Keywords
auditory neuropathy - semicircular canals - vestibulo-ocular reflexes - saccades -
pure tone threshold
Introduction
Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is characterized by the presence of otoacoustic
emissions, the absence of auditory brainstem response, and of poorer speech identification
score that does not correlate with the pure tone threshold.[1]
[2]
[3]
[4] The epidemiological data on ANSD varies across the studies and age groups. In 1979,
Davis et al[5] reported that 1 in every 200 children with hearing impairment have ANSD. Similarly,
in 1999, Berlin[6] reported 4% of children with permanent hearing loss with ANSD. In the Indian scenario,
it was reported that 1 in every 183 individuals with sensorineural hearing loss has
ANSD,[7] whereas the prevalence of ANSD was reported to be 2.27% in school-going hearing
impaired children.[8]
The prevalence of vestibular impairment varies across studies. In a retrospective
study on 50 individuals with ANSD, 53% of them were found to have vestibular dysfunction
with hypoactive caloric response.[9] Prabhu et al[10] reported that one in five individuals with ANSD reported at least one of the vestibular
symptoms. A few other studies have also reported affected sacculocollic[11]
[12]
[13] and utriculo-ocular pathways[14] in these individuals. Also, abnormal response has been reported in the Mann, Romberg
and Fukuda stepping tests for eyes closed condition suggesting a possible involvement
of peripheral vestibular organs in individuals with ANSD.[13]
However, earlier studies have also reported variability in vestibular test results
in individuals with ANSD. Sinha et al (2013b)[13] reported abnormality of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs)
in 82.26% of the ears with ANSD, Ismail et al[15] reported absence of cVEMPs in 50% of the ears with ANSD, Kumar et al[12] reported abnormal cVEMPs in 65% of the ears with ANSD, and Sinha et al (2013b)[13] reported absence of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) in 90%
of the ears with ANSD. There was a large variability not only in the cVEMPs and oVEMPs,
but also in caloric test findings. For example, Starr et al[3] reported absent responses to caloric tests in 20% of the participants with ANSD,
Abdel-Nasser et al[16] reported reduced caloric responses in 30% of the subjects with ANSD, whereas Sinha
et al[17] reported reduced caloric responses in 86% of the participants with ANSD.
The caloric test is considered as a gold standard test for the evaluation of the 2
lateral semicircular canals in a very low and brief frequency range (0.002–0.004 Hz).
However, the frequency range assessed by the caloric test is way below the frequency
range to which a normal hearing individual is exposed in everyday life.[18] Also, the caloric test does not assess the anterior and the posterior canal. Even
after combining the cVEMP, oVEMP and caloric test results, we obtain information about
the saccule, the utricle, and only the horizontal semicircular canals. Hence, there
is a need to assess the anterior and the posterior canals in individuals with ANSD.
Halmagyi et al[19] have come up with an advanced noninvasive tool based on the principle of the head
impulse test (HIT), known as the video head impulse test (vHIT). The vHIT is a software-based
test that consists of goggles with gyroscope to quantify the vestibulo-ocular reflex
(VOR) gain function and refixation saccades.[20] The vHIT has good test retest reliability[21] and good sensitivity in identifying semicircular canal lesions in various clinical
populations, such as Meniere disease,[22] benign paroxysmal positional vertigo,[23] vestibular neuritis,[24] adults with congenital sensorineural hearing loss,[25] and in vestibular migraine.[26] The inclusion of the vHIT in the vestibular test battery for the diagnosis of vestibular
lesions in individuals with ANSD will provide information about all the six semicircular
canals.
Therefore, the present study aimed at evaluating the functioning of all six semicircular
canals in individuals with ANSD and to compare it with those of normal hearing individuals.
Vestibulo-ocular reflex gain function and refixation saccades (if any) in both groups
were analyzed. The present study also aimed at finding out a correlation between vHIT
test findings with duration of disorder and pure tone thresholds and finding out an
association between the presence or absence of saccades with VOR gain values in individuals
with ANSD (if any).
Methods
Two groups of individuals were included in the present study. Group I consisted of
25 participants (18 males and 7 females) in the age range of 16 to 40 years (x̅ = 22.16;
σ = 1.8) with bilateral hearing sensitivity within normal limits as examined with
pure tone audiometry. Also, these individuals reported to have no history or presence
of any otological, neurological or vestibular disorders. None of the individuals had
been treated with any vestibulotoxic medications. Group II consisted of 25 participants
(18 males and 7 females) in the age range of 16 to 40 years (x̅ = 29.20; σ = 7.8)
and diagnosed with bilateral ANSD. The diagnosis of ANSD was made based on poor word
recognition scores, preserved otoacoustic emission/cochlear microphonics resembling
normal OHCs (outer hair cells) functioning, abnormal auditory brainstem evoked potentials
and absent acoustic reflexes. These individuals had no history or presence of any
otological disorders. A neurological opinion was taken to further confirm the diagnosis
of ANSD. A total of 5 out of 25 participants with ANSD presented with vestibular signs
and symptoms. Demographic details, duration of the disorder, and audiological information
of each of the individuals with ANSD are shown in [Table 1].
Table 1
Details of Degree, Duration and Configuration of Hearing Loss in Individuals with
Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder
Participants
|
Age(years old)/gender
|
Ear
|
Severity of hearing loss
|
Pure tone configuration
|
Duration of the disorder (years)
|
P1
|
40/F
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Reverse slope
|
1
|
Left
|
Moderately severe
|
Reverse slope
|
P2
|
35/M
|
Right
|
Moderately severe
|
Reverse slope
|
1
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Reverse slope
|
P3
|
38/F
|
Right
|
Moderately severe
|
Flat
|
5
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
P4
|
19/M
|
Right
|
Minimal
|
Flat
|
8
|
Left
|
Minimal
|
Flat
|
P5
|
40/M
|
Right
|
Minimal
|
Reverse slope
|
0.5
|
Left
|
Minimal
|
Reverse slope
|
P6
|
22/M
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
8
|
Left
|
Moderately severe
|
Flat
|
P7
|
26/F
|
Right
|
Minimal
|
Reverse slope
|
1
|
Left
|
Minimal
|
Reverse slope
|
P8
|
32/M
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
2
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
P9
|
16/F
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Reverse slope
|
1
|
Left
|
Moderately severe
|
Reverse slope
|
P10
|
19/F
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Reverse slope
|
1
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Reverse slope
|
P11
|
28/F
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
5
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
P12
|
26/M
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
5
|
Left
|
Moderately severe
|
Sloping
|
P13
|
28/F
|
Right
|
Moderately severe
|
Flat
|
8
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Sloping
|
P14
|
20/M
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Sloping
|
16
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Sloping
|
P15
|
37/F
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
5
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Reverse slope
|
P16
|
17/M
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
8
|
Left
|
Moderately severe
|
Flat
|
P17
|
38/M
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
16
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
P18
|
33/F
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
5
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
P19
|
28/M
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
5
|
Left
|
Moderately severe
|
Flat
|
P20
|
33/F
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Reverse slope
|
2
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Reverse slope
|
P21
|
26/M
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
5
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
P22
|
32/F
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Sloping
|
2
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
P23
|
21/M
|
Right
|
Minimal
|
Flat
|
1
|
Left
|
Minimal
|
Flat
|
P24
|
40/F
|
Right
|
Moderately severe
|
Flat
|
16
|
Left
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
P25
|
60/M
|
Right
|
Moderate
|
Flat
|
5
|
Left
|
Moderately severe
|
Flat
|
All of the testing procedures performed in the present study were noninvasive and
were approved by the review board of the All India Institute of Speech and Hearing.
Also, all of the procedures were explained to each individual taking part in the study,
followed by written consent on the same.
A calibrated Inventis Piano Plus audiometer (Inventis, Padova, Italy) with a TDH-39
headphone (Telephonics Corporation, Farmingdale, NY, USA) encased in MX-41/AR supra-aural
cushion (Telephonics Corporation, Farmingdale, NY, USA), and a Radioear B-71 bone
vibrator (Kimmetrics, Smithsburg, MD, USA) were used for pure tone audiometry and
speech audiometry. A calibrated Grason-Stadler Tympstar (version 2.0) (Grason-Stadler
Inc, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) middle ear analyzer was used to analyze the functioning
of the middle ear. Otoacoustic emissions were measured via a calibrated ILOV6 (version
2.0) (Grason-Stadler Inc, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). A calibrated Intelligent Hearing
System (IHS) with Smart EP (3.94 USBez) system was used to measure click evoked auditory
brainstem response. Video head impulse tests with ICS impulse lightweight video goggles
(GN Otometrics, Taastrup, Denmark) and a camera with a speed of 250 Hz was utilized
to record the motion of the right eye and to check for refixation saccades (if any).
All of the tests were performed according to the criteria of the American National
Standard Institute (ANSI) S3.1 (1991) within noise permissible limit in an acoustically
treated room. A detailed case history was taken regarding the nature and onset of
the hearing loss and the presence of any vestibular symptoms. Also, detailed information
on medical history and any other associated problems were obtained.
With the modified Hughson and Westlake procedure,[27] air conduction and bone conduction thresholds were measured at octave frequencies
from 250 Hz to 8,000 Hz and at 250 Hz to 4,000 Hz, respectively, to evaluate hearing
sensitivity of all of the individuals who participated in the present study. The tympanometry
was performed at 226 Hz probe tone, and the acoustic reflex threshold was obtained
at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, 2,000 Hz and 4,000 Hz, both ipsilaterally and contralaterally.
Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were measured at 80 dB peak SPL with
260 pairs of click stimuli in probe fit condition. Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were
considered present if the signal to noise ratio (SNR) was > 6 dB for 3 consecutive
frequencies. The conventional electrode placement technique was used to measure auditory
evoked brainstem responses using clicks of 100 µs at a repetition rate of 30.1/second,
with a filter setting of 100 to 3,000 Hz in both condensation and rarefaction polarities.
The administration of the vHIT was performed in a well-lit room using the dedicated
Otosuite vestibular software (GN Otometrics, Taastrup, Denmark). Lightweight goggles
with frenzel glasses were fixed aptly to avoid slippage. The calibration of the instrument
was performed for all of the individuals prior to the administration of the vHIT test.
After the calibration of the equipment, head thrust was given for the lateral plane,
the right anterior left posterior plane (RALP), and for the left anterior right posterior
plane (LARP) for all of the participants. The head thrust was applied randomly at
an angle ranging between 10° and 15° in all 3 orthogonal planes (pitch, roll and yaw
planes).
The VOR gain for all of the six semicircular canals and the refixation saccades (if
any) at the time of head thrust, that is, covert saccade, after the head thrust, and
overt saccade were analyzed for all the participants.
Results
Descriptive statistics was performed to calculate the mean and standard deviation
(SD) of the VOR gain between the two groups for all three planes of the semicircular
canals. The vHIT responses recorded from one individual of each groups are given in
[Figs. 1] and [2].
Fig. 1 Video head impulse test results obtained from one of the participants with normal
hearing.
Fig. 2 Video head impulse test results obtained from one of the participant with auditory
neuropathy spectrum disorder.
The VOR gain of all six semicircular canals was analyzed for both groups. The VOR
gain was considered to be abnormal if the value of the VOR gain was < 0.8.[28] According to the aforementioned criteria, the VOR gain was found to be > 0.8 for
all the normal hearing individuals for all the six semicircular canals, whereas most
of the individuals with ANSD had reduced VOR gain (< 0.8) in ≥ 1 semicircular canal.
Only one of the participants with ANSD had normal VOR gain in all six semi-circular
canals. The VOR gain data for each individual is shown in [Fig. 3].
Fig. 3 Vestibulo-ocular reflex gain values of individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum
disorder. Abbreviations: LA, left anterior; LL, left lateral; LP, left posterior;
RA, right anterior; RL, right lateral; RP, right posterior; VOR, vestibulo-ocular
reflex.
The mean and SD of the VOR gain are shown in [Table 2].
Table 2
Mean and Standard Deviation of the Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Gain Values for Both Groups
Semicircular canal
|
Individuals with ANSD
|
Normal Hearing Individuals
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Left Lateral (LL)
|
0.77
|
0.22
|
0.95
|
0.09
|
Right Lateral (RL)
|
0.77
|
0.19
|
1.00
|
0.07
|
Left Anterior (LA)
|
0.68
|
0.18
|
0.90
|
0.10
|
Right Posterior (RP)
|
0.69
|
0.13
|
0.90
|
0.13
|
Left Posterior (LP)
|
0.66
|
0.15
|
0.87
|
0.09
|
Right Anterior (RA)
|
0.76
|
0.16
|
0.98
|
0.15
|
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
From [Table 2], it can be observed that the VOR gain is reduced in individuals with ANSD compared
with normal-hearing individuals for all the six semi-circular canals.
The Shapiro-Wilk test revealed normal distribution (p > 0.05) of the VOR gain data. The independent sample t-test revealed a significant
difference in VOR gain values between the 2 groups for the right lateral (RL) (t [48] = 5.57;
p = 0.00), left lateral (LL) (t [48] = 3.69; p = 0.00), right posterior (RP) (t [48] = 5.52 p = 0.00), left anterior (LA) (t [48] = 5.17; p = 0.00), right anterior (RA) (t [48] = 4.99; p = 0.00), and left posterior LP (t [48] = 5.80; p = 0.00) canals.
Also, the refixation saccades were calculated across both groups, where they were
found to be present in individuals with ANSD and absent in normal-hearing individuals.
The overall frequency of refixation saccades in different planes in individuals with
ANSD is shown in [Table 3].
Table 3
Refixation Saccades at all Six Semicircular Canals Present in the Individuals with
Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder
Semicircular canals
|
Covert Saccade
|
Overt Saccade
|
Covert + Overt
|
None
|
Left Lateral (LL)
|
6
|
5
|
9
|
5
|
Right Lateral (RL)
|
6
|
3
|
11
|
5
|
Left Anterior (LA)
|
4
|
0
|
5
|
16
|
Right Anterior (RA)
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
17
|
Left Posterior (LP)
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
16
|
Right Posterior (RP)
|
6
|
1
|
4
|
14
|
[Table 3] shows the presence of saccades in individuals with ANSD. It can be seen that covert
saccade alone was present in all of the six semi-circular canals in individuals with
ANSD. Both the covert and overt saccades were present in all of the canals, except
in the RA. Furthermore, the presence of only overt saccade was observed in all of
the six canals, except in the LA and in the right anterior RA canals. The saccades
were found to be higher in number for lateral canals. However, no saccades were observed
in any of the normal-hearing individuals.
The Pearson correlation test was administered in individuals with ANSD to understand
the correlation between the duration of the disorder with VOR gain. The Pearson correlation
test revealed no significant correlation between the VOR gain values and the duration
of the disorders. The correlation values between VOR gain and the duration of the
disorder are shown in [Table 4].
Table 4
Correlation Between Duration of Disorder and Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Gain of the Six
Semicircular Canals in Individuals with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder
Semicircular Canals
|
‘r’ Values
|
Left Lateral (LL)
|
−0.15*
|
Right Lateral (RL)
|
0.16*
|
Left Anterior (LA)
|
0.10*
|
Right Anterior (RA)
|
0.08*
|
Left Posterior (LP)
|
−0.04*
|
Right posterior (RP)
|
0.01*
|
Note: * denotes ‘r’ values with no significant correlation.
The Pearson correlation test revealed no correlation between pure tone thresholds
and the VOR gain values for the right canals and the left canals (except for the LP
canal). Please note that the correlation was obtained between the right canals VOR
gain values with right ear pure tone thresholds and the left canals with left ear
pure tone thresholds. The correlation values for the VOR gain with pure tone thresholds
are shown in [Table 5].
Table 5
Correlation Between Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Gain and Pure Tone Thresholds in Individuals
with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder
Semicircular Canals
|
R Values
|
Left Lateral (LL)
|
0.14
|
Right Lateral (RL)
|
−0.25
|
Left Anterior (LA)
|
0.30
|
Right Anterior (RA)
|
0.04
|
Left Posterior (LP)
|
0.42*
|
Right posterior (RP)
|
0.01
|
Note: * denotes significant positive correlation at 0.05 level.
An attempt was made to find an association between the VOR gain values and the presence
or absence of saccades in individuals with ANSD. We have tried to find an association
between the VOR gain of a particular canal with the presence or absence of saccades
in that particular canal. For example, we have tried to find an association between
the VOR gain of the lateral canal with the presence or absence of saccades in the
lateral canal only. The chi-squared test revealed no association between the VOR gain
values and the presence or absence of saccades in any of the semicircular canals (p > 0.05). The summary of the chi-squared test is shown in [Table 6]
Table 6
Details of the Chi-squared Test Showing Association Between Presence or Absence of
Saccades and Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Gain
|
|
LLS
|
|
RLS
|
|
LAS
|
|
RPS
|
|
RAS
|
|
LPS
|
|
|
|
P
|
A
|
P
|
A
|
P
|
A
|
P
|
A
|
P
|
A
|
P
|
A
|
LLG
|
N
|
5
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R
|
3
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RLG
|
N
|
|
|
8
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R
|
|
|
2
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAG
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RPG
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
RAG
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
16
|
|
|
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
3
|
|
|
LPG
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
17
|
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
Abbreviation: LAG, left anterior gain; LAS, left anterior saccade; LLG, left lateral
gain; LLS, left lateral saccade; LPG, left posterior gain; LPS, left posterior saccade;
RAG, right anterior gain; RAS, right anterior saccade; RLG, right lateral gain; RLS,
right lateral saccade; RPG, right posterior gain; RPS, right posterior saccade.
Discussion
The results of the present study revealed significantly lower VOR gain values in individuals
with ANSD than in normal hearing individuals. Similar studies have reported reduced
VOR gain in individuals with various peripheral vestibular disorders.[29]
[30] Blödow et al[31] reported unusually decreased VOR gain values in 117 patients with bilateral vestibulopathy.
Blödow et al[23] reported reduced VOR gain values in 37% of the individuals with Meniere disease.
Taylor et al[32] mentioned 43 patients with bilateral vestibular neuritis, out of which 97.7% had
reduced VOR gain values in horizontal canals, 39.5% in posterior canals, and 90.7%
in anterior canals. The VOR gain has also been reported to be reduced in cases with
vestibular schwannoma.[33]
[34]
[35]
[36] The reduction in VOR gain in vestibular schwannoma has been linked to the nerve
compression that does not allow the action potentials to travel through the peripheral
vestibular system to the vestibular nucleus.
As it has been suggested that individuals with ANSD might have vestibular neuropathy,
this neuropathic condition might be interfering with the normal conduction of action
potentials between peripheral vestibular receptors and the vestibular nucleus. Neuropathic
involvement of the vestibular nerve has been reported by various authors.[2]
[12]
[14]
[18] Starr et al[37] have also reported a beaded appearance of the nerve, along with fragmentation of
the myelin sheath. Moreover, a reduced number of nerve fibers between the peripheral
vestibular receptors and the vestibular ganglion has also been reported, indicating
an axonal degeneration in individuals with ANSD. Also, the demyelinating condition
in ANSD results in the disruption of the production, as well as of the propagation
of action potentials by the vestibular nerves. This occurs due to a reduction in membrane
resistance due to which the action potential does not spread very far before requiring
regeneration.[35] This translates into the inability of the neural pathway, that is, the superior
and inferior vestibular nerves, to generate an appropriate amount of action potentials
necessary for the VOR reflex pathway to work properly and, hence, the VOR gain is
reduced.
Moreover, one of the participants with ANSD in the current study had normal VOR gain.
Various authors have reported that the vestibular tests are not affected in all of
the participants with ANSD. For example, Starr et al[3] reported caloric responses to be absent in 2 out of 10 individuals with ANSD, Konrádsson[38] reported normal caloric responses in all of the 4 children diagnosed with ANSD,
Fujikawa et al[39] reported vestibular abnormality in 9 out of 14 participants with ANSD, whereas Kumar
et al[12] reported vestibular abnormality in 80% of the participants with ANSD. The reports
from various studies indicate that there is a large variability in vestibular test
findings in individuals with ANSD. The normal VOR gain in this particular participant
could be because of the slow progression of the disease or an early stage of involvement
of the vestibular nerves.
In the present study, it was also found that normal-hearing individuals had no compensatory
saccades, which were found to be present in all of the individuals with ANSD in one
or the other canal. Similar reports have been published earlier in various vestibular
pathologies.[29]
[40]
[41] Blodow et al[31] suggested that compensatory refixation saccades occur as a result of reduced VOR
gain in individuals with vestibulopathy. Also, the similar results obtained by Neupane
et al[42] in individuals with motion sickness recommended compensatory refixation saccades
as a good parameter in evaluating these individuals.
Compensatory refixation saccades are indicative of weakened semicircular canals such
that it is incapable to stabilize the gaze with the movement of eyes in equal velocity
opposite direction to the head rotation.[30] These occur due to the variation in stimulation between two canals of the same orthogonal
plane giving rise to the generation of compensatory eye movement by VOR to retain
the gaze stability even while the head is moving.[43] These ballistic high-velocity refixation saccades can degrade the image in the retina,
therefore suppressing the vision in its onset and period of occurrence.[44] However, it is also the suppressing feature of saccades that help in the removal
of those smeared retinal images created due to the insufficient slow-phase eye velocities
that are prevalent in most of the vestibular pathologies.[45]
In the present study, the presence of refixation saccades in individuals with ANSD
clearly suggests that these individuals have a vestibular loss that might be resulting
in difficulty in stabilizing the gaze on the target. Therefore, these saccades are
helpful in maintaining gaze, but not with slow compensatory eye movements. It is the
high-velocity eye movement seen in refixation saccades that eradicates smeared retinal
image caused due to the presence of insufficient VOR.[45] Hence, the presence of refixation saccades can be one of the parameters indicating
vestibular loss in individuals with ANSD.
Also, in the present study, no correlation was found between the VOR gain and the
duration of the disorder in individuals with ANSD. None of the previous studies have
stated the correlation of VOR gain with the duration of the disorder in individuals
with ANSD. In the auditory domain, Jijo et al[46] found no significant correlation between the speech identification scores and pure
tone thresholds with the duration of the disorder in individuals with ANSD. Also,
it was reported to have the group of individuals with ANSD with similar speech identification
scores and puretone thresholds even though the duration of the disorder was not the
same and vice versa.[46] Moreover, Spoendlin[14] reported the presence of idiosyncratic variability in the range of characteristic
features of the disorder in each individual with ANSD, even if they had a similar
pathophysiology. Hence, these suggest the heterogeneity in the nature of the disorder,
which may vary across each individual with ANSD.
Therefore, considering these individualistic variations in the audiological domain,
despite the duration of the disorder in individuals with ANSD, one can assume that
the functioning of the vestibular portions in these individuals is similar. Thus,
the individualistic variations may be seen in each individual, despite the duration
of the disorder, giving rise to no correlation of the VOR gain and asymmetry with
the duration of the disorder.
In the present study, the dissociation between the vestibular responses and pure tone
thresholds might be due to the fact that these are the physiological acts by two different
systems (auditory and vestibular systems) in two different manners. Here, the auditory
system is known to be responsive to the acoustic signals, and the peripheral vestibular
system is responsive to the head movements and balance. Therefore, the physiological
basis of these two systems may go differently giving rise to no correlation between
the VOR gain and pure tone thresholds. Furthermore, the present study included the
assessment of the semicircular canals using the vHIT. The bithermal caloric test could
have been a better measure in the comparative study of the results of the lateral
canals in both groups. Also, the documentation of the onset of the disease might help
in assessing the variation in the characteristic severity expressed by the individual
with ANSD.
Conclusion
In the present study, the VOR gain was found to be reduced in individuals with ANSD.
Also, there was no correlation between the VOR test findings with pure tone thresholds
and duration of hearing loss. The reduced VOR gain indicates a deficit in the VOR
mechanism in individuals with ANSD. The presence of the refixation saccades in ANSD
indicates the presence of a compensatory mechanism of VOR in individuals with ANSD.
Presence of high-velocity eye movements seen in refixation saccades in ANSD, which
eradicates smeared retinal images caused by the presence of insufficient VOR. It is
recommended to use the vHIT test in combination with other vestibular tests to understand
the VOR compensatory mechanism in individuals vestibular loss.