Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Table of Contents Yearb Med Inform 2006; 15(01): 114-120DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638485 Reviews Georg Thieme Verlag KG StuttgartEvaluation – The Cinderella Science of ICT in Health Authors Author Affiliations M. Rigby 1 Centre for Health Planning and Management, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom Recommend Article Abstract Full Text PDF Download(opens in new window) Keywords KeywordsEvaluation - information systems References References 1 Rigby M. Evaluation: 16 Powerful Reasons Why Not to Do It – And 6 Over-Riding Imperatives. In: Patel V, Rogers R, Haux R. editors. Medinfo 2001: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2001: 11198-202. 2 Guist SHF, Rigby MJ. The Rise and Fall of the Innovator. In: Lun KC, Degoulet P, Piemme TE, Rienhoff O. Medinfo 92 - Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress on Medical Informatics, Geneva Palexpo, Switzerland, 6-10 September 1992. Amsterdarm: Elsevier Science Publications BV, North-Holland; 1992 3 http://iig.umit.at/efmi/ (Bad Health Informatics page) (accessed 21.11.2005) 4 Ash J, Coiera E, Berg M. Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors. J AmMed Inform Assoc 2004; (11) 104-12. 5 Institute of Medicine. Dick R, Steen E. editors The Computer Based Patient Record An – Essential Technology for Healthcare. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1991 6 Department of Health. Information for Health: An Information Strategy for the Modern NHS. Department of Health; London: 1998 7 Department of Health. Delivering 21st Century IT Support for the NHS. London: Department of Health; 2004 8 National Health Information Management Advisory Council. Health Online. A Health Information Action Plan for Australia. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care; y1999.; 9 Rigby M. Health Informatics as a Tool to Improve Quality in Non-acute Care New Opportunities and a Matching Need for a – New Evaluation Paradigm. Int J Med Inform 1999; (56) 141-50. 10 Malmquist G, Hansson U, Qvarnström Å, Carlsson G. Health Practice by Remote Expert: a Case Study from Sweden. In: Rigby M, Roberts R, Thick M. editors. Taking Health Telematics into the 21st. Century. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2000 11 Anderson JG, Aydin CE, Jay SJ. editors. Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994 12 van Gennip EMSJ, Talmon JL. editors. Assessment and Evaluation of Information Technologies in Medicine. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995 13 Hasselbring W, Peterson R, Smits M, Spanjers R. Strategic Information Management for a Dutch University Hospital. In: Hasman A, Blobel B, Dudeck D, Engelbrecht R, Gell G, Prokosch H-U. editors. Medical Infobahn for Europe: Proceedings of MIE2000 and GMDS2000. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2000: 969-73. 14 Aas IH. Telemedical work and co-operation. J Telemed Telecare 2001; 07 (04) 212-8. 15 Aas IH. A qualitative study of the organizational consequences of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2001; 07 (01) 18-26. 16 Aas IH. Changes in the job situation due to telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 08: 41-7. 17 Aas IH. Organizing for remote consultations in health care – the production process. Behaviour and Information Technology 2003; 22: 91-100. 18 Aas IH. Organizational cooperation in teleradiology. J Telemed Telecare 2005; 11: 45-50. 19 www.esf.org/generic/1651/EW0212Report.pdf (accessed 22.11.2005). 20 Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykänen P, Prokosch H-U, Rigby M, Talmon J. et al. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73 (06) 479-91. 21 http://iig.umit.at/efmi/ (accessed 21.11.05). 22 www.imia.org (follow Working Groups link) (accessed 21.11.2005). 23 Grémy F, Bonnin M. Evaluation of Automatic Health Information Systems – What and How?. In: van Gennip EMSJ, Talmon JL. editors. Assessment and Evaluation of Information Technologies in Medicine. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995 24 Grémy F. Hardware, software, peopleware, subjectivity. A philosophical promenade. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (03) 352-8. 25 Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a new health system for the 21st . Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001 26 Friedman CP, Wyatt J C. Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics. New York: Springer; 1997 27 Beuscart-Zephir MC, Brender J, Beuscart R, Menager-Depriester I. Cognitive evaluation: how to assess the usability of information technology in healthcare. Comp Methods Programs Biomed 1997; 54 (1-2): 19-28. 28 Beuscart-Zephir MC, Anceaux F, Renard JM. Integrating users’ activity analysis in the design and assessment of medical software applications: the example of anesthesia. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000; 77: 234-8. 29 Beuscart-Zephir MC, Menu H, Evrard F, Guerlinger S, Watbled L, Anceaux F. Multidimensional evaluation of a Clinical Information System for anaesthesiology: quality management, usability, and performances. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 95: 649-54. 30 Beuscart-Zephir MC, Pelayo S, Degoulet P, Anceaux F, Guerlinger S, Meaux JJ. A usability study of CPOE’s medication administration functions: impact on physician-nurse cooperation. Medinfo 2004; 11 (Pt 2): 1018-22. 31 Rigby M. Essential Prerequisites to the Safe and Effective Widespread Roll-out of E-Working in Healthcare. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75: 138-47. 32 Roger-France F, Noothoven van JGoor, Staehr-Johansen K. Case-Based Telematic Systems Towards Equity in Health Care (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Vol. 14). Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1994 33 Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, Ball MJ, Douglas JV. Transforming Health Care Through Information – Case Studies. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995 34 Drazen EL, Metzger JB, Ritter JL, Schneider MK. Patient Care Infomration Systems – Successful design and Implementation. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995 35 http://evaldb.umit.at/ (accessed 22.11.2005). 36 Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (01) 44-56. 37 Brender J, Ammenwerth E, Nykänen P, Talmon J. Factors Influencing Success and Failure of Health Informatics Systems – A Pilot Delphi Study. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (01) 125-36. 38 Brender J. Handbook of Evaluation Methods for Health Informatics. Academic Press; 2006 39 Talmon JL, Ammenwerth E. The declaration of Innsbruck: some reflections. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 110: 68-74. 40 Ammenwerth E, Shaw NT. Bad health informatics can kill—is evaluation the answer?. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (01) 1-3.
