Nuklearmedizin 1979; 18(02): 73-78
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1620878
Originalarbeiten - Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Mobile Gamma Cameras and 99mTc-Labelled Phosphates in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Bewegliche Gamma-Kameras und 99mTc-markierte Phosphate beim akuten Myokardinfarkt
A. V. Pereira-Prestes
1   From the Departments of Cardiology and of Nuclear Medicine, The Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, U. K
,
R. M. Donaldson
1   From the Departments of Cardiology and of Nuclear Medicine, The Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, U. K
,
P. J. Ell
1   From the Departments of Cardiology and of Nuclear Medicine, The Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, U. K
,
N. J. G. Brown
1   From the Departments of Cardiology and of Nuclear Medicine, The Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, U. K
,
P. H. Jarritt
1   From the Departments of Cardiology and of Nuclear Medicine, The Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, U. K
,
T. Al-Baghdadi
1   From the Departments of Cardiology and of Nuclear Medicine, The Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, U. K
,
A. T. Elliott
1   From the Departments of Cardiology and of Nuclear Medicine, The Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, U. K
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 21 November 1978

Publication Date:
10 January 2018 (online)

99mTc-labelled phosphates (PyP, IDP and MDP) were compared for their usefulness for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. The results indicated the superiority of 99mTc-labelled imidodiphosphonate over the other 99mTc-labelled phosphates. At the same time, two mobile gamma cameras were compared with respect to their instrumental characteristics and clinical versatility and their advantages and disadvantages are reported.

99mTc-markierte Phosphate (PyP, IDP und MDP) wurden hinsichtlich ihrer Verwendungsfähigkeit zur Diagnose des Myokardinfarkts verglichen. Die Ergebnisse zeigten die Überlegenheit des 99mTc-markierten Imidodiphosphonats gegenüber den anderen 99mTc-markierten Phosphaten. Gleichzeitig wurden zwei bewegliche Gamma-Kameras physikalisch und klinisch erprobt; ihre Vor- und Nachteile werden beschrieben.

 
  • References

  • (1) Bonte FJ, Parkey RW, Graham KD, Moore J, Stokely EM. Radiology. 110: 473 1974; .
  • (2) Ell PJ, Langford R, Pearce P, Lui D, Elliott AT, Woolf N, Williams ES. Brit. Heart J.. XL: 226 1978; .
  • (3) Grossman ZD, Foster AB, McAfee JG, Richardson R, Subramanian G, Markarian G, Gagne G, Bassano D. J. nucl. Med 17: 534 1976; .
  • (4) Grossman ZD, Foster AB, Richardson R, McAfee JG, Subramanian G, Markarian G, Bassano D, Gagne G. J. nucl. Med 17: 534 1976; .
  • (5) Joseph SP, Ell PJ, Ross P, Donaldson R, Elliott AT, Brown NJG, Williams ES. Brit. Heart J. XL: 234 1978; .
  • (6) Parkey RW, Bonte FJ, Buja LM, Stokely EM, Willerson JT. Sem. nucl. Med. 7: 15 1977; .
  • (7) Sing A, Usher G. J. nucl. Med 18: 790 1977; .
  • (8) Subramanian G, McAfee JG, Rosenstreich M, Coco M. J. nucl. Med 16: 574 1975; .
  • (9) Editorial. Brit. med. J. 1978: 717.