Open Carpal Tunnel Release Outcomes: Performed Wide Awake versus with Sedation

Abstract

Background Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is the most common surgery of the hand, and interest is growing in performing it under local anesthesia without tourniquet. To better understand differences, we hypothesized that patients undergoing CTR under wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) versus sedation (monitored anesthesia care [MAC]) would not result in a difference in outcome.

Methods Consecutive cases of electrodiagnostically confirmed open CTR across multiple surgeons at a single center were prospectively enrolled. Data included demographic data, visual analog scale, Levine-Katz carpal tunnel syndrome scale, QuickDASH questionnaire, customized Likert questionnaire, and complications.

Results There were 81 patients enrolled in the WALANT group and 149 patients in the MAC group. There were no reoperations in either group or any epinephrine-related complications in the WALANT group. Disability and symptom scores did not differ significantly between WALANT and sedation groups at 2 weeks or 3 months. Average postoperative QuickDASH, Levine-Katz, and VAS pain scales were the same in both groups. Both groups of patients reported high levels of satisfaction at 91 versus 96% for the WALANT versus MAC groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Patients in each group were likely to request similar anesthesia if they were to undergo surgery again.

Conclusion Patients undergoing open CTR experienced similar levels of satisfaction and outcomes with either the WALANT or MAC techniques. There was no statistically significant difference between either group relative to the tested outcome measures. These data should facilitate surgeons and patients' choosing freely between WALANT and MAC techniques relative to complications and outcomes.

Keywords

carpal tunnel release - sedation - wide awake - visual analog scale

Note

This study was conducted at Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

• References

• 1 Nguyen C, Milstein A, Hernandez-Boussard T, Curtin CM. The effect of moving carpal tunnel releases out of hospitals on reducing United States health care charges. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (08) 1657-1662
• 2 Weitbrecht WU, Schäfer W, Walter A. Is physiotherapy useful following surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome?. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1995; 133 (05) 429-431
• 3 Cebesoy O, Kose KC, Kuru I, Altinel L, Gul R, Demirtas M. Use of a splint following open carpal tunnel release: a comparative study. Adv Ther 2007; 24 (03) 478-484
• 4 Mariano ER, Lehr MK, Loland VJ, Bishop ML. Choice of loco-regional anesthetic technique affects operating room efficiency for carpal tunnel release. J Anesth 2013; 27 (04) 611-614
• 5 Sørensen AM, Dalsgaard J, Hansen TB. Local anaesthesia versus intravenous regional anaesthesia in endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38 (05) 481-484
• 6 Munns JJ, Awan HM. Trends in carpal tunnel surgery: an online survey of members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (04) 767-771.e2
• 7 Bismil M, Bismil Q, Harding D, Harris P, Lamyman E, Sansby L. Transition to total one-stop wide-awake hand surgery service-audit: a retrospective review. JRSM Short Rep 2012; 3 (04) 23. Doi: 10.1258/shorts.2012.012019
• 8 Chatterjee A, McCarthy JE, Montagne SA, Leong K, Kerrigan CL. A cost, profit, and efficiency analysis of performing carpal tunnel surgery in the operating room versus the clinic setting in the United States. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (03) 245-248
• 9 Leblanc MR, Lalonde J, Lalonde DH. A detailed cost and efficiency analysis of performing carpal tunnel surgery in the main operating room versus the ambulatory setting in Canada. Hand (NY) 2007; 2 (04) 173-178
• 10 Davison PG, Cobb T, Lalonde DH. The patient's perspective on carpal tunnel surgery related to the type of anesthesia: a prospective cohort study. Hand (NY) 2013; 8 (01) 47-53
• 11 Lalonde D, Martin A. Tumescent local anesthesia for hand surgery: improved results, cost effectiveness, and wide-awake patient satisfaction. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (04) 312-316
• 12 Rozanski M, Neuhaus V, Reddy R, Jupiter JB, Rathmell JP, Ring DC. An open-label comparison of local anesthesia with or without sedation for minor hand surgery. Hand (NY) 2014; 9 (04) 399-405