CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39(11): 614-621
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606129
Original Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Follicle Viability after Vitrification of Bovine Ovarian Tissue

Viabilidade folicular após a vitrificação de tecido ovariano bovinoJanaína de Souza Guedes1, 2, Jhenifer Kliemchen Rodrigues3, 4, Ana Luisa Menezes Campos1, 2, Camila Cruz de Moraes1, 2, João Pedro Junqueira Caetano1, 2, 3, Ricardo Mello Marinho1, 2, 3
  • 1Clínica Pró-Criar - Reproductive Medicine, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
  • 2Post-graduation, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
  • 3Rede Brasileira de Oncofertilidade – Brazilian Oncofertility Consortium, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
  • 4In Vitro Consultoria, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
Further Information

Address for correspondence

Janaína de Souza Guedes, BSc
Pró-Criar Medicina Reprodutiva, Rua Bernardo Guimarães
2.063, Lourdes, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil - CEP: 30140-082

Publication History

22 November 2016

09 June 2017

Publication Date:
31 August 2017 (eFirst)



Purpose The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of vitrification on the viability of follicles using a three-dimensional (3D) in vitro culture.

Methods Bovine ovarian tissue samples (n = 5) obtained from slaughterhouses were utilized. The cortex was cut into small fragments of 2 × 3 × 0.5 mm using a tissue slicer. From these fragments, secondary follicles were first isolated by mechanical and enzymatic methods, then encapsulated in alginate gel and individually cultured for 20 days. Additional fragments of the same ovarian tissue were vitrified in a solution containing 25% glycerol and 25% ethylene glycol. After warming, the follicles underwent the same follicular isolation process that was performed for the fresh follicles.

Results A total of 61 follicles were isolated, 51 from fresh ovarian tissue, and 10 from vitrified tissue. After the culture, the vitrified and fresh follicles showed 20% and 43.1% survival rates respectively (p = 0.290), with no significant differences. At the end of the culture, there were no significant differences in follicular diameter between the vitrified (422.93 ± 85.05 µm) and fresh (412.99 ± 102.55 µm) groups (p = 0.725). Fresh follicles showed higher mean rate of antrum formation when compared with vitrified follicles (47.1% and 20.0% respectively), but without significant difference (p = 0.167).

Conclusions The follicles were able to develop, grow and form antrum in the 3D system after vitrification, despite the lower results obtained with the fresh tissue.



Objetivo O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o impacto da vitrificação na viabilidade dos folículos utilizando a cultura in vitro tridimensional (3D).

Métodos Foi utilizado tecido ovariano bovino (n = 5) obtido de abatedouros. O córtex foi cortado em pequenos fragmentos de 2 × 3 × 0,5 mm, utilizando o tissue slicer e a partir destes fragmentos foram isolados folículos secundários por meio de método enzimático e mecânico, encapsulados em gel de alginato e cultivados individualmente durante 20 dias. Outros fragmentos do mesmo tecido ovariano foram vitrificados em solução contendo 25% de glicerol e 25% de etilenoglicol. Após aquecimento, os folículos passaram pelo mesmo processo de isolamento folicular realizado a fresco.

Resultados Foram isolados 61 folículos, sendo 51 originários de tecido ovariano a fresco, e 10 de tecido vitrificado. Após a cultura, os folículos vitrificados apresentaram taxa de sobrevida de 20%, e o grupo a fresco apresentou taxa de 43,1% (p = 0,290). O diâmetro folicular ao final da cultura também não apresentou diferença significativa entre o grupo vitrificado (422,93 ± 85,05 µm) e a fresco (412,99 ± 102,55 µm) (p = 0,725). Os folículos a fresco apresentaram maior taxa média de formação de antro do que os folículos vitrificados (47,1% e 20,0%, respectivamente), mas sem diferença significativa (p = 0,167).

Conclusões Os folículos foram capazes de se desenvolver, crescer e formar antro em sistema 3D após a vitrificação.



Taking into account the recent advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment, young women diagnosed with cancer present a better prognosis nowadays than a few years ago, with a good chance of cure or prolonged survival. A large portion of these women still desire to gestate. Nevertheless, the chemotherapy, the radiotherapy or even the surgery performed in the treatment may compromise their future fertility.[1] [2] [3] [4]

Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos are alternatives for young adult women who can wait ∼ 2–3 weeks for ovarian stimulation and oocyte collection.

The only option for the preservation of the fertility of the patients that require immediate treatment, such as children and prepubescent adolescents, is the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Studies have shown that freezing ovarian tissue fragments may preserve the gametes and also the ability to produce hormones.[2] [7] [8] The collection procedure can be readily programmed at any phase of the cycle, and the patient's exposure to hormone treatment is not required.[9]

When the patient is allowed to conceive, thawed fragments could be transplanted again so that the pregnancy may occur spontaneously or after performing assisted reproduction (AR) techniques. Studies show that retransplantation is a promising technique, since 60 births have been reported to date.[10] [11]

Apart from the non-standardization of ovarian tissue cryopreservation techniques, there are problems such as the local ischemia that occurs after retransplantation,[7] which currently limit the results.

One of the risks of the retransplantation would be the reintroduction of malignant cells that might have remained in the cryopreserved ovarian tissue.[1] Although to date there are no reports in humans, this is considered a theoretical risk.[4]

The maturation of existing ovarian follicles in cryopreserved ovarian tissue fragments in the laboratory to obtain mature oocytes to be fertilized in vitro would avoid the risk of cancer recurrence.[3] [4] [5]

In vitro follicular maturation techniques have been developed for humans, but their improvement becomes difficult due to the enormous difficulty in obtaining tissue and due to ethical issues.[12]

The results of human studies are still limited to the study by Amorim et al,[13] in which pre-antral ovarian follicles survived for a period of 7 days after cryopreservation. Rodrigues et al[14] reported the first in vitro culture of fresh human pre-antral follicles using the three-dimensional system (3D) in Brazil. The authors obtained follicle growth for a period of 28 days. Regarding large animals, antrum formation has already been obtained in cows,[15] [16] and embryos were produced in sheep[17] and goats.[18] In non-human primates, isolated secondary follicles reached antral stage and were able to produce mature oocytes for fertilization and embryos.[19] Rodrigues et al[20] obtained embryos of primates in the morula stage from mature oocytes of secondary ovarian follicles cultured in vitro.

The regulation of the development of the pre-antral follicle is highly complex, and involves many intra-ovarian and endocrine factors. In this context, more studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms that control the initiation and development of follicular growth.[20]

Bovines are widely used as models for the development of these techniques,[12] since their ovaries have large follicle stocks. Furthermore, access to slaughterhouses is easy, with no ethical restrictions. Similarities in ovarian physiology and dynamics of the reproductive cycle between humans and bovines make this an excellent experimental model for reproductive studies.

The main objective of this study was to compare the development of follicles after vitrification and fresh culture, evaluating the impact of the vitrification in this process, to contribute to the improvement of the technique and to its future application in human ovarian follicles.



We performed a prospective, controlled study approved by the Ethics and Animal Use Committee of one of our institutions.

Ovary Collection

Bovine ovaries (n = 5) were obtained at a local slaughterhouse in the city of Belo Horizonte, in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Immediately after the animals were slaughtered, the ovaries were collected by a properly instructed person and sent to the laboratory of another of our institutions. The ovaries were placed into a vessel containing glucose serum and gentamicin (10 μm/mL, Sigma-Aldrich G1264, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, US) at 4°C. The ovaries were cleaned with water for injection and transferred into a Petri dish containing α Minimum Essential Medium (αMEM,Sigma-Aldrich M4526) supplemented with Serum Substitute Supplement (SSS, Irvine 99193, Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, US), and gentamycin (10μm/mL).


Ovariy Processing, Follicle Isolation, Encapsulation and Culture

Each ovary was cut in half with the aid of a Solidor scalpel blade #24 (Lamedid, Osasco, SP, Brazil). One half of each ovary was placed into a tissue slicer, in which it was possible to remove a thin layer of the ovarian cortex. The medulla was discarded. Using scalpels, curve scissors and tweezers, we obtained 24 fragments of 2 × 3 × 0.5 mm from the ovarian cortex.

Total 12 of these fragments were separated and kept in a holding medium (containing αMEM supplemented with SSS, and gentamycin 10 μm/mL) inside an incubator at 37°C and 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) until the time of vitrification. The remaining twelve fragments were subjected to the enzymatic and mechanical follicle isolation procedures.

These twelve fragments were separated on four conical tubes (BD Falcon 352099, Becton, Dickinson and Company [BD], Franklin Lakes, NJ, US) of 15 mL (3 fragments per tube) containing the holding medium and collagenase (1 mg/mL type IA, Sigma-Aldrich C5894). The tubes were placed into a water bath for 20 minutes. Every 5 minutes the tubes were removed from the bath and vortexed for 3 minutes. After 20 minutes, the tubes were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1,500 rpm. After removing the supernatant, 3 mL of a manipulation medium at 4°C was added to stop digestion. The centrifugation process was repeated once again, the supernatant was removed, and 1 mL of the medium was added.

The fragments were then kept incubated at 37°C, with 5% CO2 and pH between 7.2–7.4. The strips were removed individually and placed into a new plate with the holding medium to perform mechanic follicle isolation under a stereomicroscope magnifying glass.

With the aid of 25 g needles, secondary follicles with diameters between 125 μm and 400 μm were isolated from each fragment. These follicles were transferred into another dish with the holding medium, and placed in the incubator at 37°C for a period of 2 to 6 hours, during the processing of all ovarian strips. The isolation of a total of 51 fresh secondary follicles was possible.

Only secondary follicles with the following characteristics were selected for encapsulation: absence of antral cavity; an intact basement membrane, with attached stroma; a visible rounded and centrally-located oocyte within the follicle.

Drops of 10 µL of sodium alginate 0.25% (FMC Biopolymers, Philadelphia, PA, US) were prepared. Each follicle was washed individually in two of these drops, and kept into the third and final drop. With a 10-μL tip, the alginate drop containing the follicle was pipetted and gently placed on a cross-linking calcium solution. The process was repeated for all of the isolated follicles.

The cross-linking solution (50 mM CaCl2, 140 mM NaCl, and 10 mM HEPES solution) is responsible for the chemical reaction that allows the liquid sodium alginate 0.25% to be transformed into gel.

After one minute in the solution, the alginate gel structures where the follicles were located were transferred onto individual wells of a 48-well culture dish (BD Falcon 353872) containing 300 μL of αMEM supplemented with 1,050 ng/mL of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, Sigma-Aldrich F2293), 3 mg/mL of albumin (Irvine Scientific 9988), 100 mg/mL of fetuin (Sigma-Aldrich F6131), 1 mg/mL of insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mg/mL of transferrin (Sigma-Aldrich T8158), and 50 ng/mL sodium selenite (Sigma-Aldrich S5261).

The encapsulated follicles were cultured for a period of 20 days.Every 2 days, 150 uL of the culture medium of each well of the plate was replaced with fresh medium. During the culture, images of each of the follicles were obtained to measure their diameter using the ImageJ software 1.33U (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, US).


Vitrification and Warming

The fragments were vitrified using the method described by Ting et al (2011).[21] Initially, the fragments were equilibrated sequentially in solutions containing 1.2 M of glycerol (10% glycerol v/v, Sigma-Aldrich G2025) for 3 minutes, 1.2 M of glycerol + 3.6 M of ethylene glycol (10% glycerol + 20% ethylene glycol Sigma-Aldrich 102466) for 3 minutes and 3 M of glycerol + 4.5 M of ethylene glycol (25% glycerol + 25% ethylene glycol) for 1 minute. This whole procedure was performed at room temperature. Following the last solution, the fragments were placed individually onto a piece of aluminum foil (measuring 8 × 4 mm2) and immediately submerged into liquid nitrogen (−196°C), transferred into cryovials, and stored until the moment of thawing. For warming, the cryovials were removed from the liquid nitrogen, and the fragments were individually placed immediately for 5 minutes into solutions containing 0.5 M of sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich S1888), then 0.25 M of sucrose, 0.125 M of sucrose and, to finish, only on equilibrium solution or holding medium by 2 times of 10 minutes, and the whole procedure was performed at a temperature of 37°C. After warming, the fragments were kept in the holding medium solution supplemented with 15% v/v SSS and 29 mg/mL of ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich A4403) to isolate its secondary follicles and individually encapsulated into the alginate.

After warming, the fragments were processed using the same protocol performed for the fresh ones: collagenase enzyme isolation, mechanical procedure, encapsulation in alginate gel, and culture for 20 days.


Follicle Survival and Growth

The survival and diameters of the follicles were evaluated using images taken with an Eclipse Ti-S inverted microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and an attached digital camera (OCTAX Microscience, Bruckberg, Bavaria, Germany). Images were obtained from each follicle, as well as images from a micrometer (1 mm with 0.01 mm divisions, Fisher Micromaster, Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, US) for calibration purposes. For the measurement, the images were imported to the ImageJ software 1.33U. Each follicle diameter was determined in units of pixels and converted to micrometers based on the conversion determined by measuring the image of the calibrated micrometer.

The follicles were measured from the outer layer of the cells, and the measurements included the largest follicle diameter and a second measurement perpendicular to the first. The mean of these values was then calculated and considered as the follicle diameter.Antrum formation was observed upon a morphological analysis of the follicles. The follicles were considered to be degenerating when the oocyte was no longer surrounded by a layer of granulosa cells, and when the oocyte became dark and the granulosa cells became dark and fragmented.


Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis consisted of absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. The comparison of two proportions was performed by proportions tests; the comparison of the percentage of antrum formation, by Fisher exact test; and the comparison of two means, by nonparametric Wilcoxon test.

In order to evaluate the growth of the ovarian follicles, we used the percentage variation between a start time T0 and an end time T1 , calculated by the formula: V = (T1-T0)/T0 x 100.

The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate the curves until the infeasibility of the follicles, and to compare them according to their groups (fresh and vitrified), and we calculated the median survival time of the follicles considering the follicle survival time, and the number of days between the isolation and their infeasibility. The analyses were performed using the free R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), version 3.1.3. The significance level was set to 5%.

The power of the sample was of 95%, and the calculation was based on the size of the sample analyzed and the proposed objective.



In the present study, 61 follicles were recovered after treatment with collagenase. A total of 51 follicles were isolated from fresh tissue, and 10 from vitrified tissue.

The survival rate at the end of 20 days of culture was 43.1% for the fresh group, and 20% for the vitrified group, without any significant difference.

[Table 1] shows the distribution of the surviving follicles on days 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20, regarding the fresh and vitrified groups, and the comparison test between the proportions of survivors per day. In absolute terms, the proportions of fresh surviving follicles were higher than those of the follicles after vitrification in all evaluated days, but without any significant difference. We were able to observe a gradual reduction in survival in the two groups, mainly in the vitrified group, though it was not significant.

Table 1

Distribution of surviving follicles per day and comparison between the groups













































Note: p value refers to the Fisher exact test.

[Fig. 1] shows Kaplan-Meier curves for follicle survival time regarding both groups. We observed that the fresh follicles survived longer; however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.205).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test for the survival time of the fresh and vitrified follicles in days; (A) only the curves and (B) curves with confidence intervals.

[Table 2] presents the mean ± SD of the diameters (in µm) of the two groups of follicles per day. Considering the follicles that survived, Table 2 also shows the mean diameters of both groups on the first and last days of culture. We observed a significant difference between the two groups on the first day of culture.

Table 2

Mean fresh and vitrified follicle diameters (in µm) according to the days following isolation





Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD


244.55 ± 80.57

348.78 ± 88.73



327.94 ± 87.84

375.35 ± 115.83



385.43 ± 77.98

426.59 ± 104.29



411.96 ± 87.77

485.70 ± 132.73



412.99 ± 102.55

422.93 ± 85.05


Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

Notes: p value refers to the Wilcoxon test. *Represents statistical difference (p < 0.05).

During culture, the vitrified group showed a variation in growth of 8.8% compared with 21.5% for the fresh group ([Table 3]).

Table 3

Mean variation (in %) of the fresh and vitrified follicle diameters





Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD


41.7 ± 39.6

7.6 ± 7.5



8.9 ± 12.7

13.7 ± 8.4



3.2 ± 9.4

9.9 ± 4.0



1.3 ± 13.0

5.9 ± 8.3



21.5 ± 21.4

8.8 ± 6.3


Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

Notes: p value refers to the Wilcoxon test. *Represents statistical difference (p < 0.05).

We observed a significant difference in variation of follicle growth between the groups from the first to the fifth days (p = 0.000). The fresh follicles showed a higher growth during this period. After vitrification, the follicles showed a significantly higher growth during the period from the tenth to the fifteenth days (p = 0.042). In general, the difference in growth between the two groups was not significant.

[Fig. 2] shows the distribution of antrum formation in both groups. We observed that the fresh follicles showed a higher mean antrum formation (47.1%) when compared with the vitrified follicles (20%), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.167).

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Distribution of antrum formation for the fresh and vitrified groups. Note: p = 0.167.



The results obtained demonstrated that the follicles cultured in vitro after vitrification are able to survive, develop and form antrum.

These are the first data (to the best of our knowledge) of isolation and follicle maturation obtained from vitrified bovine ovarian tissue.

Despite the sample size, we obtained a survival rate and antrum formation of 20% of these follicles following 20 days of in vitro culture in an alginate matrix, which, for an initial study, is a great advance. However, we must highlight the need for further studies in order to reach a consistent conclusion.

The viability of both follicle groups, overall, showed no significant differences. As described by Bulgarelli et al,[22] macaque secondary follicles isolated from vitrified ovarian tissue showed similar survival rates when compared with the fresh group, and showed no significant difference in the diameter and antrum formation after in vitro culture in the 3D system.

In a study by Amorim et al[13] that evaluated the survival of human pre-antral follicles after ovarian tissue cryopreservation, follicle isolation and in vitro culture into an alginate matrix, the authors did not observe any morphological or viability changes among the groups: follicles included in fresh ovarian tissue fragment, follicles included in the cryopreserved tissue, enzymatically-isolated follicle fragments after cryopreservation, and fresh follicles cultured in an alginate matrix. This study proved to be the first in which the in vitro culture of human small pre-antral follicles in cryopreserved ovarian tissue after isolation and culture for 7 days was possible.

In our study, a progressive growth in follicle diameter during the 20 days of culture was observed. This suggests that the use of a 3D culture system effectively simulates the physiological conditions, promoting interactions between somatic cells, which may be an adequate support for the in vitro maturation of isolated pre-antral follicles.[4] [23]

Xu et al[24] showed that, from fresh human ovarian tissue, they obtained the survival and growth of isolated secondary follicles using a 3D matrix. Therefore, they were able to create an environment that enabled oocyte growth.

In a study by Silva et al,[25] higher survival rates in goat secondary follicle cultures using the 3D system were obtained when compared with the two-dimensional (2D) system.

Another important factor to support follicular development was the use of a culture medium with an adequate composition to aid the development.

In the present study, a culture medium containing FSH was used for both groups. The FSH is considered important for the in vitro maturation of follicles. Its absence may contribute to low antrum formation rates, as demonstrated by Luz et al[26] and Barberino et al.[27] In a study published by Matos et al,[28] a concentration of 50 ng/mL of FSH was able to promote the growth of activated pre-antral follicles, demonstrating that the FSH plays a vital role in the culture of goat ovarian follicles.

However, to date, there are no conclusive studies on the effectiveness of different media for the in vitro culture of bovine ovarian tissue, especially after cryopreservation.[29]

In the present study, we also found that the diameters of the vitrified follicles on the first day of culture were significantly higher than those of the fresh follicles (p = 0.002). We believe that this fact may be related to the use of collagenase. This enzyme in fresh ovarian tissue assists in the isolation of pre-antral follicles, leaving the tissue less dense, and the follicles more accessible within the stroma, which makes the removal of the stromal cells surrounding the teak easier.

On the other hand, the vitrified follicles showed a higher fragility, which hampered their removal, leaving a thicker layer of stromal cells on their surfaces, making it difficult to measure their diameters on the first day of culture. This difficulty in isolating the follicles after vitrification also explains the lower number of follicles collected in this group.

During our culture, the fresh follicles showed a higher growth from days 1 to 5 when compared with the vitrified follicles during the same period. On the other hand, the vitrified follicles grew more between days 10 to 15 of culture. We obtained a variation in diameter growth of 21.5% for the fresh group versus 8.8% for the vitrified group (p = 0.074), and a mean diameter of 412.99 μm and 422.93 μm respectively (p = 0.725).

The reason for this variation in growth is unknown; however, Gutierrez et al,[15] in an in vitro culture of fresh bovine pre-antral ovarian follicles, indicated a rapid increase in follicle diameter during the first week of culture, followed by a delay in growth after 8–10 days of culture. This finding is in agreement with the results found in the present study.

We can also assume that the higher growth of vitrified follicles within 10 to 15 days could be justified since these follicles were the most resistant follicles selected in the vitrification and isolation processes: they were able to maintain their structural integrity during vitrification and isolation, and had higher survival capacity.

Moniruzzaman et al[30] observed a slowdown in the rate of development of vitrified primordial follicles of pigs. Ting et al[5] also observed a delay in the growth of vitrified isolated secondary follicles of primates.

Another possibility would be the alleviation of the effect of stromal cells in the measurement of follicular diameter during culture. Thus, the growth rate could have been similar, but confused by the larger initial diameter.

After warming, the tissue was exposed to digestion by collagenase, followed by mechanical isolation as performed in the fresh method. After it was digested, the vitrified tissue showed greater sensitivity to the mechanical isolation, resulting in easy follicle rupture. These findings can be related to the enzymatic method of isolation of ovarian follicles in vitrified tissue.

The enzymatic isolation is used to facilitate the isolation of follicles with dense and fibrous ovarian cortices, such as those of humans.[31] The enzymatic isolation of pre-antral follicles improves the recovery rate of the isolated follicles; however, the integrity of the follicle is not always preserved, damaging the theca cells and the basal membrane.[31] [32] [33]

Rupture in the follicular membrane and the destruction of other intrafollicular components during the enzymatic isolation represent major problems in the development of pre-antral follicles in vitro.[34] The potential follicle development may be hindered if the integrity of the follicle is compromised.[4]

The sensitivity of the ovarian cortex fragments demonstrated that the use of collagenase after vitrification could damage intact follicles for in vitro culture in the 3D matrix systems, but the small sample size is a limitation. Moreover, vitrification has a direct effect on the quality of the tissue after the process.

Vitrification is a challenging process due to the complex structure and different cell types present in the ovarian tissue,[35] even though it is considered an effective, faster and less expensive process.

Ting et al[21] demonstrated that macaque secondary follicles are better preserved after vitrification when compared with slow freezing.

In a recent study, Lunardi et al,[36] comparing the effect of vitrification in the development of sheep secondary follicles included in the ovarian tissue versus follicles isolated using only mechanical isolation, verified that follicles that were vitrified included in the tissue showed significantly larger rate of follicles that regressed its growth.

According Campos et al,[8] the cooling and warming processes may cause irreversible damage to the ovarian tissue.

Another important factor that is related to the number of isolated follicles is that each tissue fragment presents a different number of follicles, which makes the comparison, in terms of numbers of follicles, of the vitrified and fresh tissue groups very difficult.

Even though the effects of collagenase and/or vitrification may impair the isolation of pre-antral follicles, the growth and development in an in vitro culture was possible, confirming the viability of the vitrified follicles after enzymatic isolation.

The follicles that have survived until the last day of culture, in 100% of the cases, reached the antral stage. Antrum formation was observed from the 4th day of culture in most follicles. This ability to develop and form antrum can be considered a follicular functionality indicator.[16]

In the present study, the ovarian tissue was subjected to several different procedures, such as vitrification, warming, follicular isolation and encapsulation in alginate gel. These procedures may potentially damage the follicles, as discussed by Amorim et al[37] and Dolmans et al.[38]

Based on our results, we can assume that the isolation and culture of bovine ovarian follicles after vitrification is a possible approach. We believe more studies are necessary to improve the in vitro culture of follicles, especially for tissues previously submitted to cryopreservation. These preliminary results are important to increase the understanding and the chances of future applicability in patients requiring immediate treatment for cancer, as well as in children and prepubescent adolescents.



In conclusion, the present study demonstrates, for the first time, the feasibility of in vitro follicular maturation of bovine secondary pre-antral follicles after vitrification and enzymatic and mechanical isolation from ovarian tissue fragments in a 20-day period in an alginate matrix. Despite the lower results obtained with the fresh tissue, the cultured follicles of vitrified tissue were able to grow and, at the end of the culture, 100% of the survivors formed antrum.

The enzymatic isolation with collagenase may have impaired the efficiency in the isolation of a higher number of follicles, which indicates the need for further studies to evaluate the best technique to be used.

Despite the difficulty with the technique, we can conclude that the 3D culture system is potentially viable, and provides a new opportunity to study the optimization of in vitro follicle maturation, as well as the future possibility of clinical application.


Conflicts of Interest

Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.


We would like to thank Clínica Pró-Criar Medicina Reprodutiva, which enabled one doing this job, and Isabel Cristina Gomes for statistical support.

Address for correspondence

Janaína de Souza Guedes, BSc
Pró-Criar Medicina Reprodutiva, Rua Bernardo Guimarães
2.063, Lourdes, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil - CEP: 30140-082

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test for the survival time of the fresh and vitrified follicles in days; (A) only the curves and (B) curves with confidence intervals.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Distribution of antrum formation for the fresh and vitrified groups. Note: p = 0.167.