Closing the Genotype-phenotype Gap

Summary

Objectives: To summarize current excellent research in the field of bioinformatics.

Method: Synopsis of the articles selected for the IMIA Yearbook 2010.

Results: The selection process for this yearbook’s section on Bioinformatics results in five excellent articles highlighting the progress made in advancing the understanding of genotypephenotype relationship, and their concrete application in clinical settings. First, next generation sequencing techniques have allowed the discovery of an ever larger number of genetic variations at a greater resolution, and methods were developed to ensure accurate data analysis. Second, innovative approaches were applied to gene expression data to allow its link to a wider phenotypic spectrum and to enhance its use for disease understanding. Third, there is a notable trend in visualizing diseases as network rather than individual entities, and this has provided new insights for disease interpretation. The progress mentioned above is further aided by continual development in bio-ontologies which provide means for semantic, and thus phenotype, comparison.

Conclusions: The current literature showed a tightening link between genotype and phenotype, placing us one step closer to a better disease classification, patient stratification as well as the development of personalized medicine.

 

MissingLinkText

Keywords

Medical informatics - International Medical Informatics Association - yearbook - bioinformatics - genotype-phenotype relationships - bioontologies - semantic similarity

 

 

MissingLinkText

• References

• 1 Xu M, Li W, James GM, Mehan MR, Zhou XJ. Automated multidimensional phenotype profiling using large public microarray repositories. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 12323-8.
• 2 Hu G, Agarwal P. Human disease-drug network based on genomic expression profiles. PLoS One 2009; 04 (08) e6536.
• 3 Schwarz E, Leweke FM, Bahn S, Lio P. Clinical bioinformatics for complex disorders: a schizophrenia case study. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10 (Suppl. 12) S6.
• 4 Sadreyev RI, Feramisco JD, Tsao H, Grishin NV. Phenotypic categorization of genetic skin diseases reveals new relations between phenotypes, genes and pathways. Bioinformatics 2009; 25 (22) 2891-6.
• 5 Oti M, Brunner HG. The modular nature of genetic diseases. Clin Genet 2007; 71: 1-11.
• 6 Goh KI, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabasi AL. The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 8685-90.
• 7 Pesquita C, Faria D, Falcao AO, Lord P, Couto FM. Semantic similarities in biomedical ontologies. PLoS Computat Biol 2009; 05 (07) e1000443.
• 8 Yip YL. Accelerating knowledge discovery through community data sharing and integration. Findings from the Yearbook 2009 Section in Bioinformatics. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2009; 117-20.
• 9 Das S, Girand L, Greem T, Weitzman L, LewisBowen A, Clark T. Building biomedical web communities using a semantically aware content management system. Brief Bioinform 2008; 10 (02) 129-38.
• 10 Janevski A, Kamalakaran S, Banerjee N, Varadan V, Dimitrova N. a platform for breast cancer biomarker signature discovery, evaluation and assessment. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10 (Suppl. 09) S7.
• 11 Liu X, Wu J, Wang J, Liu X, Zhao S, Li Z. et al. WebLab: a data-centric, knowledge-sharing bioinformatics platform. NucleicAcids Res 2009; 37: W33-W39.
• 12 Kelder T, Pico AR, Hanspers K, van Iersel MP, Evelo C, Conklin BR. Mining biological pathways using WikiPathways Web Services. PLOS One 2009; 04 (07) e6447.
• 13 Yip YL. The promise of systems biology in clinical applications. Findings from theYearbook 2008 Section in Bioinformatics. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2008; 102-4.
• 14 Li R, Li Y, Fang X, Yang H, Wang J, Kristiansen K, Wang J. SNP detection for massively parallel whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res 2009; 19: 1124-32.
• 15 Freimer N, Sabatti C. The Human Phenome Project. Nature Genetics 2003; 34: 15-21.
• 16 Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. SOAP: Short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 713-4.