Preoperative Prediction of Gartland IV Supracondylar Fractures of Humerus: Is it Possible?^[*]

Abstract

Objectives The present study aims to identify preoperative characteristics of the patient, of the injury, as well as of imaging, which would point towards a type IV fracture. The present study shall help the operating team to predict more accurately the type IV pattern preoperatively, leading to improved counselling of the caregivers, planning of surgery, as well as preparedness regarding open reduction, if such situation arises.

Methods A retrospective study was conducted, including patients that met the following criteria: 1) age < 16 years old; 2) Gartland type-III and type-IV supracondylar fractures; and 3) with complete records. Demographic data like age, gender, laterality, mode of injury, hospital duration of the injury, history of previous attempts of closed reduction, open/closed fracture, distal neurovascular status, and radiographic data like angulation, translation, osseous apposition and fracture comminution were collected.

Results Hospital duration of the injury and previous attempts of closed reduction were the factors that had a statistically significant difference among types III and IV fractures (p < 0.05). A diagnosis of type IV supracondylar fractures was significantly more likely in the presence of valgus angulation of the distal fragment ≥ 17° (odds ratio [OR] = 20.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.45–118.65). Flexion angulation ≥ 10° (OR = 5.32; 95% CI = 0.24–119.88) of the distal fragment predicted Gartland type IV with a sensitivity of 41% and a specificity of 100%.

Conclusion The preoperative evaluation of suspected Gartland IV fractures can help the operating surgeon in predicting such injuries. Nonradiographic factors like increased hospital duration of the injury, attempts at previously closed reduction, and radiographic parameters like valgus and flexion angulation were more likely to be associated with type IV fractures. Level of evidence III.

Keywords

humeral fractures - child - elbow joint - fracture fixation

Introduction

Supracondylar fractures are one of the common fractures around the pediatric elbow. They comprise about two-thirds of all pediatric trauma around the elbow requiring hospitalization, with an estimated incidence of 177.3 per 100000 children.[1] It is commonly noted in boys in the age range between 5 and 8 years old, with the nondominant arm being commonly involved.[2] The most frequently used system to classify these fractures is the Gartland classification, which has a good interobserver and intraobserver concordance.[3] Leitch introduced a type IV to the Gartland classification, in which the anterior and posterior periosteum are completely torn off, leading to instability both in flexion and extension.[4] These types of fractures are assumed to be diagnosable only intraoperatively.[1] [5]

Although closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) is the common modality of treatment for both type III and IV Gartland fractures, reduction in type IV cases may be difficult due to the inherent multidirectional instability. Type IV fractures may need more commonly an open reduction and percutaneous pinning (ORPP) when compared with type III fractures.[5] There is scant literature regarding the diagnosis and optimum treatment of type IV fractures. The present study aims to identify preoperative characteristics of the patient, of the injury, as well as of imaging that would point towards a type IV fracture. The present study shall help the operating team to predict more accurately the type IV pattern preoperatively, leading to improved counselling of the caregivers, planning of surgery, as well as preparedness regarding open reduction, if such situation arises.

Material and Methods

After obtaining institutional ethics committee approval for a retrospective observational study, the patient database for cases that presented to the orthopedics department for the treatment of supracondylar fractures was acquired from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients who were included in the study met the following criteria: 1) age < 16 years old; 2) Gartland type-III and type-IV supracondylar fractures; and 3) with complete records. Patients with 1) another concomitant injury in the same limb; 2) history of previous elbow trauma; 3) suspected skeletal dysplasia; and 4) incomplete records were excluded from the study.

Age, gender, laterality, mode of injury, injury hospital duration, history of previous attempts of closed reduction, open/closed fracture, and distal neurovascular status were determined by reviewing the medical records.

Preoperative radiographs were evaluated to assess the following parameters: 1) angulation of the distal fragment in the sagittal plane; 2) angulation of the distal fragment in the coronal plane ([Fig. 1]); 3) translation of the distal fragment in the coronal plane; 4) translation of the distal fragment in the sagittal plane ([Fig. 2]); 5) osseous apposition between the proximal and distal fragments on the anteroposterior plane; 6) osseous apposition between the proximal and distal fragments on lateral radiographs ([Fig. 2]); and 7) fracture comminution. Operative notes were scrutinized to determine the Gartland type of supracondylar fractures.

Fig. 1 (i, ii). Depiction of angulation in the coronal (i) and sagittal planes (ii) by lines along the mid diaphysis of the proximal fragment and a line perpendicular to the elbow joint in the distal fragment.

Fig. 2 (i, ii). Depiction of translation and osseous apposition in the coronal (i) and sagittal planes (ii). Translation = a / c. Osseous apposition = b / c.

Data were analyzed using chi-squared tests or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and the sample t-test for continuous variables. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated and reported with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ROC curves were exploited for comparison of the diagnostic performance of various radiographic parameters in predicting Gartland type-IV fractures. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Thirty-three patients (25 males, 8 females) who met the study criteria were included in the present study, with a mean age of 8.7 ± 3.1 years old ([Table 1]). Injuries during sports practice and resulting from fall from height were the most common modes of injury. The fracture was closed in 96.9% (n = 32) of the cases. Among the patients included in the present study, 16 were Gartland III, and 17 were Gartland type IV.

Table 1

Parameters	Gartland Type		p-value
	Type 3 (n = 16)	Type 4 (n = 17)
Age (years old)	8.62 ± 2.60	8.88 ± 3.69	0.818a
Gender			1.000b
Male	12 (75.0%)	13 (76.5%)
Female	4 (25.0%)	4 (23.5%)
Mode of Injury			0.071b
Fall from height	9 (56.2%)	6 (35.3%)
Injury While practicing sports	5 (31.2%)	11 (64.7%)
Road traffic accident	2 (12.5%)	0 (0.0%)
Injury-Hospital Interval (hours)[***]	31.25 ± 43.09	52.59 ± 45.47	0.029 c
Laterality			0.392d
Right	9 (56.2%)	12 (70.6%)
Left	7 (43.8%)	5 (29.4%)
Previous Attempts at Closed Reduction (present)[***]	4 (25.0%)	11 (64.7%)	0.022 d
Type of Fracture			0.485b
Closed	15 (93.8%)	17 (100.0%)
Open	1 (6.2%)	0 (0.0%)
DNVS			0.335b
Intact	13 (81.2%)	16 (94.1%)
Involved	3 (18.8%)	1 (5.9%)

Injury hospital duration and previous attempts of closed reduction were the factors having a statistically significant difference among types III and IV fractures ([Table 1]). The mean injury hospital duration in type-III supracondylar fracture was 31.25 ± 43.09 hours, whereas in type-IV it was 52.59 ± 45.47 hours. A history of previous attempts of closed reduction was present in 11 patients (64.7%) with type IV supracondylar fractures, whereas it was present in 4 (25%) patients with type III fractures. Other demographic factors like age, gender, laterality, open/closed fracture, and distal neurovascular status were not statistically significant in differentiating types III and IV fractures.

A total of 33 preoperative radiographs were analyzed, and a diagnosis of type IV supracondylar fractures was significantly more likely in the presence of valgus angulation of distal fragment ≥ 17° (OR = 20.22; 95%CI = 3.45–118.65), with a sensitivity of 88%, and a specificity of 81% ([Table 2], [Fig. 3]). Flexion angulation ≥ 10° (OR = 5.32; 95%CI = 0.24–119.88) of the distal fragment predicted Gartland type IV with a sensitivity of 41% and a specificity of 100%. There was no significant association with fracture comminution, translation of the distal fragment over the proximal fragment in both planes and osseous apposition between the fracture fragments in both planes in predicting type IV supracondylar fractures on preoperative radiographs ([Table 2], [Fig. 3]).

Table 2

Predictor	Odds ratio (95% CI)	AUROC (95% CI)	p-value	Sn	Sp	PPV	NPV
Angulation (sagittal plane) (degrees of extension)	5.32 (0.24–119.88)	0.557 (0.343–0.771)	0.587	41%	100%	100%	62%
Angulation (coronal plane) (degrees of valgus)	20.22 (3.45–118.65)	0.868 (0.741–0.994)	< 0.001	88%	81%	83%	87%
Translation (coronal plane) (%)	0.94 (0.02–50.32)	0.557 (0.344–0.77)	0.588	71%	69%	71%	69%
Translation (sagittal plane) (%)	3.14 (0.75–13.16)	0.515 (0.316–0.714)	0.897	41%	69%	58%	52%
Osseous apposition (%)	3.14 (0.75–13.16)	0.557 (0.344–0.77)	0.588	71%	69%	71%	69%
Osseous apposition (Lateral) (%)	0.94 (0.02–50.32)	0.515 (0.316–0.714)	0.897	41%	69%	58%	52%

Fig. 3 ROC curve analysis of various parameters in predicting Gartland type 4 versus Gartland type 3.

Discussion

The multidirectionally unstable type of supracondylar fracture was first described by Leitch in 2006.[4] These fractures do not have any periosteal hinge, and the distal fragment is unstable in both flexion and extension. This type of fracture was renamed as Gartland type IV by the authors. The incidence of these fractures varies from 7 to 10% of all operated supracondylar fractures.[4] From the pool of unstable operated fractures included in the present study, ∼ 50% (n = 17) were of type IV. The diagnosis of this type of fracture is possible intraoperatively, and the intrarater and inter-rater reliabilities remain undetermined. This instability may also be exaggerated during reduction attempts, and it further confounds the actual rate of occurrence.[4] Ultimately, the diagnosis of type IV fracture is extremely subjective and depends on the operating surgeon.

The present study noted a significant difference in injury hospital duration and previous attempts of closed reduction in predicting type IV fracture from type III fracture. The mean injury hospital duration in type-III supracondylar fracture was 31.25 ± 43.09 hours, whereas in type-IV it was 52.59 ± 45.47 hours. A history of previous attempts of closed reduction was present in 11 patients (64.7%) with type IV supracondylar fractures, whereas it was present in 4 (25%) patients with type III fractures. Neurovascular injuries are not uncommon in type IV fractures, and their incidence varies ∼ between 0 and 36%.[4] [6] The present study had a single patient with type IV fracture with neurovascular injury. Other demographic factors such as age, gender, laterality, open/closed fracture, and distal neurovascular status were not statistically significant in differentiating types III and IV fractures.

The present study tried to identify preoperative radiographic parameters that would be more likely to be associated with type IV fractures. The most statistically significant factor was valgus angulation of the distal fragment (sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 81%). From the ROC curve, a valgus angulation ≥ 17° is more likely to be a type IV fracture. Flexion angulation of the distal fragment, though not statistically significant (p < 0.05), had a specificity of 100%. A flexion angulation of ≥ 10° is more likely to be a type IV fracture. Mitchell et al., in their study, had determined various preoperative radiological parameters in predicting type IV fractures.[5] A significant overlap between type IV fractures and the flexion type of supracondylar fractures was noted in the study. It also noted valgus angulation, lateral translation, and osseous apposition as other factors in predicting type IV fractures. The present study could find only valgus angulation as statistically significant. Other factors, such as lateral translation and osseous apposition, were not found to be statistically significant.

The limitations of the present study are its retrospective nature and its sample size. Another inherent limitation of the present study is the lack of a gold standard diagnostic test in diagnosing type IV fractures. Multivariate regression analysis could not be performed due to the sample size. Another important limitation of the present study is that not all cases were operated by the attending pediatric orthopedic surgeon, but by pediatric orthopedic fellows. This factor might have an influence on the classification of the fracture. The strength of the present study is that it is one of the few studies determining predictive factors for type IV fractures. The present study is also the first study to employ ROC curves to determine a cutoff value for types III and IV fractures. Radiographic parameters were determined by two experienced observers (Singh G. and Singh V.), increasing the generalizability compared with a single observer approach.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study found several preoperative factors associated with Gartland type IV fractures. Nonradiographic factors such as increased hospital injury duration, previous attempts at closed reduction, and radiographic parameters such as valgus and flexion angulation were more likely to be associated with type IV fractures.

Conflito de Interesses

Os autores não têm conflito de interesses a declarar.

^* Work developed at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

• Referências

• 1 Vaquero-Picado A, González-Morán G, Moraleda L. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3 (10) 526-540
• 2 Cheng JC, Lam TP, Maffulli N. Epidemiological features of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in Chinese children. J Pediatr Orthop B 2001; 10 (01) 63-67
• 3 Barton KL, Kaminsky CK, Green DW, Shean CJ, Kautz SM, Skaggs DL. Reliability of a modified Gartland classification of supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21 (01) 27-30
• 4 Leitch KK, Kay RM, Femino JD, Tolo VT, Storer SK, Skaggs DL. Treatment of multidirectionally unstable supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A modified Gartland type-IV fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (05) 980-985
• 5 Mitchell SL, Sullivan BT, Ho CA, Abzug JM, Raad M, Sponseller PD. Pediatric Gartland Type-IV Supracondylar Humeral Fractures Have Substantial Overlap with Flexion-Type Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (15) 1351-1356
• 6 Silva M, Cooper SD, Cha A. The Outcome of Surgical Treatment of Multidirectionally Unstable (Type IV) Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2015; 35 (06) 600-605

Publication History

Received: 28 April 2020

Accepted: 17 September 2020

Article published online:
31 March 2021