Thromb Haemost 2000; 83(06): 849-852
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613932
Commentary
Schattauer GmbH

A Computer Generated Induction System for Hospitalized Patients Starting on Oral Anticoagulant Therapy

Walter Ageno
1   From the Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, General Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Judith Johnson
1   From the Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, General Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Barbara Nowacki
1   From the Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, General Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Alexander G.G. Turpie
1   From the Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, General Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 19 August 1997

Accepted after resubmission 01 April 1999

Publication Date:
14 December 2017 (online)

Summary

There is an increasing use of computer-based dosage programs to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy in outpatients. DAWN AC INDUCTION by 4S, UK, is a computer generated system to initiate oral anticoagulant therapy providing fast access to the maintenance program. This method of initiation of anticoagulant therapy has not been validated. We therefore randomized 50 hospitalized patients starting oral anticoagulation to control by the computer and 51 by manual dosing using a dosing schedule based on a locally defined algorithm. After a 7 days follow up, the daily mean INR was 2.09 and 2.07 and the proportion of dose adjustments was 48% and 45% in the computer and manually controlled groups respectively. Twenty-eight % of the patients monitored by the computer system required at least one manual overriding. DAWN AC INDUCTION provided a simple and accurate organization of the data, with an overall quality comparable to that of the manual system. Furthermore, the induction programme provided simple access to the maintenance programme. Although it required careful monitoring, the programme resulted in a significant saving in personnel time.

 
  • References

  • 1 Wessler S, Gitel SN. Warfarin: from bedside to bench. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 645-52.
  • 2 Hirsh J, Dalen JE, Deykin D, Poller L, Bussey H. Oral anticoagulants. Mechanism of action, Clinical Effectiveness, and Optimal Therapeutic Range. Chest 1995; 108 (Suppl. 04) 231S-246S.
  • 3 O’Reilly A, Aggeler PM. Determinants of the response to oral anticoagulant drugs in man. Pharmacol Rev 1970; 22: 35-96.
  • 4 Wilson R, James AH. Computer assisted management of warfarin treatment. Br Med J 1984; 289: 422-4.
  • 5 Ryan PJ, Gilbert M, Rose PE. Computer control of anticoagulant dose for therapeutic management. Br Med J 1989; 299: 1207-9.
  • 6 Poller L, Wright D, Rowlands M. Prospective comparative study of computer programs used for management of warfarin. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46: 299-303.
  • 7 Ageno W, Turpie AGG. Randomized comparison of anticoagulant control by a computer generated system with a manual system. Thromb Haemost 1997; suppl: 701. (abstract).
  • 8 Fennerty A, Dolben J, Thomas P, Backhouse G, Bentley DP, Campbell IA, Routledge PA. Flexible induction dose regimen for warfarin and prediction of maintenance dose. Br Med J 1984; 288: 1268-70.
  • 9 Carter BL, Taylor JW, Becker A. Evaluation of three dosage-prediction methods for initial in-hospital stabilization of warfarin therapy. Clin Pharm 1987; 06: 37-45.
  • 10 White RH, Hong R, Venook AP, Daschbach MM, Murray W, Mungall DR, Coleman RW. Initiation of warfarin therapy: comparison of physician dosing with computer-assisted dosing. J Gen Intern Med 1987; 02: 141-8.
  • 11 Jupe DML, Peterson GM, Coleman RL, McLean S. Warfarin dosage requirements: prospective clinical trial of a method for prediction from the response to a single dose. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 25: 607-10.