Download PDF
Yearb Med Inform 1993; 02(01): 399-401
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637984
Synopsis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Knowledge-Based Systems

M. G. Kahn
1   Division of Medical Informatics Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 March 2018 (online)

 
 PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

 


#

  • References

  • 1 Musen MA. Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 435-67.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sandblad B, Meinzer HP. Modelling and simulation of complex control structures in cell biology. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 36-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Heckerman DE, Nathwani BN. Toward normative expert systems: Part II. Probability-based representations. for efficient knowledge acquisition and inference. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 106-16.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Koski EMJ, Makivirta A, Sukuvaara T, Kari A. Development of an expert system for haemodynamic monitoring: computerized symbolization of on-line monitoring data. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1991; 8: 289-93.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Verdaguer A, Patak A, Sancho JJ, Sierra C, Sanz F. Validation of the medical expert system PNEUMON-IA. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 511-268.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kotzke K, Pretschner DP. Possibilities of software phantoms for quality control of KBS in nuclear medicine. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 126-34.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Van Bemmel JH, McCray AT. Eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1992. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Wyatt J, Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating medical expert systems: What to test and how?. Med Inform 1990; 15: 205-17.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Compton P, Hom K, Quinlan JR, Lazarus L, Ho K. Maintaining an expert system. In: Quinlan JR. ed. Applications of Expert Systems Glasgow, Scotland: Turing Institute Press; 1989: 366-84.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Miller PL, Sittig DF. The evaluation of clinical decision support systems: What is necessary versus what is interesting. Med Inform 1990; 15: 185-90.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • References

  • 1 Musen MA. Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 435-67.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sandblad B, Meinzer HP. Modelling and simulation of complex control structures in cell biology. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 36-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Heckerman DE, Nathwani BN. Toward normative expert systems: Part II. Probability-based representations. for efficient knowledge acquisition and inference. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 106-16.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Koski EMJ, Makivirta A, Sukuvaara T, Kari A. Development of an expert system for haemodynamic monitoring: computerized symbolization of on-line monitoring data. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1991; 8: 289-93.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Verdaguer A, Patak A, Sancho JJ, Sierra C, Sanz F. Validation of the medical expert system PNEUMON-IA. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 511-268.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kotzke K, Pretschner DP. Possibilities of software phantoms for quality control of KBS in nuclear medicine. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 126-34.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Van Bemmel JH, McCray AT. Eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1992. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Wyatt J, Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating medical expert systems: What to test and how?. Med Inform 1990; 15: 205-17.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Compton P, Hom K, Quinlan JR, Lazarus L, Ho K. Maintaining an expert system. In: Quinlan JR. ed. Applications of Expert Systems Glasgow, Scotland: Turing Institute Press; 1989: 366-84.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Miller PL, Sittig DF. The evaluation of clinical decision support systems: What is necessary versus what is interesting. Med Inform 1990; 15: 185-90.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

   Permissions and Reprints