Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2018; 31(S 02): A1-A25
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660861
Podium Abstracts
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical Application of the I-LOC Angle-Stable Interlocking Nail in 100 Traumatic Fractures of the Humerus, Femur and Tibia

Albane H. Fauron
1   Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
,
Loïc M. Déjardin
1   Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
,
Rachel Phillips
1   Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
,
Krista M. Gazzola
1   Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
,
Karen L. Perry
1   Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 July 2018 (online)

Also available atVetCenter
 
 

    Introduction: A novel angle-stable nail (I-Loc) was recently designed, in part to address acute perioperative instability documented with standard veterinary nails. While experimental studies demonstrated biomechanical efficacy, clinical evaluation of the I-Loc is lacking. Our objective was to describe the use of the 6, 7 and 8-mm I-Loc nails and provide clinically relevant recommendations.

    Materials and Methods: Medical records of patients with traumatic femoral, tibial and humeral fractures treated with an I-Loc were reviewed. Data collected included affected bone, fracture pattern, body weight in relation to nail size; surgical technique, number of missed bolts and complications.

    Results: One hundred fractures affected the femur (64%), tibia (28%) and humerus (8%); most were diaphyseal (81%) and complex (59%). The 6, 7 and 8-mm nails were used in 18, 36 and 56 patients weighing an average of 24.6, 29.7, 37.9 kg, respectively. Missed bolts (6%) were successfully reoriented intraoperatively in all but two cases (final missed rate 1.3%). All complications (10%) occurred in tibial fractures and required revision surgery in 3 cases. Complete or on going follow up, available in 80 cases showed appropriate bone healing and function in all cases. Twenty cases were lost to follow-up.

    Discussion/Conclusion: This study suggests that diaphyseal, metaphyseal and juxta-articular fractures can be successfully treated using an I-Loc. Additionally, the rate of missed cannulations and complications were substantially lower than that reported for standard nails. Our results also suggest that 6, 7 and 8-mm nails can be safely recommended for dogs with mean body weights of 25, 30 and 38 kg, respectively.

    Acknowledgement: The senior author of this clinical research is the inventor of the nail described in this study and as such receives a teaching honorarium from BioMedtrix as well as royalties from Michigan State University.


     

    No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).