Section 6: Education and Consumer Informatics: Methods to Meet the Informational Demands of Patients and Health Professionals

Summary

Objectives

To summarize current excellent research in the field of education and consumer informatics.

Method

Synopsis of the articles selected for the IMIA Yearbook 2006.

Results

In the consumer informatics field current research focuses on meeting the informational needs of laypersons as well as health professionals with their specific demands and abilities. The selected papers’ topics are genetic diseases and conditions, decision support for women considering genetic testing for the risk of breast cancer, history taking and advice for parents with children suffering from asthma, timed messages to motivate and support quit smoking efforts and the integration of health economics in medical education.

Conclusions

The selected articles demonstrate examples of excellent research in consumer health informatics and medical education. The methods presented can contribute to the development of systems for the education of both laypersons and health professionals.

 

MissingLinkText

Keywords

Medical Informatics - International Medical Informatics Association - Yearbook - Education - Consumer Health Informatics

 

 

MissingLinkText

• References

• 1 Lison T, Gunther S, Ogurol Y, Pretschner DP, Wischnesky MB. VISION2003: virtual learning units for medical training and education. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73 (02) 165-72.
• 2 Heng PA, Cheng CY, Wong TT, Xu Y, Chui YP, Chan KM. et al. A virtual-reality training system for knee arthroscopic surgery. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2004; 08 (02) 217-27.
• 3 Lang JR, Collen A. Evaluating personal health care and health promotion web sites. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (02) 328-33.
• 4 Soergel D, Tse T, Slaughter L. Helping healthcare consumers understand: an “interpretive layer” for finding and making sense of medical information. Medinfo 2004; 11 (Pt 2): 931-5.
• 5 Jadad AR, Delamothe T. What next for electronic communication and health care?. BMJ 2004; 328 (7449): 1143-4.
• 6 Bott OJ, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B, Knaup P, Lang E, Pilgram R. et al. The challenge of ubiquitous computing in health care: technology, concepts and solutions. Findings from the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2005. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (03) 473-9.
• 7 Knaup P, Ammenwerth E, Brandner R, Brigl B, Fischer G, Garde S. et al. Towards clinical bioinformatics: advancing genomic medicine with informatics methods and tools. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (03) 302-7.
• 8 Mitchell JA, Fun J, McCray AT. Design of Genetics Home Reference: a new NLM consumer health resource. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (06) 439-47.
• 9 Green MJ, Peterson SK, Baker MW, Harper GR, Friedman LC, Rubinstein WS. et al. Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 2004; 292 (04) 442-52.
• 10 Lenert L, Munoz RF, Perez JE, Bansod A. Automated e-mail messaging as a tool for improving quit rates in an internet smoking cessation intervention. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (04) 235-40.
• 11 Porter SC, Cai Z, Gribbons W, Goldmann DA, Kohane IS. The asthma kiosk: a patient-centered technology for collaborative decision support in the emergency department. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (06) 458-67.
• 12 Voss JD, Nadkarni MM, Schectman JM. The Clinical Health Economics System Simulation (CHESS): a teaching tool for systems- and practice-based learning. Acad Med 2005; 80 (02) 129-34.
• 13 Lewis SE. Gene Ontology: looking backwards and forwards. Genome Biol 2005; 06 (01) 103.