Introduction
One of the functions of the larynx is phonation. Voice is produced through the repeated
movement of the vocal fold cover, producing a mucosal wave. The flexibility of the
vocal fold is essential to promote the appropriate glottic vibration.[1] However, the formation of a mucosal wave is modified by benign laryngeal lesions,
its main examples being nodules, polyps, Reinke edema and minor structural alterations
(MSAs).[2]
A precise diagnosis is essential for therapeutic decisions as well as for the instructions
to the patients about their illness and possible after effects.[3]
[4] The diagnosis is made usually through endoscopic visualization, either by videolaryngoscopy
with a rigid telescope or rhino-laryngo flexible fiberscope or videolaryngostroboscopy.[5] It is also possible to do a suspension microlaryngoscopy, considered the best to
diagnose benign laryngeal lesions.[6]
The inspiratory maneuver was initially described in 1957 by Powers et al[7] from a radiological analysis of the larynx or laryngography. Only in 2003 Kothe
et al[8] indicated its use to stimulate a precise way to classify Reinke edema. This maneuver
corresponds to a simple method used during videolaryngoscopy. For this, which can
be done through a rigid telescope or rhino-laryngo flexible fiberscope, the patient
has to, after exhalation, inhale deeply and noisily. Thus, there is a better definition
of the viscoelastic properties of the vocal folds and its cover alterations giving
the suction of the free edge of the vocal fold toward the subglottis, with a good
delimitation of the vocal ligament.[8]
[9]
[10]
The objective of the present study is to evaluate the increase in the diagnosis of
benign laryngeal lesions using inspiratory maneuver during videolaryngoscopy in patients
with or without vocal complaints.
Methods
Patients in the present cross-sectional study underwent a videolaryngoscopy at the
ambulatory in the Laryngology sector of a tertiary hospital. They were analyzed from
March 1 to July 1, 2018. The study has been evaluated and approved by the hospital's
Ethical Committee in Research, under the CAAE number 85767318.4.0000.5463.
The research included patients between 18 and 60 years old who had adequately done
videolaryngoscopy using inspiratory maneuver and filled out the written informed consent
form.
The exclusion criteria established were: suspicion or confirmation of malign laryngeal
lesion; previous laryngeal procedures, such as laryngeal microsurgery, cordectomy,
partial or total laryngectomy; radiotherapy/chemotherapy in cervical regions; replacement
of rigid telescope by rhino-laryngo flexible fiberscope resulting from intense nauseous
reflex; difficulty or unsatisfactory inspiratory maneuver; laryngeal candidiasis compromising
the vocal folds. Patients > 60 years old were excluded due to the natural physiological
aging and atrophy of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles of the age, therefore the vocal
folds gain a curved aspect with a higher prominence in the vocal process. Related
to it there is a reduction of mucous and saliva, restricting the vibrating capacity
of the vocal folds.
There was a total of 201 patients, 141 of them were excluded. All reasons for exclusion
are in [Table 1].
Table 1
Causes and frequencies of patient exclusion
Exclusion Reason
|
n (%)
|
Age > 60 years old
|
89 (44.3%)
|
Previous surgery
|
26 (12.9%)
|
Intense nauseous reflex
|
17 (8.5%)
|
Age < 18 years old
|
3 (1.5%)
|
Unsatisfactory inspiratory maneuver
|
3 (1.5%)
|
Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy
|
2 (1%)
|
Laryngeal candidiasis (vocal folds)
|
1 (0.5%)
|
Total
|
141 (70.2%)
|
The present work was performed in two steps:
1. Data collection and videolaryngoscopy: a structured interview in which epidemiological
data was gathered, such as age, gender, clinical complaints (dysphonia, cough, throat
clearing, globus pharyngeus, dysphagia, pyrosis, pain, patients without voice complaints, but having to do admission
exams to work as teachers).
The instruments used for videolaryngoscopy were: Ferrari light source (E 50S, Ferrari
Medical, São Paulo, SP, Brazil); Olympus OTV-SC camera system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan);
Precision larynx rigid telescope (Precision 8mmx70°, Richards Medical, São Paulo,
SP, Brazil), 70° angulation; MZ Medical external microphone system (MZ Medical Products,
São Paulo, SP, Brazil); Sony TV monitor model PVM-2053MD (Sony Corporation, Tokyo,
Japan). All videos were backed up in a database, using a MyGica video recorder (MyGica,
Shenzhen, China).
Patients were asked to sit, with their tonguess out, wrapped in gauze and kept in
this position by the assessor's fingers pressure. The rigid telescope was inserted
toward the oropharynx, visualizing the larynx. Patients with gag reflex received topical
anesthesia in the oropharynx with 10% lidocaine spray.
Initially, a full larynx anatomy evaluation was made, including documentation of the
supraglottis (breathing area), subglottis and trachea region. Afterwards, there was
a functional evaluation through sustained phonation of the /i/ vowel, resulting in
the elevation of the larynx and anteriorization of the epiglottis, facilitating visualization
of the laryngeal structures. In the end, the patients were asked to do the inspiratory
maneuver, which is a long and noisy inhale after exhaling.
To compare, patients were divided into two groups according to their clinical vocal
complaints: symptomatic or asymptomatic. In the first group, the symptoms were: hoarseness
and vocal fatigue. Other complaints mentioned in both groups were: pyrosis, throat
clearing, pain, dysphagia, globus pharyngeus and cough.
2. Video analyses: the videos were backed up in a database and afterwards watched
by three experienced laryngologists separately. Videos were shown at normal speed,
slow motion or paused, according to the necessity of the evaluator. These professionals
determined the findings and a possible diagnosis in each video before and after the
maneuver, to confirm if the inspiratory maneuver would contribute to the additional
alterations or if it would alter the initial diagnosis. The evaluators were not aware
of the identification of the patients or of their vocal symptoms.
The additional laryngeal alterations were: signs of chronic laryngitis (hyperemia
and edema of vocal folds, interarytenoid edema and subglottic edema), vocal nodules,
pseudocyst, polyps, epidermoid cyst, sulcus vocalis, laryngeal asymmetry, Reinke edema,
leukoplakia, mucosal thickening, vascular dysgenesis, vocal cord paresis, contact
ulcer, laryngocele, laryngeal candidiasis, as well as exams without abnormalities.
The same patient can have more than one diagnosed lesion.
For the statistic analysis, the lesions were counted in each vocal fold. Typically
bilateral lesions, such as vocal nodule and Reinke edema, and the suggestive findings
of laryngitis posterior (hyperemia and edema of interarytenoid region) were evaluated
as unique bodies. Lesions classified as “contralateral reaction” were not considered.
Statistical Analysis
The categorical variables were represented through relative and absolute frequency.
The variable figure “%,” referring to inspiratory maneuver, was calculated as the
increase of lesions referring to the initial evaluation, as the following formula
suggests: ((new diagnosis – initial evaluation) ÷ initial evaluation) × 100 = % ([Table 2]). Diagnoses with “initial evaluation” equal to zero were indicated by “*” ([Table 3]).
Table 2
Frequency (n) and increase in the diagnosis (%) of laryngeal lesions, before and after
the inspiratory maneuver, according to type of lesion in general
|
Without IM
|
With IM
|
%
|
Sulcus Vocalis
|
11
|
66
|
500
|
Chronic Laryngitis
|
40
|
40
|
0
|
Vascular Dysgenesis
|
30
|
30
|
0
|
Mucosal Thickening
|
21
|
21
|
0
|
Vocal Fold Atrophy
|
7
|
7
|
0
|
Pseudocyst
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
Reinke Edema
|
4
|
5
|
25
|
Vocal Nodules
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
Normal Exam
|
5
|
4
|
−20
|
Epidermoid Cyst
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
Vocal Polyps
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Leukoplakia
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Bilateral Laryngocele
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Contact Ulcer
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Vocal Cord Paresis
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Laryngeal Candidiasis (epiglottis)
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Laryngeal Asymmetry
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Total
|
Without IM
|
With IM
|
%
|
Diagnostics
|
138
|
193
|
40
|
Abbreviation: IM, inspiratory maneuver.
Table 3
Frequency (n) and increase in the diagnosis (%) of laryngeal lesions, before and after
the inspiratory maneuver, according to type of lesion in vocal asymptomatic patients
|
Without IM
|
With IM
|
%
|
Sulcus Vocalis
|
4
|
23
|
475
|
Chronic Laryngitis
|
13
|
13
|
0
|
Vascular Dysgenesis
|
9
|
9
|
0
|
Normal Exam
|
4
|
3
|
−25
|
Mucosal Thickening
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Reinke Edema
|
0
|
1
|
*
|
Vocal Fold Atrophy
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Vocal Cord Paresis
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Laryngeal Candidiasis (epiglottis)
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Pseudocyst
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Vocal Nodules
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Epidermoid Cyst
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Vocal Polyps
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Leukoplakia
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Laryngeal Asymmetry
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Bilateral Laryngocele
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Contact Ulcer
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Abbreviation: IM, inspiratory maneuver.
Results
The sample was formed by 60 patients according to the inclusion criteria, where 41
were vocal symptomatic and 19 vocal asymptomatic. The age group varied from 18 to
60 years old, the average being 47.3 ± 10.3 years old, and the majority was female
(85%) in both groups.
The most frequent complaint was dysphonia (68.3%), followed by pyrosis (18.3%), pain
and throat clearing (16.7% each). In the group with vocal symptoms: 100% showed dysphonia;
24.4% pain and pyrosis; 22% vocal fatigue and 19.5% throat clearing. Among the asymptomatic:
throat clearing and globus pharyngeus (10.5% each); choke and pyrosis (5.3% each). Patients without voice complaints and
the need for admission exams to teach were 26.7% of the sample.
Before the inspiratory maneuvers, the most observed lesions in both groups were chronic
laryngitis, vascular dysgenesis, mucosal thickening and sulcus vocalis ([Tables 3] and [4]). Generally, inspiratory maneuvers had a 40% increase in the diagnosis and the most
common finding was sulcus vocalis, with a 500% increase in the diagnosis. Another
lesion benefited by inspiratory maneuvers was Reinke edema (one case in the vocal
symptomatic group), which had not been visualized with the videolaryngoscopy, with
a 25% increase in the diagnosis ([Table 2]). The frequency of diagnosis in the many laryngeal lesions, before and after the
inspiratory maneuvers, are presented in [Tables 2]
[3] to [4].
Table 4
Frequency (n) and increase in the diagnosis (%) of laryngeal lesions, before and after
the inspiratory maneuver, according to type of lesion in vocal symptomatic patients
|
Without IM
|
With IM
|
%
|
Sulcus Vocalis
|
7
|
43
|
514
|
Chronic Laryngitis
|
27
|
27
|
0
|
Vascular Dysgenesis
|
21
|
21
|
0
|
Mucosal Thickening
|
20
|
20
|
0
|
Vocal Fold Atrophy
|
6
|
6
|
0
|
Pseudocyst
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
Vocal Nodules
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
Reinke Edema
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
Epidermoid Cyst
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
Vocal Polyps
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Leukoplakia
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Laryngeal Asymmetry
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Normal Exam
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Bilateral Laryngocele
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Contact Ulcer
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Vocal Cord Paresis
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Laryngeal Candidiasis (epiglottis)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Abbreviation: IM, inspiratory maneuver.
Discussion
It was observed, in the present study, a predominance of female (85%), similar to
another study, which described 77.5% of women in its casuistry of 80 patients with
benign lesions in their vocal folds.[11] A probable explanation for this would be the fact that a higher rate of women go
to the doctor, as well as a higher fundamental frequency and less hyaluronic acid,
that could facilitate the advent of glottic lesions.[12]
In the present study, the average age was 47.3 years old. Dailey et al[13] report an average age of 43.5 years old among the 100 patients who underwent suspension
microlaryngoscopy due to larynx benign lesions. Printza et al[14] showed an average of 51.4 years old, among the 150 patients who underwent videolaryngostroboscopy
due to benign laryngeal alterations.
In the present study, the inspiratory maneuver was important for the increase of diagnosis
of sulcus vocalis in 500% and in 25% of Reinke edema ([Table 2]). A total of 20% of the patients with initially normal results had a sulcus vocalis
diagnosis after the inspiratory maneuver ([Table 2]). Studies on the usage of inspiratory maneuvers to evaluate increases in the diagnosis
of the benign larynx were not found. In the present study, inspiratory maneuvers did
not change the initial diagnosis, although it allowed a 40% increase of diagnosis
of lesions ([Table 2]). Some studies evaluated the use of videolaryngostroboscopy to evaluate the increase
in diagnosis. Casiano et al[15] performed a study with 292 patients and observed a 19% change in the initial diagnosis
and 24% of additional findings. Printza et al[14] evaluated 150 patients with laryngeal benign lesions and observed that videolaryngostroboscopy
was important in the increase of diagnosis by 28.8%. The diagnostic value of videolaryngostroboscopy
varied considerably depending on the lesion, being significant to: sulcus vocalis,
cyst, nodules, fibrosis of vocal folds, vocal atrophy and psychogenic dysphonia.[14]
The explanation for a better identification of sulcus vocalis with inspiratory maneuvers
is due to the movement of the vocal fold cover and exposure of the ligament (intermediate
and deep layer of the lamina propria) with inspiratory phonation, resulting in their
partial adduction. This medialization of vocal folds allows a detailed visualization
of the cover and the lamina propria, and consequently evaluates its impairment.[4]
[8]
[16] Besides this, the partial glottic closure promotes a barrier to the inhaled air,
reducing subglottic pressure and increasing the supraglottic one.[10]
[17] This increase promotes a distension of the ventricle of Morgagni, of vestibular
folds and of the pyriform sinus, allowing a broad visualization of the supraglottis
and consequently of the vocal folds.[9]
[10]
[17]
Literature reports suggest that inspiratory maneuver provides a distinction between
deep and superficial lesions in the vocal fold mucous in relation to the lamina propria,
with a possible application when differentiating nodule and cyst. The first, because
it is more superficial, is not in contact with the vocal ligament, since it is limited
to the epithelium. The cyst is characterized for being adhered or semi-adhered to
the vocal ligament.[4]
[5]
[17] In the present study, there were no changes in the initial diagnosis among these
alterations after the inspiratory maneuver.
Despite not being the objective of the present study, the literature suggests the
benefit of inspiratory maneuver in the visualization of a suggestive malign sign.
In these cases, there is a restriction in the supraglottis distension, which can be
embedded by the tumor.[5]
[8]
[9]
In the present study, ∼ 1.5% of the exams were excluded because the inspiratory maneuvers
were performed in an unsatisfactory manner, all of these because of an inability of
the patient to maintain a forced inspiration which caused problems for evaluation.
Nauseous reflex was present in 8.5% of cases; however, this is associated to the method
of evaluation through the use of a rigid telescope, and not a result of the maneuver
itself ([Table 1]). Casiano et al[15] commented that 34% of videolaryngostroboscopy exams were performed in an unsatisfactory
manner. The motives given were: incapacity to maintain a stable fundamental frequency,
reduced phonation time, deficient visualization as a result of large quantity of secretion,
accentuated constriction of upper glottis or extensive lesions, noncollaborative patients.[15]
The present study showed a very high prevalence of sulcus vocalis, even in asymptomatic
patients. Moraes et al[18] submitted 147 patients to the suspension microlaryngoscopy and obtained a prevalence
of MSAs in patients without vocal complaints of 21.1%. Sulcus vocalis was present
in 16.3%,[18] a lower prevalence when compared with microscopic assessment that obtained a prevalence
of up to between 36 and 39%.[19]
[20] This demonstrates that the presence of MSA is not necessarily related to dysphonia.
Conclusion
In the present study, the inspiratory maneuver provided an important increase in the
diagnosis of sulcus vocalis. We recommend the use of this maneuver, even in asymptomatic
patients, with the aim of early diagnosis of laryngeal alterations and, with this,
prevent the development of secondary lesions.