Keywords
hip - resurfacing - stress fracture - sports - fixation
Introduction
Femoral neck stress fracture has a high potential for complications and early recognition
is important. It is reported by literature an increased risk of stress fracture of
the femoral neck in athletes who perform intense physical activity (e.g., long runner)
and soldiers.[1]
These fractures can be tension type in the upper part and compression type in the
lower part. Fractures in tension should be treated surgically to avoid the risk of
progression in a displaced fracture or osteonecrosis of the femoral head.[1]
We describe a case illustrating a femoral neck stress fracture in a patient operated
with hip resurfacing (HR), surgically treated with osteosynthesis.
Case Presentation
A 45-year-old male athlete who had been suffering from right hip osteoarthritis underwent
hip replacement with a resurfacing implant (Birmingham Hip Resurfacing [BHR]; Smith
& Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee, United States) through a posterior–lateral approach
in 2014. At the time of surgery, body mass index (BMI) was 23.7 and T-score at dual
energy X-ray absorptiometry was 0.5. The postoperative X-ray showed a well-positioned
implant ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 Postoperative anteroposterior X-ray after hip resurfacing.
The postoperative course was regular with a full recovery of weight-bearing after
30 days; at 3 months, he was back to play the sports. The patient reported to be a
downhill runner and had covered an average of 3,000 km in the last year, mostly on
asphalt.
In March 2016, he came at our clinic with right hip pain, without referring trauma.
The patient told us that he began to feel a “little pain” in the groin ∼2 weeks before,
during a workout session. Pain increased with time, but he could walk without crutches.
On physical examination, the pain appeared to be located in inguinal region. Passive
range of motion of the hip was painful. The patient had a FABER and FADIR positive
test; also, the hop test was positive for the painful hip.
The anteroposterior X-ray showed a stress fracture of the femoral neck with a slight
variation (4 degrees) of the prosthetic component compared with the postoperative
X-rays ([Fig. 2]). No magnetic resonance imaging was required to better assess diagnosis. The blood
serum level of Cr was 1.82 µg/L and Co was 1.38 µg/L.
Fig. 2 Anteroposterior X-ray at 2-year follow-up after hip resurfacing showing a stress
fracture of the femoral neck.
The day after, the patient underwent surgery under spinal anesthesia in the supine
position. As the fracture was incomplete, it was treated like undisplaced femoral
neck fracture, with reduction maneuver. A lateral incision was made and under observation
from the image intensifier a guidewire was passed superior to the stem of the femoral
component of the BHR. One 6.5 mm cannulated screw 75-mm long was placed into the superior
neck. The image intensifier was used to confirm that the threads were beyond the fracture
line and that the fracture was compressed ([Fig. 3]).
Fig. 3 Image intensifier during surgery: K-wire is used to check the correct position after
(A) reduction maneuver. (B) Screw introduction.
The patient was discharged after 2 days, with two crutches and partial weight-bearing
for the next 6 weeks (to prevent a secondary increase of varus angulation), then he
gradually returned to his full activity. At 6 months, he began running without limitation.
All radiographic controls at last follow-up showed a good consolidation of the fracture
([Fig. 4]). No differences were found compared with the exams prior to fracture. At the last
follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic.
Fig. 4 Anteroposterior radiograph at (A) 6 months and (B) 18 months after fracture fixation.
Discussion
Femoral neck fractures are a well-documented complication of HR and occur within the
9th week after surgery.[2] To prevent this event, it is recommended a careful patient selection and careful
surgical technique. In our case, fracture occurred many years after surgery, despite
correct implantation of the femoral component and normal BMI of the patient. This
scenario and patient history led us to diagnose a stress fracture.
Stress fractures are generated by repetitive mechanical stresses combined with an
imbalance of osteoblastic activity in favor of osteoclasts. The result is the appearance
of microfractures which, in some cases, may lead to complete fractures.[1]
[3] For this reason, we chose not to weaken the lower part of the femoral neck and tried
to stabilize the fracture. In our opinion, factors associated with the occurrence
of the fracture were prolonged downhill running and the hard training on a hard-on-hard
prostheses.
The choice of using a single screw was made for several reasons: limited surgical
access that does not compromise the blood supply; preserving the bone stock of the
femoral neck; avoiding the risk a screw-implant contact resulting in metallosis; and
the good quality of bone of the metaphyseal femur.[4]
Although the current consensus in the scientific community is to limit the return
to sports, more and more articles are documenting the results of hip prosthesis in
athletes.[5] Poor long-term results were reported with total hip replacement (THR) in young patients
(under 50 years), revision rate at 20 years being close to 50%. This is probably due
to high functional demand of this population. HR is probably the better choice for
young patients involved in sports activities. The advantages of this kind of implant
are related to preservation of the femoral bone stock, mechanoreceptors of the femoral
neck, femoral offset, and femoral lever arm that allow a better perception and reconstruction
of the hip anatomy compared with THR.
In conclusion, in selected cases, femoral neck fracture fixation can be attempted
in patients with HR. However, it is important to carry out serious checks to avoid
a progression of varus angulation of the stem, which could result in a secondary fracture.
