Keywords
extended-spectrum β-lactamases -
Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis - diarrhea
Introduction
Worldwide, gastroenteritis is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in
children under 5 years of age; it was estimated that the annual incidence of diarrhea
is 2.8 million cases,[1] leading to around 500,000 deaths each year.[2]
Salmonella is a common cause of gastroenteritis.[1] This bacterium has more than 2500 serovars, but Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis are isolated most frequently worldwide.[3] Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis has increasingly been detected in several parts of the world.[4] In the recent years, it has been associated with outbreaks in Latin American countries
like Brazil, Ecuador,[5]
[6] and Peru, where it has been reported as the third most common serotype.[7]
In Peru, Salmonella sp. resistant to β-lactam antibiotics is a problem, and extended-spectrum β-lactamases
(ESBLs) are frequently present. In 2010, Lima and its vicinity reported a considerable
increase in the number of isolates resistant to ceftriaxone (CRO), with the presence
of β-lactamases belonging to the CTX-M family.[8] Previously, in 2006, a nosocomial outbreak of S. Typhimurium harboring a bla
SHV-5 gene was also reported.[9] These findings are relevant because although antibiotic treatment is not usually
indicated in acute diarrhea, third-generation cephalosporins, together with azithromycin
(AZM) and ciprofloxacin (CIP), can be used as a treatment in high-risk groups such
as infants, the elderly, and immunocompromised patients.[10]
The main genes encoding ESBLs are bla
TEM, bla
SHV, bla
OXA, and bla
CTX-M. The latter, which confers high levels of resistance to cefotaxime (CTX), encodes
enzymes that are subdivided into five subclasses (CTX-M-1, CTX-M-2, CTX-M-8, CTX-M-9,
and CTX-M-25).[11] Currently, the CTX-M family is the most commonly disseminated in the world and different
microbial species.[12]
The objectives of this study were to determine the presence of Salmonella in fecal samples of children admitted to four hospitals in Lima, Peru, and to determine
whether the Salmonella isolates were related and expressed an ESBL phenotype. The genetic basis of the ESBL
phenotype was also determined.
Methods
Bacterial Isolates
A total of 280 stool specimens from children under 6 years of age hospitalized with
gastroenteritis and persistent diarrhea were collected from September 2012 to April
2013 from four hospitals in Lima: Hospital de Emergencias Pediátricas (HEP) (n = 212), Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia (HNCH) (n = 17), Hospital Nacional Docente Madre Niño San Bartolomé (HSB) (n = 2), and Centro de Salud Materno Infantil Tahuantinsuyo Bajo (CST) (n = 49) ([Fig. 1]). Salmonella sp. were isolated on differential culture media such as xylose lysine deoxycholate
agar and Salmonella–Shigella agar. Presumptive Salmonella colonies were identified through biochemical[13] and serological (detection of somatic antigen O, [Probac do Brasil, Sao Paulo, SP,
Brazil]) tests and then confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)[14] in the Laboratory of Enteric Diseases and Nutrition (LEEN), Tropical Medicine Institute
Alexander von Humboldt from Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH). Salmonella isolates were sent to the Nutreco Food Research Center (Toledo, Spain), where serotyping
was performed using a commercial DNA microarray system, Check & Trace Salmonella (Check-Points,
the Netherlands, Holland).
Fig. 1 Geographical distribution of point locations of four hospitals in Lima: Hospital
de Emergencias Pediátricas (HEP), Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia (HNCH), Hospital
Nacional Docente Madre Niño San Bartolomé (HSB), and Centro de Salud Materno Infantil
Tahuantinsuyo Bajo (CST).
Antibiotic Susceptibility
The antibiotic susceptibility was determined by Kirby–Bauer tests according to the
Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.[15]
[16] Antibiotics included in this study were chloramphenicol (C), aztreonam (ATM), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole
(TMP/SMX), cefotaxime (CTX), ampicillin (AMP), furazolidone (F), nalidixic acid (NA),
CRO, CIP, tetracycline (TE), AZM, erythromycin (E), amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid
(AMC) and ceftazidime (CAZ). In the case of AZM, an isolate was considered resistant
if the halo was <12 mm as proposed for other enterobacteria.[15]
Phenotypic Methods for Detection of ESBL
The presence of ESBLs was verified by two tests: double-disc synergy test with AMC
(30 μg), CAZ (30 μg), CTX (30 μg), CRO (30 μg), and ATM (30 μg)[17]; and the CLSI confirmatory test using both CTX (30 mg) and CAZ (30 mg) disks alone
and in combination with clavulanic acid (10 mg). The second test was considered positive
when an increase in the growth inhibitory zone diameter around a disk containing CTX
or CAZ with the addition of clavulanic acid was 5 mm or greater than the diameter
around the disk containing CTX or CAZ alone.[15]
Molecular Detection of ESBL Genes
The presence of bla
TEM,[18] bla
SHV,[19] and bla
CTX-M
[20] was determined by PCR in isolates presenting an ESBL phenotype. The CTX-M variants,
CTX-M 1, CTX-M 2, CTX-M 8, and CTX-M 9,[21]
[22] were also confirmed by PCR ([Table 1]). The amplification products were purified (Gel Extraction Kit from Omega Bio-tek,
Norcross, Georgia, United States) and sequenced (Beckman Coulter; Takeley, Great Britain).
Table 1
Primers used for the molecular detection of ESBL and variants
Primer
|
Nucleotide sequence 5̀—3̀
|
Amplicon size (bp)
|
Annealing temperature used for PCR (°C)
|
Reference
|
TEM-F
|
ATTCTTGAAGACGAAAGGGC
|
1,150
|
60
|
18
|
TEM-R
|
ACGCTCAGTGGAACGAAAAC
|
SHV-F
|
CACTCAAGGATGTATTGTG
|
885
|
52
|
19
|
SHV-R
|
TTAGCGTTGCCAGTTATTGTG
|
CTXM- Univ- F
|
CGATGTGCAGTACCAGTAA
|
585
|
52
|
20
|
CTXM- Univ- R
|
TTAGTGACCAGAATCAGCGG
|
CTXM-3G (group 1)-F
|
GTTACAATGTGTGAGAAGCAG
|
1,017
|
60
|
21
|
CTXM-3G (group 1)-R
|
CCGTTTCCGCTATTACAAAC
|
CTXM-9 (group 9)-F
|
TGACCGTATTGGGAGTTTCAG
|
917
|
55
|
22
|
CTXM-9 (group 9)-R
|
GATTTATTCAACAAAACCAG
|
CTXM-8 (group 8)-F
|
TGATGAGACATCGCGTTAAG
|
873
|
60
|
21
|
CTXM-8 (group 8)-R
|
TAACCGTCGGTGACGATTTT
|
CTXM-10-F
|
CCGCGCTACACTTTGTGGC
|
944
|
60
|
21
|
CTXM-10-R
|
TTACAAACCGTTGGTGACG
|
Abbreviation: ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.
Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic–Polymerase Chain Reaction
Clonal relationships between strains were determined by repetitive extragenic palindromic–PCR
(REP-PCR) using the primer GCG CCG ICA TGC GGC ATT[23] with the following amplification conditions: 95°C for 5 minutes followed by 30 cycles
of 95°C for 1 minute, 40°C for 1 minute, and 65°C for 1 minute, and final extension
at 65°C for 16 minutes. A phylogenetic tree was constructed by the unweighted pair
group method with arithmetic mean analysis using the Phoretix 1D Pro software.
Results
Bacterial Isolates
Of 280 clinical fecal samples from children with diarrhea, 26 (9%) were identified
as Salmonella sp., 25 were serotyped as S. Infantis, and 1 as S. Typhimurium. When analyzed for Hospital settings, it was observed that Salmonella sp. isolates were only recovered from HEP (21/212; 10%) and HNCH (5/17; 29%).
Antibiotic Susceptibility
All S. Infantis were resistant to AMP, E, F, NA, SXT, and TE, 24/25 isolates were also resistant
to ATM, CRO, CTX, and C, and 10/25 (40%) were resistant to AZM. Two out of the 25
isolates were resistant to CIP, and the remaining 92% (23/25) exhibited intermediate
resistance. Four isolates were resistant to CAZ and 18 presented intermediate resistance.
Salmonella Typhimurium only presented resistance to E and AZM. The CLSI confirmatory test results
were concordant with the result of the double-disc synergy test.
Molecular Detection of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase
All strains with an ESBL phenotype harbored bla
CTX-M. Two isolates, E-25 (from HNCH) and 2-094 (from HEP), also presented with bla
TEM ([Table 2]). Subsequent analysis showed the presence of a bla
CTX-M 65 gene belonging to CTX-M group 9. The bla
TEM gene was identified as encoding TEM-1 and therefore not classified as ESBL. No bla
SHV gene was detected.
Table 2
Characteristics of Salmonella Infantis strains
Isolate
|
Date
|
Hospital
|
Specie/Serovar
|
ESBL type
|
E-25
|
September 12, 2012
|
HNCH
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65, bla
TEM-1
|
E-28
|
November 12, 2012
|
HNCH
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-015
|
January 7, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-016
|
January 7, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-017
|
January 8, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-023
|
January 14, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-024
|
January 14, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-026
|
January 15, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-029
|
January 17, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2a-002
|
January 18, 2013
|
HNCH
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-031
|
January 21, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-032
|
January 22, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-040
|
January 24, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-047
|
January 28, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-050
|
29 January, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-065
|
February 1, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-068
|
February 4, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-094
|
February 14, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65, bla
TEM-1
|
2-125
|
February 27, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-144
|
March 14, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-161
|
March 20, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
DEC 1-009
|
March 25, 2013
|
HNCH
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
1-013
|
April 4, 2013
|
HNCH
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-204
|
April 17, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
bla
CTX-M 65
|
2-013
|
January 3, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Infantis
|
–
|
2-145
|
March 18, 2013
|
EP
|
Salmonella Typhimurium
|
–
|
Abbreviations: EP, Hospital de Emergencias Pediátricas; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase;
HNCN, Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia.
Molecular Typing by Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic–Polymerase Chain Reaction
REP-PCR data suggested a clonal relationship among 24 of the 25 isolates of S. Infantis. All ESBL-producing strains have identical REP-PCR profiles. The isolate,
S. infantis 2-013, that did not have the ESBL phenotype showed a different REP-PCR
profile ([Fig. 2]).
Fig. 2 Salmonella sp. similarity dendrogram: analysis of repetitive extragenic palindromic–polymerase chain
reaction profiles using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean analysis
method shows that all S. Infantis carrying the bla
CTX-M
65 belong to the same clone, whereas isolate 2-103 does not possess the bla
CTX-M
65 presented an identity level of >90%. The S. Typhimurium 2-145 showed a fully unrelated pattern.
Discussion
In this study, 92% of 25 S. Infantis strains were ESBL. Since 2010, an unusual increase in Salmonella cases has been reported in pediatric patients from various hospitals in Lima, including
the National Institute for Child Health,[8] and in food samples.[24] S. Infantis is the third most frequent serovar identified in Peru and is associated
with the consumption of contaminated eggs and meat products.[23] Some findings show that this serotype can persist and proliferate in the environment,
as well as in hospitals, for a long period of time,[7]
[25]
[26] as observed in studies conducted in Brazil,[5] Ecuador,[6] and Argentina.[27]
Most cases of gastroenteritis caused by Salmonella do not require treatment with antibiotics unless patients are young infants, are
malnourished, have systemic disease, or are immunocompromised. In these cases, cephalosporins
or quinolones are commonly used.[28] Nonetheless, severe cases related to multidrug-resistant S. Infantis have been described in Peru, including cases of bacteremia.[29]
A previous report analyzing quinolone resistance in Salmonella sp. from the area of Lima, Peru, showed that 33 and 14% of Salmonella Typhi and non-Typhi, respectively, were resistant to NA, whereas 24% and 13% presented
diminished susceptibility to CIP.[30] In our study, 100% of the isolates were NA resistant and 8% were resistant to CIP.
Usually, a single mutation in gyrA leads to resistance to NA but only decreased susceptibility to fluoroquinolones.[31] In fact, this is the most common scenario in Salmonella sp.[32]
[33] as the presence of additional mutations in quinolone-targets leading to high levels
of CIP resistance seems to have a deleterious effect on bacterial fitness.[34] Despite this impaired fitness, isolates exhibiting resistance to CIP likely harbor
additional target mutation, as was observed for highly fluoroquinolone-resistant S.
Kentucky ST198-X1-SGI1 that has been disseminated worldwide.[35] Regarding other antimicrobial agents, studies in our geographical area have shown
the presence of S. Typhimurium exhibiting resistance to CRO, CAZ, and amikacin, producing the blaSHV-5.
[9]
CTX-M group 9 (bla
CTX-M 65) was found in 24 of our S. infantis isolates with resistance to CTX and CRO and 4 out of 24 (17%) with decreased
susceptibility to CAZ, characteristic of an isolate carrying the bla
CTX-M gene.[36] Although bla
CTX-M 65 has been frequently found in neighboring countries[37] and has been observed in strains of Escherichia coli causing bacteremia in children[22] in Peru, to our knowledge, this is the first report in Peru of the bla
CTX-M 65 gene in Salmonella strains.
In Peru, the prevalence of bla
CTX-M 14, bla
CTX-M 24, bla
CTX-M 15, and bla
CTX-M 2 in E. coli has been reported as 45, 22, 22, and 11%, respectively.[38] Between July 2012 and January 2013, bla
CTX-M was detected in four strains of Salmonella at the National Institute of Child Health in Lima, Peru.[39] These strains are contemporaneous with Salmonella ESBL strains found in this study, which suggests the presence of an outbreak in the
city of Lima. This hypothesis is supported by the REP-PCR results, which showed the
presence of an S. Infantis clone disseminated between two of the Hospitals included in the study. Furthermore,
it is necessary to consider the distance of around 6 km between HEP and HNCH, which
likely precludes the presence of common environments such as schools.
Between 2014 and 2015, 5 of 28 Salmonella strains isolated in Ecuador were clonally related to S. Infantis harboring a bla
CTX-M 65 gene.[6] Also, in 2005, strains of S. Infantis with an ESBL phenotype belonging to an outbreak
were found in Argentina.[27] All these findings suggest that an epidemic clone of S. Infantis has spread to different
countries in Latin America. Riccobono et al[40] studied the spread of the bla
CTX-M 65 gene, and the authors concluded it was because of a polyclonal spread of the Inc11
ST71 epidemic plasmid transferable to other enterobacteria by conjugation. Therefore,
the presence of this epidemic plasmid in S. Infantis clone is highly probable.
The S. Infantis 2-013 isolate, the only S. Infantis without ESBL pattern, showed a
different REP-PCR profile. Nonetheless, the pattern was closely similar to exhibiting
more than 90% identity and therefore could possibly be an “ancestral” non-ESBL isolate
or it could have lost the resistance gene at some point.
In conclusion, this is the first report of an epidemic strain of S. enterica serovar Infantis carrying bla
CTX-M 65 in Peru. The data suggest that this strain is widely distributed in the area of Lima.
Furthermore, indirect evidence (e.g. similarity of antibiotic resistance patterns
or the presence of CTX-M 65) suggests the presence of multidrug-resistant ESBL carrying
S. Infantis spreading in Latin America. Further studies on S. Infantis from nonhuman origin are needed in order to determine the possible acquisition
of this pathogen. Moreover, new research should include samples from different Latin
American countries to determine cross-border dissemination of a multidrug-resistant
S. Infantis.