Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020; 33(02): 102-109
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400313
Original Research
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Computed Tomographic Assessment of Block Recession Trochleoplasty and Partial Parasagittal Patellectomy in Cats

Valentina Brioschi
1   Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Lynda Rutherford
2   The Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, London University, Hatfield, United Kingdom
,
Karin Newell
1   Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Caroline Trotter
1   Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Gareth I. Arthurs
1   Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
3   Arthurs Orthopaedics, Hardwick, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Funding This project was funded by a BVOA clinical research grant.
Further Information

Publication History

17 April 2019

01 October 2019

Publication Date:
24 January 2020 (online)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to assess computed tomography (CT) images of cadaveric feline stifles and record the relationship between the patella and femoral trochlea in normal stifles; then to investigate the effect of block recession trochleoplasty (BRT) with and without partial parasagittal patellectomy (PPP) on patellofemoral contact, depth of patellar recession and size of trochlea and patella.

Materials and Methods The sample population included six cat cadavers (12 stifles). Preoperative CT scans with stifles in three positions: extended (155–165°), neutral (85–95°) and flexed (35–45°). Lateral stifle arthrotomy was followed by BRT. CT scans were taken as above. PPP was performed so the width of the patella was 1 mm narrower than the BRT. CT scans were repeated and CT measurements were taken.

Results The area of contact between the patella and femoral trochlea was significantly reduced after BRT and then significantly increased after PPP. The depth of patellar recession was unchanged after BRT, but then was significantly higher after PPP. The patella was wider than the trochlea preoperatively and post-BRT and narrower post-PPP. Reduction in bone volume following PPP (mean: 20%) was 50% the reduction in patella width (mean: 40%).

Conclusion Block recession trochleoplasty did not improve patellar recession and decreased patellofemoral contact area. Following BRT, the patella rides the trochlear ridges and loses contact with the trochlear sulcus. Block recession trochleoplasty alone should not be performed in cats. Instead, BRT should be combined with PPP.

Note

This study was presented as a Clinical research abstract at the ECVS congress, Edinburgh, 2017.


Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.


 
  • References

  • 1 Loughin CA, Kerwin SC, Hosgood G. , et al. Clinical signs and results of treatment in cats with patellar luxation: 42 cases (1992-2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 228 (09) 1370-1375
  • 2 Rutherford L, Langley-Hobbs SJ, Whitelock RJ, Arthurs GI. Complications associated with corrective surgery for patellar luxation in 85 feline surgical cases. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 17 (04) 312-317
  • 3 Rutherford L, Arthurs GI. Partial parasagittal patellectomy: a novel method for augmenting surgical correction of patellar luxation in four cats. J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16 (08) 689-694
  • 4 Johnson AL, Probst CW, Decamp CE. , et al. Comparison of trochlear block recession and trochlear wedge recession for canine patellar luxation using a cadaver model. Vet Surg 2001; 30 (02) 140-150
  • 5 Voss K, Langley-Hobbs SJ, Montavon PM. Patellar luxation. In: Montavon PM, Voss K, Langley-Hobbs SJ. , eds. Feline Orthopedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Disease. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009: 477-479
  • 6 Langley-Hobbs SJ, Brown G, Matis U. Traumatic fracture of the patella in 11 cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (05) 427-433
  • 7 Langley-Hobbs SJ. Survey of 52 fractures of the patella in 34 cats. Vet Rec 2009; 164 (03) 80-86
  • 8 Palierne S, Palissier F, Raymond-Letron I, Autefage A. A case of bilateral patellar osteochondrosis and fracture in a cat. Clinical and histological findings. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23 (02) 128-133
  • 9 Talcott KW, Goring RL, De Haan JJ. Rectangular recession trochleoplasty for treatment of patellar luxation in dogs and cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13: 39-43
  • 10 L'Eplattenier H, Montavon P. Patellar luxation in dogs and cats: management and prevention. Compendium Continuing Educ 2002; 24 (04) 292-298
  • 11 Scott HW, McLaughlin R. Patellar luxation. In: Feline Orthopedics. London: Manson Publishing Ltd; 2007: 218-222
  • 12 Marder RA, Swanson TV, Sharkey NA, Duwelius PJ. Effects of partial patellectomy and reattachment of the patellar tendon on patellofemoral contact areas and pressures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (01) 35-45
  • 13 Hulse DA. Medial Patellar Luxation in the Dog. In: Bojrab MJ. , ed. Disease Mechanisms in Small Animal Surgery. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1993: 808-817
  • 14 Rutherford DJ. Intra-articular pressures and joint mechanics: should we pay attention to effusion in knee osteoarthritis?. Med Hypotheses 2014; 83 (03) 292-295
  • 15 Punzi L, Galozzi P, Luisetto R. , et al. Post-traumatic arthritis: overview on pathogenic mechanisms and role of inflammation. RMD Open 2016; 2 (02) e000279
  • 16 Houlton JEF, Meynink SE. Medial patellar luxation in the cat. J Small Anim Pract 1989; 30: 349-352
  • 17 Johnson ME. Feline patellar luxation: a retrospective case study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 835-838