Download PDF
Nuklearmedizin 1987; 26(06): 234-240
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628896
Review Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Quantitative Evaluation of Myocardial Stress/Rest 201TISPECT: Results of a ROI-Based Method in 108 Patients with CHD

U. Buell
1   From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Teaching Hospital, Düren, FRG
,
H. Stirner
1   From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Teaching Hospital, Düren, FRG
,
J. vom Dahl
2   From the Medicine I, Teaching Hospital, Düren, FRG
,
R. Uebis
2   From the Medicine I, Teaching Hospital, Düren, FRG
,
E. Kleinhans
1   From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Teaching Hospital, Düren, FRG
,
M. Biedermann
1   From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Teaching Hospital, Düren, FRG
,
W. Große
1   From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Teaching Hospital, Düren, FRG
,
H. J. Simon
3   From the University of Aachen and Department of Medicine, Teaching Hospital, Düren, FRG
› Author AffiliationsThe authors wish to thank Miss B. Gossmann, RTA, and Miss D. Karla, RTA, for superb technical assistance.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 22 June 1987

in revised form: 16 July 1987

Publication Date:
05 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ROI-based polar maps (33 ROIs) were employed to evaluate quantitatively stress/rest myocardial 201TI SPECT in 108 patients with angiographically proven coronary heart disease (CHD) in comparison with 30 controls. Sensitivity in detecting a CHD with stenoses of > 50% of luminal diameter was determined versus normal regional values (± 2.5 SD) employing vitality (VI) and wash-out corrected redistribution (RD). The method was evaluated referring to the severity of the disease, to the number of ROIs displaying changes [(a) 1 ROI, (b) >2 ROIs], to validity of VI, RD or a combination thereof, and for specificity. Wash-out values were found to depend on degree of stress individually achieved and thus were not used as a threshold criterion. Sensitivity in supply areas with old myocardial infarctions was 95% (a) and 86% (b), resp. With no infarction, it was 96% (a) and 79% (b), resp. VI in stenosis > 75% was more sensitive than RD. However, combined evaluation of VI and RD yielded sensitivities from 91-100% (a) and 77-94% (b), resp. for different main supply areas. In stenosis < 50% with normal VI, RD was positive in 18-31 %. Specificity turned out to be 91 % (a) and 97% (b), resp. We conclude that the method presented is reliable to quantify numerically 201TI kinetics in myocardial SPECT, aimed at detecting and describing CHD.

Zusammenfassung

33 Regions of Interest (ROIs) in polarer Anordnung wurden verwendet, um quantitative Befunde der Belastungs/Ruhe-SPECT des Myokards mit 201TI bei 108 Patienten mit koro- narangiograpisch gesicherter koronarer Herzkrankheit (KHK) und bei 30 Normalen vergleichend zu bewerten. Die Sensitivität bei der Erfassung von Stenosen >50% wurde im Vergleich zu regionalen Normwerten (± 2,5 SD) mittels der Vitalität (VI) und der Wash-out-korrigierten Rückverteilung (RD) bestimmt. Die Methode wurde unter Bezug auf Schwere der Erkrankung, Zahl veränderter ROIs [(a) 1 ROI, (b) >2 ROIs], Wertigkeit von VI, RD bzw. deren Kombination, und auf die Spezifität bewertet. Wash-out-Werte zeigten sich abhängig vom individuellen Belastungsgrad und wurden daher nicht als Schwellwert verwendet. In koronaren Versorgungsgebieten mit alten Infarkten betrug die Sensitivität 95% (a) bzw. 86% (b). Ohne Infarkt waren es 96% (a) bzw. 79% (b). Bei Stenosen >75% war VI sensitiver als RD. In der Kombination ergaben sich für die verschiedenen koronaren Hauptversorgungsgebiete Sensitivitäten von 91-100% (a) oder von 77-94% (b). Stenosen <50% mit normaler VI waren zu 18-31% mit erhöhter RD verbunden. Die Spezifität errechnete sich mit 91% (a) bzw. 97% (b). Die vorgestellte Methode erwies sich als verläßlich bei der numerischen Quantifizierung der 201T1-Kinetik mit der Myokard-SPECT, gerichtet auf die Entdeckung und Beschreibung einer KHK.

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Abdullah A, Maddahi J, Garcia E. et al. Slow regional clearance of myocardial thallium-201 in the absence of perfusion defect: Contribution to detection of individual coronary artery stenoses and mechanism of occurrence. Circulation 1985; 71: 72-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bice A. N., Clausen M, Loricaric S, Wagner H. N.. Comparison of transaxial resolution in 180° and 360° SPECT with a rotating scintillation camera. Eur. J. nucl. ‘Med 1987; 13: 7-11.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Brown K. E., Benoit L, Clements J. P., Wackers F. J.Th. Fast washout of Thallium-201 from area of myocardial infarction: Possible artifact of background subtraction. J. nucl. Med 1987; 28: 945-49.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Büll U, Doliwa R, Kirsch C. M., Roedler H. D., Strauer B. E.. Die 20lThallium-Single-Photon-Emissions-Computertomographie (SPECT) in der funktioneilen Beurteilung koronarstenotischer Veränderungen. Ergebnisse des Vergleichs von belastungsszintigraphischen mit koronarangiographischen Befunden. Z. Kardiol 1984; 73: 313-20.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Büll U, Kirsch C. M., Höfling B, Roedler H. D.. Ergebnisse der 201T1-SPECT des Myokards zur Erfassung der koronaren Herzkrankheit und zur Verlaufskontrolle bei perkutaner transluminaler koronarer Angioplastik. Nucl.-Med 1986; 25: 71-7.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Diamond G. A., Forrester J. S.. Analysis of probability as an aid in clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. New Engl. J. Med 1979; 300: 1350-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Friedman J, van Train K, Maddahi J. “Upward creep” of the heart: A frequent source of false-positive reversible defects on Thallium-201 stress-redistribution SPECT. J. nucl. Med 1986; 27: 899.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Garcia E, van Train K, Maddahi J. et al. Quantification of rotational Thallium- 201 myocardial tomography. J. nucl. Med 1985; 26: 17-26.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Go R. T., MacIntyre W. J., Houser Th. S.. et al. Clinical evaluation of 360° and 180° data sampling techniques for transaxial SPECT Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. J. nucl. Med 1985; 26: 695-706.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hör G, Kanemoto N. 201T1 myocardial scintigraphy: Current statuts in coronary artery disease, results of sensitivity/ specificity in 3092 patients and clinical recommendations. Nucl.-Med 1981; 20: 136-47.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Kaul S, Chesler D. A., Pohost G. M.. et al. Influence of peak exercise heart rate on normal thallium-201 clearance. J. nucl. Med 1986; 27: 26-30.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kirsch C. M., Doliwa R, Buell U, Roedler D. Detection of severe coronary heart disease with Tl-201: Comparison of resting single photon emission tomography with invasive angiography. J. nucl. Med 1983; 24: 761-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Koskinen M, Pöyhönen L, Seppänen S. Thallium-201 washout in coronary artery disease using SPECT - A comparison with coronary angiography. Eur. J. nucl. Med 1987; 12: 609-12.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Laird E. E., Rajathurai A, Williams E. D., Mittra B, Rankin D. Quantitative analysis of rotating gamma camera thallium-201 scintigrams of myocardium. Nucl. Med. Comm 1984; 05: 577-86.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Maddahi Y, Garcia E. V., Berman D. S.. et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of CAD by quantitative analysis or regional stress myocardial distribution and washout of thallium-201. Circulation 1981; 64: 924-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Maublant J, Cassagnes J, Lejeune J. J.. et al. A comparison between conventional scintigraphy and emission tomography with thallium-201 in the detection of myocardial infarction. J. nucl. Med 1982; 23: 204-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rabinovitch M, Suissa S, Elstein J. et al. Sex-specific criteria for interpretation of Thallium-201 myocardial uptake and washout studies. J. nucl. Med 1986; 27: 1837-41.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rothendler J. A., Okada R. D., Wilson R. A.. et al. Effect of a delay in commencing imaging on the ability to detect transient thallium defects. J. nucl. Med 1985; 26: 880-3.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Standke R, Hör G. Sektorenanalyse der myokardialen 201-Thallium-Redistri- butionskinetik. NUC-Comp 1980; 11: 249-53.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Stirner H, Buell U, Kleinhans E. Three-dimensional ROI-based quantification of stress/rest 201TI myocardial SPECT. Presentation of method. Nucl.-Med 1986; 25: 128-33.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Strauer B. E.. Hypertensive Heart Disease. 9. Springer; Berlin - Heidelberg- New York: 1980
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Van Train K. F., Berman D. S., Garcia E. V.. et al. Quantitative analysis of stress thallium-201 myocardial scintigrams: A multicenter trial. J. nucl. Med 1986; 27: 17-25.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ziada G, Hayat N, Mohammed M. et al. Quantitative analysis of stress thallium-201 studies: Comparison of SPECT and planar imaging in the detection of CAD. Nucl. Med. Comm 1986; 07: 427-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar