Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2018; 31(04): 261-272
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1647248
Original Research
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Intra-Articular Structures in the Canine Stifle Joint after Implantation of a Titanium Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy Plate

Christian Feichtenschlager
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Small Animal Clinic, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
,
Martin Gerwing
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Small Animal Clinic, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
,
Klaus Failing
2   Unit for Biomathematics and Data Processing, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
,
Christine Peppler
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Small Animal Clinic, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
,
Andreas Kása
3   Kleintierklinik Dres. Kasa, Lörrach, Germany
,
Martin Kramer
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Small Animal Clinic, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
,
Kerstin H. von Pückler
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Small Animal Clinic, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

14 November 2017

17 March 2018

Publication Date:
02 June 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives To determine the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of anatomical stifle structures with respect to implant positioning after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) using a titanium plate.

Methods Selected sagittal and dorsal sequences of pre- and postoperative MRI (1.0 T scanner) of 13 paired (n = 26) sound cadaveric stifle joints were evaluated. The effect of susceptibility artifact on adjacent anatomical stifle structures was graded from 0 to 5. The impact of implant positioning regarding assessment score was calculated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

Results Sagittal turbo spin echo (TSE)-acquired images enabled interpretation of most soft tissue, osseous and cartilage structures without detrimental effect of susceptibility artifact distortions. In T2-weighted TSE images, the cranial cruciate ligament and caudal horn of the medial meniscus could be evaluated, independent of implant position, without any susceptibility artifact in all specimens. T2-weighted fast field echo, water selective, balanced fast field echo and short tau inversion recovery were most markedly affected by susceptibility artifact.

Clinical Significance In selected TSE sequences, MRI allows evaluation of critical intra-articular structures after titanium TPLO plate implantation. Further investigations with confirmed stifle pathologies in dogs are required, to evaluate the accuracy of MRI after TPLO in clinical cases in this context.

Keywords

titanium TPLO plate - susceptibility artifact - cranial cruciate ligament rupture - dog - magnetic resonance imaging
 

  • References

  • 1 Johnson JA, Austin C, Breur GJ. Incidence of canine appendicular musculoskeletal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 through 1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 56-69
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gatineau M, Dupuis J, Planté J, Moreau M. Retrospective study of 476 tibial plateau levelling osteotomy procedures. Rate of subsequent ‘pivot shift’, meniscal tear and other complications. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24 (05) 333-341
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fitzpatrick N, Solano MA. Predictive variables for complications after TPLO with stifle inspection by arthrotomy in 1000 consecutive dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (04) 460-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Thieman KM, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, Cook C, Cook JL. Effect of meniscal release on rate of subsequent meniscal tears and owner-assessed outcome in dogs with cruciate disease treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2006; 35 (08) 705-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cook JL, Luther JK, Beetem J, Karnes J, Cook CR. Clinical comparison of a novel extracapsular stabilization procedure and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (03) 315-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pacchiana PD, Morris E, Gillings SL, Jessen CR, Lipowitz AJ. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 397 cases (1998-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222 (02) 184-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bergh MS, Peirone B. Complications of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25 (05) 349-358
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Case JB, Hulse D, Kerwin SC, Peycke LE. Meniscal injury following initial cranial cruciate ligament stabilization surgery in 26 dogs (29 stifles). Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (04) 365-367
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Blond L, Thrall DE, Roe SC, Chailleux N, Robertson ID. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for meniscal tears in dogs affected with naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008; 49 (05) 425-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Oei EH, Ginai AZ, Hunink MG. MRI for traumatic knee injury: a review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2007; 28 (02) 141-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kaiser SM, Harms O, Konar M. , et al. Clinical, radiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging findings of gastrocnemius musculotendinopathy in various dog breeds. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (06) 515-521
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Haaland PJ, Sjöström L. Luxation of the long digital extensor tendon as a complication to tibial plateau levelling osteotomy. A presentation of four cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20 (03) 224-226
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hargreaves BA, Worters PW, Pauly KB, Pauly JM, Koch KM, Gold GE. Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (03) 547-555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 David FH, Grierson J, Lamb CR. Reducing susceptibility artefacts in magnetic resonance images of the canine stifle following surgery for cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25 (06) 488-497
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Taylor-Brown F, Lamb CR, Tivers MS, Li A. Magnetic resonance imaging for detection of late meniscal tears in dogs following tibial tuberosity advancement for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament injury. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27 (02) 141-146
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Barrett E, Barr F, Owen M, Bradley K. A retrospective study of the MRI findings in 18 dogs with stifle injuries. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50 (09) 448-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pieske O, Geleng P, Zaspel J, Piltz S. Titanium alloy pins versus stainless steel pins in external fixation at the wrist: a randomized prospective study. J Trauma 2008; 64 (05) 1275-1280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Soultanis KC, Pyrovolou N, Zahos KA. , et al. Late postoperative infection following spinal instrumentation: stainless steel versus titanium implants. J Surg Orthop Adv 2008; 17 (03) 193-199
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Podadera J, Gavin P, Saveraid T, Hall E, Chau J, Makara M. Effects of stifle flexion angle and scan plane on visibility of the normal canine cranial cruciate ligament using low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014; 55 (04) 407-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pujol E, Van Bree H, Cauzinille L, Poncet C, Gielen I, Bouvy B. Anatomic study of the canine stifle using low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI arthrography. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (04) 395-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 David FH, Grierson J, Lamb CR. Effects of surgical implants on high-field magnetic resonance images of the normal canine stifle. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2012; 53 (03) 280-288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sage JE, Gavin P. Musculoskeletal MRI. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2016; 46 (03) 421-451 , v
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Martig S, Konar M, Schmökel HG. , et al. Low-field MRI and arthroscopy of meniscal lesions in ten dogs with experimentally induced cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47 (06) 515-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Guermazi A, Miaux Y, Zaim S, Peterfy CG, White D, Genant HK. Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. Clin Radiol 2003; 58 (04) 322-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH. , et al. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171 (05) 1207-1213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jones BG, Fosgate GT, Green EM, Habing AM, Hettlich BF. Magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts in the cervical vertebrae and spinal cord related to monocortical screw-polymethylmethacrylate implants in canine cadavers. Am J Vet Res 2017; 78 (04) 458-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sutherland-Smith J, Tilley B. Magnetic resonance imaging metallic artifact of commonly encountered surgical implants and foreign material. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2012; 53 (03) 312-317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar