presented at The 47th Annual Scientific and Technology Conference of the American Auditory Society; March 5-7, 2020, Scottsdale, AZ. Research reported in this paper received IRB approval from The Ohio State University.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 03. Februar 2021
Angenommen: 25. Mai 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. Dezember 2021
© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Bodmer D, Shipp DB, Ostroff JM. et al. A comparison of postcochlear implantation speech scores in an adult population. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (08) 1408-1411
- 2 Lenarz M, Sönmez H, Joseph G, Büchner A, Lenarz T. Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (01) 112-118
- 3 Fitzpatrick DC, Campbell AP, Choudhury B. et al. Round window electrocochleography just before cochlear implantation: relationship to word recognition outcomes in adults. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35 (01) 64-71
- 4 Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Pfingst BE. Assessing the relationship between the electrically evoked compound action potential and speech recognition abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear 2018; 39 (02) 344-358
- 5 Svirsky MA, Fitzgerald MB, Sagi E, Glassman EK. Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: implications for the study of auditory plasticity. Acta Otolaryngol 2015; 135 (04) 354-363
- 6 DeVries L, Scheperle R, Bierer JA. Assessing the electrode-neuron interface with the electrically evoked compound action potential, electrode position, and behavioral thresholds. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2016; 17 (03) 237-252
- 7 Lawler M, Yu J, Aronoff JM. Comparison of the spectral-temporally modulated ripple test with the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2017; 38 (06) 760-766
- 8 Won JH, Drennan WR, Nie K, Jameyson EM, Rubinstein JT. Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 130 (01) 376-388
- 9 Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102 (12) 909-916
- 10 Moberly AC, Houston DM, Castellanos I. Non-auditory neurocognitive skills contribute to speech recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2016; 1 (06) 154-162
- 11 Moberly AC, Pisoni DB, Harris MS. Visual working memory span in adults with cochlear implants: Some preliminary findings. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 3 (04) 224-230
- 12 Moberly AC, Reed J. Making sense of sentences: top-down processing of speech by adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2019; 62 (08) 2895-2905
- 13 Tao D, Deng R, Jiang Y, Galvin III JJ, Fu QJ, Chen B. Contribution of auditory working memory to speech understanding in mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users. PLoS One 2014; 9 (06) e99096
- 14 Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA. et al. Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear Hear 2016; 37 (Suppl. 01) 5S-27S
- 15
Rönnberg J,
Lunner T,
Zekveld A.
et al.
The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical
advances. Front Syst Neurosci 2013; 7: 31
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 16 Peterson GE, Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962; 27 (01) 62-70
- 17 Holden LK, Firszt JB, Reeder RM, Uchanski RM, Dwyer NY, Holden TA. Factors affecting outcomes in cochlear implant recipients implanted with a perimodiolar electrode array located in scala tympani. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (10) 1662-1668
- 18 Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995; 270 (5234): 303-304
- 19 Akeroyd MA. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol 2008; 47 (Suppl. 02) S53-S71
- 20
Baddeley A.
Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4 (10) 829-839
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 21 Rönnberg J. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model. Int J Audiol 2003; 42 (Suppl. 01) S68-S76
- 22 Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Foo C, Lunner T. Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). Int J Audiol 2008; 47 (Suppl. 02) S99-S105
- 23 Kahneman D. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.; 1973
- 24 Bosen AK, Barry MF. Serial recall predicts vocoded sentence recognition across spectral resolutions. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2020; 63 (04) 1282-1298
- 25 Shader MJ, Yancey CM, Gordon-Salant S, Goupell MJ. Spectral-temporal trade-off in vocoded sentence recognition: effects of age, hearing thresholds, and working memory. Ear Hear 2020; 41 (05) 1226-1235
- 26 Ward CM, Rogers CS, Van Engen KJ, Peelle JE. Effects of Age, Acoustic challenge, and verbal working memory on recall of narrative speech. Exp Aging Res 2016; 42 (01) 97-111
- 27 Gershon RC, Cella D, Fox NA, Havlik RJ, Hendrie HC, Wagster MV. Assessment of neurological and behavioural function: the NIH Toolbox. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9 (02) 138-139
- 28 Binnie CA, Montgomery AA, Jackson PL. Auditory and visual contributions to the perception of consonants. J Speech Hear Res 1974; 17 (04) 619-630
- 29 Dodd B. The role of vision in the perception of speech. Perception 1977; 6 (01) 31-40
- 30 Easton RD, Basala M. Perceptual dominance during lipreading. Percept Psychophys 1982; 32 (06) 562-570
- 31 Erber NP. Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res 1972; 15 (02) 413-422
- 32 Walden BE, Busacco DA, Montgomery AA. Benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition by middle-aged and elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36 (02) 431-436
- 33 Sommers MS, Phelps D. Listening effort in younger and older adults: a comparison of auditory-only and auditory-visual presentations. Ear Hear 2016; 37 (Suppl. 01) 62S-68S
- 34 Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 1982; 3 (03) 128-134
- 35 Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ. Wide Range Achievement Test. 4th edition. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2006
- 36
Kirk K,
Prusick L,
French B.
et al.
Evaluating multimodal speech perception in adults with cochlear implants and hearing
aids. . Paper presented at the 12th Conference on Cochlear Implant and Other Implantable
Auditory Technology; 2012; Baltimore
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 37 Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110 (02) 1150-1163
- 38 Moberly AC, Vasil KJ, Wucinich TL. et al. How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech?. Laryngoscope 2018; 128 (Suppl. 05) 40-52
- 39 Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognit Psychol 2000; 41 (01) 49-100
- 40 Verbruggen F, Liefooghe B, Vandierendonck A. The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2004; 116 (01) 21-37