Download PDF
Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2020; 10(02): e1
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716587
Original Article

Erratum: Evaluation of Toxicity and Antiangiogenic Activity of Murraya koenigii Leaf Extracts in Zebrafish

Authors

  • Deeksha Dinesh

    1   Division of Molecular Genetics and Cancer, Nitte University Centre for Science and Education, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

  • Dechamma Pandyanda Nanjappa

    1   Division of Molecular Genetics and Cancer, Nitte University Centre for Science and Education, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

  • Nishith Babu

    1   Division of Molecular Genetics and Cancer, Nitte University Centre for Science and Education, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

  • Krithika Kalladka

    1   Division of Molecular Genetics and Cancer, Nitte University Centre for Science and Education, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

  • Gunimala Chakraborty

    1   Division of Molecular Genetics and Cancer, Nitte University Centre for Science and Education, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

  • Anirban Chakraborty

    1   Division of Molecular Genetics and Cancer, Nitte University Centre for Science and Education, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Further Information
Also available at
 
 PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Correction to:

Evaluation of Toxicity and Antiangiogenic Activity of Murraya koenigii Leaf Extracts in ZebrafishJournal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2020; 10(02): 79-85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714936

ERRATUM

The authors have brought to publisher’s attention that [Tables 1] and [2] have been set incorrectly in the above article (DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714936) published in the Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU (10(2):79–85). The correct tables appear as follows.

Table 1

Estimation of LC50 for aqueous extract

Concentration (ppm)

N = 30

Dose difference

(a)

Mean death

(b)

(a) × (b)

Note: LC50 = Maximum dose - (Σab/no. of embryos used) = 4000 −(15500/10) = 2450 ppm.

4,000

–

–

–

3,500

500

9.5

4,750

3,000

500

8

4,000

2,500

500

6

3,000

2,000

500

4.5

2,250

1,500

500

2.5

1,250

1,000

500

0.5

250

Total

15,500
Table 2

Estimation of LC50 for ethanol extract

Concentration (ppm)

N = 30

Dose difference

(a)

Mean death

(b)

(a) × (b)

Note: LC50 = Maximum dose - (Σab/no. of embryos used) = 12 − (21.5/10) = 9.85 ppm.

12

–

–

–

11

1

8

8

10

1

5

5

9

1

3.5

3.5

7

2

2.5

5

Total

21.5


Address for correspondence

Anirban Chakraborty, PhD
Division of Molecular Genetics and Cancer, Nitte University Centre for Science and Education, Nitte (Deemed to be University)
Deralakatte, Mangalore 575018, Karnataka
India   

Publication History

Article published online:
27 August 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India


  Permissions and Reprints