Thromb Haemost 2003; 89(01): 97-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613548
Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis
Schattauer GmbH

Ruling out clinically suspected pulmonary embolism by assessment of clinical probability and D-dimer levels: a management study

Authors

  • Monique G. L. Leclercq

    1   Department of Internal Medicine, Isala clinics, location Sophia, Zwolle
  • Johan G. Lutisan

    1   Department of Internal Medicine, Isala clinics, location Sophia, Zwolle
  • Marinus van Marwijk Kooy

    1   Department of Internal Medicine, Isala clinics, location Sophia, Zwolle
  • Bart F. Kuipers

    2   Department of Pulmonology, Isala clinics, location Sophia, Zwolle
  • Ad H. J. Oostdijk

    3   Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala clinics, location Sophia, Zwolle
  • Jef J. C. M. van der Leur

    4   Department of Clinical Chemistry, Isala clinics, location Sophia, Zwolle
  • Harry R. Büller

    1   Department of Internal Medicine, Isala clinics, location Sophia, Zwolle
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 22. August 2002

Accepted after revision 17. Oktober 2002

Publikationsdatum:
09. Dezember 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

D-dimer test combined with clinical probability assessment has been proposed as the first step in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). In a prospective management study we investigated the safety and efficiency of excluding PE by a normal D-dimer combined with a low or moderate clinical probability. Of the 202 study patients this combination ruled out PE in 64 (32%) patients. The 3-month thromboembolic risk in these patients was 0% (95% CI, 0.0-5.6%).The prevalence of PE in the entire cohort was 29% (59 patients), whereas in the low, moderate and high clinical probability groups this was 25%, 26% and 50%, respectively. We conclude that ruling out suspected PE by a normal D-dimer combined with a low or moderate clinical probability appears to be a safe and efficient strategy. The accuracy of the clinical probability assessment is modest.