Keywords
oromandibular defect - fibular free flap - chimeric flap - functional head and neck
reconstruction - dynamic reconstruction
An extensive oromandibular defect after oral cavity cancer resection is one of the
most challenging aspects of head and neck reconstruction. The current advances in
microsurgical free flaps have enabled the use of double free flaps for covering extensive
defects. The concept is that each defect can be matched with each selected flap; thus,
some surgeons use dual free flaps as their preferred method.[1]
[2]
In spite of the relatively successful outcomes, we think that this concept aims at
anatomical restoration. Given the fact that the tongue is one of the most dynamic
structures in our body, simple coverage of the tongue and mandible defects cannot
guarantee the patient's postoperative quality of life. We realize that we have been
missing an important part of functional impairment when treating intraoperative defects.
The defect involves a mandibular bony defect and soft tissues such as the oral mucosa
or tongue/base of the tongue, and commonly involves various submental muscles related
to tongue function.
Feeding and speech are the most concerning functions in head and neck reconstruction.
In our experience, tongue movement is commonly restricted after mandible reconstruction
with a fibular free flap in which the submental muscles related to the tongue movement
are resected. Tongue movement is controlled by the extrinsic/intrinsic muscles of
the tongue.[3] In the jaw-hyoid-tongue complex, hyoid movement is linked to the masticatory/chewing
cycle and their relative relationship affects the range of motion (ROM) of the oral
floor. This hyolingual apparatus also affects the oropharyngeal surface of the tongue.[4]
[5]
[6] Patients with oromandibular cancer show impairment of this tongue–jaw interaction.
Thus, a dynamic functional approach through comprehensive reconstruction is required
to improve the quality of life in such cases.
We hypothesized that dynamic oromandibular reconstruction is possible on the basis
of the concept of using a chimeric flap with a free fibular osteocutaneous flap conjoined
with a functional muscular flap such as the gracilis muscle free flap. All the extrinsic
and intrinsic tongue muscles except one muscle are innervated by the hypoglossal nerve.
While the osteocutaneous flap can provide a rigid mandibular reconstruction, the conjoined
gracilis or vastus lateralis muscular flap can replace the genioglossus muscle function.
Finally, the chimerization and reinnervation give rise to a dynamic system.
This article describes our experience with oromandibular reconstruction using a chimeric
free fibular osteocutaneous flap conjoined with a functional muscle free flap. To
achieve a dynamic reconstruction, the method of designing the chimeric flap and its
functional comparison with the conventional fibular free flap are detailed herein.
Methods
For adequate comparison of the surgical details, we included four consecutive patients.
The former two patients underwent reconstruction with a conventional osteocutaneous
free fibular flap. The latter two patients had an oromandibular defect after cancer
resection and underwent a dynamic oromandibular reconstruction with a chimeric free
fibular flap conjoined with a gracilis free flap ([Table 1]).
Table 1
Patient demographic and baseline characteristics
Patient no.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Type of reconstruction
|
Dynamic
|
Dynamic
|
Control
|
Control
|
Age (y)
|
51
|
52
|
69
|
56
|
Sex
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
M
|
Comorbidity
|
(−)
|
(−)
|
DM, HTN
|
(−)
|
Pathology
|
Mouth floor cancer
|
Gingival cancer
|
Mouth floor cancer
|
Gingival cancer
|
Stage
|
cT4aN0M0
|
cT4aN2cM0
|
cT4aN1M0
|
cT4N0M0
|
Neck dissection
|
Bilateral SND
|
Bilateral SND
|
Ipsilateral SND
|
Ipsilateral SND
|
Chemotherapy
|
(−)
|
(−)
|
(−)
|
(−)
|
Radiotherapy
|
(+)
|
(−)
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
Length of hospital stay (d)
|
27
|
51
|
21
|
19
|
Follow-up (mo)
|
14
|
10
|
12
|
34
|
Survival
|
Survive
|
Survive
|
Survive
|
Survive
|
Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; SND, selective neck dissection.
Fibula Osteocutaneous Free Flap
Fibula Osteocutaneous Free Flap
Preoperatively, the mandibular resection margin and type of reconstruction were planned.
Thus, we manufactured a three-dimensional (3-D) printing cutting guide (Jeil Medical,
Seoul, Republic of Korea) based on 3-D simulation ([Fig. 1]). With a cutting guide, the proximal osteotomy site can be estimated. The patient
was positioned supine with knee flexion. With a handheld Doppler device, after marking
with a skin perforator, dissection was performed via the posterior approach.[7] The distal soleus and flexor hallucis longus muscles are detached from the fibula,
and all the branches and perforators are traced until the peroneal vessels were reached.
After completing the posterior dissection, the anterior skin paddle was then incised.
A 1- to 2-mm muscle cuff was left at the lateral border of the fibula. In this study,
distal osteotomy was performed first, followed by proximal osteotomy. The dissection
of the interosseous membrane enabled mobilization of the fibular segments. For the
chimerization of other flaps, the distal pedicle length should remain > 2 cm longer
than the needed length. After completion of the osteotomy and interosseous membrane
cutting on both sides, the pedicle could be freely skeletonized. Cutting the proximal
pedicle should be delayed until completion of the chimerization with a dynamic muscular
flap through microanastomosis ([Fig. 2]). For the donor site, split-thickness skin grafts were placed after muscle repair.
Fig. 1 Preoperative computer simulation and three-dimensional (3-D) printing cutting guide.
The patient had an oromandibular defect on her left side after cancer resection. The
defect involved the tongue base; thus, we planned to perform a dynamic oromandibular
reconstruction. Once the plan to use a fibular free flap was established, we used
3-D computer simulation to manufacture a 3-D printing cutting guide (Jeil Medical,
Seoul, Korea). (A, B) Preoperative simulation. (C) 3-D printing cutting guide.
Fig. 2 Schematic illustration of the concept of dynamic oromandibular reconstructions. (A) A 51-year-old woman who had an extensive oromandibular defect that involved the
oral floor and base of the tongue underwent segmental mandibulectomy involving teeth
31–33 and 41–44. (B) We decided to reconstruct the chimeric fibular free flap with functional gracilis
transfer. (C) The distal pedicle of the fibular flap was anastomosed to the pedicle of the gracilis
muscle. Neurorrhaphy was performed between the obturator nerve of the gracilis muscle
and the remaining hypoglossal nerve. The following illustrations depict the insertion
of the chimeric flap step by step. (D) The gracilis flap was inserted first. Its origin was sutured with the tongue defect,
and the insertion was connected to the genioglossus mandibular attachment. (E) The fibular skin flap was overlaid on the gracilis muscle, which resulted in water
tightness. (F) Finally, the fibular bone flap can occupy the mandibular defect.
Case 1: Chimeric Gracilis Muscle Flap
A 51-year-old woman with an adenoid cystic carcinoma in the oral floor underwent resection
of the oral floor along with the base of the tongue and a bilaterally modified radical
neck dissection with resection of the segmental mandibulectomy involving teeth 31
to 33 and 41 to 44. The right inferior alveolar nerve was cut, and the genioglossus,
hyoglossus, and geniohyoid muscles were resected to secure a safe margin. The mandibular
defect was reconstructed with a free fibular flap, and two segmental osteotomies were
performed to achieve the mandibular shape. A 4 × 2 cm of gracilis muscle flap was
harvested with the obturator nerve. Its pedicle medial circumflex artery and vein
were anastomosed with the distal pedicle of the fibular free flap. After the completion
of the distal anastomosis, the fibular free flap was fully mobilized. A 7 × 4 cm size
skin paddle of fibular flap covered the oral floor, and the gracilis muscle lay beyond
the skin flap. The gracilis muscle flap was inserted in the direction of the genioglossus
for mimicking its function. Eight miniscrews were used for intermaxillary fixation.
The facial artery and vein were used as recipient vessels anastomosed end-to-end to
the peroneal artery and vein. Both flaps survived well, and complete wound healing
was attained uneventfully ([Table 2]; [Fig. 3]).
Fig. 3 Intraoperative photograph of patient 1. (A) Base of the tongue in the tongue-mandible defect. (B) Chimeric flap insertion. (C) Immediate postoperative feature. (D) Pedicle insertion.
Table 2
Operative details of the study population
Patient no.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Type of reconstruction
|
Dynamic
|
Dynamic
|
Control
|
Control
|
Mandibular defect size (cm)
|
8 × 4
|
7 × 4
|
5 × 3
|
6 × 5
|
Type of flap
|
Fibular free flap
|
Fibular free flap
|
Fibular free flap
|
Fibular free flap
|
Conjoined flap
|
Gracilis
|
Vastus lateralis
|
(−)
|
(−)
|
Pedicle length (cm)
|
8
|
9
|
8
|
7
|
Flap dimension (cm)
|
|
|
|
|
Skin
|
7 × 4
|
15 × 8
|
5 × 3
|
7 × 5
|
Muscle
|
4 × 2
|
8 × 5
|
(−)
|
(−)
|
Bone
|
6
|
8
|
4
|
6
|
Microanastomosis
|
|
|
|
|
Number of A.
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Number of V.
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Recipient A.
|
Facial A.
|
Facial A.
|
STA
|
STA
|
Recipient V.
|
Facial V.
|
Facial V.
|
IJV, EJV
|
Facial V.
|
Recipient N.
|
Hypoglossal N.
|
Hypoglossal N.
|
(−)
|
(−)
|
Number of bone segments
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
Donor site coverage
|
STSG
|
STSG
|
STSG
|
STSG
|
Flap survival
|
Survive
|
Survive
|
Survive
|
Survive
|
Complications
|
(−)
|
Wound dehiscence
|
(−)
|
(−)
|
Abbreviations: A, artery; EJV, external jugular vein; IJV, internal jugular vein;
N, nerve; STA, superior thyroidal artery; STSG, split-thickness skin graft; V, vein.
Case 2: Chimeric Anterolateral Free Flap with the Vastus Lateralis
A 52-year-old woman with a recurrent gingival squamous cell carcinoma underwent tumor
resection with skin invasion involving the mentum and right submandible. A right midline
segmental mandibulectomy was performed, and three-fourths of the tongue was resected
with the oral floor and extrinsic muscle above the hyoid bone level. The left upper
gingiva was resected including the anterior pillar and right tonsil. The main mass
invasion visibly extended to the right medial pterygoid and masseter muscles. A vascularized
fibular osteocutaneous flap was designed for the anterior and right mandibular body.
A simultaneously harvested anterolateral thigh free flap was designed to cover the
right external skin defect, and the tongue defect was covered with a vastus lateralis
muscle flap. An anterolateral thigh skin paddle of 15 × 8 cm in size and an 8 × 5 cm
muscle flap were harvested. The descending branches of the lateral circumflex artery
and vein were anastomosed with the distal pedicle of the fibular flap. The peroneal
artery and vein were anastomosed to the right facial artery and vein. The motor branch
of the femoral nerve that innervated the vastus lateralis was anastomosed end-to-side
with the hypoglossal nerve ([Table 2]; [Fig. 4]).
Fig. 4 Intraoperative photograph of patient 2. (A) Defect involving the mentum and right submandibular skin treated with midline segmental
mandibulectomy with resection of three-fourths of the tongue. (B) Chimeric flap insertion. (C) Postoperative photograph. (D) Immediate postoperative feature.
Neurorrhaphy
In both cases, the hypoglossal nerve was used as the recipient nerve. The hypoglossal
nerve innervates most of the extrinsic and intrinsic muscles of the tongue and is
involved in controlling the tongue movements required for speech and swallowing. Therefore,
the hypoglossal nerve as the sole motor nerve was selected as the recipient nerve
and anastomosed to the obturator nerve, which supplies the gracilis muscle, and branch
of the femoral motor nerve, which supplies the vastus lateralis muscle. The ear, nose,
and throat (ENT) team preserved the hypoglossal nerve; thus, we anastomosed it end-to-side
with Ethilon 8–0.
Functional Assessment
For the objective assessment of surgical outcomes, we categorized the outcomes into
three subspecializations, namely speech, swallowing, and aesthetics. For speech evaluation,
a trained speech therapist evaluated the patient outcomes. Tongue ROM upon protrusion,
lateralization, and elevation, and the total performance severity score were evaluated.
Then, the total tongue ROM score was calculated from (Protrusion + Right Lateralization + Left
Lateralization + Elevation)/4 ([Videos 1] and [2]).[8] For proper swallowing evaluation, we used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which
is a dynamic imaging modality. Multiphase MRI scans were taken after the intravenous
injection of a contrast agent. MRI shows characteristics of the time-intensity curve
of the regions of interest. Therefore, dynamic MRI has recently gained attention for
the subjective and semiquantitative analysis of time-intensity curves.[9] Our institution recently developed an imaging modality that enables evaluation of
patients who have undergone dynamic reconstruction ([Video 3]). Lastly, for aesthetic evaluation, in the era of mandibular reconstruction, the
final facial contour was evaluated. Postoperative 3-D photographs of all the selected
patients were obtained with a Morpheus 3-D scanner (Morpheus Co., Ltd., Seongnam City,
Gyeonggi-do, Korea). We compared hemifacial 3-D volumes. A similar facial volume was
considered to indicate well-reconstructed facial bony contour.
Video 1
Speech evaluation of patient 1 (dynamic group).
Video 2
Speech evaluation of patient 3 (control group).
Video 3
Swallowing evaluation with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patient 1 (dynamic
group).
Results
The four patients included one man and three women, with a mean age of 57 years at
the time of reconstruction. Patients 1 and 2 underwent dynamic reconstruction with
a chimeric free fibular flap. Patients 3 and 4 underwent conventional reconstruction
with a free fibular flap only. Two patients had oral floor cancer, and the other two
had gingival cancer. The mean follow-up period was 17.5 months, and all the patients
received radiotherapy during the postoperative period, except patient 2 who refused
postoperative treatment. All the flaps survived without major complications such as
flap rejection ([Table 1]).
In the speech outcome analysis, the dynamic group showed satisfactory tongue movements.
Protrusion and lateralization were the movements that showed the most remarkable changes
among others in patients who underwent conventional reconstruction. The total tongue
ROM score was 62.5 in the dynamic group and 25.0 in the control group. Both groups
had similar levels of intelligibility, but the articulation correction was more superior
in the dynamic group ([Table 3]).
Table 3
Objective functional outcome assessment of the study population
|
Patient no.
|
1
|
3
|
|
Type of reconstruction
|
Dynamic
|
Control
|
Speech outcome
|
Postoperative period (mo)
|
10
|
10
|
Protrusion
|
Mildly impaired
|
Totally impaired
|
Right lateralization
|
Normal
|
Mildly impaired
|
Left lateralization
|
Mildly impaired
|
Totally impaired
|
Elevation
|
Mildly impaired
|
Mildly impaired
|
Total tongue ROM score (/100)
|
62.5
|
25
|
Articulation
|
90.69
|
78.2
|
Intelligibility
|
Mild
|
Mild
|
Three-dimensional volumetric analysis (mL)
|
Hemifacial right
|
848.47
|
998.18
|
Hemifacial left
|
774.77
|
896.34
|
Difference
|
73.7
|
101.76
|
Dynamic MRI
|
|
(+)
|
(−)
|
Soft palate
|
Contact
|
|
Epiglottis
|
Closure
|
|
Pharyngeal constrictor muscle
|
Contraction
|
|
Abbreviations: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ROM, range of motion.
In the 3-D volumetric analysis of mandibular aesthetic contouring, the dynamic group
showed a smaller difference in hemifacial volume (73.7 vs. 101.76 mL; [Table 3]).
Patient 1 underwent dynamic MRI ([Table 3]). The patient was instructed to gulp continuously several times to allow contrast
media to flow. According to the tracking MRI, we demonstrated the tongue movement
and swallowing action. The contact of the soft palate with the tongue was excellent,
and epiglottis closure was performed when glutition was complete. Pharyngeal constrictor
muscle contraction was evidently visible.
In the videofluoroscopic swallow test, the dynamic and control groups were evaluated
([Table 4]). The pharyngeal and esophageal phases appeared similar in both groups; however,
the oral phase in the control group showed more mobilization during chewing motion.
The overall function of the dynamic group was not inferior to that of the control
group.
Table 4
Results of the videofluoroscopic swallow test
|
Patient no.
|
2
|
4
|
|
Type of reconstruction
|
Dynamic
|
Control
|
Oral phase
|
Lip sealing
|
Enough
|
Enough
|
Chewing
|
Not enough
|
Not enough
|
Tongue control
|
Enough
|
Enough
|
Velar elevation
|
Enough
|
Enough
|
Oral transit time
|
0.001
|
0.001
|
Piecemeal swallow
|
No
|
No
|
Residue in mouth
|
No
|
No
|
Pharyngeal phase
|
Aspiration amount
|
No
|
No
|
Nasal regurgitation
|
No
|
No
|
Pharyngeal transit time
|
0.001
|
0.001
|
Amount of food in the vallecular pouch
|
No
|
No
|
Residue in the pyriform sinus
|
No
|
No
|
Coating of the pharynx walls after swallow
|
No
|
No
|
Opening of the pharyngoesophageal segment
|
Intact
|
Intact
|
Triggering of pharyngeal swallow
|
Normal
|
Normal
|
Laryngeal elevation and epiglottic closure
|
Normal
|
Normal
|
Esophageal phase
|
Mechanical obstruction
Delayed passage
Gastroesophageal reflux
|
No
No
No
|
No
No
No
|
Functional dysphagia scale
|
|
3
|
3
|
ASHA NOMS
|
|
6
|
7
|
Abbreviations: ASHA NOMS, American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcome
Measurement System Swallowing Scale.
Discussion
Given the fact that the tongue and mandible are the most dynamic structures in our
body, we believe that dynamic reconstruction should be performed more while focusing
on comprehensive anatomical and functional restoration of oromandibular defects. For
mandibular bony defects, the consensus is that the fibular osteocutaneous flap is
an excellent option. The fibular free flap provides support for dental implantation
and dentures, helping in the recovery of occlusal function. Recently, a patient-specific
virtual surgical planning and 3-D printing cutting guide was developed to enable reconstruction
with successful aesthetic and functional outcomes.[10]
[11] However, with regard to the tongue, only few trials of dynamic tongue reconstruction
have been conducted. Thus, we hypothesized that functional muscle transfer would be
a solution for the restoration of the hyoid-jaw-tongue complex. Reports have demonstrated
a cortical reorganization after motor nerve-innervated microneurovascular muscle transfer.[12] By adapting these biomechanics, we believe that the hypoglossal motor nerve can
provide a powerful and reliable innervation to the transferred muscle. A transferred
musculo/musculocutaneous flap can mimic oral soft tissue anatomical structures. The
extrinsic and intrinsic muscles of the tongue actively affect tongue movements, and
their relationship with the jaw also affects the base of the tongue. The hypoglossal
nerve plays a major role in these activities. Therefore, our dynamic oromandibular
reconstruction uses a fibular flap for bony coverage and innervated functional muscle
and skin flaps for comprehensive coverage of the soft tissues.
The best option for functional muscle transfer in head and neck reconstruction must
be identified. First, we searched for the most valuable options. In our cases, we
demonstrated that functional muscle transfer is possible even in oral reconstruction.
The gracilis and vastus lateralis muscles facilitated successful functional reconstruction.
The prerequisites were as follows: First, the muscle should have a reliable motor
nerve with sufficient length. The obturator nerve can be easily harvested when the
pedicle dissected and the motor nerve branch of the vastus lateralis travel medially
alongside the descending branch vessels. Second, the muscle should have a favorable
muscle fiber direction. It is evident that reconstruction of all 26 extrinsic and
intrinsic muscles is impossible. Therefore, we decided to target muscle function.
Among the various extrinsic tongue muscles, we aimed at the genioglossus or styloglossus
muscle, which allows protrusion and swallowing through a sling action. Third, in the
interest of time, two teams participated in the chimeric flap harvest. For this, the
ipsilateral upper thigh was easy to access. While the ENT team resected the cancer
lesion, the plastic surgery team harvested the fibular free flap. Then, we proceeded
to harvest one more chimeric flap and simultaneously prepared the recipient vessel
and nerve. This is a preliminary trial of dynamic oromandibular reconstruction; thus,
we planned to identify optimal options for functional muscle transfer. We believe
an integrated reconstruction of the jaw–tongue complex and an innervated functional
muscle transfer could be an effective approach in similar cases.
Conclusion
This study is a preliminary trial of dynamic oromandibular reconstruction using a
chimeric free fibular flap with functional muscle transfer. Although the number of
cases was limited, through this study, we demonstrated the possibility of dynamic
oromandibular reconstruction, which enhances more functional aspects in the patients.