Hearing Outcomes Reporting in Lateral Skull Base Surgery

Abstract

Hearing outcomes reporting has evolved significantly and new standards for reporting now enable a more precise and comprehensive representation of hearing outcomes. Hearing is one of the critical sensory domains contained within the lateral skull base and temporal bone. For those patients with serviceable hearing, hearing preservation is a key treatment goal. Pre- and postoperative hearing assessment is fundamental to the diagnostic evaluation of patients preparing to undergo lateral skull base surgery. Standardization in reporting these hearing outcomes is critical to compare the efficacy of different treatment options for lateral skull base lesions. Over the time, reporting of hearing outcomes has evolved from broadly categorizing patients into large groups to comparing individual patients which requires more specific datasets to compare pre- and posttreatment hearing outcomes. Future research in lateral skull base surgery will benefit from precise, accurate, and easily understood reporting outcomes, all of which will allow for more efficient comparability between studies and pooling of data for meta-analysis.

Keywords

lateral skull base surgery - hearing - audiology - neurotology

• References

• 1 Margolis RH, Madsen B. The acoustic test environment for hearing testing. J Am Acad Audiol 2015; 26 (09) 784-791
• 2 Walker JJ, Cleveland LM, Davis JL, Seales JS. Audiometry screening and interpretation. Am Fam Physician 2013; 87 (01) 41-47
• 3 Guide for the evaluation of hearing handicap. JAMA 1979; 241 (19) 2055-2059
• 4 Dobie RA. The AMA method of estimation of hearing disability: a validation study. Ear Hear 2011; 32 (06) 732-740
• 5 Gardner G, Robertson JH. Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988; 97 (01) 55-66
• 6 Wade PJ, House W. Hearing preservation in patients with acoustic neuromas via the middle fossa approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984; 92 (02) 184-193
• 7 Silverstein H, McDaniel A, Norrell H, Haberkamp T. Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery with intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring: Part II. A classification of results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 95 (3 Pt 1): 285-291
• 8 Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, INC. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113 (03) 179-180
• 9 Monsell EM. New and revised reporting guidelines from the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113 (03) 176-178
• 10 Meyer TA, Canty PA, Wilkinson EP, Hansen MR, Rubinstein JT, Gantz BJ. Small acoustic neuromas: surgical outcomes versus observation or radiation. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27 (03) 380-392
• 11 Woodson EA, Dempewolf RD, Gubbels SP. , et al. Long-term hearing preservation after microsurgical excision of vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (07) 1144-1152
• 12 Stangerup SE, Tos M, Thomsen J, Caye-Thomasen P. Hearing outcomes of vestibular schwannoma patients managed with ‘wait and scan’: predictive value of hearing level at diagnosis. J Laryngol Otol 2010; 124 (05) 490-494
• 13 Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P, Tos M, Thomsen J. Change in hearing during ‘wait and scan’ management of patients with vestibular schwannoma. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122 (07) 673-681
• 14 Gurgel RK, Jackler RK, Dobie RA, Popelka GR. A new standardized format for reporting hearing outcome in clinical trials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (05) 803-807
• 15 Gurgel RK, Popelka GR, Oghalai JS, Blevins NH, Chang KW, Jackler RK. Is it valid to calculate the 3-kilohertz threshold by averaging 2 and 4 kilohertz?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (01) 102-104