Keywords
platelets - secretion - thrombosis - cardiomyocytes - ischemia
Introduction
Platelets are the guardians of hemostasis, but are also established mediators of pathological
thrombosis causing myocardial infarction and stroke. More recently, novel unconventional
roles for platelets have emerged with the repertoire extending to numerous physiological
and pathological roles within the body. From a physiological context, platelets are
crucial for tissue regeneration,[1] wound healing,[2] and protecting from septic shock,[3] but pathologically, they have established roles in atherogenesis,[4] tumor stability,[5] and metastasis.[6] Key to this functional heterogeneity is the armory of biological cargo stored within
distinct secretory platelet granules, namely, α-, dense, and lysosomal granules, the
contents of which are released upon platelet activation. Platelet α-granules represent
the most abundant and heterogeneous granules in terms of cargo, containing over 300
proteins released upon activation.[7] These include growth factors, chemokines, cytokines, clotting factors, and adhesive
proteins, and are widely recognized for eliciting this broad functionality of platelets.[8]
[9]
In this study, we assessed the direct effects of released cargo from activated platelets
on isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes during ischemic injury. Undoubtedly, platelets,
through occlusive thrombosis of coronary arteries, trigger ischemic injury and furthermore
they have causative roles in the pathogenesis of myocardial reperfusion injury, particularly
through their ability to recruit and activate inflammatory cells.[10]
[11] Interestingly, cardioprotective roles for platelets have also been described, effects
which appear to be indirectly mediated by the endothelium.[12]
[13] However, there is no evidence assessing direct, paracrine effects of platelet-derived
factors on cardiomyocytes during ischemic injury. Recently, heterocellular signaling
pathways between endothelial-derived growth factors (neuregulin-1) and ErbB4 receptors
on cardiomyocytes have been identified and we therefore hypothesized that vascular
endothelial denudation, which initiates platelet activation, represents a likely conduit
for soluble platelet-derived factors to interact with the myocardium directly during
coronary thrombosis.[14] Our study identifies a novel role for platelets in preconditioning cardiomyocytes
to ischemic damage. We show that secreted platelet factors alter the tolerance of
cardiomyocytes to ischemic injury by delaying the rate of cardiomyocyte death and
we further explore the mechanism behind this protective effect. Importantly, we observed
that blocking platelet P2Y12, a clinical target of platelet-dependent thrombosis, obscures this nonconventional
aspect of platelet function. This is in contrast to aspirin, also used clinically
in the management of myocardial infarction, which preserves the cardioprotective effects
of platelets and could therefore have future implications for antiplatelet strategies
in the management of heart attacks.
Methods
Mice
All animal studies were approved by the local research ethics committee at the University
of Bristol. Mice were bred and maintained in the University of Bristol animal facility
in accordance with the UK Home Office regulations and Animals (Scientific Procedures)
Act of 1986 (PPL No: 3003445). Male, C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) mice were from Harlan
Laboratories (Bicester, UK). Unc13d
Jinx
mice on a C57BL/6 background were from the Mutant Mouse Regional Resource Center
(University of California, United States).
Platelet Preparation
Eight- to 20-week old mice were sacrificed by a gradual rise in CO2 and blood was drawn from the inferior vena cava into a syringe containing 4% trisodium
citrate (1:10 v/v). Washed platelets were prepared as previously described,[15] resuspended in modified HEPES-Tyrode's buffer (10 mM HEPES, 145 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 3 mM KCL, 5 mM Glucose, pH 7.3) without apyrase addition and allowed to recover
for 30 minutes at 30°C. Immediately prior to stimulation, 1 mM CaCl2 was added to platelets.
Platelet Activation: Releasate Isolation and α-Granule Secretion
For platelet experiments involving pharmacological inhibitors, platelets at 2 × 108/mL were pretreated for 10 minutes prior to stimulation with vehicle (HEPES-Tyrode's)
or 10 µg/mL collagen-related peptide (CRP; from Prof. Richard Farndale, University
of Cambridge, UK) for 15 minutes at 37°C. Inhibitors AR-C 66096 (Tocris Bioscience,
Bristol, UK) and aspirin (Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) were used to block P2Y12 and cyclooxygenase, respectively. For releasate isolation, 140 nmol/L PGE1 (Sigma-Aldrich) was added poststimulation and platelets were pelleted by centrifugation
at 580g for 10 minutes. The supernatant containing released platelet factors (henceforth
referred to as “platelet releasate”) was removed and subjected to 2× pulse centrifugations
to clarify any remaining debris and the soluble releasate was used to pretreat cardiomyocytes.
Fractionation of the platelet releasates using 3-kDa molecular weight cutoff filters
was performed as per manufacturer's instructions (Millipore, Hertfordshire, UK). In
brief, 500 µL of platelet releasate was centrifuged at 14,000g for 20 minutes. This yielded approximately 400 µL of filtered releasate, with approximately
100 µL of retained releasate, which was adjusted to 400 µL with HEPES-Tyrode's. To
measure α-granule secretion, platelets, poststimulation, were incubated with 2.5 µL
FITC-labeled antimouse CD62P (Emfret Analytics, Würzburg, Germany) for 5 minutes,
then fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes and analyzed using a FACS Canto II
flow cytometer (Becton Dickenson, New Jersey, United States). Samples were analyzed
with FACSDiva software where a total of 10,000 gated events per sample were collected.
Ventricular Cardiomyocyte Isolation
Male, adult (9–14 weeks) WT mice were intraperitoneally injected with 400 U of heparin
prior to schedule 1 by cervical dislocation. Hearts were rapidly excised and placed
in a nominally (0.05 mM) CaCl2-free HEPES-Tyrode's perfusion buffer (henceforth referred to as perfusion buffer—130
mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCL, 0.4 mM NaH2PO4, 4.2 mM HEPES, 10 mM Glucose, 1.4 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Taurine, 1 mM Creatine, 10 mM 2,3-butanedione monoxime, and pH 7.4). The aorta
was cannulated and the heart perfused retrograde, in a noncirculating mode on a Langendorff
apparatus in CaCl2-free perfusion buffer at a flow rate of 3 mL/min for 4 minutes at 37°C. The buffer
was switched to a myocyte digestion buffer containing 0.7 mg/mL collagenase type II
(Worthington Biochemicals, New Jersey, United States) and 0.1 mg/mL Protease XIV (Sigma-Aldrich)
in 0.05 mM CaCl2-containing perfusion buffer for 15 minutes at 37°C until the heart appeared pale
and swollen. Atria were removed and digested ventricles were minced and triturated
in perfusion buffer containing 5% fetal calf serum to inactivate proteases, and then
sequentially filtered through a 200-µm nylon gauze (Millipore) resulting in four isolates.
Cardiomyocytes were isolated by centrifugation for 1 minute at 60g, resuspended in 0.1 mM CaCl2 containing perfusion buffer, and visualized at 100× on a light microscope (Swift
M4000-D, California, United States). Isolate 1 contained mostly round, hypercontracted
and nonviable cardiomyocytes which were discarded. Isolates 2 to 4 were pooled and
Ca2+ was gradually restored in a step-wise fashion to 1 mM over 30 minutes. The isolation
typically yielded 60% Ca2+ tolerant cardiomyocytes.
In vitro Myocardial Ischemia Viability Assay
The assay setup was based on the established “ischemic pelleting” model, with minor
modifications.[16] For experiments involving pharmacological inhibitors, cardiomyocytes were pretreated
for 30 minutes with indicated inhibitors: AMD3100 (CXCR4); SB431542 (TGFBR1), and
BIM I (protein kinase C [PKC])—all from Tocris. Cardiomyocytes were then treated with
platelet releasates, diluted 1:2 with 1 mM Ca2+ containing perfusion buffer or recombinant proteins for 10 minutes at 37°C. Cardiomyocytes
were then allowed to recover for 10 minutes in perfusion buffer prior to ischemic
pelleting. With the cardiomyocytes pelleted, precisely 450 µL buffer was removed from
each sample, which was carefully layered with 200 µL mineral oil to exclude gaseous
exchange and initiate ischemia, that is, T = 0 minutes. Every 30 minutes (for up to 240 minutes), a 2.5 µL sample was removed
from the pellet and resuspended in 50 µL reperfusion buffer (perfusion buffer containing
3 mM Amytal – Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 minutes. The sample was mixed with an equal volume
of counting media (perfusion buffer containing 1% glutaraldehyde and 0.4% trypan blue)
allowing detection of viable (trypan blue excluded) and nonviable (trypan blue stained)
cardiomyocytes. Images were acquired with a mounted digital microscope camera (AmScope,
California, United States) at 100× magnification, with eight random fields of view
per sample at every time point (equating to ∼ 250–300 cardiomyocytes/time point).
This method allowed for a maximum of three treated samples per isolation.
Western Blotting
Cardiomyocytes were lysed in buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1%
Triton X-100) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail sets (Roche,
UK) and harvested as previously described.[17] Equal amounts of protein (15 µg/sample) were resolved by electrophoresis on 10%
Tris-glycine gels, transferred onto Immobolin PVDF membranes (Millipore), blocked
and probed with specific antibodies: Phospho-(Ser) PKC substrate, phospho-Erk1/2,
(Thr202/Tyr204), Erk1/2, phospho-Akt, (Ser 473), and Akt antibodies (all 1:1,000 dilution)
were from Cell Signaling Technology (Massachusetts, United States) and mouse–anti-GAPDH
(1:2,000 dilution) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany). HRP-conjugated
secondary antibodies (antimouse and antirabbit, both 1:10,000 dilution) were from
GE Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, UK).
Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software Inc., California,
United States). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation with the indicated
number of independent experiments. Statistical analysis was determined using one-
or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post hoc test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Released Factors from Platelet Granules Protect Cardiomyocytes during Ischemia
During myocardial infarction, platelets release bioactive molecules exerting autocrine/paracrine
effects causing occlusive thrombosis of coronary arteries, with subsequent ischemic
damage to cardiac tissue.[18] Our initial observations demonstrated that biomolecules released from platelets
activated with 10 µg/mL CRP, a ligand for the platelet-specific collagen receptor,
glycoprotein (GP) VI, could delay the rate of cardiomyocyte death during ischemic
injury compared with controls ([Fig. 1A, B]). The effect was not immediate, but was consistently observed between 60 and 180
minutes post ischemia onset and lost between 210 and 240 minutes. Dose response analysis
identified 10 µg/mL CRP to induce maximal platelet secretion, by means of surface
exposure of the α-granule protein, CD62P ([Fig. S1A], supplementary figure available in the online version only). Importantly, control
experiments with CRP alone did not alter the cardiomyocyte response to ischemic cell
death ([Fig. S1B], supplementary figure available in the online version only). Platelet granules represent
the most abundant sources for released platelet cargo and Unc13djinx
mice, which lack the vesicle priming protein Munc13–4, have proved useful in dissecting
functional roles for platelet granules.[19] We confirmed platelet α-granule secretion with CRP was reduced by approximately
82% in Munc13–4−/− platelets ([Fig. 1C]). Subsequent experiments demonstrated that the cardioprotective effects of stimulated
platelet releasates from these mice were completely lost in comparison to wild-type
(WT) stimulated platelet releasates, suggesting the active component(s) in the releasate
are of granular origin ([Fig. 1D]).
Fig. 1 Factors released from platelet secretory vesicles protect cardiomyocytes from ischemic
injury. (A and D) Cardiomyocytes from wild-type (WT) hearts preconditioned with released factors from
vehicle-treated (control) and collagen-related peptide (CRP)-treated (stimulated)
platelets from WT or Unc13dJinx
mice (as indicated) were subjected to ischemic injury using a cell pelleting method.
Samples from the pellet were analyzed for cell viability every 30 minutes, for up
to 240 minutes, with nonischemic (oxygenated control) samples monitored at 0- and
240-minute time points. Data are mean ± SD (n = 7 for (A), n = 5 for (D)), (A) *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 versus WT-controlled releasate and (D) ΦΦ
p < 0.01, ΦΦΦ
p < 0.001 versus Unc13dJinx
stimulated releasate. (B) Representative images of trypan blue stained and nonstained cardiomyocytes at 60-minute
intervals throughout ischemia assay (0–240 minutes). (C) Washed platelets (2 × 108/mL) from WT and Unc13dJinx
mice were treated with vehicle control (Tyrode's) or 10 µg/mL CRP and monitored for
α-granule secretion by CD62P surface expression. Data are mean ± SD; n = 3, **p < 0.01. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test for (A), (C), and (D).
Platelet Dense Granules Are Not the Source of Cardioprotective Cargo
To discriminate between dense and α-granule cargo, we took advantage of the fact that
cargo in dense granules has generally very low molecular mass, whereas that in α-granules
is principally peptide based and is of much higher average molecular mass. We therefore
fractionated the stimulated releasates from WT platelets into less than and more than
3 kDa fractions. Notably, the less than 3 kDa fraction did not delay the kinetics
of cardiomyocyte death during ischemia, whereas the more than 3 kDa fraction did significantly
delay cardiomyocyte death in a manner similar to unfiltered releasates from stimulated
WT platelets ([Fig. 2A]). To ensure the fractionation procedure effectively separated dense and α-granule
components, we demonstrated that a significant portion (∼ 78%) of released adenosine
triphosphate (ATP) is present in the less than 3 kDa fraction ([Fig. S2A], supplementary figure available in the online version only). These data support
the hypothesis that α-granule content, but not dense granule content, mediates the
cardioprotective effect.
Fig. 2 Role for platelet α-granule proteins, SDF-1α and TGF-β1, in mediating the protective
effects of platelet secreted factors. (A–F) Cardiomyocytes were preconditioned with releasates from vehicle-treated (control)
WT platelets: (A) filtered, <3 kDa and retained, >3 kDa releasates from CRP-treated (stimulated) WT
platelets; (B) recombinant SDF-1α (100 ng/mL); (C) recombinant TGF-β1 (100 ng/mL) and (D–F) unfiltered releasate from CRP-treated (stimulated) WT platelets, then monitored
for cardiomyocyte viability for up to 240 minutes of ischemic injury, with nonischemic
(oxygenated control) samples monitored at 0- and 240-minute time points. (D–F) Cardiomyocytes were pretreated with vehicle control (0.1% DMSO) or inhibitors: (D) 0.5 µM AMD3100 (CXCR4 antagonist); (E) 1 µM SB431542 (TGFBR1 antagonist), and (F) 0.5 µM AMD3100 and 1 µM SB431542 for 30 minutes prior to releasate preconditioning.
Data are mean ± SD (n = 4 for (A) and (F), n = 3 for B–E); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus control releasate (A, D–F)/vehicle (B,C) and Φ
p < 0.05, ΦΦ
p < 0.01, ΦΦΦ
p < 0.001 versus stimulated releasate (<3 kDa (A)/ + AMD3100 (D)/ + SB431542 (E)/AMD3100 + SB431542 (F)).
Cardioprotective Roles for Platelet α-Granule Proteins SDF-1α and TGF-β1
Platelet α-granules are loaded with functionally active proteins, some of which have
been previously implicated as having protective effects on cardiac tissue, including
the cytokines stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1α and transforming growth factor
(TGF)-β1.[20]
[21] Initially, we demonstrated that recombinant SDF-1α or TGF-β1 could significantly
delay cardiomyocyte death during ischemia compared with vehicle-treated cardiomyocytes
([Fig. 2B, C]). Subsequently, we assessed the functional relevance of platelet-derived SDF-1α
and TGF-β1 by targeting their respective receptors, CXCR4 and TGFßR1, both of which
are expressed on cardiomyocytes.[22]
[23] Blocking CXCR4 with AMD3100 or TGFßR1 with SB431542 on cardiomyocytes caused a subtle,
yet significant reversal of the cardioprotective effect of the stimulated platelet
releasate between 60 and 120 minutes of ischemia ([Fig. 2D, E]). However, blocking both receptors simultaneously caused a more profound attenuation
of the protective effect and persisted from 60 up to 180 minutes of ischemia, at which
point the protective effect typically dissipates ([Fig. 2F]). Control experiments with AMD3100 or SB41542 did not reveal any baseline effects
on cardiomyocyte viability during ischemia when compared with vehicle-treated cardiomyocytes
(data not shown).
Protein Kinase C Is Essential for Platelet Releasate-Mediated Cardioprotection
Considering the protective effects of the stimulated platelet releasates, we sought
to determine possible prosurvival signaling mechanisms activated within cardiomyocytes
during ischemia. By measuring serine phosphorylated PKC substrates, we observed that
stimulated platelet releasates enhanced PKC activity between 30 and 120 minutes of
ischemia relative to control releasate-treated cardiomyocytes ([Fig. 3A]). However, we did not detect any temporal differences in the phosphorylation kinetics
of the kinases, Akt or Erk 1/2 between treatments ([Fig. 3A]). To assess a potentially causal role for PKC, pretreatment of cardiomyocytes with
a pan PKC inhibitor, BIM I, completely suppressed the cardioprotective response of
the stimulated platelet releasate during ischemia ([Fig. 3B]). Control experiments with BIM I alone treated cardiomyocytes confirmed that PKC
inhibition does not induce a baseline reduction in cardiomyocyte viability during
ischemia, relative to vehicle-treated cardiomyocytes ([Fig. S4], supplementary figure available in the online version only).
Fig. 3 Protein kinase C (PKC) activity is essential for platelet releasate-mediated cardioprotection.
(A) Cardiomyocytes preconditioned with releasates from vehicle- (control) and CRP- (stimulated)
treated WT platelets were subjected to ischemic injury, with samples removed from
the pellet and lysed at indicated ischemic time points. Samples were monitored for
changes in PKC activity (Phospho serine PKC substrate), phospho Akt (Ser473), and
Erk 1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) by immunoblotting with specific antibodies followed by appropriate
loading controls. Blots shown are representative of three independent experiments.
(B) Cardiomyocytes were pretreated in the absence (+ DMSO vehicle) or presence of 10
µM BIM I for 30 minutes prior to preconditioning with releasates from vehicle- (control)
and CRP-treated (stimulated) WT platelets, then monitored for cardiomyocyte viability
for up to 240 minutes of ischemic injury, with nonischemic (oxygenated control) samples
monitored at 0- and 240-minute time points. Data are mean ± SD; n = 4, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus control releasate, ΦΦ
p < 0.01, ΦΦΦ
p < 0.001 versus stimulated releasate (+ BIM I). Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post
hoc test.
Fig. 4 Targeting platelet P2Y12, but not cyclooxygenase, reduces platelet secretion and cardioprotection. (A) Washed platelets (2 × 108/mL) from WT mice were pretreated with vehicle (Tyrode's) or inhibitors; 30 µM aspirin
(cyclooxygenase) and 1 µM AR-C 66096 (P2Y12 antagonist) for 10 minutes, then stimulated with 10 µg/mL CRP and analyzed for α-granule
secretion by surface CD62P exposure. Data are mean ± SD; n = 4, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test. (B–D) Cardiomyocytes preconditioned with releasates from vehicle-treated (control) or
CRP-treated (stimulated) WT platelets in the absence (+ Tyrode's vehicle) or presence
of (B) 30 µM aspirin, (C) 1 µM AR-C 66096, and (D) 30 µM aspirin + 1 µM AR-C 66096 were monitored for changes in viability during ischemic
injury, with nonischemic (oxygenated control) samples monitored at 0 and 240 minutes
time points. Data are mean ± SD; n = 4, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus WT-controlled releasate (+ vehicle (B–D)) and Φ
p < 0.05, ΦΦ
p < 0.01, ΦΦΦ
p < 0.001 versus stimulated releasate (+Aspirin (B)/ + ARC66096 (C)/ + Aspirin + AR-C66096 (D)), two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test.
Clinical Antiplatelet Target P2Y12, but Not cyclooxygenase-1, Is Important for Cardioprotective Effects of Platelets
Clinically, a mainstay of therapy for myocardial infarction is the rapid control of
platelet function to prevent further thrombotic and ischemic episodes and to help
destabilize any ongoing thrombotic event. Antiplatelet therapies target the activatory
adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thromboxane A2 amplification pathways in platelets by blocking the P2Y12 receptor, via clopidogrel and cyclooxygenase (COX)-1, via low-dose aspirin, respectively.
Under our conditions, pretreating platelets with the P2Y12 inhibitor, AR-C 66096, reduced CRP-induced α-granule secretion by approximately 51%,
whereas aspirin had no significant effect ([Fig. 4A]). Consistent with the effect on α-granule secretion, blockade of P2Y12 in platelets, alone or in combination with aspirin, substantially attenuated the
subsequent protective effect of the stimulated releasate on cardiomyocyte viability
during ischemia ([Fig. 4C, D]), whereas stimulated releasates from aspirin alone pretreated platelets did not
exhibit a significant reduction in cardioprotection compared with stimulated releasates
from vehicle-treated platelets ([Fig. 4B]).
Discussion
Platelets play a critical role in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction, initiating
the ischemic damage through the thrombotic plug that they form in the coronary vessels.
As part of their activity, however, platelets secrete cargo that is able to exert
localized effects on numerous cells at the injury site, including leukocytes and endothelial
cells.[24]
[25] Here, we hypothesized that through secretion of multiple bioactive mediators platelets
may play a paradoxical protective role in addition to their induction of ischemic
damage. This study reveals new paracrine signaling capabilities of platelets to modulate
the sensitivity of myocardial cardiomyocytes to ischemic injury.
It is well described that the myocardium possesses its own inherent, cardioprotective
capacity as short bouts of ischemia, followed by reperfusion, and can protect cardiomyocytes
from prolonged exposure to ischemia, a phenomenon referred to as ischemic preconditioning
(IPC).[26] Importantly, the isolated in vitro model used in this study, which was first described
by Vander Heide et al, has been effectively utilized to recapture the IPC effect observed
from various in vivo and ex vivo models.[16]
[27] Our observations that released cargo from platelets stimulated with maximal doses
of CRP could temporally delay the kinetics of cardiomyocyte death are consistent with
the responses observed from earlier studies demonstrating the protective effects of
acute IPC.[27]
[28] Inevitably, absolute protection of cardiomyocytes is not sustained with prolonged
ischemia and this acute protective effect is lost by 240 minutes of ischemia. Importantly,
the receptor for CRP, GPVI, has established roles in platelet-mediated coronary thrombosis,
but is also platelet-specific, allowing for discrimination against any potential “off-target”
effects on cardiomyocytes that other common platelet agonists such as thrombin, ADP,
and thromboxane A2 may incur.
To explore the most probable candidate sources of biomolecules within the platelet
releasate, we utilized platelets from Unc13dJinx
mice, which are unable to secrete dense granule cargo and have severely compromised
α-granule ([Fig. 1C]) and lysosomal cargo release.[29] Notably, CRP-stimulated platelet releasates from these mice completely lost the
protective effect on cardiomyocyte viability during ischemia compared with WT platelets.
Dense granules are loaded with high concentrations of low-molecular-weight components,
in particular adenine nucleotides (ADP and ATP), divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+), and neurotransmitters (serotonin, histamine) and are critical regulators of thrombosis
and vascular remodeling.[30] Separating these components from larger α-granule cargo by fractionation showed
that the dense granule content was incapable of supporting cardioprotection. Interestingly,
adenosine has previously been shown to have a cardioprotective effect and could be
formed by degradation of secreted ADP and ATP by platelet surface ectonucleotidases,
CD39 and CD73.[31] However, preconditioning cardiomyocytes with adenosine did not significantly delay
the rate of cardiomyocyte death, providing further supportive evidence for dense granule
cargo lacking a cardioprotective role in our model ([Fig. S2B], supplementary figure available in the online version only).
Platelet lysosomal number is low and their cargo, which contains numerous proteases
implicated in vessel remodeling post injury, makes it an unlikely source of cardioprotective
factors. Conversely, platelet α-granules, of which there are approximately 50 to 80
per platelet, are loaded with functionally active cargo with the ability to target
numerous vascular cells.[32] Pertinent to our findings, the α-granule proteins, SDF-1α and TGF-β1, both of which
are known to be secreted from activated platelets,[33] have also been implicated in cardioprotection. We observed that pretreating cardiomyocytes
with recombinant SDF-1α or TGF-β1 could substantially delay the rate of cardiomyocyte
death during ischemia, in a manner similar to stimulated platelet releasates, but
individually blocking the respective receptors for these ligands, CXCR4 and TGFßR1,
could only partially block the cardioprotective effect of the releasate. Importantly,
the dose of the receptor antagonist was sufficient to completely block the effect
of their respective recombinant ligand ([Fig. S3A, B], supplementary figure available in the online version only). The apparent discrepancy
between findings with the platelet releasate and recombinant pretreatments likely
reflects differences in soluble ligand concentration between the two, but may also
reflect the opposing, functional nature of different components of the complex secreted
platelet cargo.[34] Interestingly, simultaneous blockade of CXCR4 and TGFßR1 caused a more substantial
attenuation in platelet releasate-mediated cardioprotection, suggesting a synergistic
or additive contribution of different cargo to the protective effect. However, the
attenuation was not complete, implicating other secreted platelet granule contents,
possibly additional α-granule peptide(s), as additive or synergistic regulators in
this complex releasate. Indeed, synergistic behavior of various growth factors toward
scavenger receptor activity in smooth muscle cells has been previously reported and
we speculate that a similar modality of function may be in effect here.[35]
Mechanistically, we wanted to explore possible prosurvival targets within cardiomyocytes
that were sensitive to releasate stimulation. The kinases Akt and Erk1/2 have been
previously linked to cardioprotection, but we did not detect any temporal differences
in phosphorylation kinetics between vehicle- and CRP-stimulated platelet releasates
during ischemia.[36]
[37] However, we did detect prolonged PKC activity during ischemia in the stimulated
releasate samples. Pertinent to this, the PKC family is widely recognized for its
regulatory roles in IPC,[38]
[39] and previous studies have also identified signaling links between either SDF-1α
or TGF-β1 and PKC.[40]
[41] Findings from our functional ischemia assay suggest that PKC signaling within cardiomyocytes
is essential to the protective effect of the releasate. The end effectors that functionally
couple PKC activity to a cardioprotective response are still not determined. Some
evidence suggests that PKC activity increases opening of the mitochondrial and sarcolemmal
ATP-dependent potassium (KATP) channels, which lowers Ca2+ loading during ischemia and protects the mitochondrial permeability transition pore
(mPTP) from the deleterious effects of elevated Ca2+. Other studies, however, dispute the KATP channel theory, suggesting that a lowering of oxidative stress during ischemia desensitizes
the mPTP to the deleterious effects of Ca2+ loading.[42]
[43]
Undoubtedly, the initiating predisposition to myocardial ischemic injury is a platelet-mediated
process and antiplatelet therapies are prophylactically administered as effective
tools in the primary and secondary prevention of occlusive thrombosis.[44] Interestingly, blockade of P2Y12, but not aspirin, significantly reduced the cardioprotective effect of the platelet
releasate. Unlike stimulated releasates from Munc13–4−/− platelets, the reversal of the protective effect with P2Y12 inhibition was not complete and likely reflects the greater attenuation of platelet
α-granule secretion in Unc13dJinx
mice. Consistently, aspirin treatment did not significantly alter α-granule secretion
or cardioprotection from the platelet releasate. Findings from in vivo studies of
myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, by coronary artery ligation, may seem
to contradict our data, as different studies have demonstrated cardioprotective effects
of the antiplatelet therapies and also implicated platelet-specific roles during I/R
injury pathogenesis.[10]
[45]
[46] Interestingly, other studies have demonstrated that the P2Y12 antagonist, clopidogrel, had no effect on myocardial I/R injury, despite its antiplatelet
effect, while it has also been suggested that the cardioprotective effect of a more
recently developed P2Y12 antagonist, ticagrelor, may be independent of its antiplatelet properties.[47]
[48] Notably, the mechanical nature of ligation in these in vivo models, in place of
occlusive thrombosis due to endothelial disruption, raises issues concerning the mechanism
of platelet activation and secretion, and makes accurate inferences more challenging.
The in vitro model used here is also not without limitations, as it lacks the mechanics
of reperfusion hypercontracture from an intact myocardium and also the influence of
other vascular cells.[49] It does also presume that soluble platelet cargo can target the myocardium during
thrombosis. However, in light of evidence demonstrating a functional crosstalk between
endothelial growth factors and cardiomyocytes, it is probable that such a conduit
exists during endothelial disruption and coronary thrombosis.[14] Importantly, the model does allow us to mimic platelet activation and secretion
relevant to thrombosis, which is currently lacking in the coronary ligation model
of myocardial infarction. Our approach therefore allowed us to monitor cardiomyocyte
viability over time during ischemia, and the effect of activated platelet releasates
on this viability.
Overall, our findings suggest that platelet-released factors enhance a therapeutic
window of cardiomyocyte survival during ischemia, highlighting a double-edged sword
functionality of platelets because they are also causative of the initial ischemic
insult. This adds to the expanding list of nonclassical roles for platelets, and also
highlights important considerations for antiplatelet therapies that alter platelet
activity and in particular granule secretion, as this cargo possesses numerous beneficial
influences, for example, in the context of wound healing,[50] yet deleterious consequences in the context of tumor growth and stability.[5] The intriguing observation in this study is that in the context of ischemic damage
to cardiomyocytes, platelet P2Y12, but not cyclooxygenase, blockade may block the release of protective components
from platelets. The supposition here is not to undermine the protective capabilities
of P2Y12 inhibitors in the primary prevention of ischemic tissue damage, but to raise important
issues regarding the utility of antiplatelet therapies that impact on nonclassical
aspects of platelet biology.