Keywrds
periodontal disease - corticosteroid - review
Introduction
Periodontitis, the leading cause of tooth loss in adults, is a disease that affects
the teeth supporting structures, such as periodontal tissues. Periodontal disease
results in an extension of the inflammatory process initiated by the supporting periodontal
tissue, which characterized by inflammation of the gums, presence of subgingival pathogenic
plaque, loss of clinical insertion with the presence of periodontal pocket due to
injury of the periodontal ligament, and loss of adjacent supporting bone.[1] Therefore, we understand that periodontitis is a multifactorial disease.
Patients with systemic diseases present physiologic changes triggered by the disease
mechanism or by the use of medication, which may contribute to periodontal disease
progression. Corticosteroids, for example, are potent steroidal agents that have anti-inflammatory
and immunosuppressive action due to different factors. The use of corticosteroids
stabilizes the effect on the lysosome membrane, inhibits the production of cytokines
that cause vasodilation, increases capillary permeability, inhibits the proliferation
of fibroblasts, and reduces collagen production.[2] Corticosteroids also favor osteoclastogenesis, which leads to increased bone reabsorption
and stimulation of the inflammatory process in the periodontal support structure.[3]
Since the introduction of glucocorticoids use in 1940,[4] this class of drugs has been widely prescribed for many medical disorders such as
the necessity of replacement therapy in patients with insufficiency of the adrenal
gland, in case of immunosuppressive therapy, and also for anti-inflammatory treatment.[5] The use of corticosteroids in dentistry mainly comprises the control of postoperative
edema, the management of oral lesion associated with pemphigus, pemphigoid, lichen
planus, erythema multiforme, recurrent aphthous stomatitis, among others, and allergic
reactions.[6] Systemic administration in dentistry is necessary in case of extensive trauma or
lesion with aggressive symptomatology.[6]
Chronical use of corticosteroids may lead not only to systemic disorders like immunosuppression,
suppression of adrenal, hyperglycemia, central obesity, loss of bone mineral density,
and osteoporosis,[7] but also may predispose to oropharyngeal candidiasis and alveolar bone loss.[8] The association of periodontal disease and the use of corticosteroids is unclear
in the scientific literature since periodontal diseases have slow chronic progression,
requiring longer follow-up period[9] and the reports described different methods of intraoral clinical evaluation for
diagnosis of periodontal diseases.[10]
[11]
The purpose of this review was to evaluate the association between periodontal disease
and the use of corticosteroids.
Materials and Methods
The present systematic literature review followed a predefined protocol based on the
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines.[12] This research study protocol has been registered on PROSPERO platform with the number
CRD42020164063. We performed a literature searches in MEDLINE (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/clinical), Web of Sciences (www.isiknowledge.com), SCOPUS (https://www.scopus.com/home.uri), LILACS (http://lilacs.bvsalud.org), and Cochrane (http://www.thecochranelibrary.com) databases, using the following descriptors “periodontal diseases” AND (“adrenal
cortex hormones” OR “adrenal cortex hormones” OR (“adrenal” AND “cortex” AND “hormones”)
OR “adrenal cortex hormones” OR “corticosteroid”), from May 2018 to January 2020.
We used the strategy according to Participants, Exposure, Comparisons, Outcomes and
Study Designs to develop our research question, considering P (the population using
corticosteroids), E (using corticosteroids), C (having or not having periodontal disease),
O (periodontal disease), and S (observational studies). The following inclusion criteria
were applied: cohort, case–control studies, and cross-sectional studies, without time
and language restrictions, which investigated the association of periodontal disease
and the use of corticosteroids in patients with 18 years or more. Review articles,
clinical trials, case reports, editorial letter, and experimental studies with animals
were excluded.
Two independent authors performed database searches and read the titles and abstracts
of the retrieved articles applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements
were sorted out by consensus or by a third reviewer that also validated data extraction.
Data were collected about study design, year, country, the methods used to evaluate
the presence of periodontal disease, number of patients, mean age, and comorbidities
associated with corticosteroid use. All articles analyzed through the abstracts had
their eligibility confirmed by the authors accessing the detailed reading of the full
text. When any disagreement between the reviewers occurred, they resolved it by consensus.
Results
We identified 403 articles from MEDLINE (137), Web of Sciences (32), ELSEVIER (227),
LILACS (1), and Cochrane (6) databases. We excluded 57 duplicated articles, and other
180 according to the inclusion criteria. Among the latter studies, 129 did not evaluate
the use of corticosteroids, 25 were experimental studies with animals, and 4 studies
evaluated individuals with age under 18 years. Therefore, eight articles met the inclusion
criteria of the proposed review ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 Flowchart summarizing the identification and selection of studies.
All articles included[9]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19] were organized in a table, including the two cohort studies and six cross-sectional
studies. All eight articles included were written in English. The studies were conducted
in Taiwan,[9]
[13] India,[14] Turkey,[15]
[16]
[18] Egypt,[17] and England.[19] The associated comorbidities that led to the use of corticosteroids included asthma,[9] chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),[13]
[14]
[18] rheumatoid arthritis (RA),[15]
[16]
[17] and renal transplant patients.[19] The studies included a total of 41,768 individuals with different comorbidities
who used corticosteroids and 120,818 individuals in the control groups. Studies have
similar mean ages when compared with case and control groups in each study ([Table 1]).
Table 1
Design and characteristics of included studies
Author
|
Year
|
Country
|
Study
|
Comorbidity
|
Cases
(n)
|
Controls
(n)
|
Total
(n)
|
Age of cases
(mean ± SD)
|
Age of controls
(mean ± SD)
|
Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SD, standard deviation.
|
Shen et al[9]
|
2017
|
Taiwan
|
Retrospective cohort
|
Asthma
|
19,206
|
76,824
|
96,030
|
41.5 ± 25.9
|
41.3 ± 25.7
|
Shen et al[13]
|
2015
|
Taiwan
|
Retrospective cohort
|
COPD
|
22,332
|
43,762
|
66,094
|
63.9 ± 15.9
|
62.8 ± 15.7
|
Raj et al[14]
|
2018
|
India
|
Cross-sectional
|
COPD
|
170
|
170
|
340
|
36.8 ± 7.1
|
35.8 ± 7.3
|
Biyikoğlu et al[16]
|
2006
|
Turkey
|
Cross-sectional
|
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
23
|
17
|
40
|
52.6 ± 9.9
|
40.6 ± 6.7
|
Abou-Raya et al[17]
|
2005
|
Egypt
|
Cross-sectional
|
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
50
|
50
|
100
|
48.0 ± 10.8
|
49.4 ± 10.5
|
Kömerik et al[18]
|
2005
|
Turkey
|
Cross-sectional
|
COPD
|
30
|
30
|
60
|
65.9 ± 11.0
|
66.2 ± 8.4
|
Sutton et al[19]
|
1983
|
England
|
Cross-sectional
|
Kidney transplant
|
102
|
111
|
213
|
38.7 ± 1.16
|
36.2 ± 1.4
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
41,938
|
120,988
|
162,926
|
|
|
Cohort studies by Shen et al[9] and Shen et al[13] reported that individuals with asthma and COPD had higher incidence of periodontal
disease when compared with the control group ([Table 2]). The incidence of periodontal diseases was 1.18-fold greater (95% confidence interval
[CI]: 1.14–1.22) in the asthma group than in the control group (38.6 vs. 32.5 per
1,000 person-years, respectively), adjusting for sex, age, income, and comorbidities.[9] Among asthmatic patients, individuals treated with inhaled corticosteroids presented
a greater risk of periodontal diseases compared with noncorticosteroid users (adjusted
hazard ratios of 1.12 [95% CI: 1.03–1.23]). Individuals with COPD presented an incidence
of periodontal disease 1.20-fold greater than in the comparison control group (32.2
vs. 26.4 per 1,000 person-years; (95% CI: 1.15–1.24).[13] Individuals who received corticosteroids as treatment, inhaled corticosteroids (hazard
ratio [HR]: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.11–1.34) or systemic corticosteroids (HR: 1.15, 95% CI:
1.07–1.23), showed a higher risk of periodontal diseases when compared with patients
that did not receive treatment with corticosteroids.[13]
Table 2
Incidence of periodontal disease in the cohort studies
Study (y)
|
Comorbidity
|
PD among cases
(%)
|
PD among controls
(%)
|
aHR
|
95% CI
|
Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease; PD, periodontal disease.
|
Shen et al[9] (2017)
|
Asthma
|
38.6
|
32.5
|
1.18
|
1.14–1.22
|
Shen et al[13](2015)
|
COPD
|
32.2
|
26.4
|
1.20
|
1.15–1.25
|
Cross-sectional studies[14]
[19] considered the diagnosis of periodontal disease based on the mean and standard deviation
of different intraoral clinical parameters, comparing individuals with different comorbidities
who used corticosteroids and individuals in the control group ([Table 3]).
Table 3
Clinical periodontal measurements in the cross-sectional studies included
Study (y)
|
PIa
(%)
|
PIb
(%)
|
p-Value
|
PDa
(mm)
|
PDb
(mm)
|
p-Value
|
CALa
(mm)
|
CALb
(mm)
|
p-Value
|
BOPa
(%)
|
BOPb
(%)
|
p-Value
|
Abbreviations: BOP, presence of bleeding on probing; CAL, clinical attachment level;
PD, probing depth; PI, plaque index.
aCase group.
bControl group.
|
Rajel al[14] (2018)
|
1.40 ± 0.91
|
0.60 ± 0.59
|
<0.001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biyikoğlu et al[15] (2009)
|
80.0 ± 27.0
|
15.0 ± 0.0
|
<0.05
|
2.4 ± 0.6
|
1.2 ± 0.2
|
<0.05
|
2.5 ± 0.8
|
0.4 ± 0.7
|
<0.05
|
70.0 ± 52.0
|
8.5 ± 7.4
|
<0.05
|
Biyikoğlu et al[16] (2006)
|
80.0 ± 27.0
|
30.2 ± 11.5
|
<0.05
|
2.3 ± 0.5
|
1.3 ± 0.3
|
<0.05
|
2.6 ± 0.5
|
0.4 ± 0.7
|
<0.05
|
63.0 ± 29.0
|
5.3 ± 2.5
|
<0.05
|
Abou-Raya et al[17] (2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
<0.001
|
|
|
<0.001
|
|
|
<0.001
|
Kömerik et al[18] (2005)
|
1.40 ± 1.1
|
1.44 ± 1.1
|
>0.05
|
3.4 ± 0.9
|
3.2 ± 0.7
|
>0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sutton et al[19] (1983)
|
1.8 ± 0.1
|
1.70 ± 0.1
|
>0.05
|
2.5 ± 0.1
|
2.9 ± 0.1
|
>0.05
|
|
|
|
0.6 ± 0.1
|
0.5 ± 0.1
|
<0.001
|
When assessing plaque index and probing depth, the studies by Biyikoğlu et al[15] and Biyikoğlu et al[16] statistically presented higher means in the RA groups compared with the control
group, in contrast to the studies by Komerik et al[18] and Sutton and Smales et al[19] present values in which there was no statistical difference between the groups with
COPD and kidney transplant and their control groups, respectively ([Table 3]).
When assessing the clinical insertion level, we observed that in the groups with RA,[15]
[16]
[17] there was a greater loss of clinical insertion with statistical significance when
compared with the control groups. And in four studies,[15]
[16]
[17]
[19] we observed that the presence of probing bleeding was statistically higher in case
groups than in their respective control groups ([Table 3]).
We applied the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the risk of bias and quality
of the included article. The NOS comprises a maximum of nine points for the lowest
risk of bias in three domains: the selection of study groups (4 points); group comparability
(2 points); and determination of exposure and results (3 points). The NOS was chosen
to select articles that presented greater transparency in its description, those reaching
score[3] 7 were included[20] ([Table 4]).
Table 4
Evaluation of quality of included studies by Newcastle-
Study (y)
|
Selection (4)
|
Comparability (2)
|
Exposure (3)
|
Total (0–9)
|
Shen et al[9] (2017)
|
*
|
|
✫
|
|
✫ ✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
7
|
Shen et al[13] (2015)
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
|
✫ ✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
8
|
Rajet al[14] (2018)
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫ ✫
|
✫
|
|
|
7
|
Biyikoǧlu et al[15] (2009)
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫ ✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
|
8
|
Biyikoǧlu et al[16] (2006)
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫ ✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
|
8
|
Abou-Raya et al[17] (2005)
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫ ✫
|
✫
|
|
|
7
|
Kömerik et al[18] (2005)
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
✫ ✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
|
8
|
Sutton et al[19] (1983)
|
✫
|
✫
|
|
✫
|
✫ ✫
|
✫
|
✫
|
|
7
|
Discussion
We have observed that few studies evaluated the effect of corticosteroids on the development
and progression of periodontal disease. This article addresses the results of eight
articles, two cohort, and six cross-sectional studies that could present different
answers to our question.
One cohort study confirmed that asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids
had a higher risk of periodontal disease than asthmatic patients without corticosteroid
treatment.[9] Another well-conducted cohort study[13] showed that inhaled or systemic corticosteroids can have a significant effect on
the development of periodontal diseases in COPD patients.
In the studies by Biyikoğlu et al[15] and Biyikoğlu et al,[16] the coexistence of rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis affected the measurement
of clinical parameters investigated. The study by Abou-Raya et al[14] presented data indicating that patients with RA are more likely to have periodontal
disease, including more gingival bleeding, presence of dental calculus, alveolar bone
loss, when compared with patients without RA. Because periodontal disease and RA have
very similar pathologies, a better understanding of the biological processes common
to both diseases can help to find new ways to treat them with drugs that modify the
body’s response to inflammation.[14]
The study by Komerik et al[18] suggested that long-term inhaled corticosteroid treatment may impair bone metabolism,
leading to a considerable decrease in bone mineral density. However, the cross-sectional
study design presents limitation for further conclusions. In addition, it is still
difficult to establish the association between prolonged use of inhaled corticosteroids
and tooth loss or periodontal disease in COPD patients.
We also found a study in which the results showed statistically significant differences
between immunosuppressed patients and controls, using probing depth estimates. However,
the authors state that these estimates have no clinical significance due to the higher
prevalence of gingival recession in patients treated with corticosteroids.[19]
One study reported that periodontal disease severity was lower among cases compared
with controls although caries, plaque, calculus, and candida presence were higher
among the cases. It reinforces the need to focus attention on the effects of COPD
medication on the oral health status of adults and on the need to develop oral hygiene
protocols during therapy.[14]
The study by Fabbri et al[21] shows us that the treatment of periodontal disease can have a beneficial effect
on the management of SLE patients on immunosuppressive therapy and that the management
of this modifiable risk factor is highly recommended.
One study reported that corticosteroid therapy maintained over 1 to 4 years has no
influence on the development of gingival or periodontal disease in patients with multiple
sclerosis.[22]
This study has some limitations that may affect the validity of the conclusions, including
the inclusion of studies with clinical heterogeneity and the inclusion of cross-sectional
studies, which assesses oral health parameters in one moment only. To reduce the bias
of results, we only included studies that had diagnostic evidence of periodontal disease
and that all patients in the group if using corticosteroids.
Many risk factors can influence the individual’s response to the onset and progression
of periodontal disease. Since it is a multifactorial disease, the metabolism of some
systemic diseases, tooth loss, loss of the level of clinical insertion,[23]
[24] poor oral hygiene,[25] obesity, smoking,[24] genetics, immune response, stress, anxiety, and depression[26] may be responsible for making the host more susceptible to immunoinflammatory changes
in periodontal disease. Therefore, not taking into consideration, these risk factors
could have biased the results of this review.
The eight studies also differed about many methodological aspects: selection criteria
of patients in each group, the type of corticosteroid administered in therapy, the
techniques used to evaluate periodontal disease in intraoral examinations, external
variables such as school and economic level of the studied population, and data from
different countries. This heterogeneity is evidenced in the presentation of the results
of the clinical parameters analyzed in each study. Thus, it is important to conduct
further studies about a putative cause-effect relationship of corticosteroid use and
periodontal disease.
This study has some limitations as the heterogeneity of underlying diseases, and the
lack of information about comorbidities. The lack of assessment of the total daily
or cumulative dose of inhaled, oral, and/or parenteral corticosteroids use limits
our conclusions. Missing data about oral hygiene supervision and oral care in patients
using the medication also represents a limitation. Literature is scarce of studies
with representative samples and adequate methodology, which could address the epidemiological
aspects involved in the association between periodontitis and the use of corticosteroids
since both conditions present similarities in the inflammatory mechanisms. The effect
of the use of corticosteroids on oral biofilm, salivary flow, oral microbiota, and
immunoglobulins needs to be elucidated.
The present review evidenced that there are few studies with appropriate methodology
to produce sound evidence about the causal relationship between the use of corticosteroids
and periodontitis. Although the retrospective cohort studies did not establish the
strength of the association between COPD or asthma and periodontitis, they confirmed
that patients with asthma and COPD treated with corticosteroids presented higher incidence
of periodontal disease compared with individuals treated with other drugs. Dental
staff must be aware of this association for better management of periodontal disease
therapy in patients using corticosteroids, either inhaled or oral.