Keywords
knowledge - bisphosphonates - osteonecrosis - dental practitioners
Introduction
Bisphosphonates (BPs) are a group of medications used to treat several bone lesions,
including, but not limited to, osteoporosis, hypercalcemia, Paget’s disease, multiple
myeloma, and bone metastasis.[1]
[2]
[3] The BPs have great affinity for bone tissues; they inhibit osteoclasts activity
and thus reduce bone resorption and disrupt normal bone remodelling.[1] BPs have been implicated in causing osteonecrosis of the jaws, a condition that
was later called bisphosphonates-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ).[3]
[4] The first case of BRONJ was reported in 2003 by Marx,[5] and since then numerous cases have been reported in the literature.[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10] BRONJ is a very serious condition that negatively impacts quality of life, producing
a significant morbidity.[3]
[4]
[11] It is characterized by an area of exposed bone that presents for more than 8 weeks
with no history radiotherapy.[11] As BRONJ cases can be associated with other antiresorptive medications (such as
denosumab) and antiangiogenic therapies, the American Association of Maxillofacial
Surgeons (AAOMS) in 2014 changed the nomenclature to medications-related osteonecrosis
of the jaw (MRONJ).[4] Although the exact etiopathogenesis of MRONJ is not fully elucidated, several risk
factors have been suggested, including duration of BP therapy, route of BPs administration
(e.g., the risk is significantly greater with intravenous BPs), dentoalveolar surgery,
age of the patient, systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, and corticosteroid
use, among others.[3]
[4]
[12] Dentists can play a pivotal role in prevention of BRONJ/MRONJ through providing
preventive care and prioritization of preventive treatment before the commencement
of BPs.[3]
[9]
[13]
[14] Hence, dentists and physicians must have adequate knowledge on BPs, its potential
complications, and the appropriate treatment planning in patients at risk of MRONJ.[14]
The AAOMS published guidelines on staging and treatment strategies for patients receiving
BPs.[3]
[4] The main purpose of these guidelines was to provide the clinicians a base knowledge
on BPs, clinical features and risk factors of MRONJ/BRONJ, and most importantly, how
to prevent and treat MRONJ/BRONJ. Unfortunately, despite these guidelines, several
studies have shown very poor knowledge of dentists regarding treatment patients undergoing
BPs therapy.[2]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16] Dentists can play a pivotal role in prevention of MRONJ in patients receiving BPs
therapy. In Saudi Arabia, no information exists about the dentists’ knowledge concerning
BP therapy. Therefore, this study is aimed to assess the level of knowledge and opinions
of dentists working in Saudi Arabia regarding dental treatment of patients receiving
BP therapy.
Materials and Methods
This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed using a web-based structured
questionnaire among dental professionals working in Saudi Arabia. The study was approved
by the research and ethics committee, Al-Farabi colleges, Riyadh, and complied with
the declared ethical principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki
(2002). A link of structured questionnaire was sent to a convenience sample of dental
practitioners through emails or WhatsApp groups, and a cover letter explaining the
purpose of the study and identified the research team was also included. The survey
was sent to potential participants during November 2018 and February 2019. The sample
size was calculated considering 95% confidence level, absolute precision of 5%, and
an expected level of knowledge of 50%. The estimated sample size was 380.
The self-administered questionnaire was adapted from previously validated questionnaires
that had been used in similar studies.[13]
[14]
[15]
[16] To ensure clarity and understandability, the questionnaire was pilot tested on 30
dentists. The questionnaire consisted of two main parts. The first part sought demographic
and professional data including age, gender, graduation year, years of experience,
specialization (general dentist or specialist), and type of working sector (public,
private, and academic). The second section comprised close-ended questions that assessed
dentist’s knowledge about BPs and MRONJ: the general knowledge about MRONJ, commercial
names and therapeutic indications of BP, risk factors and clinical features of MRONJ,
and knowledge regarding treatment guidelines for patients taking intravenous or oral
BPs (Appendix A).
Statistical Analysis
IBM SPSS Version 21.0. software for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York) was used
for data management and analysis. Descriptive statistics including frequencies and
percentages were calculated. Chi-square test was used to compare between groups. The
significance level was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Out of the targeted 1,000 dentists, 607 completed the survey, giving a response rate
of 60.7% (607/1,000). Most of the respondents were males (66.4%), less than 40 years
old (84.2%), and had less than 5 years of clinical experience (56.8%). Around half
of the respondents (50.2%) were general practitioners and 49.8% were specialists ([Table 1]).
Table 1
General characteristics of the participants
|
N
|
%
|
Age
|
|
|
< 30 y
|
298
|
49.1
|
30–39 y
|
219
|
36.1
|
≥ 40 y
|
90
|
14.8
|
Gender
|
|
|
Male
|
403
|
66.4
|
Female
|
204
|
33.6
|
Graduation
|
|
|
1–5 y
|
308
|
50.7
|
6–10 y
|
157
|
25.9
|
> 10 y
|
142
|
23.4
|
Experience
|
|
|
1–5 y
|
345
|
56.8
|
6–10 y
|
147
|
24.2
|
> 10 y
|
115
|
18.9
|
Specialty
|
|
|
General practitioner
|
305
|
50.2
|
Specialists
|
302
|
48.2
|
Work
|
|
|
Academic sector
|
113
|
18.6
|
Both public/private sectors
|
70
|
11.5
|
Private sector
|
210
|
34.6
|
Public sector
|
214
|
35.3
|
[Table 2] presents results of the general knowledge about MRONJ and BP therapeutics. Around
71% of the respondents were familiar with the term MRONJ, with no significant differences
according to gender, qualifications, or years since graduation. Unfortunately, only
one-third of the respondents reported to be familiar with the disease staging and
treatment guidelines suggested by AAOMS, with a significant difference according to
the qualification in favor of specialists (p < 0.01).
Table 2
General knowledge about BRONJ and indications/types of BP (% of Yes answers)
|
Total
|
Gender
|
Specialty
|
Years since graduation
|
M
|
F
|
p-Value
|
GP
|
Specialist
|
p-Value
|
1–5 years
|
6–10 years
|
> 10 Years
|
p-Value
|
Abbreviations: BP, bisphosphonate; BRONJ, bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of
the jaw; F, female; GP, general practitioner; M, male.
**”Yes” is the correct answer for all items.
|
General knowledge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Familiar with BRONJ
|
71
|
73.2
|
66.7
|
0.107
|
63.9
|
78.1
|
0.000
|
69.5
|
71.3
|
73.9
|
0.621
|
Familiar with staging and guidelines by AAOMS
|
36.4
|
37.5
|
34.3
|
0.476
|
26.2
|
46.7
|
0.000
|
30.8
|
45.2
|
38.7
|
0.008
|
Uses of BP**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bone metastases
|
52.2
|
51.9
|
52.9
|
0.758
|
46.6
|
57.9
|
0.019
|
49.7
|
53.5
|
56.3
|
0.436
|
Multiple myeloma
|
35.3
|
34.5
|
36.8
|
0.367
|
29.5
|
41.1
|
0.001
|
31.2
|
37.6
|
41.5
|
0.241
|
Hypercalcemia of malignancy
|
33.4
|
33.3
|
33.8
|
0.907
|
28.9
|
38.1
|
0.033
|
28.6
|
38.9
|
38.0
|
0.127
|
Osteopenia and Osteoporosis
|
57.5
|
57.6
|
57.4
|
0.996
|
48.9
|
66.2
|
0.000
|
54.5
|
59.2
|
62.0
|
0.221
|
Paget’s disease of bone
|
45.8
|
44.4
|
48.5
|
0.579
|
40.0
|
51.7
|
0.002
|
42.9
|
47.8
|
50.0
|
0.414
|
Types of BP**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alendronate (Fosamax)
|
35.1
|
36.5
|
32.4
|
0.584
|
23.9
|
46.4
|
0.000
|
28.2
|
38.9
|
45.8
|
0.000
|
Risendronate (Actonel)
|
23.4
|
25.8
|
18.6
|
0.122
|
17.7
|
29.1
|
0.003
|
16.6
|
29.9
|
31.0
|
0.001
|
Ibandronate (Boniva)
|
24.5
|
27.0
|
19.6
|
0.057
|
20.3
|
28.8
|
0.012
|
20.1
|
29.9
|
28.2
|
0.058
|
Zolendronate (Zometa)
|
30.3
|
33.5
|
24.0
|
0.034
|
21.0
|
39.7
|
0.000
|
23.7
|
36.9
|
37.3
|
0.001
|
With regards to BP indications, the correct answers ranged between 33.4% and 57.5%,
with significant higher knowledge among specialists (average knowledge: 51%) compared
with general practitioners. Regarding commercial names of BPs, only one-third of the
respondents were familiar with these medications, with significant better knowledge
among specialist and those with long clinical experience. The total specialist knowledge
is 36% ([Table 2]). Around half of the respondents (49%) gained the information about MRONJ from dental
school/residency program and 10% from the internet ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 Source of information regarding MRONJ.
[Table 3] presents dentists’ knowledge regarding risk factors and clinical features of MRONJ.
Regarding risk factors for MRONJ, the correct answers ranged from 30.5 to 67.1%. The
most identified risk factors were type of BP therapy (67.1%), dentoalveolar surgery
(55.4%), age of the patient (51.6%), and route of drug administration (51.7%). Similarly,
the dentists’ knowledge regarding clinical features of the disease was very low, ranging
from 38.9% to 64.9%. Specialist showed significantly better knowledge regarding the
risk factors of MRONJ than general practitioners (p < 0.01). Additionally, specialists showed better knowledge regarding the clinical
features of the disease, but with no significant differences except in one item. However,
no significant association was observed between level of knowledge and gender and
years since graduation.
Table 3
Knowledge regarding risk factors and clinical features of MRONJ (% of correct answers
[Yes answers])
Items
|
Total
|
Gender
|
Specialty
|
Years since graduation
|
M
|
F
|
p-Value
|
GP
|
Specialist
|
p-Value
|
1–5 y
|
6–10 y
|
> 10 y
|
p-Value
|
Abbreviations: BP, bisphosphonate; F, female; GP, general practitioner; M, male.
Note: “Yes” is the correct answer for all questions.
|
Risk factors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of BP therapy
|
67.1
|
66.7
|
67.6
|
0.722
|
61.0
|
73.2
|
0.001
|
64.6
|
68.8
|
70.4
|
0.683
|
Route of administration
|
51.7
|
53.6
|
48.0
|
0.399
|
40.3
|
63.2
|
0.000
|
46.8
|
55.4
|
58.5
|
0.103
|
Age of the patient
|
51.6
|
51.4
|
52.0
|
0.906
|
49.2
|
54.0
|
0.026
|
52.6
|
51.6
|
49.3
|
0.884
|
Gender
|
30.5
|
29.5
|
32.4
|
0.576
|
31.1
|
29.8
|
0.199
|
32.1
|
24.2
|
33.8
|
0.394
|
Tobacco use
|
40.4
|
38.7
|
43.6
|
0.425
|
42.0
|
38.7
|
0.444
|
39.3
|
36.9
|
46.5
|
0.366
|
Diabetes mellitus
|
47.8
|
47.4
|
48.5
|
0.904
|
45.2
|
50.3
|
0.001
|
44.8
|
50.3
|
51.4
|
0.392
|
Use of steroid
|
48.8
|
48.9
|
48.5
|
0.852
|
43.3
|
54.3
|
0.002
|
42.9
|
53.5
|
56.3
|
0.018
|
Type of Bisphosphonate
|
47.1
|
49.1
|
43.1
|
0.232
|
40.0
|
54.3
|
0.000
|
43.5
|
49.7
|
52.1
|
0.333
|
Genetic factors
|
33.9
|
33.0
|
35.8
|
0.674
|
29.5
|
38.4
|
0.068
|
30.8
|
37.6
|
36.6
|
0.096
|
Denture wearing
|
32.5
|
32.3
|
32.8
|
0.191
|
29.2
|
35.8
|
0.029
|
26.0
|
40.1
|
38.0
|
0.005
|
Dentoalveolar surgery
|
55.4
|
56.8
|
52.5
|
0.296
|
46.2
|
64.6
|
0.000
|
51.6
|
56.7
|
62.0
|
0.174
|
Local anatomical factors
|
47.4
|
46.9
|
48.5
|
0.293
|
39.0
|
56.0
|
0.000
|
44.2
|
49.7
|
52.1
|
0.355
|
Presence of oral disease
|
49.8
|
48.6
|
52.0
|
0.233
|
46.2
|
53.3
|
0.004
|
46.8
|
53.5
|
52.1
|
0.262
|
Clinical features
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pain
|
61.9
|
59.6
|
66.7
|
0.083
|
62.0
|
61.9
|
0.442
|
61.7
|
63.1
|
63.1
|
0.213
|
Purulent discharge
|
47.0
|
47.4
|
46.1
|
0.088
|
42.6
|
51.3
|
0.087
|
41.6
|
53.5
|
51.4
|
0.067
|
Exposed bone
|
64.9
|
63.5
|
67.6
|
0.563
|
61.0
|
68.9
|
0.100
|
63.6
|
66.2
|
66.2
|
0.765
|
Fistula
|
38.9
|
39.0
|
38.7
|
0.812
|
34.4
|
43.4
|
0.077
|
34.1
|
43.9
|
43.7
|
0.149
|
Paraesthesia
|
45.0
|
45.4
|
44.1
|
0.741
|
40.3
|
49.7
|
0.024
|
41.9
|
47.1
|
49.3
|
0.564
|
Pathologic fracture
|
57.2
|
59.1
|
53.4
|
0.176
|
52.5
|
61.9
|
0.059
|
56.2
|
57.3
|
59.2
|
0.895
|
[Table 4] presents dentists’ responses to questions regarding dental treatment strategies
in patients receiving BPs. Around two-thirds of the respondents believe that taking
BPs history is important for all patients, and that all patients should be checked
by a dentist before commencement of BP therapy. However, the majority did not have
sufficient knowledge regarding the appropriate treatment strategies for patients undergoing
BPs therapy, with only 25.7 to 51% knew the correct treatment strategy for each scenario.
Generally, specialist showed significantly better knowledge in all items than general
practitioners.
Table 4
Knowledge regarding dental therapy/preventive strategies in patients undergoing BP
treatment (% of the correct answer)
|
Total
|
Specialty
|
Years since graduation
|
GP
|
Specialist
|
P-Value
|
1–5 years
|
6–10 years
|
> 10 years
|
P-Value
|
Abbreviations: BP, bisphosphonate; F, female; GP, general practitioner; M, male.
|
Taking BP history is important? (correct answer: Yes)
|
|
63.0
|
77.8
|
0.000
|
68.2
|
68.8
|
76.8
|
0.348
|
Patients to be checked by a dentist before BP treatment?
(correct answer: Yes)
|
71.7
|
63.6
|
79.8
|
0.000
|
68.5
|
75.2
|
74.6
|
0.451
|
Invasive dental treatment during IV BP therapy?
(correct answer: No)
|
51.6
|
43.6
|
59.6
|
0.000
|
49
|
53.5
|
54.9
|
0.393
|
Dental treatment in patients with oral BP therapy for < 4 years without risk factors?
(correct answer: Yes)
|
40.5
|
30.5
|
50.7
|
0.000
|
32.1
|
43.3
|
55.6
|
0.000
|
Invasive dental treatment during oral BP therapy for < 4 years with risk factors?
(correct answer: No)
|
34.6
|
29.5
|
39.7
|
0.000
|
34.7
|
35
|
33.8
|
0.137
|
Invasive dental treatment during oral BP therapy for more than 4 years? (correct answer:
No)
|
25.7
|
20.3
|
31.1
|
0.001
|
24.7
|
24.2
|
29.6
|
0.053
|
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that assessed MRONJ knowledge
among dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia. Overall, the results revealed a very alarming
lack of knowledge on MRONJ among the surveyed dentists, with a significant better
knowledge among respondents with higher degrees (specialists) compared with general
practitioners. However, the results of the present study should be interpreted with
caution given the methodological shortcomings explained at the end of this section.
The main result of the present study was the evident poor level of knowledge about
MRONJ and BPs, with only 70% of dentists have heard about the disease, less than half
of the respondents knew about the risk factors and clinical features of MRONJ, and
the majority could not recognize the commercial names of BPs. Our findings are in
line with most of previous similar studies in different countries, which reported
very poor knowledge on MRONJ and BPs among dentists.[2]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16] This can be attributed to the insufficient exposure of dentists to these topics
during undergraduate and postgraduate education.[17] Additionally, lack of periodic continuing educational courses such as attending
workshops and seminars is another contributing factor.
MRONJ adversely affects the quality of life, producing significant morbidity in afflicted
patients. Therefore, dentists should have adequate knowledge about MRONJ, especially
regarding the appropriate treatment strategies in patients undergoing BPs therapy.
Luckily, the AAOMS have set very clear guidelines regarding MRONJ staging and treatment
strategies of patients at risk of this debilitating disease. However, despite the
existence of these guidelines, several studies have shown that majority of dentists
were not aware as how to carry out invasive treatments (such as tooth extraction)
in patients undergoing BPs therapy.[2]
[13]
[16] Our results are not exception as most of dentists in the present study showed very
poor knowledge in this regard. While two-thirds of respondents acknowledged the importance
of taking BP history, the majority were not aware of the treatment strategies of patients
at risk of MRONJ. For example, only 20% of dentists knew that no invasive dental treatment
should be done in patients receiving IV BP. These results are indeed a reason for
concern and necessitate an immediate action to improve dentists’ awareness about MRONJ
and the importance of following the established guidelines for treatment of people
at the risk MRONJ. Conducting periodic continuing education courses and workshops
related to MRONJ is the answer to address this evident gap in the knowledge about
MRONJ and to implement these guidelines.
The other important finding was the noticeable better knowledge among specialists
compared with general practitioners. These results are not surprising as specialists
had better exposure to the topic during postgraduate studies, which may explain their
better knowledge. Additionally, specialists usually are more interested in attending
conferences and scientific activities. However, despite that, the knowledge of specialists
in our study is still below average, and hence more work should be done to promote
their knowledge regarding diagnosis and prevention of MRONJ.
As stated above, this is the first survey that assessed dentists’ knowledge concerning
MRONJ in Saudi Arabia. However, the survey has some limitations that should be acknowledged.
First, low response rate is an obvious limitation of the study. Second, this study
used a convenience sample of dentists and, thus, generalization of the results is
limited. Third, this is a self-reported survey and thus the responses might not have
reflected the real knowledge of dentists. However, despite these limitations, we believe
that this study has shed some light and provided valuable baseline information on
the level of MRONJ knowledge among dental professionals nationwide.
In summary, this study, similar to previous studies in other countries, revealed very
poor knowledge of MRONJ among dentists practicing in Saudi Arabia. Such alarming results
necessitate an immediate action to improve dentists’ awareness and knowledge about
MRONJ treatment and prevention. Periodic continuing courses about how treat and prevent
MRONJ in patients receiving BPs therapy are highly recommended.