Shunts: Is Surgical Education Safe?

Aim: More data regarding complications in neurosurgery residents’ cases is needed to assess patients’ safety during hands-on surgical education.

Methods: Retrospective 2-center study comparing consecutive patients undergoing shunt implantation by a supervised neurosurgery resident (teaching cases) versus a board-certified faculty neurosurgeon (BCFN; nonteaching cases). Primary endpoint was surgical revision after shunting. Uni- and multivariate Cox’s proportional hazard models (Breslow method for ties) with time censored at 2 years were used to examine time-to-event data. Operation time, length of hospitalization, intracranial hemorrhage, and misplacement of the shunt catheter were other outcome measures to be compared between the groups.

Results: A total of n = 320 shunts (n = 180 [56.3%] teaching and n = 140 [43.7%] nonteaching cases) with a mean follow-up of 563 ±771 days (standard deviation) were analyzed. Revision rates for the entire cohort were 9.3% at 90 days, 13.3% at 6 months, 18.4% at 1 year and 26.5% at 2 years. In univariate analysis, teaching cases were 96% as likely as nonteaching cases to be surgically revised (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54–1.70, p = 0.877). In multivariate analysis adjusted for indication and shunt type, teaching cases were 94% as likely as nonteaching cases to undergo surgical revision (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.53–1.69, p = 0.847). There were no group differences in operation time, length of hospitalization, intracranial hemorrhage and rates of shunt misplacement.

Conclusions: The current study results in addition to the literature on neurosurgery resident training supports the safety of supervised early surgical education for shunt surgery.

 

MissingLinkText

No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).