Keywords
atherosclerosis - non-coding RNAs - vascular inflammation
Myeloid Cell-Driven Vascular Inflammation during Atherosclerosis Progression: Focus
on Non-Coding Ribonucleic Acid
Myeloid Cell-Driven Vascular Inflammation during Atherosclerosis Progression: Focus
on Non-Coding Ribonucleic Acid
Atherosclerosis is defined as a chronic disease of the arterial vessel wall whose
architecture is slowly remodelled during time. The endothelial layer, at the interface
with circulating blood cells, plays a relevant role in the initial stage of atherosclerosis.
Subsequent pathological remodelling of the medial layer populated by smooth muscle
cells (SMCs) leads to lesion formation and evolution into an atherosclerotic plaque.
In the present review, we discuss mechanisms responsible for the chronicity of atherosclerotic
disease, with a focus on myeloid cells contribution in aggravating the inflammatory
status during lesion progression and destabilisation.
Myeloid cells originate from a common myeloid progenitor during haematopoiesis. They
include thrombocytes, erythrocytes, mast cells and myeloblast-derived cells that are
basophils, neutrophils, eosinophils and monocytes. Among those, the monocytes play
a predominant role in the initiation and also in the advancement of atherosclerosis.
Monocytes can differentiate into macrophages and myeloid lineage dendritic cells (DCs),
thereby triggering and perpetuating inflammatory processes. DCs of myeloid origin
are sub-populations of monocytes/macrophages, potent activators of the adaptive immune
system, also known as antigen presenting cells.
The contribution of neutrophils, which are the most abundant leucocyte sub-type in
human circulation, is mostly described in acute inflammatory responses whereas their
contribution to chronic inflammation has only recently been appreciated. Neutrophils
are found in both human and murine atherosclerotic plaques throughout different stages
of the disease[1]
[2] underscoring their contribution to this chronic form of inflammation. In fact, recent
studies have shed light on the importance of neutrophils during atherosclerosis and
its complications.[1]
[3]
[4]
In the present review, we provide examples of how, ‘molecular messages’ originating
from myeloid cells can be detrimental for vascular wall cells with the formation of
advanced atherosclerotic lesions as a consequence. As for ‘molecular messages’, we
focus on non-coding ribonucleic acids (RNAs), for their potential to orchestrate pathological
changes occurring during disease.
Previously, it was assumed that roughly 98% of the genome is ‘junk deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA)/RNA’. Through next-generation sequencing and other novel RNA/DNA profiling
techniques, it has been shown that non-coding RNAs possess key relevance in the regulation
of gene expression. This current review focuses on better-studied micro-RNAs (miRNAs)
and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and their capability to function as a means of
intercellular communication between myeloid cells and resident cells of the vessel
wall, such as endothelial cells (ECs) and SMCs, in the context of atherosclerosis
([Table 1]).
Table 1
Non-coding RNAs regulation of vascular inflammation
ncRNA
|
Model organism
|
Modulation and target
|
Experimentally validated function
|
Ref
|
miR-10a
|
Mouse; Human EC
|
↑ to inhibit NF-κB pathway via IRAK4
|
Inhibits monocytes attachment
|
[42]
|
miR-21
|
Mouse; Mouse macrophages (peritoneal, bone marrow-derived)
|
↑ to inhibit JNK signalling via ABCG1
|
Regulates foam cells transformation
|
[10]
|
miR-92a
|
Human ECs, macrophages and SMC; bovine aortic EC
|
↓ to prevent inhibition of KLF2, KLF4
|
Regulates EC activation by oxLDL under low shear stress
|
[14]
[15]
[16]
|
miR-126
|
Mouse; Human EC and SMC
|
↑ to inhibit VCAM-1, CXCL12
|
Regulates leukocyte trafficking to sites of inflammation
|
[40]
[41]
|
miR-142
|
Mouse; Mouse stromal cells
|
↓ to induce STAT1a, IRF1b
|
Reduces neutrophil count
|
[28]
|
miR-146a
|
Mouse; Mouse aortic cells, monocytes and macrophages
|
↑ to inhibit NF-κB via IRAK1, TRAF6
|
Reduces monocytes-derived inflammation
|
[11]
|
miR-155
|
Mouse; Mouse macrophages
|
↑ to inhibit CSFR1, ↓ to activate BCL6
|
Suppresses macrophage proliferation; impairs efferocytosis
|
[13]
|
miR-181a
|
Rat aortic SMC; Mouse SMC
|
↑ to inhibit OPN expression
|
Induces phenotypic switch in smooth muscle cells
|
[39]
|
miR-181a
|
Mouse; Mouse dendritic cells
|
↑ to inhibit cFOS
|
Activates anti-oxLDL-stimulated immune inflammation responses
|
[27]
|
miR-181b
|
Mouse; Human monocytes, EC
|
↑ to inhibit importin-α3
|
Reduces NF-κB inflammatory pathway cascade
|
[37]
|
miR-195
|
Human monocytes, SMC, macrophages
|
↑ to inhibit IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α
|
Induces polarisation towards M2-anti-inflammatory phenotype
|
[22]
|
miR-223
|
Human EC and platelets
|
↓ to prevent inhibition of IGF1R
|
Induces apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells
|
[34]
|
miR-223
|
Mouse; Mouse granulocytes
|
↑ to inhibit MEF2C
|
Regulates expansion and activity of neutrophils
|
[31]
|
miR-223
|
Mouse; Mouse macrophages and dendritic cells
|
↑ to inhibit NLRP3
|
Regulates neutrophil-derived inflammation
|
[32]
|
miR-223
|
Mouse; Human neutrophils
|
↑ to inhibit PARP-1
|
Dampens acute lung inflammation
|
[35]
|
ANRIL
|
Human vascular tissue and peripheral blood
|
↓ to prevent inhibition of CDKN2B/A
|
Associated to the cardiovascular disease locus 9p21.3
|
[8]
|
HOTAIR
|
Human macrophages
|
↓ to prevent inhibition of ABCA1, miR-330–5p
|
Influences cholesterol efflux
|
[19]
|
LINC00305
|
Human monocytes and SMC
|
↓ to prevent inhibition of LIMR, AHRR
|
Increases inflammatory genes and drives SMC synthetic phenotype
|
[23]
[24]
|
GAS5
|
Human monocytes, macrophages and EC
|
↓ to inhibit apoptosis pathway
|
Induces apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells
|
[36]
|
MALAT1
|
Mouse; Human monocytes, macrophages
|
↑ to induce interaction with lncNEAT
|
A deficiency leads to immune system dysregulation and atherosclerosis
|
[20]
|
MEXIS
|
Mouse; Mouse macrophages
|
↑ to activate LXR-dependent gene via DDX17
|
Modulates inflammatory cytokines production
|
[18]
|
RNCR3
|
Mouse; Human EC and SMC
|
↑ to form a feedback loop with KLF2 and miR-185–5p
|
Protects against hypercholesterolemia-induced EC and SMC dysfunction
|
[43]
|
Abbreviations: ABCG1, ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 1; AHRR, aryl hydrocarbon
receptor repressor; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; BCL6, B-cell lymphoma 6; CDKN2B,
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B; CSFR1, colony stimulating factor receptor 1;
CXCL12, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12; EC, endothelial cell; IGF1R, insulin-like
growth factor 1 receptor; IL-1, interleukin 1; IRAK4, IL-1 receptor associated kinase
4; IRF1b, interferon regulatory factor 1; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; KLF2, Krüppel-like
factor 2; LIMR, Lipocalin-1 interacting membrane receptor; LXR, liver X receptor;
MEF2C, myocyte enhancer factor-2C; NF-κB, nuclear factor-kappa B; NLRP3, NLR family
pyrin domain containing 3; OPN, osteopontin; oxLDL, oxidised low-density lipoprotein;
PARP-1, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase-1; RNA, ribonucleic acid; SMC,
smooth muscle cell; STAT1a, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; TNF-α,
tumour necrosis factor α; TRAF6, TNF receptor-associated factor 6; VCAM-1, vascular
cell adhesion molecule 1.
MiRNAs are small (21–23 nucleotides [nt]), non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression
on the post-transcriptional level.[5] One processed strand gets loaded into the miRNA-induced silencing complex, where
it interacts with the Argonaute protein to bind to the 3′ untranslated region of the
target sequence. Thus, messenger RNA (mRNA) translation within this target sequence
is inhibited.[5] By this function, miRNAs were discovered to take part in several important biological
processes and—following—also in disease development by orchestrating gene expression
via inhibiting crucial target mRNAs. Therefore, they are considered as key mediators
that can be used as biomarker or even as a potential therapeutic target.
LncRNAs, which by definition are longer than 200 nt, are less well characterised and
conserved compared with miRNAs but more tissue-specific. Their function also differs
from miRNAs, as they can share complementary exons with their targets, which can be
found in both sense and anti-sense direction of an lncRNA.[6] They can function as a scaffold for transcription factors (lincRNAs), enhancers (eRNAs) or as sponges for miRNAs.[7] Thus, lncRNAs are able to communicate/interact with both proteins and also DNA or
RNAs. Even though they appear to be distinctively different from miRNAs, their ultimate
purpose is to orchestrate cellular processes and to filter unnecessary ‘genetic/molecular
noise’.[6] One prominent example of a lncRNA in atherosclerotic diseases is certainly cyclin-dependent
kinase inhibitor 2B-antisense 1 or ANRIL, which was identified in a chromosomal region
(9p21.3) strongly linked to cardiovascular disease.[8] Although the molecular mechanisms of how ANRIL and its numerous isoforms are regulated
by the genotype at the locus have not fully been elucidated, its presence in circulating
blood and within the atherosclerotic tissue has been showed by several, highlighting
its crucial role as intercellular mediator in atherosclerosis.[9]
[10]
[11]
Relevant Non-Coding RNAs Regulating Vascular Inflammation: Myeloid Cell-Borne Non-Coding
RNAs
Relevant Non-Coding RNAs Regulating Vascular Inflammation: Myeloid Cell-Borne Non-Coding
RNAs
During atherogenesis, monocytes infiltrate the vessel wall, undergo transition to
macrophages, which then start engulfing lipids, and activate inflammatory signals.
Macrophages also regulate cholesterol efflux, via adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding
cassette (ABC) transporters, which are important contributors to atherosclerotic plaque
development and progression. MiR-21 is the most abundantly expressed miRNA in macrophages,
and has been shown to negatively regulate pro-inflammatory responses.[12] Its absence in macrophages on the contrary accelerates vascular inflammation, by
enhancing ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 1, and by this augmenting the number
of macrophages that turn into foam cells.[12]
MiRNA-146a plays an important role in monocyte and macrophage activation by negatively
regulating nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), if abundantly expressed in these cell types.[13] This activity was found to be influenced and steered by apolipoprotein E (ApoE)
by enhancing the transcription factor PU.1.[13] Delivery of miR-146a mimics to ApoE−/−Ldlr−/−
(low-density lipoprotein receptor) mice led to alleviation of inflammation-related
symptoms, such as a reduced number of blood monocytes, as well as down-regulated expression
of NF-κB and tumour necrosis factor α.[13] MiR-146 deficient Ldlr
−/− mice, however, show increased levels of circulating leukocytes (neutrophils and monocytes)
during early stages, followed by a decrease due to bone marrow failure with an overall
protective effect for the animals which appear less susceptible to develop atherosclerosis.[14]
Further, it has been indicated that miRNA-146a is transferred from atherosclerotic
macrophages to naive macrophages via extracellular vesicles to halt migration by repressing
the insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 1 and human antigen R, which
are both key players in migration by modulating β-actin expression.[15]
Interestingly, some mRNAs can also function in two different ways depending on the
stage of the disease. For example, in early atherosclerosis miR-155 inhibits macrophage
proliferation/influx by repressing colony stimulating factor (CSF) receptor 1 that
normally reacts to external CSF with preventing lesion formation.[16] In advanced atherosclerosis, miR-155 however targets B-cell lymphoma 6, which leads
to impaired efferocytosis further fuelling the process of unstable lesion formation.[16]
Loyer et al were able to show that miR-92a up-regulation correlated with low shear
stress as well as elevated oxidised LDL (oxLDL) levels.[17] By utilising miR-92a antagomirs (inhibitors), smaller plaque size as well as a more
stable phenotype could be achieved in vivo.[17] Further, over-expression of miR-92a was shown to lower expression levels of Krüppel-like
factors 2[18] and 4[19], which could be reversed by depleting miR-92a via using site-specific inhibitors.[18]
The therapeutic potential of anti-mir92a was originally discovered in ischaemic diseases
by preventing down-regulation of several pro-angiogenic proteins.[20] Mir92a can also target autophagy and metabolism-related genes in a cell-specific
manner. Its inhibition exerts beneficial effects also in the case of post-infarction
events as highlighted by a recent publication.[21] Here, anti-mir92a was shown to induce autophagy in ECs, which confers resistance
to hypoxia and nutrient stress response post-infarction by providing access to energy
substrates.
Another recent study performed in mouse macrophages highlighted a long non-coding
RNA with a human homologue: macrophage-expressed liver X receptor-induced sequence
(MEXIS).[22] Loss of MEXIS impairs the cellular response to cholesterol overload by preventing
ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 1 transcription, and accelerates inflammatory
mechanisms leading to atherosclerosis.[22] Long non-coding RNA homeobox transcript anti-sense RNA (HOTAIR) was also discovered
for its role in vascular inflammation. When macrophages encounter oxLDL, HOTAIR is
up-regulated and modulates the inflammatory cytokine production.[23] Furthermore, the long non-coding RNA metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript
1 (MALAT1) has been linked to immune system-mediated atherosclerosis in mice.[10] Loss of MALAT1 in monocyte-derived macrophages amplifies the inflammatory responses,
which can then aggravate atherosclerosis development.[24]
In addition, resident macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions can respond to various
micro-environmental stimuli and modify their functional phenotypes.[25] Mir-195 was shown to regulate macrophage polarisation towards the M2 anti-inflammatory
phenotype by targeting the autocrine Toll-like receptor 2 inflammatory signalling
pathway.[12] In pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, mir-195 is decreased, and an artificial induction
was able to prevent migration of the underlying co-cultured SMCs.[26] This work further confirms the role of non-coding RNAs in mediating effects among
different cells type by acting as powerful paracrine signals.
It has further been reported that monocytes express the long intergenic non-coding
RNA 00305 (LINC00305), a lincRNA encoded from a region that contains single-nucleotide
polymorphisms reported in genome-wide association study databases of atherosclerosis.[27] Increased levels of LINC00305 in primary monocytes activated NF-κB signalling pathways,
and contributed to increased expression of inflammation-associated genes.[13] A secondary effect is exerted on SMCs, co-cultured with monocytes to mimic the atherosclerotic
lesion microenvironment. Here, SMCs shift towards a synthetic phenotype, and thus
contribute to disease progression. Furthermore, LINC00305 was shown to affect apoptosis
of ECs via sponging miR-136.[28]
DCs share with macrophages a common myeloid progenitor termed macrophage-DC progenitor.[29] The presence of inflamed lipids, such as oxLDL, leads to maturation and accumulation
of DCs in the arterial wall, an event that amplifies local inflammatory processes
and leads to an advanced atherosclerotic plaque phenotype, including extracellular
matrix (ECM) degradation and necrotic core development.[30] It was found that miR-181a is up-regulated in DCs exposed to oxLDL. By reducing
c-Fos protein expression, miR-181 activates an anti-inflammatory program, suggesting
that non-coding RNAs can substantially trigger myeloid inflammation in vascular diseases.[31]
Since neutrophils are known to have a short lifespan, the importance of non-coding
RNAs has been partially neglected. The relevance of miRNAs in neutrophils can, however,
be inferred from a CCAAT enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα)-Cre-driven Dicer1 deletion mouse line. The C/EBPα promoter increases its activity during the transition
from common myeloid progenitors to granulocyte and monocyte progenitors. Dicer deletion
in these progenitor cells causes myeloid dysplasia and decreases neutrophils in peripheral
blood. [32] Until now, several of these small fine-tuners of gene expression have been reported
to be involved in neutrophil biology.[33]
[34]
Both miRs-142 and -223 have been particularly studied in the context of neutrophils
and vascular inflammation. In mice, miR-142 expression is restricted to haematopoietic
tissues.[35] Murine depletion of miR-142a/b show reduced numbers of both neutrophils and macrophages
during foetal myelopoiesis, with neutrophils being aberrantly scattered around the
head.[36] Transcriptomic studies suggest that the increased expression of the genes signal
transducer and activator of transcription 1 and interferon regulatory factor 1 might
mediate the observed changes on the neutrophil population and morphology seen in the
miR-142−/− mice.[37] MiR-223 is highly expressed in myeloid progenitor cells, and is particularly increased
in granulocytes.[35] Via a transcriptional factor that promotes myeloid progenitor proliferation (MEF2c),
miR-223 negatively regulates the expansion and activity of neutrophils.[38] Neutrophil-driven inflammation is also regulated by miR-223, with one possible mechanism
being the targeting of the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammasome, suppressing
its activity and hereby decreasing interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) secretion.[39]
Intercellular communication is performed by microparticles, which can be generated
from many cell types, via transfer of proteins and RNAs to target cells.[40] MiR-223 is an interesting intercellular mediator found in microvesicles released
by activated circulating thrombocytes, and expressed at elevated levels in atherosclerotic
patients. Thrombocyte-shed miR-223 is capable of triggering apoptosis in ECs upon
uptake.[41] Interestingly, neutrophil-derived miR-223 can also dampen acute lung inflammation
upon intercellular transfer from neutrophils to epithelial cells, possibly by repressing
poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase-1 in epithelial cells.[42] Whether neutrophil-derived particles that carry miR-223 may play similar roles in
cardiovascular diseases remains yet to be addressed.
An example of another non-coding RNA being transferred in exosomes from macrophages
that populate the arterial wall during lesion progression is the lncRNA growth arrest
specific 5 (GAS5).[43] LncRNA GAS5 has a detrimental effect on vascular ECs that receive a ‘death message’
from circulating monocytes, which can further infiltrate the damaged endothelium,
thereby promoting vascular inflammation.
Relevant Non-Coding RNAs Regulating Vascular Inflammation: Vascular Wall-Borne Non-Coding
RNAs
Relevant Non-Coding RNAs Regulating Vascular Inflammation: Vascular Wall-Borne Non-Coding
RNAs
As an alternative to myeloid-borne non-coding RNAs, controlling critical aspects of
the vascular cells homeostasis, the vascular cells themselves can respond to the inflammatory
environment, characteristic of advanced lesions, by impairing non-coding RNA expression
profiles. MiR-181b was found to be decreased in ECs exposed to inflammatory stimuli
with consequent activation of NF-κB signalling, suggesting that strategies aimed at
restoring miR-181b expression may reduce the inflammatory cascade.[44] Moreover, in ECs, NF-κB itself mediates the expression of the aforementioned lncRNA
ANRIL,[45] further indicating that non-coding RNAs could be novel targets to treat inflammatory
pathway.
MiR-181a has also proven to regulate vascular inflammation, by targeting arterial
SMCs.[46] SMCs play a crucial role in pathological remodelling of the arterial wall. In the
atherosclerotic plaque, SMCs can acquire bone-like features in response to the vasoconstricting
peptide angiotensin II (AngII). AngII is produced by the ECs in close proximity, which
increases expression of osteopontin, a non-collagenous protein present in the bone
matrix. Interestingly, one major inducer is again a non-coding RNA, miR-181a, which
orchestrates the AngII-mediated effect on osteopontin expression.[47]
Transfer of miRNAs via extracellular vesicles is not exclusively found in macrophages
to promote propagation of atherosclerosis and plaque instability. Also, ECs are able
to communicate with other cell sub-sets in the vessel wall via apoptotic bodies, which
induce a rescue mechanism that involves the C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12).[24] CXCL12 is known to play a key role in tissue repair as well as angiogenesis, and
can limit apoptosis.[24] miR-126 has been identified to mediate CXCL12 expression in apoptotic bodies-receiving
cells.[24] miR-126 regulates expression of a G-protein coupled receptor inhibitor, which then
enables C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 to induce a feedback loop that can further
increase the CXCL12 content.[48]
MiRNA-126 does not only play an important role in inhibiting inflammation of the vessel
wall by being engulfed in apoptotic bodies released by ECs but also in ECs themselves.[49] It has been shown to be expressed by ECs to inhibit vascular cell adhesion molecule
1 (VCAM-1) expression, a surface molecule found on activated ECs exclusively.[49] VCAM-1 mediates adhesion of monocytes, which will then eventually migrate to the
lesion site where they contribute to a potentially instable plaque.[49] However, miR-126 is a prominent example for miRNAs that acts strand-specifically.
MiR-126–5p rather than miR-126–3p has been found to play a beneficial role in EC proliferation,
reducing atherosclerotic lesion formation.[50]
Another miRNA that is used by ECs to prevent monocyte attachment and activation is
miR-10a. Engulfed in extracellular vesicles, it is transferred to circulating monocytes.[51] By targeting IL-1 receptor associated kinase 4 (IRAK4), a component of the NF-κB
pathway in monocytes that leads to activation, the inflammatory pathway can be inhibited.
Initiation and progression of atherosclerosis can thus be dampened.[51]
Another example of an intercellular communication cascade is provided by the retinal
non-coding RNA3 (lncRNCR3), which exerts an atheroprotective role, and gets transferred
via exosomes from ECs to SMCs. LncRNCR3 confers protection against hypercholesterolaemia-induced
EC and SMC dysfunction.[52]
In advanced atherosclerotic lesions, many different cells types are confined in the
same active area (atherosclerotic plaque). These different and distinct cell sub-types
can communicate and influence each other as shown by the examples provided above.
If EC dysfunction plays an initiating role in the atherosclerosis cascade, by allowing
monocytes to infiltrate and initiate inflammation, in more advanced stages, SMCs become
crucially relevant to determine the lesion fate.[53]
SMCs can receive signals that lead to trans-differentiation towards calcification,
or de-differentiation towards a more proliferative phenotype, or even as more recently
described transformation towards a more macrophage-like phenotype.[54]
[55] This transformation induces a significant acceleration in phagocytic capacity, which
ultimately enforces different characteristics within atherosclerotic lesions (from
a more stable lesion with proliferative SMCs that produce ECM towards a more unstable
phenotype with inflamed and apoptotic SMCs).
All the described events can be regulated by non-coding RNAs, offering tremendous
potential as intercellular effectors and communicators. Identifying and understanding
the mechanism of action of those powerful mediators will provide new ways to intervene,
by operating at the cellular level and modifying the cells responsible for stabilising
already formed atherosclerotic lesions ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 Myeloid and vascular-borne non-coding RNAs aggravate vascular inflammation.
Clinical Perspective and Outlook on the Therapeutic Potential of Non-Coding RNAs
Clinical Perspective and Outlook on the Therapeutic Potential of Non-Coding RNAs
The Cantos trial[56] has proved that targeting inflammation with canakinumab (monoclonal antibody directed
against IL-1β) results in better outcome as compared with placebo among patients with
a history of myocardial infarction and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
These results have truly opened up the ‘anti-inflammatory route’ for treating advanced
vascular lesions. In this light, non-coding RNAs capable of modulating inflammatory
networks, such as the IL-1β-pathway, could represent interesting and therapeutically
novel strategies to treat atherosclerosis. There are two types of modulations used
in RNA research to interfere with miRNA or lncRNA expression: one way is to inhibit
miRNAs or lncRNAs by anti-sense oligonucleotides (anti-miRs, Gapmers) or by genetic
knockout models (murine, and more recently porcine). The other way is to synthetically
over-express the miRNA by miRNA mimics or viral vectors. Off-target effects, toxicity,
easy delivery and long-term usage are obstacles to be carefully considered in this
context. The aforementioned anti-miR-92a appears to be the frontrunner in non-coding
RNA-based therapies for ischaemic cardiovascular diseases. A first in-patient trial
is expected to be initiated in 2019.