Evaluating an Image-Guided Operating Room with Cone Beam CT for Skull Base Surgery

Abstract

Importance Skull base surgery requires precise preoperative assessment and intraoperative management of the patient. Surgical navigation is routinely used for complex skull base cases; however, the image guidance is commonly based on preoperative scans alone.

Objective The primary objective of this study was to assess the image quality of intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) within anatomical landmarks used in sinus and skull base surgery. The secondary objective was to assess the registration error of a surgical navigation system based on intraoperative CBCT.

Design Present study is a retrospective case series of image quality after intraoperative cone beam CT.

Setting The study was conducted at Toronto General Hospital and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.

Participants A total of 46 intraoperative scans (34 patients, 21 skull base, 13 head and neck) were studied.

Main Outcome and Measures Thirty anatomical landmarks (vascular, soft tissue, and bony) within the sinuses and anterior skull base were evaluated for general image quality characteristics: (1) bony detail visualization; (2) soft-tissue visualization; (3) vascular visualization; and (4) freedom from artifacts (e.g., metal). Levels of intravenous (IV) contrast enhancement were quantified in Hounsfield's units (HU). Standard paired-point registration between imaging and tracker coordinates was performed using 6 to 8 skin fiducial markers and the corresponding fiducial registration error (FRE) was measured.

Results Median score for bony detail on CBCT was 5, remaining at 5 after administration of IV contrast. Median soft-tissue score was 2 for both pre- and postcontrast. Median vascular score was 1 precontrast and 3 postcontrast. Median score for artifacts on CBCT were 2 for both pre-and postcontrast, and metal objects were noted to be the most significant source of artifact. Intraoperative CBCT allowed preresection images and immediate postresection images to be available to the skull base surgeon. There was a significant improvement in mean (standard deviation [SD]) CT intensity in the left carotid artery postcontrast 334 HU (67 HU) (p < 10⁻¹⁰). The mean FRE was 1.8 mm (0.45 mm).

Conclusion Intraoperative CBCT in complex skull base procedures provides high-resolution bony detail allowing immediate assessment of complex resections. The use of IV contrast with CBCT improves the visualization of vasculature. Image-guidance based on CBCT yields registration errors consistent with standard techniques.

Keywords

cone-beam CT - image-guided surgery - intraoperative imaging - head and neck cancer

• References

• 1 Jackman AH, Palmer JN, Chiu AG, Kennedy DW. Use of intraoperative CT scanning in endoscopic sinus surgery: a preliminary report. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22 (02) 170-174
• 2 American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. Accessed September 16, 2019 at: https://www.entnet.org/content/intra-operative-use-computer-aided-surgery
• 3 Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (11) 2767-2779
• 4 Siewerdsen JH. Cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector: from image science to image-guided surgery. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 2011; 648 (S1): S241-S250
• 5 Murayama Y, Irie K, Saguchi T. et al. Robotic digital subtraction angiography systems within the hybrid operating room. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (05) 1427-1432
• 6 Tjardes T, Shafizadeh S, Rixen D. et al. Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (01) 25-45
• 7 Ujiie H, Effat A, Yasufuku K. Image-guided thoracic surgery in the hybrid operation room. J Vis Surg 2017; 3: 148-148
• 8 Fujiwara T, Kunisada T, Takeda K. et al. Intraoperative O-arm-navigated resection in musculoskeletal tumors. J Orthop Sci 2018; 23 (06) 1045-1050
• 9 King E, Daly MJ, Chan H. et al. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for head and neck surgery: feasibility of clinical implementation using a prototype mobile C-arm. Head Neck 2013; 35 (07) 959-967
• 10 Batra PS, Kanowitz SJ, Citardi MJ. Clinical utility of intraoperative volume computed tomography scanner for endoscopic sinonasal and skull base procedures. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22 (05) 511-515
• 11 Bai M, Liu B, Mu H, Liu X, Jiang Y. The comparison of radiation dose between C-arm flat-detector CT (DynaCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): a phantom study. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81 (11) 3577-3580
• 12 Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC. et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006; 31 (03) 1116-1128
• 13 Daly MJ, Chan H, Nithiananthan S. et al. Clinical implementation of intraoperative cone-beam CT in head and neck surgery. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging—Proceedings of SPIE 2011;7964. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.878976
• 14 Enquobahrie A, Gobbi D, Turek M. et al. Designing tracking software for image-guided surgery applications: IGSTK experience. Int J CARS 2008; 3 (05) 395-403
• 15 Fitzpatrick JM, West JB. The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20 (09) 917-927
• 16 Engelhorn T, Struffert T, Richter G. et al. Flat panel detector angiographic CT in the management of aneurysmal rupture during coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29 (08) 1581-1584
• 17 Meyer BC, Frericks BB, Albrecht T, Wolf KJ, Wacker FK. Contrast-enhanced abdominal angiographic CT for intra-abdominal tumor embolization: a new tool for vessel and soft tissue visualization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30 (04) 743-749
• 18 Watanabe H, Honda E, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77 (03) 397-402
• 19 Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109 (01) e25-e31
• 20 Doelken M, Struffert T, Richter G. et al. Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT. Neuroradiology 2008; 50 (06) 517-523
• 21 Kim MS, Kim BY, Choi HY. et al. Intravenous contrast media application using cone-beam computed tomography in a rabbit model. Imaging Sci Dent 2015; 45 (01) 31-39
• 22 Groell R, Willfurth P, Schaffler GJ. et al. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the head and neck: comparison of contrast material injection rates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20 (09) 1732-1736
• 23 Citardi MJ, Batra PS. Intraoperative surgical navigation for endoscopic sinus surgery: rationale and indications. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 15 (01) 23-27
• 24 Otake Y, Leonard S, Reiter A. et al. Rendering-based video-CT registration with physical constraints for image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2015; 9415
• 25 Daly MJ, Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA, Irish JC. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. Med Phys 2006; 33 (10) 3767-3780
• 26 McCollough CH, Bushberg JT, Fletcher JG, Eckel LJ. Answers to common questions about the use and safety of CT scans. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90 (10) 1380-1392