Health Information Systems - Technology and Acceptance

Summary

Objectives

To summarize current outstanding research in the field of health information systems (HIS).

Method

Synopsis of the articles selected for the IMIA Yearbook 2007.

Results

Five articles from three international peer reviewed journals were selected for the HIS section of the IMIA Yearbook 2007. They represent outstanding research on new user interfaces for mobile data entry, smart card based approaches for national eHealth projects, generic system architectures for telemedicine services, new approaches for electronic prescriptions based on ubiquitous computing, and telemedical systems for chronic care in COPD.

Conclusions

In the field of health information systems, evaluation and general architectural aspects of telemedical platforms respectively eHealth infrastructures currently is an important research topic as well as establishing acceptance of new technologies from the users and the organizations point of view.

 

MissingLinkText

Keywords

Medical informatics - International Medical Informatics Association - yearbook - health information systems

 

 

MissingLinkText

• References

• 1 Kuhn KA, Wurst SH, Bott OJ, Giuse DA. Expanding the scope of health information systems. Challenges and developments. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 43-52.
• 2 Haux R. Health information systems - past, present, future. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (3-4): 268-81.
• 3 Winter A, Brigl B, Funkat G, Haber A, Heller O, Wendt T. 3LGM(2)-Modelling to Support Management of Health Information Systems. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 491-6.
• 4 Lenz R, Buessecker F, Herlofsen H, Hinrichs F, Zeiler T, Kuhn KA. Demand-driven evolution of IT systems in healthcare—a case study for improving interdisciplinary processes. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (01) 4-10.
• 5 Bott OJ, Bergmann J, Hoffmann I, Vering T, Gomez EJ, Hernando ME. et al. Analysis and Specification of Telemedical Systems Using Modelling and Simulation: the MOSAIK-M Approach. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 503-8.
• 6 Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (01) 44-56.
• 7 Moehr JR, Anglin C, Schaafsma J, Pantazi S, Grimm N. Lest formalisms impede insight and success: evaluation in health informatics—a case study. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (01) 67-72.
• 8 Ammenwerth E. Health technology assessment. Findings from the section on assessing information technologies for health. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 16-9.
• 9 Brender J, Ammenwerth E, Nykanen P, Talmon J. Factors influencing success and failure of health informatics systems—a pilot Delphi study. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (01) 125-36.
• 10 Ammenwerth E, Talmon J, Ash JS, Bates DW, Beuscart-Zephir MC, Duhamel A. et al. Impact of CPOE on mortality rates—contradictory findings, important messages. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (06) 586-93.
• 11 Aarts J, Doorewaard H, Berg M. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (03) 207-16.
• 12 Haux R. Individualization, globalization and health—about sustainable information technologies and the aim of medical informatics. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (12) 795-808.
• 13 Lenz R, Beyer M, Kuhn KA. Semantic integration in healthcare networks. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (2-3) 201-7.
• 14 Maglaveras N, Chouvarda I, Koutkias VG, Gogou G, Lekka I, Goulis D. et al. The Citizen Health System (CHS): a modular medical contact center providing quality telemedicine services. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2005; 09 (03) 353-62.
• 15 Schabetsberger T, Ammenwerth E, Andreatta S, Gratl G, Haux R, Lechleitner G. et al. From a paperbased transmission of discharge summaries to electronic communication in health care regions. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (3-4) 209-15.
• 16 Bricon-Souf N, Anceaux F, Bennani N, Dufresne E, Watbled L. A distributed coordination platform for home care: analysis, framework and prototype. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74 (10) 809-25.
• 17 Larizza C, Bellazzi R, Stefanelli M, Ferrari P, De Cata P, Gazzaruso C. et al. The M2DM Project— the experience of two Italian clinical sites with clinical evaluation of a multi-access service for the management of diabetes mellitus patients. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (01) 79-84.
• 18 Lin CC, Chiu MJ, Hsiao CC, Lee RG, Tsai YS. Wireless health care service system for elderly with dementia. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2006; 10 (04) 696-704.
• 19 Parkka J, Ermes M, Korpipaa P, Mantyjarvi J, Peltola J, Korhonen I. Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2006; 10 (01) 119-28.
• 20 Bott OJ, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B, Knaup P, Lang E, Pilgram R. et al. The challenge of ubiquitous computing in health care: technology, concepts and solutions. Findings from the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2005. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (03) 473-9.
• 21 Bott OJ. Health information systems: between shared care and body area networks. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 53-4.
• 22 de Toledo P, Jimenez S, del Pozo F, Roca J, Alonso A, Hernandez C. Telemedicine experience for chronic care in COPD. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2006; 10 (03) 567-73.
• 23 Liu CT, Yang PT, Yeh YT, Wang BL. The impacts of smart cards on hospital information systems— an investigation of the first phase of the national health insurance smart card project in Taiwan. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (02) 173-81.
• 24 Ghinea G, Asgari S, Moradi A, Serif T. A Jinibased solution for electronic prescriptions. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2006; 10 (04) 794-802.
• 25 McDonald CJ, Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Martin DK, Wilson GA. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers. MD Comput 1992; 09 (04) 206-17.
• 26 Despont-Gros C, Landau R, Rutschmann O, Simon J, Lovis C. The digital pen and paper. Evaluation and acceptance of a new data acquisition device in clinical settings. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (03) 359-68.
• 27 Kuperman GJ, Bobb A, Payne TH, Avery AJ, Gandhi TK, Burns G. et al. Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (01) 29-40.
• 28 Schug SH, Redders M. [Health telematics projects in the perspective of the German federal states]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2005; 48 (06) 649-56.
• 29 Schmidt K. [The electronic prescription and its consequences: physicians need waiting room like a railroad station]. MMW Fortschr Med 2006; 148 (38) 58-9.
• 30 Sun-Microsystems. Jini Architectural Overview Technical white paper. 1999 [cited 14.04.2007]; Available from: http://www.sun.com/software/jini/whitepapers/architecture.pdf.
• 31 bWHO. eHealth. 2005 [cited 14.04.2007]; Available from: http://www.who.int/healthacademy/media/en/eHealth_EB_Res-en.pdf
• 32 Blobel B, Pharow P. A model driven approach for the German health telematics architectural framework and security infrastructure. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (2-3): 169-75.
• 33 Koch S. Meeting the challenges—the role of medical informatics in an ageing society. Stud HealthTechnol Inform 2006; 124: 25-31.
• 34 Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Pyle KKrages, Helfand M. Diagnosis, access and outcomes: Update of a systematic review of telemedicine services. J Telemed Telecare 2006; 12 (Suppl. 02) S3-31.
• 35 Whitten P, Mickus M. Home telecare for COPD/CHF patients: outcomes and perceptions. JTelemed Telecare 2007; 13 (02) 69-73.
• 36 Maiolo C, Mohamed EI, Fiorani CM, De Lorenzo A. Home telemonitoring for patients with severe respiratory illness: the Italian experience. JTelemed Telecare 2003; 09 (02) 67-71.
• 37 Lamothe L, Fortin JP, Labbe F, Gagnon MP, Messikh D. Impacts of telehomecare on patients, providers, and organizations. Telemed J E Health 2006; 12 (03) 363-9.