Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17(04): 184-188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632818
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of portal locations and periarticular structures in canine coxofemoral arthroscopy: a cadaver study

W. B. Saunders
,
D. A. Hulse
1   Texas A&M University, Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College Station, TX, USA
,
K. S. Schulz
2   Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 20 November 2003

Accepted 12 March 2004

Publication Date:
07 February 2018 (online)

Summary

The objectives of this study were to determine the optimum limb position for the creation of safe arthroscopy portals for coxofemoral arthroscopy, to determine anatomical landmarks for arthroscopy portals, and to determine distances of portals to periarticular neurovascular structures. Eight hemipelves were harvested from adult dogs that died for reasons unrelated to this project and were free of joint pathology as determined by gross examination at the conclusion of the study. The results suggest that the ideal limb position for canine coxofemoral arthroscopy was slight limb adduction, thirty degrees of hip flexion, with the stifle in a neutral position. With the limb in the ideal position, the arthroscope portal was 5 mm cranial (range 0 mm 10 mm) and 15 mm proximal (range 12 mm 18 mm) to the greater trochanter. The instrument portal was 10.2 mm cranial (range 5 mm 18 mm) and 14 mm proximal (range 7 mm 20 mm) to the greater trochanter. The sciatic nerve and the caudal gluteal artery were 9 mm caudal (range 6 mm 15 mm) to the arthroscope portal. This is the first study to evaluate the location of both arthroscopy portals and periarticular neurovascular structures in relation to surrounding surgical landmarks.

 
  • References

  • 1 Anderson K, McCarty EC, Warren RF. Thermal capsulorrhaphy: Where are we today?. In: Sports medicine and arthroscopy review. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Inc; 1999: 117-27.
  • 2 Bardet JF. Arthroscopy of the elbow in dogs. Part I: The normal arthroscopic anatomy using the craniolateral portal. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10: 1-5.
  • 3 Beale BS, Hulse DA, Whitney WO. Arthroscopically assisted surgery of the hip joint. In: Small animal arthrosocpy. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003: 97-115.
  • 4 Beale BS, Schulz KS. Arthroscopic evaluation of the dysplastic hip. Proceedings. 47-50 2002
  • 5 Bree HV, Ryssen BV. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the canine elbow. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 09: 63-4.
  • 6 Chung WK, Slater GL, Bates EH. Treatment of septic arthritis of the hip by arthroscopic lavage. J Ped Orthop 1993; 13: 444-6.
  • 7 Cook JL, Kenter K, Tomlinson JL. Arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability using radiofrequency-induced thermal modification. Proceedings of the Veterinary Orthopaedic Society 28th Annual Conference, Lake Louise, Canada, March 2001 Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2001; 14: A3 (Abstract).
  • 8 Cory JW, Ruch DS. Arthroscopic removal of a .44 caliber bullet from the hip. Arthroscopy 1998; 14: 624-6.
  • 9 Farjo LA, Glick JM, Sampson TG. Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy 1999; 15: 132-7.
  • 10 Hawkins RB. Arthroscopy of the hip. Clin Orthop 1989; 44-7.
  • 11 Holsworth IG, Schulz KS, Beale B. et al. Arthroscopic correlation to radiographic findings in canine juvenile hip arthroscopy. Proceedings of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society 29th Annual Conference, Park City, Utah, March 2002. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2002; 15: A62 (Abstract).
  • 12 Hyman JL. et al. The arthroscopic drainage, irrigation, and debridement of late, acute total hip arthroplasty infections: average 6-year followup. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 903-10.
  • 13 Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D. Reliability of goniometry in Laborador Retrievers. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 979-86.
  • 14 Keene GS, Villar RN. Arthroscopic loose body retrieval following traumatic hip dislocation. Injury 1994; 25: 507-10.
  • 15 Kivumbi CW, Bennett D. Arthroscopy of the canine stifle joint. Vet Rec 1981; 109: 241-9.
  • 16 Lopez MJ, Vanderby R, Bogdanske J. et al. Prevention of hip dysplasia with thermal energy. ACVS Proceedings. 2001. Chicago: 13 (Abstr).
  • 17 Mah ET, Bradley CM. Arthroscopic removal of acrylic cement from unreduced hip prosthesis. Aust N Z J Surg 1992; 62: 508-10.
  • 18 Martini FM, Pinna S, Bue MD. A simplified technique for diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the shoulder joint in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 2002; 43: 7-11.
  • 19 McCarthy JC, Wardell SR, Mason JB. Arthroscopy. In: The adult hip. Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE. eds. Philadelphia: LippincottRaven Publishers; 1998: 721-36.
  • 20 Person MW. A procedure for arthroscopic examination of the canine stifle joint. J Am Animal Hospital Assoc 1985; 21: 179-86.
  • 21 Person MW. Arthroscopy of the canine shoulder joint. Compendium Continuing Education 1986; 08: 537-46.
  • 22 Person MW. Arthroscopy of the canine coxofemoral joint. Compendium Continuing Education 1989; 11: 930-5.
  • 23 Philippon MJ. The role of arthroscopic thermal capsulorrhaphy in the hip. Clinics Sports Med 2001; 20: 817-29.
  • 24 Ryssen Bv, Bree Hv, Vyt P. Arthroscopy of the shoulder joint in the dog. J Am Animal Hospital Assoc 1993; 29: 101-5.
  • 25 Sams AE. Canine elbow joint arthroscopy: introduction and description of technique. Compendium Continuing Education 2000; 22: 135-48.
  • 26 Santori N, Villar RN. Arthroscopic findings in the initial stages of hip osteoarthritis. Orthopedics 1999; 22: 405-9.
  • 27 Williams MS, Hutcheson RL, Miller AR. A new technique for removal of intraarticular bullet fragments from the femoral head. Bulletin Hospital for Joint Diseases 1997; 56: 107-10.