Nuklearmedizin 1983; 22(03): 152-154
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1623791
Originalarbeiten - Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

On the Mechanisms of 67Ga and 59Fe Uptake by Tumors

Über Mechanismen der 67Ga-Zitrat und 59Fe-Zitrat Aufnahme bei Tumoren
L. J. Anghileri
1   From the Service of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics Laboratory, University of Nancy, Medical Faculty B, Nancy, France
,
M. C. Crone
1   From the Service of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics Laboratory, University of Nancy, Medical Faculty B, Nancy, France
,
P. Thouvenot
1   From the Service of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics Laboratory, University of Nancy, Medical Faculty B, Nancy, France
,
F. Brunotte
1   From the Service of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics Laboratory, University of Nancy, Medical Faculty B, Nancy, France
,
C. Marchai
1   From the Service of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics Laboratory, University of Nancy, Medical Faculty B, Nancy, France
,
J. Robert
1   From the Service of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics Laboratory, University of Nancy, Medical Faculty B, Nancy, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 27 January 1983

Publication Date:
10 January 2018 (online)

Preview

The uptake of 67Ga-citrate and 59Fe-citrate in the presence or absence of gallium and iron carriers, was studied on DSsarcoma-bearing rats. Differences of uptake pattern were observed with both radionuclides. The tumor uptake of 67Ga is greatly affected by both carriers while 59Fe uptake is independent of the presence of carriers. The role of isotopic dilution, ionic competition, and the probable presence of high and low affinity binding sites in this phenomenon are discussed.

Die Aufnahme von 67Ga-Zitrat und 59Fe-Zitrat, mit und ohne Gallium-und Eisenträger, wurde in Ratten mit DSSarkom untersucht. Beide Radionuklide zeigen unterschiedliche Aufnahmen. Beide Träger beeinflussen die Speicherung von 67Ga-Zitrat stark, jedoch nicht jene der 59Fe-Zitrat Aufnahme. Die Rolle der isotopischen Verdünnung, des isomorphen Ionenaustauschs und des wahrscheinlichen Auftretens von „high” und „low affinity” Bindungsstellen wird diskutiert.