CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10(01): e140-e142
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669930
Research Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Pediatric Ophthalmology Fellowship Survey: Fellows Selection Criteria for Training Programs

Jasleen K. Singh
1  Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado–Denver, Aurora, Colorado
,
Kimberly Lovelace
2  Monroe Clinic, Monroe, Wisconsin
,
Jennifer L. Patnaik
1  Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado–Denver, Aurora, Colorado
,
Robert Enzenauer
1  Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado–Denver, Aurora, Colorado
› Author Affiliations
Funding This article was supported in part by a challenge grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to the Department of Ophthalmology.
Further Information

Address for correspondence

Jasleen K. Singh, MD
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado–Denver
13123 E 16th ave B430, Aurora, CO 80045

Publication History

22 February 2018

27 July 2018

Publication Date:
21 September 2018 (online)

 

Abstract

Purpose This article investigates the characteristics that trainees look for in a pediatric ophthalmology fellowship program.

Methods A 14-question anonymous survey was created and sent out via the United States Postal Service to all physicians of American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. The survey addressed demographics, the interview process, and the qualities of fellowship training programs that were important factors in ranking fellowship training programs. A Likert scale was used to rate different qualities (1: not important, 9: very important) and summary statistics were reported as overall means and standard deviations.

Results In total, 1,061 were mailed out with 413 returned amounting to a 38.9% response rate. The qualities with the highest mean were diversity of surgical procedures, volume of procedures/surgeries, reputation of the fellowship director, advice from mentor, emphasis on type of surgery performed, program association with an academic institution, and national reputation of program. The characteristics that ranked the lowest were presence of a Veteran's Administration hospital and presence of a county hospital. Females rated proximity to family significantly higher than males. Among responders who ranked volume of procedures/surgeries as very important, strabismus surgery was the most important.

Conclusion Pediatric ophthalmologists chose fellowship training programs based on the diversity and surgical volume of procedures and the reputation of the program director.


#

Residents in ophthalmology have a desire to pursue fellowship after their initial training. About 64% of residents decide to pursue a fellowship, and of those approximately 10% choose pediatric ophthalmology.[1] Factors influencing residents to pursue a fellowship include obtaining new skills and becoming more marketable for jobs. The top reasons for residents to not pursue a subspecialty in pediatric ophthalmology include a low interest in the clinical field despite good training in residency, aversion to working with children, and lower financial compensation. Pediatric ophthalmologists do have high job satisfaction in areas ranging from diversity of pathology, intellectually stimulating field, and good lifestyle.[2]

Pediatric ophthalmology fellowship is one of the many fellowships offered in ophthalmology. It includes a 1-year fellowship in pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus, which can include adult strabismus. The fellowship match is through the San Francisco Matching Program (SF Match). According to the SF Match statistics, the number of positions offered in pediatric ophthalmology has remained stable at 57 to 62 spots per year. However, pediatric ophthalmology has remained the subspecialty with the most vacancies per year.[3]

Given the fewer number of applicants pursuing pediatric ophthalmology than the number of positions available, fellowship programs are in competition for the best candidates. However, each program has its own criteria for what they consider an ideal fellow. There is a desire to learn more about what characteristics applicants consider in choosing a fellowship program. This article highlights these characteristics to help fellowship program directors to better understand what aspects of fellowship are most valued.

Methods

A 14-question anonymous survey was created and included questions about applicants' demographic data, the application and interview process in pediatric ophthalmology, and the qualities of a fellowship program that were important to the applicant. This survey was modeled after a similar survey given to the members of the American Society of Ophthalmic and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in regard to their fellowship match.[4] This is available in [Supplementary Material] (online only). The qualities of the fellowship were ranked on a 9-point Likert scale (1: not important and 9: very important).

Prior pediatric ophthalmology fellows were identified using the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) physician member database. The survey was then mailed to AAPOS members via addresses identified in the member database. Respondents were asked to mail the completed survey back for statistical analysis.

The demographics of the respondent pool were analyzed with simple statistics. The fellowship program qualities were evaluated with means and standard deviations. The provided results are given as means and standard deviations for the entire respondent population. Comparisons were done between demographic groups (gender, practice environment, and years of training) using Benjamin–Hochberg adjustment for multiple testing. Comparisons with a p-value of < 0.05 after the adjustment were considered significant.


#

Results

A total of 1,061 surveys were mailed, with 413 received, a 38.9% response rate. Of the respondents, 58.4% were male, and 41.6% were female. Additional demographic data are reported in [Table 1].

Table 1

Demographic data of respondents, N = 413

n

%

Gender

 Male

241

58.4

 Female

172

41.6

Spouse

 Yes

332

80.6

 No

80

19.4

Children

 Yes

253

61.4

 No

159

38.6

Years of training

 Prior to 1989

129

31.2

 1989–1998

118

28.6

 1999–2008

92

22.3

 2009–2012

74

17.9

Practice environment in 5 y

 Private practice

166

40.6

 Academic practice

114

27.9

 Private and academic practice

128

31.3

 Military

1

0.2

Most respondents applied either to 1, 5, or more than 10 to 19 AAPOS programs. Similarly, most respondents received interviews to 1, 5, or more than 10 to 19 programs. Most respondents attended five or less interviews.

The program qualities (summarized in [Table 2]) that had the highest mean response was diversity of surgical procedures and volume of procedures/surgeries performed. This was followed by reputation of the fellowship director, advice from mentor, and national reputation of the program. Emphasis on the type of surgery performed was ranked at a mean of 7.5 with a standard deviation of 1.6. Those who ranked emphasis on the type of surgeries performed with a rating between 6 and 9 on a Likert scale were asked to rank the type of surgery that was the most important. Respondents ranked strabismus surgery as the most important followed by cataract surgery, oculoplastics, retinopathy of prematurity treatment, and glaucoma in descending order.

Table 2

Mean Likert rating of program characteristics (from highest to lowest rating)

Quality

n

Mean (SD)

Diversity of surgical procedures

409

8.0 (1.4)

Volume of procedures/surgeries

409

8.0 (1.5)

Reputation of fellowship director

411

7.7 (1.8)

Advice from mentor

409

7.6 (1.7)

National reputation of program

410

7.5 (1.8)

Emphasis on type of surgery performed

408

7.5 (1.6)

Program associated with academic institution

410

7.5 (1.8)

Patient diversity

413

6.8 (2.1)

Presence of children's hospital

412

6.6 (2.5)

Interview

396

6.5 (2.1)

Reputation of larger cognate ophthalmology department

408

6.5 (2.1)

Didactics

412

6.5 (1.9)

Collaboration with other specialties

410

6.5 (1.9)

Number of preceptors

413

6.4 (2.0)

Appointments of fellowship graduates

406

6.1 (2.2)

Fellow clinic

405

6.0 (2.1)

Spousal considerations

383

5.8 (2.9)

Appeal of city

409

5.7 (2.4)

Teaching responsibilities

411

5.5 (2.0)

Research reputation of program

409

5.3 (2.2)

Fellow call responsibility

411

5.1 (2.2)

Research opportunities

413

4.9 (2.1)

Proximity to family

411

4.7 (3.0)

Benefits

413

4.6 (2.2)

Presence of county hospital

408

3.3 (2.4)

Presence of Veteran's Administration hospital

409

2.8 (2.1)

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.


The program qualities that were ranked the lowest based on all respondents were the presence of a Veteran's Administration hospital, presence of a county hospital, benefits, proximity to family, and research opportunities.

When comparing these program qualities' Likert item ratings between the genders of the applicant, the mean rating of proximity to family was higher for females compared with males. There was a statistical difference in valuing research reputation of program and research opportunities when comparing those whose future practice environment was an academic institution or private practice with academic affiliation than those whose practice environment was private practice alone. Benefits, number of preceptors, and fellow call responsibility were rated significantly higher in more recent applicants (2009–2012) than applicants before 1989 and reputation of fellowship director was rated significantly lower in these recent applicants.

The last question of the survey asked the respondents to write what they considered the most important quality that influenced their fellowship program ranking and selection. There were a variety of responses including “mentor advice,” “fellowship director,” and “autonomy/independence of fellow and surgery.” The most common responses among all respondents were “program reputation,” “variety and volume of procedures,” “location,” “environment of the department,” and “fellowship director.”


#

Discussion

Knowing what applicants consider important when choosing a fellowship program is very helpful for fellowship directors. The overall most important aspects of fellowship training were volume and diversity of surgical procedures, mentorship, and reputation of the program and fellowship director. This is very much related to what pediatric ophthalmologists value in their job satisfaction of diversity of pathology and intellectually stimulating.[2]

A similar survey was conducted for evaluating characteristics important in oculoplastics fellowship training.[4] In this survey, respondents highly valued a variety and volume of surgical cases, personality of program director, the interview, and an emphasis on the type of surgeries performed. Pediatric ophthalmology respondents were similar in considering the surgical aspect of fellowship training as the most important. Another pediatric-based surgery fellowship surveyed respondents in 2010 on program characteristics that are considered important.[5] Similar to pediatric ophthalmology, pediatric surgery valued “diversity of cases,” “advice from mentor,” “total number of cases,” and “academic prestige of program.”

This survey provides pediatric ophthalmology fellowship directors a better understanding of the qualities an applicant seeks in their fellowship training. This survey was sent to all physicians of AAPOS including those who were in fellowship over 10 years ago. Different generations value specific qualities differently, such as number of preceptors and fellow call responsibility. Applicants who wish to pursue a more academic career did rank programs qualities with an emphasis on research as more important.

There are a few limitations to this survey. In the survey response, not every question was answered. The response rate was low and we do not know whether respondents differ from the entire cohort that was contact. Our low response rate may be due to fact that the survey was delivered and responded via mail, and in the future an electronic survey might help improve such results. The survey included fellows up to the 2012 academic year. Fellows in more recent years may have similar or different responses. As the millennial generation begins[6] to enter the fellowship workforce, a repeat survey may be useful. Regardless of these limitations, this survey is the only one to provide useful information for both applicants and fellowship directors.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

None.

Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, and the drafting and reviewing of the manuscript. All authors gave approval to the version submitted. Dr. Robert Enzenauer is responsible for the overall content as the guarantor and corresponding author.


Supplementary Material


Address for correspondence

Jasleen K. Singh, MD
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado–Denver
13123 E 16th ave B430, Aurora, CO 80045