Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Vestibular Schwannoma

Introduction: Magnetic resonance elastography(MRE) is a MRI-based imaging sequence that uses mechanical waves to quantify the stiffness of tissue in kilopascal(kPa). More recently, a form of MRE has been developed called slip-interface imaging(SII) that uses octahedral shear-strain(OSS)to evaluate the surgical plane between extra-axial brain tumors and adjacent neural structures. The feasibility of MRE for evaluating the extent of resection and facial nerve outcomes in vestibular schwannoma (VS) has never been evaluated.

Methods: After institutional review board approval and written consent, 11 patients with a VS ≥2.0 cm in maximum diameter were prospectively evaluated by MRE prior to surgery from February 2014 to July 2015. Mean patient age was 54.3 ± 14.5(30–75) years and 7(64%) were female. MRE data were collected with a spin-echo EPI-MRE pulse sequence on a 3T MR scanner. Shear waves at 60 Hz were introduced with a soft pillow-like driver placed under the head. Retrospectively collected data included patient characteristics; surgeon impression of tumor consistency, adherence, and vascularity; MRE stiffness measured in kilopascal(kPa); SII measured by OSS; extent of resection; House-Brackmann scores preoperatively, postoperatively, and at latest follow-up; and latest-follow-up in months. Tumor consistency and adhesion were graded on a 3-point scale. Cohen κ coefficients were considered 0.20, poor agreement; 0.21–0.40, fair agreement; 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; and >0.60, good agreement. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results: Mean tumor size was 3.2 ± 0.67(2–4)cm. Six(55%) patients underwent a retrosigmoid craniotomy while 5(45%) underwent translabyrinthine craniectomy. Mean follow-up was 13.4 ± 8.9(3–28) months.

With regard to tumor stiffness, surgeons categorized 5 as soft, 4 as intermediate, and 2 as firm. Mean MRE stiffness increased for each group, 3.09 ± 0.58(2.39–3.95), 3.17 ± 0.48(2.58–3.74), and 3.5 ± 0.39 (3.26, 3.80) kPa respectively, but the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.633). Two tumors were soft at surgery, but had MRE values >3.30 kPa. Both were noted to be vascular at surgery, a feature which has been noted to cause poor correlation in liver and meningioma MRE.

With regard to tumor adherence, surgeons categorized 5 as complete, 3 as partial and 3 as no separation. SII categorized 7 tumors as complete, 3 as partial and 1 as no separation (κ=0.70 95%CI 0.35–1.00). Both tumors with discrepancy between SII and surgical findings were read as non-adherent on SII, but were completely adherent at surgery. Both had cyst in the posterior portion of the tumor which may lead to a false positive for non-adherence from intratumoral movement.

Surgical consistency, adhesion, SII, MRE, and tumor size were evaluated for extent of resection and for House-Brackman scores ≥ 3 in the 9 tumors that had good correlation with either stiffness or adhesion. Both mean MRE stiffness [3.34 ± 0.37(2.85 – 3.80)v2.64 ± 0.28(2.39–2.85), p = 0.025] and tumor size[3.53 ± 0.47(2.8–4.0)v2.5 ± 0.50(2.0–3.0)p = 0.011] were higher in patients that had near-total/subtotal resection compared with those that had gross-total resection (p = 0.024).

Conclusion: MRE is feasible in VS and has the potential to provide information regarding tumor consistency and adhesion. Further study is needed to determine clinical utility and improve accuracy.

 

MissingLinkText

No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).