Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30(05): 387-394
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606116
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Management of the Complete Clinical Response

Angelita Habr-Gama
1   Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
2   University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Guilherme Pagin São Julião
1   Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Bruna Borba Vailati
1   Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Ivana Castro
1   Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Debora Raffaele
1   Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 November 2017 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Organ preservation is considered in the management of selected patients with rectal cancer. Complete clinical response observed after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer is one of these cases. Patients who present complete clinical response are candidates to the watch-and-wait approach, when radical surgery is not immediately performed and is offered only to patients in the event of a local relapse. These patients are included in a strict follow-up, and up of 70% of them will never be operated during the follow-up. This strategy is associated with similar oncological outcomes as patients operated on, and the advantage of avoiding the morbidity associated to the radical operation. In this article we will discuss in detail the best candidates for this approach, the protocol itself, and the long-term outcomes.

Keywords

rectal cancer - complete response - neoadjuvant therapy - watch-and-wait
 

  • Reference

  • 1 Kosinski L, Habr-Gama A, Ludwig K, Perez R. Shifting concepts in rectal cancer management: a review of contemporary primary rectal cancer treatment strategies. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62 (03) 173-202
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Sanghera P, Wong DW, McConkey CC, Geh JI, Hartley A. Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an updated analysis of factors affecting pathological response. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2008; 20 (02) 176-183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Habr-Gama A, Lynn PB, Jorge JMN. , et al. Impact of organ-preserving strategies on anorectal function in patients with distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (04) 264-269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, São Julião GP. , et al. Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 88 (04) 822-828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Smith FM, Rao C, Oliva Perez R. , et al. Avoiding radical surgery improves early survival in elderly patients with rectal cancer, demonstrating complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy: results of a decision-analytic model. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58 (02) 159-171
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP, Perez RO. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer: identifying the ideal patients. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2015; 29 (01) 135-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Smith FM, Waldron D, Winter DC. Rectum-conserving surgery in the era of chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 2010; 97 (12) 1752-1764
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Wynn G, Marks J, Kessler H, Gama-Rodrigues J. Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: characterization of clinical and endoscopic findings for standardization. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53 (12) 1692-1698
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W. , et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (04) 711-717 , discussion 717–718
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lopes-Ramos C, Koyama FC, Habr-Gama A. , et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of gene expression signatures to predict complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and guide surgical intervention in rectal cancer. Cancer Genet 2015; 208 (06) 319-326
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Brettingham-Moore KH, Duong CP, Greenawalt DM. , et al. Pretreatment transcriptional profiling for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17 (09) 3039-3047
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Akiyoshi T, Matsuda K, Ishihara S, Nozawa K. Prediction of response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer by using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis of four genes. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57 (01) 23-31
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Rimkus C, Friederichs J, Boulesteix AL. , et al. Microarray-based prediction of tumor response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6 (01) 53-61
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Hardiman KM, Ulintz PJ, Kuick RD. , et al. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity in rectal cancer. Lab Invest 2016; 96 (01) 4-15
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Bettoni F, Masotti C, Habr-Gama A. , et al. Intratumoral genetic heterogeneity in rectal cancer: are single biopsies representative of the entirety of the tumor?. Ann Surg 2017; 265 (01) e4-e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP. , et al. Should we give up the search for a clinically useful gene signature for the prediction of response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiation?. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (09) 895-897
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W. , et al; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (17) 1731-1740
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID. , et al; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 (09) 638-646
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID. , et al; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12 (06) 575-582
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S. , et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (16) 1926-1933
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW. , et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients--a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 (25) 6199-6206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J. , et al. Accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and clinical assessment in the detection of complete rectal tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: long-term results of a prospective trial (National Clinical Trial 00254683). Cancer 2012; 118 (14) 3501-3511
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Garcia-Aguilar J, Shi Q, Thomas Jr CR. , et al. A phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and local excision for T2N0 rectal cancer: preliminary results of the ACOSOG Z6041 trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (02) 384-391
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Lezoche E, Baldarelli M, Lezoche G, Paganini AM, Gesuita R, Guerrieri M. Randomized clinical trial of endoluminal locoregional resection versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for T2 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 2012; 99 (09) 1211-1218
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Habr-Gama A, Sabbaga J, Gama-Rodrigues J. , et al. Watch and wait approach following extended neoadjuvant chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer: are we getting closer to anal cancer management?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (10) 1109-1117
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L. , et al. Enhanced tumorocidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: preliminary results--EORTC 22921. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 (24) 5620-5627
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Radu C, Berglund A, Påhlman L, Glimelius B. Short-course preoperative radiotherapy with delayed surgery in rectal cancer - a retrospective study. Radiother Oncol 2008; 87 (03) 343-349
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Wiltshire KL, Ward IG, Swallow C. , et al. Preoperative radiation with concurrent chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: effect of dose escalation on pathologic complete response, local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64 (03) 709-716
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Jakobsen A, Ploen J, Vuong T, Appelt A, Lindebjerg J, Rafaelsen SR. Dose-effect relationship in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized trial comparing two radiation doses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84 (04) 949-954
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Gerard JP, Frin AC, Doyen J. , et al. Organ preservation in rectal adenocarcinoma (T1) T2-T3 Nx M0. Historical overview of the Lyon Sud - Nice experience using contact x-ray brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for 120 patients. Acta Oncol 2015; 54 (04) 545-551
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Appelt AL, Pløen J, Harling H. , et al. High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (08) 919-927
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Vuong T, Devic S, Podgorsak E. High dose rate endorectal brachytherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable rectal cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2007; 19 (09) 701-705
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Schrag D, Weiser MR, Goodman KA. , et al. Neoadjuvant FOLFOX-bev, without radiation, for locally advanced rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(suppl):abstr 3511
    PubMed
  • 34 Habr-Gama A, Fernandez LM, Perez RO. What more do we want from neoadjuvant treatment strategies in rectal cancer?. Colorectal Cancer 2015; 4: 1-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Sabbaga J, Nadalin W, São Julião GP, Gama-Rodrigues J. Increasing the rates of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal cancer: results of a prospective study using additional chemotherapy during the resting period. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52 (12) 1927-1934
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Brown G. Thin section MRI in multidisciplinary pre-operative decision making for patients with rectal cancer. Br J Radiol 2005; 78 (Spec No 2): S117-S127
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Francois Y, Nemoz CJ, Baulieux J. , et al. Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: the Lyon R90-01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17 (08) 2396
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Tulchinsky H, Shmueli E, Figer A, Klausner JM, Rabau M. An interval >7 weeks between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery improves pathologic complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15 (10) 2661-2667
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Kalady MF, de Campos-Lobato LF, Stocchi L. , et al. Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (04) 582-589
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Evans J, Tait D, Swift I. , et al. Timing of surgery following preoperative therapy in rectal cancer: the need for a prospective randomized trial?. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (10) 1251-1259
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, Haustermans K. , et al. Impact of interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and TME for locally advanced rectal cancer on pathologic response and oncologic outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (09) 2833-2841
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD. , et al; Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation Consortium. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (08) 957-966
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Lefevre JH, Mineur L, Kotti S. , et al. Effect of interval (7 or 11 weeks) between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery on complete pathologic response in rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (GRECCAR-6). J Clin Oncol 2016; (e-pub ahead of print). JCO676049
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP. , et al. Optimal timing for assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer: do all patients benefit from waiting longer than 6 weeks?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84 (05) 1159-1165
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Pereira GV. , et al. Role of biopsies in patients with residual rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation after downsizing: can they rule out persisting cancer?. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14 (06) 714-720
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Lambregts DM, Maas M, Bakers FC. , et al. Long-term follow-up features on rectal MRI during a wait-and-see approach after a clinical complete response in patients with rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (12) 1521-1528
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L. , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (28) 3753-3760
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Patel UB, Brown G, Rutten H. , et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathological response to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (09) 2842-2852
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Nahas SC, Rizkallah Nahas CS, Sparapan Marques CF. , et al. Pathologic complete response in rectal cancer: can we detect it? Lessons learned from a proposed randomized trial of watch-and-wait treatment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (04) 255-263
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF. Clinical criteria underestimate complete pathological response in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57 (03) 311-315
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Bhoday J, Smith F, Siddiqui MR. , et al. Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade and residual mucosal abnormality as predictors for pathological complete response in rectal cancer postneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (10) 925-933
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Lambregts DM, Vandecaveye V, Barbaro B. , et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI for selection of complete responders after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (08) 2224-2231
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M. , et al. Rectal cancer: assessment of complete response to preoperative combined radiation therapy with chemotherapy--conventional MR volumetry versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2011; 260 (03) 734-743
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Dos Anjos DA, Habr-Gama A, Vailati BB. , et al. (18)F-FDG uptake by rectal cancer is similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes. Ann Nucl Med 2016; 30 (08) 513-517
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Cascini GL, Avallone A, Delrio P. , et al. 18F-FDG PET is an early predictor of pathologic tumor response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Nucl Med 2006; 47 (08) 1241-1248
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Kristiansen C, Loft A, Berthelsen AK. , et al. PET/CT and histopathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (01) 21-25
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Dos Anjos DA, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A. , et al. Semiquantitative volumetry by sequential PET/CT may improve prediction of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with distal rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (09) 805-812
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Vaccaro CA, Yazyi FJ, Ojra Quintana G. , et al. Locally advanced rectal cancer: preliminary results of rectal preservation after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy [in Spanish]. Cir Esp 2016; 94 (05) 274-279
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Araujo RO, Valadão M, Borges D. , et al. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer after chemoradiation opposed to resection after complete clinical response. A comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41 (11) 1456-1463
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM. , et al. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (35) 4633-4640
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Dalton RS, Velineni R, Osborne ME. , et al. A single-centre experience of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: is there potential for nonoperative management?. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14 (05) 567-571
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Smith RK, Fry RD, Mahmoud NN, Paulson EC. Surveillance after neoadjuvant therapy in advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response can have comparable outcomes to total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30 (06) 769-774
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Renehan AG, Malcomson L, Emsley R. , et al. Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17 (02) 174-183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Martens MH, Maas M, Heijnen LA. , et al. Long-term outcome of an organ preservation program after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108 (12) 108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I. , et al. Interval between surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: does delayed surgery have an impact on outcome?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71 (04) 1181-1188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Perez RO. Complete clinical response in rectal cancer: a turning tide. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17 (02) 125-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V. , et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11 (09) 835-844
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar