The Interprofessional Education Environment: Places and Pedagogies

John W. McCarthy; Jeffrey J. DiGiovanni

doi:10.1055/s-0037-1607345

Seminars in Speech and Language, Table of Contents

Semin Speech Lang 2017; 38(05): 368-380
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607345

Review Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Interprofessional Education Environment: Places and Pedagogies

John W. McCarthy

¹Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio

,

Jeffrey J. DiGiovanni

¹Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) can occur in many places and in many ways. In this article, we focus on the inclusion of standards from the Interprofessional Education Collaborative in several different environments. We consider traditional classrooms and classrooms that integrate clinical placements for varying amounts of instructional time. We also consider a various types of simulations, including virtual and augmented reality, and their potential for advancement of IPE.

Keywords

Interprofessional education - interprofessional practice - health education

Full Text

References

References
1 Zabala JS. Ready, SETT, go! Getting started with the SETT framework. Closing the Gap 2005; 23 (06) 1-3
2 World Health Organization (WHO). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010 . Available at: http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/framework_action/en/ . Accessed October 12, 2017
3 Institute of Medicine (IOM). Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003
4 Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Report of an Expert Panel. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2011
5 Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: 2016 Update. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2016
6 Ekpe J, Moore DR, McCarthy JW, DiGiovanni JD. Comparing change in perceived achievement of students in an interprofessional class: The effectiveness of participatory versus direct instruction. J Interprof Educ Pract 2017; 9: 41-50
7 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Expanding the Toolbox: Methods to Study and Refine Patient-Centered Medical Home Models. Rockville, MD: AHRQ Research Series Publications; 2011
8 Rodriguez-Paz JM, Kennedy M, Salas E. , et al. Beyond “see one, do one, teach one”: toward a different training paradigm. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18 (01) 63-68
9 Schmidt HG. Assumptions underlying self-directed learning may be false. Med Educ 2000; 34 (04) 243-245
10 Srinivasan M, Wilkes M, Stevenson F, Nguyen T, Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Acad Med 2007; 82 (01) 74-82
11 Michaelson LK, Parmelee DX, McMahon KK, Levine RE. . (eds.). Team-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Guide to Using Small Groups for Improving Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus; 2008
12 Simulation. Merriam-Webster.com. 2017. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/simulation . Accessed October 5, 2017
13 Society for Simulation in Healthcare. About simulation. Available at: http://www.ssih.org/About-SSH/About-Simulation . Accessed October 9, 2017
14 Kardong-Edgren S, Hanberg A, Dodge Ackermann A. , et al. Supplement. Clin Simul Nurs 2011; 4: S1-S20
15 McCarthy J, Buchman S, DiGiovanni J. Using the SEGUE framework to discuss and understand interprofessional encounters. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association; November 17–19, 2016; Philadelphia, PA
16 Makoul G. The SEGUE Framework for teaching and assessing communication skills. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 45 (01) 23-34
17 Yorkston KM, Baylor CR, Burns MI, Morris MA, McNalley TE. Enhancing communication in outpatient medical clinic visits. In: Blackstone S, Beukelman DR, Yorkston KM. , eds. Patient-Provider Communication Roles for Speech Pathologists and Other Health Care Professionals. San Diego, CA: Plural; 2015
18 Kroll T, Pasupathy R, Schuck J, Gunduz S. Interprofessional conflict resolution training increases conflict resolution self-efficacy beliefs in SLP & nursing students. Paper presented at: ASHA Convention; November 2016; Philadelphia, PA
19 U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Team STEPPS. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/index.html . Accessed October 9, 2017
20 Riener R, Harders M. Virtual Reality in Medicine. London, UK: Springer; 2012
21 Dascal J, Reid M, IsHak WW. , et al. Virtual reality and medical inpatients: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Innov Clin Neurosci 2017; 14 (1–2): 14-21
22 Seymour NE. VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 2008; 32 (02) 182-188
23 Kilmon CA, Brown L, Ghosh S, Mikitiuk A. Immersive virtual reality simulations in nursing education. Nurs Educ Perspect 2010; 31 (05) 314-317
24 Embodied Labs. Embodied virtual reality labs for healthcare training. Available at: http://www.embodiedlabs.com/ . Accessed October 9, 2017
25 Goodman JI, Brady MP, Duffy ML, Scott J, Pollard NE. The effects of “bug-in-ear” supervision on special education teachers' delivery of learn units. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl 2008; 23 (04) 207-216
26 Parsable. Wearable intelligence in healthcare. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnEdaslPtEg . Accessed October 9, 2017