Intraoperative near Infrared Fluorescent Visualization of Meningiomas

Introduction: Extent of resection remains an important predictor of outcome for patients with meningioma. Visible light fluorescent prodrug such as 5-ALA have been used to identify meningioma in the operating room with varying degrees of success. We sought to improve optical contrast with a drug that fluoresces in the near infrared (NIR) spectrum.

Methods: All patients undergoing intracranial surgery for tumor resection were eligible for this IRB-approved study registered in clinicaltrials.gov. Twenty-four hours prior to surgery, 5 mg/kg of an FDA-approved NIR contrast agent was administered intravenously. Intermittently, during surgery, a near infrared camera with excitation light of 805nm was used to photo-document the presence of NIR signal. Margin specimens were obtained, and the presence or absence of tumor based on visible light and NIR light was recorded in binary format (yes/no).

Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this preliminary, proof of concept study. All twenty-two meningiomas demonstrated strong near infrared signal with a signal to background ratio of 4.6 +/− 2.5. Imaging was performed on average 23 +/− 2.3 hours after IV injection of second window ICG. A total of 22 gross tumors and 38 margin samples were studied. Dye remained confined within meningioma in 18 of 22 patients, but in 4 patients an “inversion” pattern was identified which appears to be related to time from injection. Sensitivity of bright light alone for meningioma detection using pathology as gold standard was 85.0%; Sensitivity of NIR was 97.5%. In contrast, specificity of bright light alone was 90.0%; Specificity of NIR was 30.0%.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that Second Window ICG (SWIG) can be administered at high doses 24 hours prior to surgery. Despite having a half-life measured in minutes, ICG remains contained within meningiomas at sufficient concentration to serve as a tumor marker via the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect. The SWIG technique does not demonstrate vasculature but rather tumor permeability. It appears to be sensitive but nonspecific.

 

Scroll to top

Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.